Skip to main content

An Approach for the Selection of Process Plans Based on Part Family Changes

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
  • 2970 Accesses

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering ((LNME))

Abstract

In recent times, in the field of manufacturing, due to the continuously changing market demand, the concept of reconfigurable manufacturing systems emerged. This requires a process plan along with the machinery (kinematic configuration) to produce the part. When the product is changed, consequently the process plans and the kinematic configurations change accordingly as well. The change in the basic machinery seriously affects the overall profit of the industry. This paper presents an approach to minimize this cost while still providing a suitable process plan for the associated kinematic configuration. The algorithm to implement this approach is also the part of this paper. A sample part is taken as an example to illustrate the use of this approach. The results are compared with the existing data for the part. The applicability, uses and future trends have been discussed in conclusion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Shabaka AI, ElMaraghi HA (2007) Generation of machine configurations based on product features. Int J Comput Integr Manuf 20(4):355–369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kruth J, Detand J (1992) A CAPP system for nonlinear process plans. CIRP Ann Manufact Technol 41(1):489–492

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kim YS, Wang E, Rho HM (2001) Geometry-based machining precedence reasoning for feature-based process planning. Int J Product 2001 Res 39(10):2077–2103

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gologlu C (2004) Machine capability and fixturing constraints-imposed automatic machining set-ups generation. J Mater Process Technol 148(1):83–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Colosimo BM, Semerar Q, Tolio T (2004) Rule based system for nonlinear process plan generation. Stud Inf Control 9:13–43

    Google Scholar 

  6. Grieco A, Matta A, Nucci F, Tolio T (2000) New policy to manage tools in flexible manufacturing systems using network part program. In: Proceedings of ASME 3rd conference on intelligent systems in design and manufacturing, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  7. Azab A, ElMaraghy HA (2007) Mathematical modeling for reconfigurable process planning. CIRP Ann Manufact Technol 56(1):467–472

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ma’rkus A, Va’ncza J (2001) Process planning with conditional and conflicting advice. CIRP Ann Manufact Technol 50(1):327–330

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ma′rkus A, Va’ncza J, Kova’cs A (2002) Constraint-based process planning in sheet metal bending. CIRP Ann Manufact Technol 51(1):425–428

    Google Scholar 

  10. Duflou JR, Va’ncza J (2005) Computer aided process planning: a state of the art. Comp Ind 56(7):747–771

    Google Scholar 

  11. Tolio T, Ceglarek D, ElMaraghy HA, Fischer A, Hu SJ, Laperrie` re L, Newman ST, Va’ncza J (2010) Co-evolution of products, processes and production systems. CIRP Ann Manufact Technol

    Google Scholar 

  12. Youssef AMA, ElMaraghy HA (2007) Optimal configuration selection for reconfigurable manufacturing systems. Published online: 30 June 2007 @ Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

    Google Scholar 

  13. Chu C-CP, Gadh R (1996) Feature-based approach for set-up minimization process design from product design. Comput-Aid Des 28:321–332

    Google Scholar 

  14. Cochran DS, Arinez JF, Duda JW, Linck J (2001) A decomposition approach for manufacturing system design. J Manuf Syst 20(6):371–438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. ElMaraghy HA (1992) Integrating assembly planning and scheduling—CAPP related issues. Annls CIRP 41:11–14

    Google Scholar 

  16. Saygin C, Kilic SE (1999) Integrating flexible process plans with scheduling in flexible manufacturing systems. Int J Adv Mfg Technol 15:268–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. ElMaraghy HA (2005) Flexible and reconfigurable manufacturing systems paradigms. Int J Flex Manuf Syst 17(4):261–276 (Special issue on Reconfigurable Manufacturing Systems)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The moral, financial, and the knowledge-based support of NUST is acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. M. Hasan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Hasan, S.M., Baqai, A. (2013). An Approach for the Selection of Process Plans Based on Part Family Changes. In: Azevedo, A. (eds) Advances in Sustainable and Competitive Manufacturing Systems. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-00557-7_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-00557-7_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-00556-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-00557-7

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics