Skip to main content

Phonological Short-Term Memory and the Operation of Cross-Linguistic Factors in Elementary and Pre-Intermediate Adult L2 Learners’ Collocational Usage

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Second Language Learning and Teaching ((SLLT))

Abstract

This chapter addresses the link between Phonological Short-term Memory (PSTM) and collocational transfer between L1 and L2, which to date has been relatively unexplored. According to Bonk (2001), elementary and intermediate L2 learners “may not have sufficient available processing capacity to pay careful attention to how words are conventionally combined” and when not sure of the correct L2 form they may resort to avoidance or transfer from L1. In this connection we hypothesize that in L2 learners with lower PSTM capacity L1 transfer may be more discernible than in those with higher PSTM capacity. We report on an empirical study involving adult Polish learners of English attending a six-month English language course in Ireland—30 students at elementary level and 30 at intermediate level—whose mean age was 29.8 years. The testing battery we deployed included decontextualized multiple-choice questions, collocation accuracy judgement sentences, fill-in-the-blank sentences and writing tasks. The findings from the study are broadly supportive of our hypothesis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Atkinson, R. C. and R. M. Shiffrin. 1968. Human memory: A proposed system and its control processes. In The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 2), eds. K. W. Spence and J. T. Spence. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baddeley, A. D. 1986. Working memory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baddeley, A. D. 1990. Human memory: Theory and practice. Hove: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baddeley, A. D. 1992. Is working memory working? The Fifteenth Bartlett Lecture. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology44A(1), 1–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baddeley, A. D. 2000. The episodic buffer: A new component of working memory? Trends in Cognitive Sciences 4(11): 417–423.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baddeley, A. D. 2003a. Working memory and language: An overview. Journal of Communication Disorders 36(3): 85–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baddeley, A. D. 2003b. Working memory: Looking back and looking forward. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 4: 829–839.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baddeley, A. D. 2007. Working memory, thought, and action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baddeley, A. D., Gathercole, S. E. and C. Papagno. 1998. The phonological loop as a language learning device. Psychological Review 105(1): 158–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baddeley, A. D. and G. J. Hitch. 1974. Working memory. In The psychology of learning and motivation, ed. G. Bower, 47–90. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benson, M. et al. 1986. The BBI combinatory dictionary of English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, D. V. M. 2006. Beyond words: Phonological short-term memory and syntactic impairment in specific language impairment. Applied Psycholinguistics 27(4): 545–547.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonk, W. J. 2001. Testing ESL learners' knowledge of collocations. In A focus on language test develoopment: Expanding the language proficiency construct across a variety of tests, eds. T. Hudson and J. D. Brown. Honolulu: University of Hawai'i Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowey, J. A. 2001. Nonword repetition and young children’s receptive vocabulary: A longitudinal study. Applied Psycholinguistics 22(3): 441–469.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, F. J.-G. 1999. The role of first language transfer and second language proficiency in the writing of Chinese learners of English as a second language. Ph.D. thesis, University of Pennsylvania. Available at: ProQuest http://repository.upenn.edu/dissertations/AAI9937709.

  • Cheung, H. 1996. Nonword span as a unique predictor of second language vocabulary learning. Developmental Psychology 32(5): 867–873.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clare, A. and J. J. Wilson. 2006. Total English: Intermediate. Harlow: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, G. et al. 1986. Memory: A cognitive approach. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corder, S. P. 1978. Language learner language. In Understanding second and foreign language learning: Issues and perspectives, ed. J. C. Richards. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corder, S. P. 1983. A role for the mother tongue. In Language transfer in language learning, eds. S. Gass and L. Selinker. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council of Europe. 2001. Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craik, F. I. M. and R. S. Lockhart. 1972. Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 11(6): 671–684.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, V. and J. Dooley. 1999. Enterprise 3: Grammar. Newbury: Express Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faerch, C., Haastrup, K. and R. Phillipson. 1984. Learner language and language learning. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flege, J. E. and I. R. A. MacKay. (2004). Perceiving vowels in a second language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 26: 1–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • French, L. M. 2004. Phonological working memory and L2 acquisition: A developmental study of Quebec Francophone children learning English. Dissertation Abstracts International, A: The Humanities and Social Sciences 65(2): 487.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gathercole, S. E. 2006a. Nonword repetition and word learning: The nature of the relationship. Applied Psycholinguistics 27(4): 513–543.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gathercole, S. E. 2006b. Complexities and constraints in nonword repetition and word learning. Applied Psycholinguistics 27(4): 599–613.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gathercole, S. E., and A. D. Baddeley. 1990. The role of phonological memory in vocabulary acquisition: A study of young children learning new names. British Journal of Psychology 81: 439–454.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gathercole, S. E. and S. J. Pickering. 1999. Estimating the capacity of the phonological short-term store. International Journal of Psychology 34(5 and 6): 378–382.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gathercole, S. E. et al. 2001. Dissociable lexical and phonological influences on serial recognition and serial recall. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 54A(1): 1–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gathercole, S. E. et al. 1999. Phonological short-term memory and vocabulary development: Further evidence on the nature of the relationship. Applied Cognitive Psychology 13(1): 65–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gathercole, S. E. and A. S. C. Thorn. 1998. Phonological short-term memory and foreign language learning. In Foreign language learning: Psycholinguistic studies on training and retention, eds. A. F. Healy and L. E. Bourne. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gathercole, S. E. et al. 1992. Phonological memory and vocabulary development during the early school years: A longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology 28(5): 887–898.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gough, C. 2000. English vocabulary organizer: 100 topics for self-study. Hove: Language Teaching Publications Series.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, P. 2003. Examining the relationship between word learning, nonword repetition, and immediate serial recall in adults. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 56A(7): 1213–1236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, P. and J. Tisdale 2009. Does phonological short-term memory causally determine vocabulary learning? Toward a computational resolution of the debate. Journal of Memory and Language 61: 481–502.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howarth, P. 1998. Phraseology and second language proficiency. Applied Linguistics 19(1): 24–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarrold, C. et al. 2004. What links verbal short-term memory performance and vocabulary level? Evidence of changing relationships among individuals with learning disability. Journal of Memory and Language 50(2): 134–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kellerman, E. 1991. Compensatory strategies in second language research: A critique, a revision, and some (non-)implications for the Classroom. In Foreign/second language pedagogy research, eds. R. Phillipson et al. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kormos, J. and A. Sáfár. 2008. Phonological short-term memory, working memory and foreign language performance in intensive language learning. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 11(2): 261–271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krashen, S. D. 1981. Second language acquisition and second language learning. Oxford: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krashen, S. D. 1983. Newmark’s ignorance hypothesis and second language acquisition theory. In Language transfer in language learning, eds. S. Gass and L. Selinker, 135–153. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurcz, I. et al. 1990. Słownik frekwencyjny polszczyzny współczesnej. Kraków: Instytut Języka Polskiego PAN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, M. 2002. The lexical approach: The state of ELT and a way forward. Boston: Thomson Heinle.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, K. I. 2009. Phonological and working memory and L2 grammar learning. B.A. thesis, University of Michigan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masoura, E. V. and S. E. Gathercole. 1999. Phonological short-term memory and foreign language learning. International Journal of Psychology 34(5/6): 383–388.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, M. and F. O’Dell. 2005. English collocations in use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery, J. 1995. Examination of phonological working memory in specifically language-impaired children. Applied Psycholinguistics 16: 355–378.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, R. 2007. Essential grammar in use: Elementary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newmark, L. 1966. How not to interfere with language learning. In Language learning: The individual and the process, ed. E. W. Najam, 77–83. The Hague: Mouton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newmark, L. and D. A. Reibel. 1968. Necessity and sufficiency in language learning. International Review of Applied Linguistics 6(2): 145–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien, I. S. et al. 2006. Phonological memory and lexical, narrative, and grammatical skills in second language oral production by adult learners. Applied Psycholinguistics 27: 377–402.

    Google Scholar 

  • Odlin, T. 1989. Language transfer. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • OUP. 2001. Paper and pen test: User manual. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papagno, C. et al. 1991. Phonological short-term memory and foreign-language vocabulary learning. Journal of Memory and Language 30(3): 331–347.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papagno, C. and G. Vallar. 1992. Phonological short-term memory and the learning of novel words: the effect of phonological similarity and item length. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 44A(1): 47–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papagno, C. and G. Vallar. 1995. Verbal short-term memory and vocabulary learning in polyglots. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, Section A: Human Experimental Psychology 48A(1): 98–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Service, E. 1992. Phonology, working memory and foreign-language learning. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 45A(1): 21–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Service, E. and F. I. M. Craik. 1993. Differences between young and older adults in learning a foreign vocabulary. Journal of Memory and Language 32(5): 608–623.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singleton, D. (in press). Multilingual lexical operations: Keeping it all together… and apart. In Third language acquisition in adulthood, eds. S. Flynn and J. Rothman. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skrzypek, A. 2009. Phonological short-term memory and L2 collocational development in adult learners. EUROSLA Yearbook 9: 160–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skrzypek, A. 2010. The relationship between phonological short-term memory and the development of L2 vocabulary and collocational knowledge: A study of adult Polish learners of English at the A2 and B1 levels of English proficiency. Ph.D. thesis, Trinity College Dublin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skrzypek, A. in press. The direction of causality in the relationship between phonological short-term memory and L2 lexical knowledge: The case of adult Polish learners of English in Ireland. In Linguistic and cultural acquisition in a migrant community, eds. D. Singleton et al. Multilingual Matters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skrzypek, A. et al. (in press). Language and culture: Attitudes towards and perceptions of English L2 acquisition among adult Polish migrants in Ireland. In Cultures in contact: Contemporary issues in language use and language learning, eds. B. Geraghty and J. E. Conacher. London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snowling, M. et al. 1991. Words, nonwords and phonological processes: Some comments on Gathercole, Willis, Emslie and Baddeley Applied Psycholinguistics 12(3): 369–373.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soars, L. and J. Soars. 2006. New Headway: Elementary. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Speciale, G. et al. 2004. Phonological sequence learning and short-term store capacity determine second language vocabulary acquisition. Applied Psycholinguistics 25(2): 293–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarone, E. 1977. Conscious communication strategies in interlanguage. In On TESOL77, eds. H. D. Brown et al. Washington, D.C.: TESOL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, B. 1975. The use of overgeneralization and transfer learning strategies by elementary and intermediate students of ESL. Language Learning 25(1): 73–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trojano, L. et al. 1992. Short-term memory and verbal learning with auditory phonological coding defect: A neuropsychological case study. Brain and Cognition 18(1) 12–33.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Agnieszka Skrzypek .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Skrzypek, A., Singleton, D. (2014). Phonological Short-Term Memory and the Operation of Cross-Linguistic Factors in Elementary and Pre-Intermediate Adult L2 Learners’ Collocational Usage. In: Szubko-Sitarek, W., Salski, Ł., Stalmaszczyk, P. (eds) Language Learning, Discourse and Communication. Second Language Learning and Teaching. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-00419-8_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics