Skip to main content

Computational Tactic to Retrieve a Complex Seismic Structure of the Hydrocarbon Model

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
How Nature Works

Abstract

Passive seismic is a direction of human activity, due to which the prospecting of hydrocarbons can be performed by producing a minimal amount of drilling. The synthetic data are presented as arrival times of waves from regional events. Seismic rays pass through the thin layers that compose 2-D hydrocarbon model. The conventional view views mathematical methods as weakly reliable in a detection of hydrocarbons. Nevertheless we demonstrate that numerical reconstruction of seismic velocities in the gas-saturated reservoir can be accurate if the tactic of solution includes a statistical analysis of different subsets of observations and a selection of computational techniques, which resolve a complexity of the structure. Unconventional computing is in that we first make an assumption about geophysical properties of a subject, and only then the appropriate calculation scheme is chosen with following checking of parameters of a resolution. The basic techniques involve the relaxation scheme of the gradient descent method or CSSA to retrieve the large-size structure beneath the gas reservoir and the modification of Gaussian elimination that is effective to overcome the problem of an uncertain error of seismic observations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. K. Aki, W.K.H. Lee, Determination of three-dimensional velocity anomalies under a seismic array using first P-arrival times from local earthquakes: 1. A homogeneous initial model. J. Geophys. Res. 81(23), 4381–4399 (1976)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. G.E. Backus, J.F. Gilbert, The resolving power of gross earth data. Geophys. J. R. Astron. Soc. 16, 169–205 (1968)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. S. Ito, W. Ellsworth, Y. Iio, Complex fault patterns in Western Nagano, Japan revealed by the double-difference method. Eos, Trans. Am. Geophys. Union. 82(47), F870 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  4. A. Jakovlev, G. Rümpker, M. Lindenfeld, I. Koulakov, A. Schumann, N. Ochmann, Crustal seismic velocities of the Rwenzori region, east African rift, from local travel-time tomography: evidence for low-velocity anomalies beneath the mountain range. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 101(2), 848–858 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  5. C. Jing, J.J. Carazzone, E.M. Rumpfhuber, R.L. Saltzer, T.A. Dickens, A.A. Mullur, Patent application title: Hydrocarbon Detection with Passive Seismic Data. IPC8 Class: AG01V128FI. USPC Class: 367 73. Class name: Synthetic seismograms and models. Patent application number: 20110255371 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  6. C. Lanczos, Applied Analysis (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, 1956)

    Google Scholar 

  7. M.M. Lavrentiev, V.G. Romanov, Three linearized inverse problems for hyperbolic equations. Soviet Math. Dokl. 7, 1650–1652 (1966)

    Google Scholar 

  8. M.M. Lavrentiev, Some Improperly Posed Problems in Mathematical Physics. Tracts in Natural Philosophy, vol. 11, (Springer, Berlin, 1967)

    Google Scholar 

  9. J.J. Leveque, L. Rivera, G. Wittlinger, On the use of the checker-board test to assess the resolution of tomographic inversions. Geophys. J. Int. 115, 313–318 (1993) (Blackwell)

    Google Scholar 

  10. E.H. Moore, On the reciprocal of the general algebraic matrix. Bull. Am. Math. Soc. 26, 394–395 (1920)

    Google Scholar 

  11. C.C. Paige, M.A. Saunders, LSQR: an algorithm for sparse linear equations and sparse least squares. ACM Trans. Math. Soft. 8, 43–71, 195–209 (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  12. G.L. Pavlis, Appraising earthquake hypocenter location errors: a complete practical approach for single-event locations. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 76, 1699–1717 (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  13. R.A. Penrose, Generalized inverse for matrices. Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 51, 406–413 (1955)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. H. Ren, G. Goloshubin, Spectra crossplot. Lead. Edge. 1563, 1562–1566 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. J.R.R. Ritter, M. Jordan, U. Christensen, U. Achauer, A mantle plume below the Eifel volcanic fields, Germany. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 186, 7–14 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. V.G. Romanov, Some Inversion Problems for Hyperbolic Equations (in Russian) (Nauka, Novosibirsk, 1972)

    Google Scholar 

  17. A.N. Shiryaev, Probability (Springer, New York, 2008)

    Google Scholar 

  18. T.A. Smaglichenko, A.V. Nikolaev, S. Horiuchi, A. Hasegawa, The method for consecutive subtraction of selected anomalies: the estimated crustal velocity structure in the 1996 Onikobe (M = 5.9) earthquake area (1996), northeastern Japan. Geophys J. Int. 153, 627–644 (2003) (Blackwell)

    Google Scholar 

  19. T.A. Smaglichenko, Modification of Gaussian elimination for the complex system of seismic observations. Founded by Stephen Wolfram 20(3), 229–241 (2012) (Complex systems Publications, Inc. USA), http://www.complex-systems.com/index.html

  20. T.A. Smaglichenko, H. Shigeki, T. Kaori, A differentiated approach to the seismic tomography problem: method, testing and application to the western Nagano fault area (Japan). Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf. 16, 27–41 (2012) (Elsevier)

    Google Scholar 

  21. V.V. Tetelmin, V.A. Yazev, Basics of Drilling for Oil and Gas (Editorial URSS, Moscow, 2009)

    Google Scholar 

  22. R.W. Wiggins, The general linear inverse problem: Implication of surface waves and free oscillations for earthstructure. Rev. Geophys. Space Phys. 10, 251–285 (1972)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. G.J. Wolfe, I.T. Bjarnason, J.C. VanDecar, S.C. Solomon, Seismic structure of the Iceland mantle plume. Nature 385(16), 245–247 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank the organizers of the Symposium. Since the last ICNAAM conference we had a fruitful discussion of subject of complexity. This helped in developing of the computational tactic that is presented in this study. Our thanks go to Reviewers for providing of comments, owing to which the description of consistency between computational and seismic models has been extended.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tatyana A. Smaglichenko .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Smaglichenko, T.A., Sayankina, M.K., Smaglichenko, A.V. (2014). Computational Tactic to Retrieve a Complex Seismic Structure of the Hydrocarbon Model. In: Zelinka, I., Sanayei, A., Zenil, H., Rössler, O. (eds) How Nature Works. Emergence, Complexity and Computation, vol 5. Springer, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-00254-5_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-00254-5_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-00253-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-00254-5

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics