Skip to main content

Modelling of Simply-Supported Beams

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Compressive Force-Path Method

Part of the book series: Engineering Materials ((ENG.MAT.))

  • 1512 Accesses

Abstract

In this chapter, the qualitative description of the beam behaviour presented in Chap. 2 is transformed into a physical model with behavioural characteristics (such as, for example, crack pattern, internal actions, transfer mechanism of external load to the supports, failure mechanism, etc.) similar to those of a real simply-supported beam at its ultimate limit state. The physical model’s behavioural characteristics form the basis for the development of failure criteria which are shown to be capable of providing realistic predictions of a beam’s load-carrying capacity for all types of behaviour discussed in the preceding chapter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Kotsovos GM (2011) Assessment of the flexural capacity of RC beam/column elements allowing for 3D effects. Eng Struct 33(10):2772–2780

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. EN 1998-1 (2004) Eurocode 8: design of structures for earthquake resistance—part 1: general rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings

    Google Scholar 

  3. EN 1992-1 (2004) Eurocode 2: design of concrete structures—part 1-1: general rules and rules for buildings

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kotsovos MD (1982) A fundamental explanation of the behaviour of reinforced concrete beams in flexure based on the properties of concrete under multiaxial stress. Mater Struct RILEM 15(90):529–537

    Google Scholar 

  5. Eibl J (ed) (1994/96) Concrete structures Euro-design handbook. Ernst and Sohn, Berlin, pp 764

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kotsovos GM, Kotsovos MD (2008) Criteria for structural failure of RC beams without transverse reinforcement. Struct Eng 86(23/24):55–61

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kotsovos GM, Kotsovos MD (forthcoming) Effect of axial compression on shear capacity of linear RC members. Mag Concr Res

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kani GNJ (1966) Basic facts concerning shear failure. J ACI 63(6):675–691

    Google Scholar 

  9. Leonhardt F, Wather R (1961) The Stuttgart shear tests, 1961: contributions to the treatment of the problems of shear in reinforced concrete construction. Translation No. 111 (A translation of the articles that appeared in beton-und Stahlbetonbau 56(12); Cement Concr Assoc 57(2, 3, 6, 7, 8), (1962)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Taylor R (1960) Some shear tests on reinforced concrete beams without shear reinforcement. Mag Concr Res 12(35):145–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. American Concrete Institute (2002) Building code requirements for structural concrete (ACI 318-02) and Commentary (ACI 318R-02)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kong FΚ (ed) (1990) Reinforced concrete deep beams. Blackie and Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, pp 288

    Google Scholar 

  13. The Institution of Structural Engineers (1978) Design and detailing of concrete structures for fire resistance. Interim guidance by a joint committee of the Institution of Structural Engineers and the Concrete Society. The Institution of Structural Engineers, pp 59

    Google Scholar 

  14. Brown MD, Bayrak O, Jirsa JO (2006) Design of shear based on loading conditions. ACI Struct J 103(4):541–550

    Google Scholar 

  15. Angelakos D, Bentz EC, Collins MP (2001) Effect of concrete strength and minimum stirrups on shear strength of large members. ACI Struct J 98(3):290–300

    Google Scholar 

  16. Collins MP, Kuchma D (1999) How safe are our large, lightly reinforced concrete beams, slabs, and footings. ACI Struct J 96(4):482–490

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kotsovos MD, Pavlovic MN (1997) Size effects in structural concrete: a numerical experiment. Comput Struct 64(1–4):285–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Rawdon de Paive ΗΑ, Siess CΡ (1965) Strength and behaviour of deep beams in hear. J Struct Div Proc ASCE 91(ST5):19–41

    Google Scholar 

  19. Smith ΚΝ, Vantsiotis ΑS (1982) Shear strength of deep beams. ACI J 79(3):201–213

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ramakrishna V, Ananthanarayana Υ (1968) Ultimate strength of deep beams in shear. ACI J 65(2):87–98

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kong FΚ, Robins ΡJ, Cole DF (1970) Web reinforcement effects in deep beams. ACI J 67(12):1010–1017

    Google Scholar 

  22. Rogowski DΜ, MacGregor JG, Ong SΥ (1986) Tests of reinforced concrete deep beams. ACI J 83(4):614–623

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ahmad SH, Lue DM (1987) Flexure-shear interaction of reinforced high-strength concrete beams. ACI Struct J 84(4):330–341

    Google Scholar 

  24. Shin S-W, Lee K-S, Moon J-I, Ghosh SK (1999) Shear strength of reinforced high-strength concrete beams with shear span-to-depth ratios between 1.5 and 2.5. ACI Struct J 96(4):549–556

    Google Scholar 

  25. Xie Y, Ahmad SH, Yu T, Hino S, Chung W (1994) Shear ductility of reinforced beams with normal and high-strength concrete. ACI Struct J 91(2):140–9

    Google Scholar 

  26. Mphonde G, Frantz GC (1984) Shear tests of high- and low-strength concrete beams without stirrups. ACI Struct J 81(4):350–357

    Google Scholar 

  27. Lubell A, Sherwood T, Bentz E, Collins MP (2004) Safe shear design of large, wide beams: adding shear reinforcement is recommended. Concr Int 26(1):67–78

    Google Scholar 

  28. Morrow J, Viest IM (1957) Shear strength of reinforced concrete frame members without web reinforcement. ACI J Proc 53:833–886

    Google Scholar 

  29. Kotsovos GM, Kotsovos DM, Kotsovos MD, Kounadis A (2011) Seismic design of structural concrete walls: an attempt to reduce reinforcement congestion. Mag Concr Res 63(4):235–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Kotsovos GM (2011) Seismic design of RC beam-column structural elements. Mag Concr Res 63(7):527–537

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael D. Kotsovos .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kotsovos, M.D. (2014). Modelling of Simply-Supported Beams. In: Compressive Force-Path Method. Engineering Materials. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-00488-4_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-00488-4_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-00487-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-00488-4

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics