Abstract
This chapter critically reflects on the panel on ‘International Approaches to Local Ownership’ at the swisspeace 2012 annual conference, which featured a representative of a donor institution, the founder and CEO of an international peacebuilding NGO, and a scholar with extensive experience in UN peacekeeping operations. The chapter exposes the nearly insurmountable difficulties that external actors face when trying to implement the concept of local ownership, even when they have the best of intentions. Aside from struggling to define what exactly the term means, they are not able to (or don’t want to, and perhaps shouldn’t) overcome the power imbalances between donor and target beneficiaries. As the concept of inclusiveness, suggested as an alternative to ownership during the panel, carries similar challenges, the author offers transparency and honesty of external interveners’ agendas and intervention approaches as a perhaps more empowering solution that could lead to a more equal partnership between the respective actors.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
- 2.
See http://www.newdeal4peace.org/ (1 April 2013).
- 3.
See the Peace Direct website at http://www.newdeal4peace.org/ (1 April 2013).
- 4.
Also see MacGinty, who warns against the “romanticization of the local” (MacGinty 2011: 51).
- 5.
A transparent communication on the external actor's interests would of course also be desirable, but appears too unrealistic as to justify being included here.
References
Autesserre, Séverine, 2010: The Trouble with the Congo: Local Violence and the Failure of International Peacebuilding (New York: Cambridge University Press).
Brabant, Koenraad van, 2010: “Peacebuilding How? Broad Local Ownership” (Geneva: Interpeace); at: http://www.interpeace.org/publications/doc_download/143-peacebuilding-how-broad-local-ownership-english (1 April 2013).
Chade, Jamil, 2012: “The Conflict and Fragility Agenda Post-Busan: Directions, Opportunities, Challenges” (Geneva: Geneva Peacebuilding Platform); at: http://www.genevadeclaration.org/fileadmin/docs/general/GD-GPB-Brief2-Conflict-fragility-post-Busan.pdf (1 April 2013).
Donais, Timothy, 2009: “Empowerment or Imposition? Dilemmas of Local Ownership in Post-Conflict Peacebuilding Processes”, in: Peace & Change 34, 1: 3–26.
Hellmüller, Sara, 2012: “The Ambiguities of Local Ownership: Evidence from the Democratic Republic of Congo”, in: African Security, 5, 3–4: 236–254.
MacGinty, Roger, 2011: International Peacebuilding and Local Resistance: Hybrid Forms of Peace (New York: Palgrave Macmillan).
Reich, Hannah, 2006: “Local Ownership” in Conflict Transformation Projects, Berghof Occasional Paper (Berlin: Berghof Research Center for Constructive Conflict Management).
Sending, Ole Jacob, 2009: Why Peacebuilders Fail to Secure Ownership and Be Sensitive to Context, NUPI Working Paper, Security in Practice (Oslo: Norwegian Institute of International Affairs).
United Nations General Assembly, 2012: Strengthening the Role of Mediation in the Peaceful Settlement of Disputes, Conflict Prevention and Resolution—Report of the Secretary General (New York: United Nations).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Pfister, M. (2014). Shooting Bambi? Critical Reflections on International Approaches to Local Ownership. In: Hellmüller, S., Santschi, M. (eds) Is Local Beautiful?. SpringerBriefs in Environment, Security, Development and Peace(), vol 11. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-00306-1_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-00306-1_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-00305-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-00306-1
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)