Testing Hypotheses

  • Peter TruranEmail author
Part of the SpringerBriefs in Philosophy book series (BRIEFSPHILOSOPH)


There are useful guidelines that allow us to identify effective and powerful ways of testing hypotheses. Many of these are informed by an attitude towards hypotheses and theories that views them with caution and skepticism. The community of researchers is constantly striving to make itself aware of which critical strategies are being employed to achieve a rigorous approach to the framing and testing of hypotheses.


Lung Cancer Factorial Design Orthogonal Array Alternative Potential Explanation Recent Scientific Literature 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Doll R, Hill AB (1954) The mortality of doctors in relation to their smoking habits: a preliminary report. British Medical J, 1(4877):1451–1455Google Scholar
  2. Feyerabend P (1975) Against method. NLB, LondonGoogle Scholar
  3. Feynman R (1965) The development of the space-time view of quantum electrodynamics. Nobel LectureGoogle Scholar
  4. Mayo D (1996) Error and the growth of experimental knowledge. University of Chicago Press, Chicago and LondonGoogle Scholar
  5. Medawar P (1963) Is the scientific paper a fraud? The Listener Sep 3: 377–378Google Scholar
  6. Medawar P (1969) Induction and intuition in scientific thought. American philosophical society (These essays are transcripts of the Jayne lectures given by Peter Medawar in 1968. Winner of the Nobel Prize for Medicine in 1960, Medawar brings the perspective of the seasoned researcher to these expert and accessible reflection on the nature of scientific thought. Clear, concise and an excellent read.)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center for the Philosophy of ScienceUniversity of MinnesotaMinneapolisUSA

Personalised recommendations