Wundt and Titchener

  • Christian BeenfeldtEmail author
Part of the SpringerBriefs in Philosophy book series (BRIEFSPHILOSOPH)


The year 1879 is generally regarded as seminal in the history of psychology; it is widely agreed that this marks the official beginning of modern psychology.


  1. Anderson RJ (1975) The untranslated content of Wundt’s Grundzüge Der Physiologischen Psychologie. J Hist Behav Sci 11(4):381–386Google Scholar
  2. Baars BJ (1986) The cognitive revolution in psychology. Guilford, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. Bain A (1887) On ‘Association’—controversies. Mind 12(46):161–182Google Scholar
  4. Blumenthal AL (1979) The founding father we never knew. Contemp Psychol 24(7):547–550Google Scholar
  5. Boring EG (1927) Edward Bradford Titchener: 1867–1927. Am J Psychol 38(4):489–506Google Scholar
  6. Boring EG (1937) Titchener and the existential. Am J Psychol 50(1/4):470–483Google Scholar
  7. Boring EG (1950) A history of experimental psychology. Appleton-Century-Crofts, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  8. Boring EG (1953) A history of introspection. Psychol Bull 50(3):169–189Google Scholar
  9. Boring EG (1965) On the subjectivity of important historical dates: Leipzig 1879. J Hist Behav Sci 1(1):5–9Google Scholar
  10. Boring EG (1967) Titchener’s experimentalists. J Hist Behav Sci 3(4)Google Scholar
  11. Bringmann WG, Balance WDG, Evans RB (1975) Wilhelm Wundt 1832–1920: a brief biographical sketch. J Hist Behav Sci 11(3):287–297Google Scholar
  12. Costall A (2006) ‘Introspectionism’ and the mythical origins of scientific psychology. Conscious Cogn 15(4):634–654Google Scholar
  13. Danziger K (1979) The positivist repudiation of Wundt. J Hist Behav Sci 15(3):205–230Google Scholar
  14. Danziger K (1980) The history of introspection reconsidered. J Hist Behav Sci 16(3):241–262Google Scholar
  15. Danziger K (1990) Constructing the subject: historical origins of psychological research. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  16. Dobson V, Bruce D (1972) The German university and the development of experimental psychology. J Hist Behav Sci 8(2):204–207Google Scholar
  17. Greenwood JD (2003) Wundt, Völkerpsychologie, and experimental social psychology. Hist Psychol 6(1):70–88Google Scholar
  18. Hatfield G (2002) Psychology, philosophy, and cognitive science: reflections on the history and philosophy of experimental psychology. Mind Lang 17(3):207–232Google Scholar
  19. Hatfield G (2003) Psychology: old and new. In: Baldwin (ed) The Cambridge history of philosophy 1870–1945. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  20. Leahey TH (1981) The mistaken mirror: on Wundt’s and Titchener’s psychologies. J Hist Behav Sci 17(2):273–282Google Scholar
  21. Lyons W (1986) The disappearance of introspection. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  22. Schwitzgebel E (2004) Introspective training apprehensively defended: reflections on Titchener’s lab manual. J Conscious Stud 11(7–8):58–76Google Scholar
  23. Titchener EB (1920) Wilhelm Wundt, 1832–1920. Science, New Series 52(1352):500–502Google Scholar
  24. Watson RI (1965) The historical background for national trends in psychology: United States. J Hist Behav Sci 1(2):130–138Google Scholar
  25. Watson JB (1966) Behaviorism. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Media, Cognition and CommunicationUniversity of CopenhagenCopenhagenDenmark

Personalised recommendations