Skip to main content

Distance Ratio: An Exploratory Application to Compare Complex Networks

  • Conference paper
Book cover Proceedings of the European Conference on Complex Systems 2012

Part of the book series: Springer Proceedings in Complexity ((SPCOM))

  • 829 Accesses

Abstract

This paper describes an experimental application of the distance ratio measure used to compare individual networks among themselves and to analyze the aggregated network representing the group mental model from the field of emergency management.

The data was obtained by surveying a group of Civil Protection graduates and aggregating all the answers (shared mental model). The data allowed us to deepen the analysis of the resulting network in order to research for differences among networks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    We recall that the Distance Ratio formula is adapted from systems dynamics where self-loops are a normal situation.

References

  1. Butts CT (2009) Revisiting the foundations of network analysis. Science 325(5939):414–416

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Newman MEJ (2003) The structure and function of complex networks. SIAM Rev 45(2):167

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Boccaletti S, Latora V, Moreno Y, Chavez M, Hwang D (2006) Complex networks: structure and dynamics. Phys Rep 424(4–5):175–308

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Dorogovtsev SN, Goltsev AV, Mendes JFF Critical phenomena in complex networks. Networks 1–79. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.80.1275

  5. Dorogovtsev SN, Mendes JF (2001) Language as an evolving word web. Proc - Royal Soc, Biol Sci 268(1485):2603–2606

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Rubinov M, Sporns O (2010) NeuroImage complex network measures of brain connectivity: uses and interpretations. NeuroImage 52(3):1059–1069

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Li W, Yang J-Y (2009) Comparing networks from a data analysis perspective. Complex Sci 5:1907–1916

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Schaffernicht M, Groesser SN (2011) A comprehensive method for comparing mental models of dynamic systems. Eur J Oper Res 210(1):57–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Langfield-Smith K, Wirth A (1998) Measuring differences between cognitive maps. J Oper Res Soc 43(12):1135–1150

    Google Scholar 

  10. Langan-Fox J (2001) Analyzing shared and team mental models. Int J Ind Ergon 28(2):99–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Schaffernicht M (2006) Detecting and monitoring change in models. Syst Dyn Rev 22(1):73–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Markóczy L, Goldberg J (1995) A method for eliciting and comparing causal maps. J Manag 21(2):305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Muñoz GJ, Glaze RM, Winfred Arthur J, Jarrett S, McDonald JN (2011) Driving mental models as a predictor of crashes and moving violations. In: 26th annual conference of the society for industrial and organizational psychology

    Google Scholar 

  14. Jones NA, Ross H, Lynam T, Perez P, Leitch A (2011) Mental models: an interdisciplinary synthesis of theory and methods. Ecol Soc 16(1). http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol16/iss1/art46/

  15. Carley KM, Palmquist M (1992) Extracting, representing, and analysing mental models. Soc Forces 70(3):601–636

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kim MK (2012) Cross-validation study of methods and technologies to assess mental models in a complex problem solving situation. Comput Hum Behav 28(2):703–717

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Sayama H, Farrell DL, Dionne SD (2010) The effects of mental model formation on group decision making: an agent-based simulation. Complexity 16(3):49–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kai Y, Qingquan W, Lili R (2008) Emergency Ontology construction in emergency decision support system. In: IEEE international conference on service operations and logistics, and informatics, vol 1, pp 801–805

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Alexander D (2002) Principles of emergency planning and management. Oxford University Press, London, p 340

    Google Scholar 

  20. Griffin BD (2009) Emergency management terms and concepts. High Educ 1–8

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nuno Caseiro .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Caseiro, N., Trigo, P. (2013). Distance Ratio: An Exploratory Application to Compare Complex Networks. In: Gilbert, T., Kirkilionis, M., Nicolis, G. (eds) Proceedings of the European Conference on Complex Systems 2012. Springer Proceedings in Complexity. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-00395-5_19

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics