Abstract
After the initiation of a democratic reform process in March 2011, the regime in Myanmar, being challenged by democratic and ethnic-based opposition movements for decades, has started peace negotiations with approximately nineteen armed groups, all of them with different agendas and priorities, even within the groups themselves. The government under president Thein Sein insisted in managing all peace processes without any engagement of a third party mediator. The opening process is also marked by an enormous increase of international stakeholders eager to contribute to a peaceful transition. This influx has had different impacts; on the one hand, the international community has enriched the landscape of local actors and contributed to the process by facilitating contacts, sharing expertise and building capacities; on the other hand, the increased presence is also problematic insofar as it bears the risk of enhancing dependency as well as compromising local ownership and inclusivity. The present case study illustrates the cooperation between the Myanmar NGO Shalom Foundation and the Swiss NGO swisspeace as a successful way of constructive collaboration. By seconding a mediation expert for several months, knowledge exchange and local mediation capacity have been strengthened while guaranteeing local ownership and inclusivity—an innovative way to be replicated.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
As of 1 October 2012, according to the Nyein (Shalom) Foundation.
- 2.
These are technically more ‘truces’ than ceasefire agreements.
- 3.
The IPSG, founded in January 2012, is an informal grouping of international and national actors involved in assisting and advising the parties to ethnic conflict in Myanmar. It meets on a regular basis, both to review the situation and coordinate efforts to support durable peace processes. Members of the IPSG agree on the need for national stakeholders to own the peace process in Myanmar and have come together to aid and assist in a spirit of consultation, transparency and collaboration. They also deploy international experts to support and observe the negotiations between the ethnic groups and the government (taken from the draft TORs of the IPSG).
- 4.
EBO acts as their Secretariat.
- 5.
MSP is a joint project between swisspeace and the ETH/CSS, funded by the Swiss Federal Department of Foreign Affairs.
- 6.
The peace mediation course mentioned here takes place once a year in Switzerland and is funded by the Swiss Federal Department of Foreign Affairs. For more information please visit: http://peacemediation.ch.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gasser, R., Lahtaw, J.N. (2014). Partners for Peace: A Case Study of Local—International Cooperation. In: Hellmüller, S., Santschi, M. (eds) Is Local Beautiful?. SpringerBriefs in Environment, Security, Development and Peace(), vol 11. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-00306-1_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-00306-1_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-00305-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-00306-1
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)