Skip to main content

Rugged Landscapes and Timescale Distributions in Complex Systems

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Emergence, Complexity and Computation ((ECC,volume 5))

Abstract

We review a simple model of random walks on a rugged landscape, representing energy or (negative) fitness, and with many peaks and valleys. This paradigm for trapping on long timescales by metastable states in complex systems may be visualized as a terrain with lakes in the valleys whose water level depends on the observational timescale. The “broken ergodicity” structure in space and time of trapping in the valleys can be analyzed using invasion percolation, picturesquely in terms of “ponds and outlets” as water flows to a distant sea. Two main conclusions concern qualitative dependence on the spatial dimension \(d\) of the system landscape. The first is that the much-used example of a one-dimensional rugged landscape is entirely misleading for any larger \(d\). The second is that once \(d\) is realistically large (above \(6\) seems to suffice), there are many nonmerging paths to the sea; this may be relevant for the issue of contingency vs. convergence in macro-evolution.

This paper is based on a talk at the Interdisciplinary Symposium on Complex Systems, Kos, Greece, September 19–25, 2012.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. J. Jäckle, On the glass transition and the residual entropy of glasses. Phil. Mag. B 44, 533–545 (1981)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. R.G. Palmer, Broken Ergodicity. Adv. Phys. 31, 669–735 (1982)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. R.G. Palmer, Broken ergodicity in spin glasses. in Heidelberg Colloquium on Spin Glasses, (Springer, Berlin, 1983), pp. 234–251

    Google Scholar 

  4. A.C.D. van Enter, J.L. van Hemmen, Statistical-mechanical formalism for spin-glasses. Phys. Rev. A 29, 355–365 (1984)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. R.G. Palmer, D.L. Stein, Broken Ergodicity in Glass. in Relaxations in Complex Systems, (U.S. GPO, Washington, 1985), pp. 253–259

    Google Scholar 

  6. S.A. Kauffman, Origins of Order (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1993)

    Google Scholar 

  7. K. Binder, A.P. Young, Spin glasses: experimental facts, theoretical concepts, and open questions. Rev. Mod. Phys. 58, 801–976 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. P.F. Stadler, W. Schnabl, The landscape of the traveling salesman problem. Phys. Lett. A 161, 337–344 (1992)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. D.L. Stein, C.M. Newman, Broken ergodicity and the geometry of rugged landscapes. Phys. Rev. E 51, 5228–5238 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. D.L. Stein, C.M. Newman, Spin Glasses and Complexity (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 2013)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. U. Krey, Amorphous magnetism: theoretical aspects. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 6, 27–37 (1977)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. This happened to us

    Google Scholar 

  13. C.M. Newman, D.L. Stein, Random walk in a strongly inhomogeneous environment and invasion percolation. Ann. Inst. Henri Poincaré 31, 249–261 (1995)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. R. Lenormand, S. Bories, Description d’un mécanisme de connexion de liaison destiné à l’étude du drainage avec piègeage en milieu poreux. C.R. Acad. Sci. 291, 279–282 (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  15. R. Chandler, J. Koplick, K. Lerman, J.F. Willemsen, Capillary displacement and percolation in porous media. J. Fluid Mech. 119, 249–267 (1982)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. D. Wilkinson, J.F. Willemsen, Invasion percolation: a new form of percolation theory. J. Phys. A 16, 3365–3376 (1983)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. P. Bak, C. Tang, K. Wiesenfeld, Self-organized criticality: an explanation of the 1/f noise. Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 381–384 (1987)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. D. Stauffer, A. Aharony, Introduction to Percolation Theory, 2nd edn. (Taylor and Francis, London, 1992)

    Google Scholar 

  19. C.M. Newman, D.L. Stein, Spin glass model with dimension-dependent ground state multiplicity. Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 2286–2289 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. C.M. Newman, D.L. Stein, Ground state structure in a highly disordered spin glass model. J. Stat. Phys. 82, 1113–1132 (1996)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. J.S. Jackson, N. Read, Theory of minimum spanning trees. I. Mean-field theory and strongly disordered spin-glass model. Phys. Rev. E 81, 021130 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. J.S. Jackson, N. Read, Theory of minimum spanning trees. II. Exact graphical methods and perturbation expansion at the percolation threshold. Phys. Rev. E 81, 021131 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. G. Papanicolaou, S.R.S. Varadhan, Diffusions with random coefficients. in Statistics and Probability: Essays in Honor of C.R. Rao (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1982), pp. 547–552

    Google Scholar 

  24. C. Kipnis, S.R.S. Varadhan, Central limit theorem for additive functionals of reversible Markov processes and applications to simple exclusions. Comm. Math. Phys. 104, 1–19 (1986)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. A. De Masi, P.A. Ferrari, S. Goldstein, D.W. Wick, An invariance principle for reversible Markov processes. Applications to random motions in random environments. J. Stat. Phys. 55, 787–855 (1989)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. In ordinary BE there is assumed to exist some highest barrier, \(\Delta F_{\max }\) that confines the system; after escape occurs over \(\Delta F_{\max }\), dynamical processes are ergodic. Before this occurs (that is, when the system is still in the broken ergodic regime) barriers confining the system are assumed to grow logarithmically with time, which follows from the Arrhenius relation between escape time and barrier height. In contrast, there is no clear analogue in our models to \(\Delta F_{\max }\); after initial transients, barriers are roughly constant, with expected small fluctuations owing to deviations in the diffusion process from the strict \(T\rightarrow 0\) limit.

    Google Scholar 

  27. G. Grimmett, Percolation (Springer, New York, 1989)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. J.M. Hammersley, A Monte Carlo solution of percolation in a cubic lattice. in Methods in Computational Physics, vol. I (Academic Press, New York 1963), pp. 281–298

    Google Scholar 

  29. A precise formulation which is valid for any \(d\ge 2\), irrespective of whether there is one or many disjoint invasion regions, and which does not conflict with recurrence, is as follows: for any fixed \(N\) and with probability approaching one as \(\beta \) tends to \(\infty \), the RWRE will visit all sites in the second through \(N\)th ponds before it either returns to the first pond or crosses a bond of larger value than the first outlet.

    Google Scholar 

  30. M. Damron, A. Sapozhnikov, Outlets of \(2D\) invasion percolation and multiple-armed incipient infinite clusters. Prob. Theory Rel. Fields 150, 257–294 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. M. Damron, A. Sapozhnikov, Relations between invasion percolation and critical percolation in two dimensions. Ann. Prob. 37, 2297–2331 (2009); Limit theorems for 2D invasion percolation. arXiv:1005.5696v3 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  32. H. Kesten, The incipient infinite cluster in two-dimensional percolation. Prob. Theory Rel. Fields 73, 369–394 (1986)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  33. R.V. Chamberlin, M. Hardiman, L.A. Turkevich, R. Orbach, \(H-T\) phase diagram for spin-glasses: an experimental study of Ag:Mn. Phys. Rev. B 25, 6720–6729 (1982)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. J.-L. Tholence, R. Tournier, Susceptibility and remanent magnetization of a spin glass. J. Phys. (Paris) 35, C4–229-C4-236 (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  35. C.N. Guy, Gold-iron spin glasses in low DC fields. I. Susceptibility and thermoremanence. J. Phys. F 7, 1505–1519 (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  36. R.W. Knitter, J.S. Kouvel, Field-induced magnetic transition in a Cu-Mn spin-glass alloy. J. Magn. Magn. Mat. 21, L316–L319 (1980)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. P. Refrigier, E. Vincent, J. Hamman, M. Ocio, Ageing phenomena in a spin glass: effect of temperature changes below \({T}_g\). J. Phys. (Paris) 48, 1533–1539 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. S.J. Gould, C.M. Newman, D.L. Stein (unpublished)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported in part by NSF Grants DMS-0604869, DMS-1106316, and DMS-1207678.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. L. Stein .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Stein, D.L., Newman, C.M. (2014). Rugged Landscapes and Timescale Distributions in Complex Systems. In: Zelinka, I., Sanayei, A., Zenil, H., Rössler, O. (eds) How Nature Works. Emergence, Complexity and Computation, vol 5. Springer, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-00254-5_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-00254-5_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-00253-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-00254-5

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics