Abstract
The chapter presents and discusses important methodological principles involved in the study and analysis of spoken language data. The objective addressed by the author is gauging learners’ proficiency in English by measuring their performance along the variables used in numerous studies devoted to spoken discourse and labelled as linguistic, i.e. complexity, accuracy and fluency. The article offers an overview of various measurement tools used in studies on CAF worldwide, outlines psycholinguistic criteria underpinning the choice of the most appropriate data segmentation method, and, finally, describes a method of identifying and calculating instances of the unit of spoken discourse, referred to as AS-unit, which has been proved to significantly improve the quality of analyses of learner language.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Brumfit, C. 1984. Communicative methodology in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bachman, L. F. 1990. Fundamental considerations in language testing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Butterworth, B. 1980. Evidence from pauses in speech. In Language production: vol 1: Speech and talk, ed. B. Butterworth, 155–177. London: Academic Press.
Bygate, M. 1999. Quality of language and purpose of task: Patterns of learners’ language on two oral communication tasks. Language Teaching Research 3: 185–214.
Bygate, M. 2001. Effects of task repetition on the structure and control of oral language. In: Researching Pedagogic Tasks: Second Language Learning, Teaching and Testing, eds. M. Bygate, P. Skehan, and M. Swain, 23–48. Harlow: Longman.
Canale, M. and M. Swain. 1980. Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics 1: 1–47.
Chafe, W. 1980. Some reasons for hesitating. In Temporal variables in speech, eds. H. W. Dechert, and M. Raupach, 169–180. The Hague: Mouton Publishers.
Crookes, G. 1990. The utterance and other basic units for second language discourse analysis. Applied Linguistics 11: 183–199.
Ellis, R. 2003. Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ellis, R. and G. Barkhuizen. 2005. Analysing learner language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Foster, P., Tonkyn A. and G. Wigglesworth. 2000. Measuring spoken language: A unit for all reasons. Applied Linguistics 21: 354–75.
Foster, P. and P. Skehan. 1996. The influence of planning and task type on second language performance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 18: 299–323.
Harley, B. et al. 1990. The nature of language proficiency. In The development of second language proficiency, eds. B. Harley, J. Cummins, M. Swain, and P. Allen, 7–25. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Housen, A. and F. Kuiken. 2009. Complexity, accuracy, and fluency in second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics 30(4): 461–473.
Iwashita, N. et al. 2008. Assessed levels of second language speaking proficiency: How distinct? Applied Linguistics 29(1): 24–49.
Lennon, P. 1990. Investigating fluency in EFL: A quantitative approach. Language Learning 40: 387–417.
Levelt, W. J. M. 1989. Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Mehnert, U. 1998. The effects of different lengths of time for planning on second language performance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 20: 83–108.
Norris, J. M. and L. Ortega. 2009. Towards an organic approach to investigating CAF in instructed SLA: The case of complexity. Applied Linguistics 30(4): 555–578.
Read, J. (2000). Assessing vocabulary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Richards, J., Platt, J. and H. Weber. 1989. Longman Dictionary of Applied Linguistics. Harlow: Longman.
Riggenbach, H. 1991. Toward an understanding of fluency: A microanalysis of nonnative speaker conversations. Discourse Processes 14: 423–441.
Robinson, P. 2001. Task complexity, task difficulty, and task production: Exploring interactions in a componential framework. Applied Linguistics 22(1): 27–57.
Skehan, P. 1998. A Cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Skehan, P. 2009. Modelling second language performance: Integrating complexity, accuracy, fluency, and lexis. Applied Linguistics 30(4): 510–532.
Skehan, P. and P. Foster. 1997. Task type and task processing conditions as influences on foreign language performance. Language Teaching Research 1(3): 185–211.
Towell, R., Hawkins, R. and N. Bazergui. 1996. The Development of fluency in advanced learned of French. Applied Linguistics 17(1): 84–119.
Wolfe-Quintero, K., Inagaki, S. and H.-Y. Kim. 1998. Second language development in writing: Measures of fluency, accuracy, and complexity. University of Hawaii, Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Center.
Yuan, F. and R. Ellis. 2003. The effects of pre-task planning and on-line planning on fluency, complexity and accuracy in L2 Monologic Oral Production. Applied Linguistics 24(1): 1–27.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Czwenar, I. (2014). Analysing Spoken Language for Complexity, Accuracy and Fluency: Some Methodological Considerations. In: Szubko-Sitarek, W., Salski, Ł., Stalmaszczyk, P. (eds) Language Learning, Discourse and Communication. Second Language Learning and Teaching. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-00419-8_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-00419-8_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-00418-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-00419-8
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)