Skip to main content

Triangulation in Researching Autonomy: A Post-Research Analysis

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 1699 Accesses

Part of the book series: Second Language Learning and Teaching ((SLLT))

Abstract

Promoted by the CEFR and implemented as an element of curricular objectives in many countries, learner autonomy has become a buzz word in foreign language teaching and learning. Due to its multi-faceted nature, there have been numerous attempts to formulate a comprehensive definition embracing various aspects of this construct. This multidimensionality poses a problem for researchers trying to observe the emergence of changes in learner autonomy. If autonomy is to be investigated, then the first step should be to establish which aspects of this construct we are really interested in. This article aims to analyze the benefits as well as challenges of implementing methodological triangulation in research devoted to measuring learner autonomy. The main emphasis will be placed on the role of qualitative instruments as valuable alternatives to the prevalence of quantitative tools. It is hoped that the conclusions will provide useful guidelines on researching this construct in the future. The discussion will be based on a study conducted in order to establish the impact of different self-assessment methods on the level of autonomy in lower secondary school learners in a selected educational context. The data collected during a one-year quasi-experiment was based on both qualitative (classroom observations and interviews) and quantitative (a questionnaire) instruments. The analysis of the emerging autonomous behaviors was performed in reference to seven aspects of learner autonomy selected for the purposes of this research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Benson, P. 2001. Teaching and researching autonomy in language learning. London: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benson, P. 2010. Measuring autonomy: Should we put our ability to the test? In Testing the untestable in language teaching and learning, eds. A. Paran and L. Sercu, 77–97. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boud, D. 1988. Moving towards autonomy. In Developing student autonomy in learning, ed. D. Boud, 17–39. London: Kogan Page Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breen, M. and C. Candlin. 1980. The essentials of a communicative curriculum in language teaching. Applied Linguistics 12: 89–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breen, P. and S. Mann. 1997. Shooting arrows at the sun: Perspectives on a pedagogy for autonomy. In Autonomy and independence in language learning, eds. P. Benson and P. Voller, 132–149. London: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. D. 2004. Research methods for applied linguistics: Scope, characteristics, and standards. In The handbook of applied linguistics, eds. A. Davis and C. Elder, 476–499. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council of Europe. 2001. Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. 2003. Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Czura, A. 2010. The influence of assessment type on the development of autonomy in lower secondary school learners. Unpublished PhD dissertation. Wrocław: University of Wrocław.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dam, L. 1995. Learner autonomy 3: From theory to classroom practice. Dublin: Authentic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickinson, L. 1987. Self-instruction in language learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickinson, L. 1992. Learner autonomy 2: Learner training for language learning. Dublin: Authentik.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dörnyei, Z. 2007. Research methods in applied linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dörnyei, Z. and T. Taguchi. 2010. Questionnaires in second language research: Construction, administration, and processing. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holec, H. 1981. Autonomy in foreign language learning. Oxford: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Legutke, M. and H. Thomas. 1991. Process and experience in the language classroom. London: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Little, D. 1991. Learner autonomy 1: Definitions, issues and problems. Dublin: Authentic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michońska-Stadnik, A. 2000. Attitudes to learner autonomy. IATEFL Research SIG. Special Joint Issue. June 2000: 67–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michońska-Stadnik, A. 2004. Autonomia w uczeniu się języka obcego—mity i rzeczywistość. In Aspekty współczesnych dyskursów. Język a komunikacja, ed. P. Chruszczewski, 253–262. Kraków: Tertium.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsen, W. K. 2004. Triangulation in social research: Qualitative and quantitative methods can really be mixed. In Developments in sociology, ed. M. Holborn, 103–121. Ormskirk: Causeway Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oxford, R. 2002. Language learning strategies in a nutshell: Update and ESL suggestions. In Methodology in language teaching: An anthology of current practice, eds. J. C. Richards and A. Renandya, 124–132. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pawlak, M. 2004. Autonomia studenta anglistyki – deklaracje a rzeczywistość. In Autonomia w nauce języka obcego, ed. M. Pawlak, 173–191. Poznań - Kalisz: Adam Mickiewicz University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pawlak, M. 2008. Autonomia w nauce języka angielskiego w liceum – diagnoza, analiza, wnioski. In M. Pawlak, Autonomia w nauce języka obcegoco osiągnęliśmy i dokąd zmierzamy, pp. 137–157. Poznań - Kalisz - Konin: Adam Mickiewicz University and State School of Higher Professional Education in Konin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheerin, S. 1997. An exploration of the relationship between self-access centres: Changing roles? In Autonomy and independence in language learning, eds P. Benson and P. Voller, 54–65. London: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skrzypek, A. 2004. Autonomizajca ucznia w polskim kontekście edukacyjnym – środowisko gimnazjalne i licealne. In Autonomia w nauce języka obcego, ed. M. Pawlak, 160–172. Poznań - Kalisz: Adam Mickiewicz University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilczyńska, W. and A. Michońska-Stadnik. 2010. Metodologia badań w glottodydaktyce. Wprowadzenie. Kraków: AVALON.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anna Czura .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Czura, A. (2014). Triangulation in Researching Autonomy: A Post-Research Analysis. In: Pawlak, M., Bielak, J., Mystkowska-Wiertelak, A. (eds) Classroom-oriented Research. Second Language Learning and Teaching. Springer, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-00188-3_19

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics