Abstract
The aim of this paper is to present theoretical foundations pertaining to interpersonal communication as well as to expound its role in defining teacher competence and evaluating teacher classroom performance. Furthermore, interpersonal skills are related to the concept of perceived teacher credibility and classroom justice as constituting the basis for the evaluation of teacher effectiveness in the classroom. The overall working hypothesis is that teacher evaluation pertains basically to the perception of his/her interpersonal communication skills. Both of the key concepts of teacher credibility and classroom justice rest firmly on these skills. Hence, their applicability in the verification process of teacher evaluation may shed additional light on the overall perception of teacher communicative abilities. As a result, the juxtaposition of the administrative teacher evaluation with the one based on the above-mentioned concepts corroborates the principal hypothesis.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Adams, J. S. 1965. Inequity in social exchange. In Advances in experimental social psychology. Volume II, ed. L. Berkowitz, 267–299. New York: Academic Press.
Andrzejewska, E. 2008. Kompetencja nauczyciela języków obcych w edukacji wczesnoszkolnej. Języki Obce w Szkole 4: 42–47.
Arnold, J. and H. D. Brown. 1999. Introduction: A map of the terrain. In Affect in language learning, ed. J. Arnold, 1–24. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Austin, W. 1977. Equity theory and social comparison processes. In Social comparison processes: Theoretical and empirical perspectives, eds. J. M. Suls and R. L. Miller, 279–305. Washington, DC: Hemisphere.
Bies, R. J. and J. S. Moag. 1986. Interactional justice: Communication criteria of fairness. Research on Negotiation in Organizations 1: 43–55.
Bolkan, S. and A. K. Goodboy. 2009. Transformational leadership in the classroom: Fostering student learning, student participation, and teacher credibility. Journal of Instructional Psychology 36: 296–306.
Chory, R. M. 2007. Enhancing student perceptions of fairness: The relationship between instructor credibility and classroom justice. Communication Education 56: 89–105.
Chory, R. M. and J. C. McCroskey. 1999. The relationship between teacher management communication style and affective learning. Communication Quarterly 47: 1–11.
Chory-Assad, R. M. 2002. The relationship between teacher management style and affective learning. Communication Quarterly 50: 58–77.
Chory-Assad, R. M. and M. L. Paulsel. 2004a. Antisocial classroom communication: Instructor influence and interactional justice as predictors of student aggression. Communication Quarterly 52: 98–114.
Chory-Assad, R. M. and M. L. Paulsel. 2004b. Classroom justice: Students aggression and resistance as reactions to perceived unfairness. Communication Education 53: 253–273.
Clampitt, P. G. 1991. Communicating for managerial effectiveness. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Colquitt, J. A., D. E. Conlon, M. J. Wesson, C. O. L. H. Porter and K. Y. Ng. 2001. Justice at the millennium: A meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research. Journal of Applied Psychology 86: 425–445.
Cooper, P. J. 1993. Oral communication training for teachers. In Language and content, eds. N. Bird, J. Harris and M. Ingham, 433–480. Hong Kong: Government Printer.
Cropanzano, R. and J. Greenberg. 1997. Progress in organizational justice. Tunneling through the maze. In International review of industrial and organizational psychology. Volume 12, ed. C. L. Cooper and I. T. Robertson, 317–372. London: Willey.
Damasio, A. 1999. The feeling of what happens: Body and emotions in the making of consciousness. New York: Harcourt Brace.
DeVito, J. A. 1986. Teaching as relational development. In Communication in college classrooms, ed. J. M. Civikly, 51–59. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
De Vito, J. 2011. Human communication: The basic course. Sydney: Pearson.
Dobransky, N. D. and A. B. Frymier. 2004. Developing teacher-student relationship through out of class communication. Communication Quarterly 52: 211–223.
Dodge, Y. 2003. Oxford dictionary of statistical terms. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Edwards, C. and S. A. Myers. 2007. Perceived instructor credibility as a function of instructor aggressive communication. Communication Research Reports 24: 47–53.
Frymier, A. B. and M. L. Houser. 2000. The teacher-student relationship as an interpersonal relationship. Communication Education 49: 207–219.
Frymier, A. B. and C. A. Thompson. 1992. Perceived teacher affinity-seeking in relation to perceived teacher credibility. Communication Education 41: 388–399.
Fulcher, D. G. and T. W. Anderson Jr. 1974. Interpersonal dissimilarity and teaching effectiveness: A relational analysis. The Journal of Educational Research 68: 19–25.
Gouran, D., W. E. Wiethoff and J. A. Doelger. 1994. Mastering communication, 2nd ed. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Hamer, H. 1994. Klucz do efektywności nauczania. Poradnik dla nauczycieli. Warszawa: Veda.
Hartley, P. 1999. Interpersonal communication. London and New York: Routledge.
Head, K. and P. Taylor. 1997. Readings in teacher development. Oxford: Heinemann.
Horan, S. M. and S. A. Myers. 2009. An exploration of college instructors’ use of classroom justice, power, and behavior alteration techniques. Communication Education 58: 483–496.
Jewett G. S. and V. O’Donnell. 2006. Propaganda and persuasion. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Johnson, S. D. and A. N. A. Miller. 2002. Cross-cultural study of immediacy, credibility, and learning in the U.S. and Kenya. Communication Education 51: 280–292.
Kohonen, V. 1992. Experiential learning: Second language learning as cooperative learner education. In Collaborative language learning and teaching, ed. D. Nunan, 14–39. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kohonen, V., R. Jaatinen, P. Kaikkonen and J. Lehtovaara. 2001. Experiential learning in foreign language education. Harlow: Pearson Education.
Komorowska, H. 1993. Rola i styl kierowania a sukces zawodowy nauczyciela języka obcego. Neofilolog 6: 7–16.
Kurcz, I. 2005. Psychologia języka i komunikacji. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar.
Lankiewicz, H. 2011. Away from the input: Affordance as the way of activating personal touch to language learning. In Extending the boundaries of research on second language learning and teaching, ed. M. Pawlak, 227–240. Heidelberg: Springer.
Luechauer, D. and G. M. Shulman. 1993. Empowerment at work: Separating folklore from fact. At Work: Stories of Tomorrow’s Workplace 2: 13–14.
Martin, M. M., J. L. Chesebro and T. P. Mottet. 1997. Students’ perceptions of instructors’ socio-communicative style and the influence on instructor credibility and situational motivation. Communication Research Reports 14: 431–440.
McCroskey, J. C. 1992. An introduction to communication in the classroom. Edina, MN: Burgess International.
McCroskey, J. C., W. Holdridge and J. K. Toomb. 1974. An instrument for measuring the source credibility of basic speech communication instructors. Speech Teacher 23: 26–33.
McCroskey, J. C. and J. J. Teven. 1999. Goodwill: A reexamination of the construct and its measurement. Communication Monographs 66, 90–103.
McCroskey, J. C., K. M. Valencic and V. P. Richmond. 2004. Toward a general model of instructional communication. Communication Quarterly 52: 197–210.
McCroskey, J. C. and T. J. Yung. 1981. Ethos and credibility: The construct and its measurement after three decades. Central States Speech Journal 32: 24–34.
McLean, C. A. 2007. Establishing credibility in the multicultural classroom: When the instructor speaks with an accent. New Directions for Teaching and Learning 110. (Retrieved from http://www.gwu.edu/~fellows/GTAP/Online%20Makeup/T-L%20Presentation%20Readings/Establishing%20Credibility_2007-Summer_15.pdf.
McPherson, M. B. and Y. J. Liang. 2007. Students’ reactions to teachers’ management of compulsive communicators. Communication Education 56: 18–33.
Mottet, T. P., J. Parker-Raley, S. A. Beebe and C. Cunningham. 2007. Instructors who resist ‘college lite’: The neutralizing effect of instructor immediacy on students’ course workload violations and perceptions of instructor credibility and affective learning. Communication Education 56: 145–167.
Myers, S. A. and R. L. Knox. 2001. The relationship between college student information-seeking behaviors and perceived instructor verbal behaviors. Communication Education 50: 343–356.
Paulsel, M. L. 2005. Classroom justice as a predictor of students’ perceptions of empowerment and emotional response. PhD dissertation, West Virginia University. (Retrieved from http://gradworks.umi.com/31/70/3170942.html).
Paulsel, M. L., R. M. Chory-Assad and K. N. Dunleavy. 2005. The relation between student perceptions of instructor power and classroom justice. Communication Research Reports 22: 207–215.
Pogue, L. L. and K. AhYun. 2006. The effect of teacher nonverbal immediacy and credibility on student motivation and affective learning. Communication Education 55: 331–344.
Premack, D. and G. Woodruff. 1978. Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind? The Behavioral and Brain Sciences 4: 515–526.
Richards, J. C. 1998. Beyond training. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Richmond, V. P. and K. D. Roach. 1992. Power in the classroom: Seminal studies. In Power in the classroom: Communication, control, and concern, eds. V. P. Richmond and J. C. McCroskey, 47–66. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Schrodt, P. 2003. Students’ appraisals of instructors as a function of students’ perceptions of instructors’ aggressive communication. Communication Education 52: 106–121.
Schrodt, P., P. D. Turman and J. Soliz. 2006. Perceived understanding as a mediator of perceived teacher confirmation and students’ ratings of instruction. Communication Education 55: 370–388.
Schrodt, P. and P. L. Witt. 2006. Students’ attributions of instructor credibility as a function of students’ expectations of instructional technology use and nonverbal immediacy. Communication Education 55: 1–20.
Shannon, C. E. and W. Weaver. 1949. A mathematical model of communication. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
Shebanova, I. 2010. Interpersonal communication value in globalizing community. Limes 3: 80–86.
Stern, H. H. 1992. Issues and options in language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Stonkuviene, I. 2010. Communication as an essential element of pedagogical process. TILTAI/BRIDGES/BRÜCKEN 4, 53: 189–200.
Tesser, A. and N. Schwarz, eds. 2001. Blackwell handbook of social psychology: Intraindividual processes. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Teven, J. J. 2007. Teacher caring and classroom behavior: Relationships with student affect and perceptions of teacher competence and trustworthiness. Communication Quarterly 55: 433–450.
Teven, J. J. and T. L. Hanson. 2004. The impact of teacher immediacy and perceived caring on teacher competence and trustworthiness. Communication Quarterly 52: 39–53.
Teven, J. J. and J. C. McCroskey. 1997. The relationship of perceived teacher caring with student learning and teacher evaluation. Communication Education 46: 1–9.
Thweatt, K. S. and J. C. McCroskey. 1998. The impact of teacher immediacy and misbehaviors on teacher credibility. Communication Education 46: 348–358.
Umphrey, L. R., J. A. Wickersham and J. C. Sherblom. 2006. Immediacy, composure, receptivity, communication quality, communication satisfaction, involvement, and connectedness/mutuality in face-to-face and IITV instruction. Paper submitted to the Western States Communication Association Conference, Palm Springs, CA. (Retrieved from http://www8.nau.edu/~d-elearn/assessment/research/documents/Umphrey.pdf).
van Lier, L. 2004. The ecology and semiotics of language learning. A sociocultural perspective. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Werbińska, D. 2011. Developing into an effective Polish teacher of English. Słupsk: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Akademii Pomorskiej w Słupsku.
Wiener, J. L. and J. C. Mowen. 1986. Source credibility: On the independent effects of trust and expertise. In Advances in consumer research. Volume 13, ed. R. J. Lutz, 306-310. Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research.
Witt, P. L. 2004. Students’ perceptions of teacher credibility and learning expectations in the classroom courses with websites. Community College Journal of Research and Practice 28: 423–434.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lankiewicz, H. (2014). Teacher Interpersonal Communication Abilities in the Classroom with Regard to Perceived Classroom Justice and Teacher Credibility. In: Pawlak, M., Bielak, J., Mystkowska-Wiertelak, A. (eds) Classroom-oriented Research. Second Language Learning and Teaching. Springer, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-00188-3_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-00188-3_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-00187-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-00188-3
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)