It’s About Attitude and Experiments

  • Peter TruranEmail author
Part of the SpringerBriefs in Philosophy book series (BRIEFSPHILOSOPH)


Although it is clear that philosophers are unable to identify unique methodological elements that characterize scientific research, it appears that we can identify certain features from which it derives its explanatory power. An awareness of the philosophical and historical underpinnings of science provides the researcher with the conceptual and analytical tools to examine and evaluate his practice. These tools will also help in the assessment of the work done in his own field, and in other disciplines.


Scientific Methodology Historical Science Scientific Attitude Mainstream Science Supernatural Explanation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Cleland CE (2001) Historical science, experimental science, and the scientific method. Geology 29:987–990CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ioannidis JPA (2005) Why most published research findings are false. PLoS Med 2(8): e124. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124 Accessed 17 Aug 2011
  3. Mayo D (1996) Error and the growth of experimental knowledge. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Popper KR (1963) Conjectures and refutations. Routledge and Keagan Paul, London, pp 33–39Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center for the Philosophy of ScienceUniversity of MinnesotaMinneapolisUSA

Personalised recommendations