Abstract
Virtual reality (VR) technology is starting to become widely and freely available (for example the online OpenSimulator tool), with potential for use in 3D urban planning and design tasks on a correspondingly widespread scale. However, rigorous assessment on usability of such tools is needed to ascertain the likely effect on the profession. A previous study consulted with a small group of urban professionals, who concluded in a satisfaction usability test that online VR had potential value as a usable 3D communication and remote marketing tool but acknowledged that visual quality and geographic accuracy were obstacles to overcome. This research takes the investigation a significant step further to also examine the usability aspects of efficiency (how quickly tasks are completed) and effectiveness (how successfully tasks are completed), relating to OpenSimulator in an urban planning situation. The comparative study pits a three-dimensional VR model (with increased graphic fidelity and geographic content to address the feedback of the previous study) of a subdivision design (in a Dunedin suburb) against 3D models built with GIS (ArcGIS) and CAD (BricsCAD) tools, two types of software environment well established in urban professional practice. Urban professionals participated in the study by attempting to perform timed tasks correctly in each of the environments before being asked questions about the technologies involved and their perceived importance to their professional work. The results reinforce the positive feedback for VR of the previous study, with the graphical and geographic data issues being somewhat addressed (though participants stressed the need for accurate and precise object and terrain modification capabilities in VR). Ease-of-use and associated fastest task completion speed were significant positive outcomes to emerge from the comparison with GIS and CAD, pointing to a strong future for VR in an urban planning context.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Axford S, Keltie G, Wallis C (2007) Virtual reality in urban planning and design. In: Cartwright W, Peterson M, Gartner G (eds) Multimedia cartography, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin, pp 283–294
Becker T, Boschert S, Hempel L, Höffken S, Obst B (2013) Complex urban simulations and sustainable urban planning with spatial and social implications. Int Ann Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing Spat Inf Sci, ISPRS 8th 3DGeoInfo conference and WG II/2 workshop, volume II-2/W1, pp 43–50
Camara A, Raper J (eds) (1999) Spatial multimedia and virtual reality. Taylor and Francis, London
Campagna M (2006) GIS for sustainable development. In: Campagna M (ed) GIS for sustainable development. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 2–20
Döllner J (2007) Real-Time Virtual Landscapes. In: Cartwright W, Peterson M, Gartner G (eds) Multimedia cartography, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin, pp 241–254
Gong J, Lin H (2006) A Collaborative VGE: Design and Development. In: Balram S and Dragicevic S (eds.) Collaborative geographic information systems, pp 186–206
Goodchild MF (2010) Towards geodesign: Repurposing cartography and GIS? Cartographic Perspect 66:7–22
Hudson-Smith A (2008) The visual city. In: Dodge M, McDerby M, Turner M (eds) Geographic visualization—concepts tools and applications. Wiley, Chichester, pp 183–197
Innes JE, Booher DE, (2000) Public participation in planning: New strategies for the 21 st century. Working paper 2000–07, Institute of Urban and Regional Development, UC Berkeley, CA, 39 pp
ISO (International Standards Organisation) (1998) ISO 9241-11: Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals (VDTs)—Part 11: Guidance on Usability. ISO
Lai PC, Kwong KH, Mak ASH (2010) Assessing the applicability and effectiveness of 3D visualization in environmental impact assessment. Environ Plann B—Plann Des 37(2): 221–233
Laurini R (2001) Information systems for urban planning: A hypermedia co-operative approach. Taylor and Francis, London
Lin H, Zhu J, Gong J, Xu B, Qi H (2010) A grid-based collaborative virtual geographic environment for the planning of silt dam systems. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 24(4):607–621
Linden Research Inc (2014) Second life official site—virtual worlds, avatars, free 3D Chat. http://secondlife.com Accessed 29 Jan 2014)
Lopes CV, Lindstrom C (2012) Virtual cities in urban planning: The Uppsala case study. J Theor Appl Electron Commer Res 7(3):88–100
Métral C, Ghoula N, Silva V, Falquet G (2013) A repository of information visualization techniques to support the design of 3D virtual city models. Int Ann Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing Spat Inf Sci, ISPRS 8th 3DGeoInfo conference and WG II/2 workshop, volume II-2/W1, pp 247–254
OpenSim (2014) OpenSimulator. http://opensimulator.org Accessed 29 Jan 2014
Pouliot J, Wang C, Fuchs V, Hubert F, Bédard M (2013) experiments with notaries about the semiology of 3D cadastral models. Int Arch Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing Spat Inf Sci, ISPRS 8th 3DGeoInfo conference and WG II/2 workshop, Volume XL-2/W2, pp 53–57
Schroeder R, Huxor A, Smith A (2001) Activeworlds: geography and social interaction in virtual reality. Futures 33(7):569–587
Shepherd IDH, Bleasdale-Shepherd ID (2012) Videogames: The new GIS? In: Lin H, Batty M (eds) Virtual geographic environments. ESRI Press, pp 311–344
Tsiliakou E, Labropoulos T, Dimopoulou E (2013) Transforming 2D cadastral data into a dynamic smart 3D model. Int Arch Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing Spat Inf Sci, ISPRS 8th 3DGeoInfo conference and WG II/2 workshop, volume XL-2/W2, pp 105–111
Zhang S and Moore AB (2014) Assessing an online virtual environment as a tool for potential urban developments. In: Arrowsmith C, Bellman C, Cartwright W, Jones S, Shortis M (eds) Advances in Geospatial Science, Melbourne: Publishing Solutions
Acknowledgments
Thanks to Peter George (NZVWG, Department of Information Science) and the study participants. Feedback from members of the Interaction Design Centre, Middlesex University (UK) is also gratefully acknowledged.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Zhang, S., Moore, A.B. (2014). The Usability of Online Geographic Virtual Reality for Urban Planning. In: Isikdag, U. (eds) Innovations in 3D Geo-Information Sciences. Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-00515-7_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-00515-7_14
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-00514-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-00515-7
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)