Skip to main content

Integration, Institutions and Export Specialization

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Economic Crisis in Europe and the Balkans

Part of the book series: Contributions to Economics ((CE))

  • 824 Accesses

Abstract

This paper studies the impact of economic integration and institutional reforms on export specialization in Central and Eastern Europe. The integration and transition process in Central and Eastern Europe offer us a good empirical setting to examine this research question. The empirical analysis is set up for ten Central and Eastern European countries (CEEC) over the period 1996–2008. We find robust results that better protected property rights and a fair credit policy lead to more diversified exports. Trade integration, on the other hand, stimulates export specialization, but institutions seem to be more important in explaining export patterns

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For a list of free-trade agreements see http://www.stabilitypact.org and http://www.wto.org and Damijan et al. (2009), Niebuhr and Schlitte (2009).

  2. 2.

    Bulgaria, Romania, Hungary, Estonia and Slovenia.

  3. 3.

    Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Slovak Republic and Slovenia.

  4. 4.

    Francois and Manchin (2007) investigate world data with a special focus for the relations South-South, North–south and North-Least developed countries.

  5. 5.

    Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Lithuania, Latvia, Poland, Romania, Slovakia and Slovenia.

  6. 6.

    We investigate here the degree of the so-called absolute specialization, i.e. the extent to what a given country or region is specialized in a limited number of activities. This concept of specialization directly relates to the concept of risk exposure. This contrasts with relative specialization which measures to what extent the export or production structure differs from those of the other (contingent) countries or regions.

  7. 7.

    The Eurostat comext trade statistics is a high quality database containing annual data on trade flows to and from European countries. The HS product level data were converted to the NACE 2-digit level using the concordance table from Eurostat (HS to NACE Rev. 1.1).

  8. 8.

    Tariffs and imports were collected on product level and converted to the NACE 2-digit level using the concordance table from Eurostat (HS to NACE Rev. 1.1).

  9. 9.

    Enterprise reform reflects a tight credit and subsidy policy, a good bankruptcy legislation and effective corporate control. Competition policy indicates that actions are taken to reduce abuse of market power. The financial institutions indicator reflects the emergence of investment funds, private insurance and pension funds and a regulatory framework.

  10. 10.

    CEEC are often used as export platforms because these countries are a cheaper location (a.o. labor costs, corporate tax) and have good market access to Western Europe (Sinn 2006; Ekholm et al. 2007; Bloningen et al. 2007)

  11. 11.

    Trade freedom reflects the openness of an economy to imports of goods and services and the ability of citizens to buy and sell at the international market.

  12. 12.

    Investment freedom means no restrictions on foreign investment.

  13. 13.

    Full price liberalization would mean that prices are left to the market and no price controls on housing or transport exist.

  14. 14.

    Trade liberalization means the removal of all quantitative and administrative import and export restrictions.

  15. 15.

    A well-functioning banking competition, effective supervision, liberalization of interest rates and credit allocation.

References

  • Acemoglu D, Johnson S, Robinson, JA (2005) Institutions as a fundamental cause of long-run growth, handbook of economic growth. In: Aghion P, Durlauf S (eds) Handbook of economic growth, vol 1, 1st edn, chapter 6. Elsevier, pp 385–472

    Google Scholar 

  • Amiti M (1999) Specialization patterns in Europe. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv 134(4):573

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beine M, Coulombe S (2007) Economic integration and regional industrial specialization: evidence from the Canadian-US FTA experience. J Econ Geogr 7(1):93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benedictis LD, Gallegati M, Tamberi M (2009) Overall trade specialization and economic development: countries diversify. Rev World Econ 145:37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berkowitz D, Moenius J, Pistor K (2006) Trade, law and product complexity. Rev Econ Stat 88:363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bloningen B, Davies R, Waddell G, Naughton H (2007) FDI in space: spatial autoregresseive relationships in foreign direct investment. Eur Econ Rev 51(5):1303–1325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brulhart M (1998) Economic geography, industry location and trade: the evidence. World Econ 21(6):775

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Damijan J, Rojec M, Ferjancic M (2008) Growing export performance of transition economies: EU market access versus supply capacity factors. Licos Discussion Paper (20208)

    Google Scholar 

  • Damijan J, Sousa J, Lamotte O (2009) Does international openness affect the productivity of local firms? Evidence from South-Eastern Europe. Econ Transit 17(3):559

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Bruyne K (2004) Essays in the location of economic activity. Doctoral dissertation, KULeuven

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekholm K, Markusen J, Forslid R (2007) Export-platform foreign direct investment. J Eur Econ Assoc 5(4):776–795

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Francois J, Manchin M (2007) Institutions, infrastructure and trade. CEPR Discussion Paper No. 6068, p 26

    Google Scholar 

  • Hildebrandt A, Wörz J (2004) Determinants of industrial location patterns in CEECs. wiiw Working Paper No. 32

    Google Scholar 

  • Jansen M, Nordas K (2004) Institutions, trade policy and trade flows. CEPR Discussion Paper No. 4418, p 18

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalemli-Ozcan S, Sorensen B, Yosha O (2001) Economic integration, industrial specialization and the asymmetry of macroeconomic fluctuations. J Int Econ 55:107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Konings J, Vandenbussche H (2003) Investment and financial constraints in transition economies: micro evidence from Poland, the Czech Republic, Bulgaria and Romania. Econ Lett 78(2):253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koren M, Tenreyro S (2003) Diversification and development. Federal Reserve Bank of Boston Working Paper (03):60

    Google Scholar 

  • Levchenko A (2007) Institutional quality and international trade. Rev Econ Stud 74:791

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martincus C, Gallo A (2009) Institutions and export specialization: just direct effects. Kyklos 62(1):129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niebuhr A, Schlitte F (2009) EU enlargement and convergence does market access matter? East Eur Econ 47(3):28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noev N, Dries L, Swinnen J (2009) Institutional changes, contracts and quality in transition agriculture. Evidence from the Bulgarian dairy sector. East Eur Econ 47:62–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nunn N (2007) Relationship-specificity, incomplete contracts and the pattern of trade. Q J Econ 122(2):569

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ranjan P, Lee J (2007) Contract enforcement and the volume of international trade in different types of goods. Econ Polit 19:191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodrik D (1994) Foreign trade in Eastern Europe’s transition: early results. In: Blanchard OJ et al (eds) The transition in Eastern Europe. University of Chicago, Chicago/London

    Google Scholar 

  • Roland G (2000) Transition and economics: politics, markets and firms, chap 1 and 7. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 1–22, 153–169

    Google Scholar 

  • Sapir A (1996) The effects of Europe’s internal market programme on production and trade: a first assessment. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv 132:457

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schuler P (2003) Institutions and the changing composition of international trade in the post-socialist transition. Paper presented at the annual conference of the international society of new institutional economics, Budapest

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinn H (2006) The pathological export boom and the bazaar effect. How to solve the German puzzle. CESifo Working Paper (1708):33

    Google Scholar 

  • Spies J, Marques H (2009) Trade effects of the Europe agreements: a theory based gravity approach. J Int Trade Econ Dev 18(1):11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Traistaru I, Nijkamp P, Longhi S (2003) Determinants of manufacturing location in EU accession countries. ERSA 2003 Congress, p 36

    Google Scholar 

  • Trefler D (2004) The long and short of the Canada-US free trade agreement. Am Econ Rev 94(4):870

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venables A (1999) Geography and specialisation: industrial belts on a circular plain. In: Baldwin R, Cohen D, Sapir A, Venables A (eds) Market integration, regionalism and the global economy. CEPR, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsh P, Whelan C (2001) Firm performance and the political economy of corporate governance: survey evidence for Bulgaria, Hungary, Slovakia and Slovenia. Econ Syst 25:85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zervoyianni A, Anastasiou A (2009) Convergence of shocks and trade in the enlarged European union. J Int Trade Econ Dev 18(1):79

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Hylke Vandenbussche, Joep Konings, André Sapir, Christophe Croux, Carlo Altomonte and Julia Wörz for providing useful feedback. We also thank participants of LICOS and UCL seminars, ETSG and Midwest Trade Meetings for comments and the Research Council of the KULeuven for funding this research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Karen Crabbé .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix

Appendix

Data description:

  • Export specialization: Herfindahl index is the sum of all export shares over all industries within one country, source: Eurostat Comext trade database

  • Weighted tariff: historical applied tariffs, source: WTO, UN comtrade database

  • Business cycle: detrended GDP data with Hodrick-Prescott filter, source: Eurostat

  • Labor cost index: is a Euro indicator which measures the cost of the production factor labor with base year =2000, source: Eurostat

  • Government size: The burden of excessive government on a scale from 0 to 100, source: The Heritage Foundation

  • Property rights: The ability to accumulate private property from 0 to 100, source: The Heritage Foundation

  • FDI: Value of foreign direct investment stock, source: EBRD Transition report 2009

  • Trade freedom: The openness of an economy to imports of goods and services and the ability of firms to export on a scale from 0 to 100, source: The Heritage Foundation

  • Investment freedom: The absence of restrictions on foreign investments on a scale from 0 to 100, source: The Heritage Foundation

  • Enterprise reform: index ranging from 0 to 4 reflecting the judgment of the EBRD’s Office of the Chief Economist about country-specific progress in credit policy reform, source: EBRD Transition report 2009

  • Competition policy: index ranging from 0 to 4 reflecting the judgment of the EBRD’s Office of the Chief Economist about country-specific progress in competition policy, source: EBRD Transition report 2009

  • Financial institutions: index ranging from 0 to 4 reflecting the judgment of the EBRD’s Office of the Chief Economist about country-specific progress in non-bank financial institutions, source: EBRD Transition report 2009

  • Large scale privatization: index ranging from 0 to 4 reflecting the judgment of the EBRD’s Office of the Chief Economist about country-specific progress in private ownership of firms, source: EBRD Transition report 2009

  • Price liberalization: index ranging from 0 to 4 reflecting the judgment of the EBRD’s Office of the Chief Economist about country-specific progress in market prices, source: EBRD Transition report 2009

  • Trade liberalization: index ranging from 0 to 4 reflecting the judgment of the EBRD’s Office of the Chief Economist about country-specific progress in liberalization of import and export, source: EBRD Transition report 2009

  • Banking liberalization: index ranging from 0 to 4 reflecting the judgment of the EBRD’s Office of the Chief Economist about country-specific progress in the realization of interest rates and credit allocation, source: EBRD Transition report 2009

More information on the institutional reforms can be found at http://www.heritage.org/ and http://www.ebrd.com/.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Crabbé, K., Beine, M. (2014). Integration, Institutions and Export Specialization. In: Karasavvoglou, A., Polychronidou, P. (eds) Economic Crisis in Europe and the Balkans. Contributions to Economics. Springer, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-00494-5_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics