Skip to main content

Teacher Interpersonal Communication Abilities in the Classroom with Regard to Perceived Classroom Justice and Teacher Credibility

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Classroom-oriented Research

Part of the book series: Second Language Learning and Teaching ((SLLT))

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to present theoretical foundations pertaining to interpersonal communication as well as to expound its role in defining teacher competence and evaluating teacher classroom performance. Furthermore, interpersonal skills are related to the concept of perceived teacher credibility and classroom justice as constituting the basis for the evaluation of teacher effectiveness in the classroom. The overall working hypothesis is that teacher evaluation pertains basically to the perception of his/her interpersonal communication skills. Both of the key concepts of teacher credibility and classroom justice rest firmly on these skills. Hence, their applicability in the verification process of teacher evaluation may shed additional light on the overall perception of teacher communicative abilities. As a result, the juxtaposition of the administrative teacher evaluation with the one based on the above-mentioned concepts corroborates the principal hypothesis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adams, J. S. 1965. Inequity in social exchange. In Advances in experimental social psychology. Volume II, ed. L. Berkowitz, 267–299. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrzejewska, E. 2008. Kompetencja nauczyciela języków obcych w edukacji wczesnoszkolnej. Języki Obce w Szkole 4: 42–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnold, J. and H. D. Brown. 1999. Introduction: A map of the terrain. In Affect in language learning, ed. J. Arnold, 1–24. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Austin, W. 1977. Equity theory and social comparison processes. In Social comparison processes: Theoretical and empirical perspectives, eds. J. M. Suls and R. L. Miller, 279–305. Washington, DC: Hemisphere.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bies, R. J. and J. S. Moag. 1986. Interactional justice: Communication criteria of fairness. Research on Negotiation in Organizations 1: 43–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolkan, S. and A. K. Goodboy. 2009. Transformational leadership in the classroom: Fostering student learning, student participation, and teacher credibility. Journal of Instructional Psychology 36: 296–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chory, R. M. 2007. Enhancing student perceptions of fairness: The relationship between instructor credibility and classroom justice. Communication Education 56: 89–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chory, R. M. and J. C. McCroskey. 1999. The relationship between teacher management communication style and affective learning. Communication Quarterly 47: 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chory-Assad, R. M. 2002. The relationship between teacher management style and affective learning. Communication Quarterly 50: 58–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chory-Assad, R. M. and M. L. Paulsel. 2004a. Antisocial classroom communication: Instructor influence and interactional justice as predictors of student aggression. Communication Quarterly 52: 98–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chory-Assad, R. M. and M. L. Paulsel. 2004b. Classroom justice: Students aggression and resistance as reactions to perceived unfairness. Communication Education 53: 253–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clampitt, P. G. 1991. Communicating for managerial effectiveness. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colquitt, J. A., D. E. Conlon, M. J. Wesson, C. O. L. H. Porter and K. Y. Ng. 2001. Justice at the millennium: A meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research. Journal of Applied Psychology 86: 425–445.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, P. J. 1993. Oral communication training for teachers. In Language and content, eds. N. Bird, J. Harris and M. Ingham, 433–480. Hong Kong: Government Printer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cropanzano, R. and J. Greenberg. 1997. Progress in organizational justice. Tunneling through the maze. In International review of industrial and organizational psychology. Volume 12, ed. C. L. Cooper and I. T. Robertson, 317–372. London: Willey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Damasio, A. 1999. The feeling of what happens: Body and emotions in the making of consciousness. New York: Harcourt Brace.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeVito, J. A. 1986. Teaching as relational development. In Communication in college classrooms, ed. J. M. Civikly, 51–59. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Vito, J. 2011. Human communication: The basic course. Sydney: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobransky, N. D. and A. B. Frymier. 2004. Developing teacher-student relationship through out of class communication. Communication Quarterly 52: 211–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodge, Y. 2003. Oxford dictionary of statistical terms. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, C. and S. A. Myers. 2007. Perceived instructor credibility as a function of instructor aggressive communication. Communication Research Reports 24: 47–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frymier, A. B. and M. L. Houser. 2000. The teacher-student relationship as an interpersonal relationship. Communication Education 49: 207–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frymier, A. B. and C. A. Thompson. 1992. Perceived teacher affinity-seeking in relation to perceived teacher credibility. Communication Education 41: 388–399.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fulcher, D. G. and T. W. Anderson Jr. 1974. Interpersonal dissimilarity and teaching effectiveness: A relational analysis. The Journal of Educational Research 68: 19–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gouran, D., W. E. Wiethoff and J. A. Doelger. 1994. Mastering communication, 2nd ed. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamer, H. 1994. Klucz do efektywności nauczania. Poradnik dla nauczycieli. Warszawa: Veda.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartley, P. 1999. Interpersonal communication. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Head, K. and P. Taylor. 1997. Readings in teacher development. Oxford: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horan, S. M. and S. A. Myers. 2009. An exploration of college instructors’ use of classroom justice, power, and behavior alteration techniques. Communication Education 58: 483–496.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jewett G. S. and V. O’Donnell. 2006. Propaganda and persuasion. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, S. D. and A. N. A. Miller. 2002. Cross-cultural study of immediacy, credibility, and learning in the U.S. and Kenya. Communication Education 51: 280–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohonen, V. 1992. Experiential learning: Second language learning as cooperative learner education. In Collaborative language learning and teaching, ed. D. Nunan, 14–39. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohonen, V., R. Jaatinen, P. Kaikkonen and J. Lehtovaara. 2001. Experiential learning in foreign language education. Harlow: Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Komorowska, H. 1993. Rola i styl kierowania a sukces zawodowy nauczyciela języka obcego. Neofilolog 6: 7–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurcz, I. 2005. Psychologia języka i komunikacji. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lankiewicz, H. 2011. Away from the input: Affordance as the way of activating personal touch to language learning. In Extending the boundaries of research on second language learning and teaching, ed. M. Pawlak, 227–240. Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luechauer, D. and G. M. Shulman. 1993. Empowerment at work: Separating folklore from fact. At Work: Stories of Tomorrow’s Workplace 2: 13–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, M. M., J. L. Chesebro and T. P. Mottet. 1997. Students’ perceptions of instructors’ socio-communicative style and the influence on instructor credibility and situational motivation. Communication Research Reports 14: 431–440.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCroskey, J. C. 1992. An introduction to communication in the classroom. Edina, MN: Burgess International.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCroskey, J. C., W. Holdridge and J. K. Toomb. 1974. An instrument for measuring the source credibility of basic speech communication instructors. Speech Teacher 23: 26–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCroskey, J. C. and J. J. Teven. 1999. Goodwill: A reexamination of the construct and its measurement. Communication Monographs 66, 90–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCroskey, J. C., K. M. Valencic and V. P. Richmond. 2004. Toward a general model of instructional communication. Communication Quarterly 52: 197–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCroskey, J. C. and T. J. Yung. 1981. Ethos and credibility: The construct and its measurement after three decades. Central States Speech Journal 32: 24–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLean, C. A. 2007. Establishing credibility in the multicultural classroom: When the instructor speaks with an accent. New Directions for Teaching and Learning 110. (Retrieved from http://www.gwu.edu/~fellows/GTAP/Online%20Makeup/T-L%20Presentation%20Readings/Establishing%20Credibility_2007-Summer_15.pdf.

  • McPherson, M. B. and Y. J. Liang. 2007. Students’ reactions to teachers’ management of compulsive communicators. Communication Education 56: 18–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mottet, T. P., J. Parker-Raley, S. A. Beebe and C. Cunningham. 2007. Instructors who resist ‘college lite’: The neutralizing effect of instructor immediacy on students’ course workload violations and perceptions of instructor credibility and affective learning. Communication Education 56: 145–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, S. A. and R. L. Knox. 2001. The relationship between college student information-seeking behaviors and perceived instructor verbal behaviors. Communication Education 50: 343–356.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paulsel, M. L. 2005. Classroom justice as a predictor of students’ perceptions of empowerment and emotional response. PhD dissertation, West Virginia University. (Retrieved from http://gradworks.umi.com/31/70/3170942.html).

  • Paulsel, M. L., R. M. Chory-Assad and K. N. Dunleavy. 2005. The relation between student perceptions of instructor power and classroom justice. Communication Research Reports 22: 207–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pogue, L. L. and K. AhYun. 2006. The effect of teacher nonverbal immediacy and credibility on student motivation and affective learning. Communication Education 55: 331–344.

    Google Scholar 

  • Premack, D. and G. Woodruff. 1978. Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind? The Behavioral and Brain Sciences 4: 515–526.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, J. C. 1998. Beyond training. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richmond, V. P. and K. D. Roach. 1992. Power in the classroom: Seminal studies. In Power in the classroom: Communication, control, and concern, eds. V. P. Richmond and J. C. McCroskey, 47–66. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schrodt, P. 2003. Students’ appraisals of instructors as a function of students’ perceptions of instructors’ aggressive communication. Communication Education 52: 106–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schrodt, P., P. D. Turman and J. Soliz. 2006. Perceived understanding as a mediator of perceived teacher confirmation and students’ ratings of instruction. Communication Education 55: 370–388.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schrodt, P. and P. L. Witt. 2006. Students’ attributions of instructor credibility as a function of students’ expectations of instructional technology use and nonverbal immediacy. Communication Education 55: 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shannon, C. E. and W. Weaver. 1949. A mathematical model of communication. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shebanova, I. 2010. Interpersonal communication value in globalizing community. Limes 3: 80–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern, H. H. 1992. Issues and options in language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stonkuviene, I. 2010. Communication as an essential element of pedagogical process. TILTAI/BRIDGES/BRÜCKEN 4, 53: 189–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tesser, A. and N. Schwarz, eds. 2001. Blackwell handbook of social psychology: Intraindividual processes. Malden, MA: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teven, J. J. 2007. Teacher caring and classroom behavior: Relationships with student affect and perceptions of teacher competence and trustworthiness. Communication Quarterly 55: 433–450.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teven, J. J. and T. L. Hanson. 2004. The impact of teacher immediacy and perceived caring on teacher competence and trustworthiness. Communication Quarterly 52: 39–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teven, J. J. and J. C. McCroskey. 1997. The relationship of perceived teacher caring with student learning and teacher evaluation. Communication Education 46: 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thweatt, K. S. and J. C. McCroskey. 1998. The impact of teacher immediacy and misbehaviors on teacher credibility. Communication Education 46: 348–358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Umphrey, L. R., J. A. Wickersham and J. C. Sherblom. 2006. Immediacy, composure, receptivity, communication quality, communication satisfaction, involvement, and connectedness/mutuality in face-to-face and IITV instruction. Paper submitted to the Western States Communication Association Conference, Palm Springs, CA. (Retrieved from http://www8.nau.edu/~d-elearn/assessment/research/documents/Umphrey.pdf).

  • van Lier, L. 2004. The ecology and semiotics of language learning. A sociocultural perspective. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werbińska, D. 2011. Developing into an effective Polish teacher of English. Słupsk: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Akademii Pomorskiej w Słupsku.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiener, J. L. and J. C. Mowen. 1986. Source credibility: On the independent effects of trust and expertise. In Advances in consumer research. Volume 13, ed. R. J. Lutz, 306-310. Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Witt, P. L. 2004. Students’ perceptions of teacher credibility and learning expectations in the classroom courses with websites. Community College Journal of Research and Practice 28: 423–434.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hadrian Lankiewicz .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lankiewicz, H. (2014). Teacher Interpersonal Communication Abilities in the Classroom with Regard to Perceived Classroom Justice and Teacher Credibility. In: Pawlak, M., Bielak, J., Mystkowska-Wiertelak, A. (eds) Classroom-oriented Research. Second Language Learning and Teaching. Springer, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-00188-3_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics