Advertisement

The Role of Complex Systems in Public-Private Service Networks

  • Ameneh DeljooEmail author
  • Marijn Janssen
  • Y.-H. Tan
Conference paper
Part of the Springer Proceedings in Complexity book series (SPCOM)

Abstract

The complex systems field provides powerful instruments and concepts for understanding evolution and developments. Public Private Service Networks (PPSN) are increasingly advocated as beneficial for the delivery of public services. Yet how these networks evolve and adopt new policies is ill-understood. In this paper the characteristics of PPSN and Complex Adaptive Systems (CAS) are compared and it is suggested that PPSN can be viewed as a particular type of CAS. We argue that CAS research methods and tools and agent based simulation of PPSN can help to increase our understanding of the evolutionary nature of PPSN.

Keywords

Public private networks Complex adaptive systems Agent based modeling 

References

  1. 1.
    Dooley K (1996) Complex adaptive systems: a nominal definition, vol 8, pp 2–3 Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Provan KG, Milward HB (2001) Do networks really work? A framework for evaluating public-sector organizational networks. Public Adm Rev 61:414–423 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Levin SA (2002) Complex adaptive system: exploring the known, the unknown and the unknowable, vol 40. AMS, Providence, pp 3–19 Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Holland JH (1992) Complex adaptive systems. Daedalus 121:17–30 Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Janssen M, Kuk G (2006) A complex adaptive system perspective of enterprise architecture in electronic government. In: Conference on a complex adaptive system perspective of enterprise architecture in electronic government, p 71 Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Tesfatsion L (2003) Agent-based computational economics: modeling economies as complex adaptive systems. Inf Sci 149:262–268 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Shalizi CR (2006) In: Deisboeck TS, Kresh JY (eds) Methods and techniques of complex systems science: an overview complex systems science in biomedicine. Springer, New York, pp 33–114 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bonabeau E (2002) Agent-based modeling: methods and techniques for simulating human systems. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99(3):14 Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Brown DG (2006) Agent-based models. In: Geist H (ed) The Earth’s changing land: an encyclopedia of land-use and land-cover change. Greenwood Publishing Group, Westport, pp 7–13 Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Nicholas RJ (2001) An agent-based approach for building complex software systems. Commun ACM 44:35–41 Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Nutt PC (2006) Comparing public and private sector decision-making practices. J Public Adm Res Theory 16:289–318 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Klievink B (2011) Unravelling interdependence coordinating public-private service networks. Faculty of Technology, Policy and Management, TU Delft, Delft Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Walter PW (1990) Neither market nor hierarchy: network forms of organization, vol 12. JAI Press, London, pp 295–336 Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Arase D (1994) Public-private sector interest coordination in Japan’s ODA. Pac Aff 67:171–199 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Anderson PW (1972) More Is different, vol 177. AAAS, Washington, pp 393–396 Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Rounsevell MDA, Robinson DT, Murray-Rust D (2012) From actors to agents in socio-ecological systems models. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B, Biol Sci 367:259–269 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Technology, Policy and ManagementDelft University of TechnologyDelftThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations