Abstract
Promoted by the CEFR and implemented as an element of curricular objectives in many countries, learner autonomy has become a buzz word in foreign language teaching and learning. Due to its multi-faceted nature, there have been numerous attempts to formulate a comprehensive definition embracing various aspects of this construct. This multidimensionality poses a problem for researchers trying to observe the emergence of changes in learner autonomy. If autonomy is to be investigated, then the first step should be to establish which aspects of this construct we are really interested in. This article aims to analyze the benefits as well as challenges of implementing methodological triangulation in research devoted to measuring learner autonomy. The main emphasis will be placed on the role of qualitative instruments as valuable alternatives to the prevalence of quantitative tools. It is hoped that the conclusions will provide useful guidelines on researching this construct in the future. The discussion will be based on a study conducted in order to establish the impact of different self-assessment methods on the level of autonomy in lower secondary school learners in a selected educational context. The data collected during a one-year quasi-experiment was based on both qualitative (classroom observations and interviews) and quantitative (a questionnaire) instruments. The analysis of the emerging autonomous behaviors was performed in reference to seven aspects of learner autonomy selected for the purposes of this research.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Benson, P. 2001. Teaching and researching autonomy in language learning. London: Longman.
Benson, P. 2010. Measuring autonomy: Should we put our ability to the test? In Testing the untestable in language teaching and learning, eds. A. Paran and L. Sercu, 77–97. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Boud, D. 1988. Moving towards autonomy. In Developing student autonomy in learning, ed. D. Boud, 17–39. London: Kogan Page Ltd.
Breen, M. and C. Candlin. 1980. The essentials of a communicative curriculum in language teaching. Applied Linguistics 12: 89–112.
Breen, P. and S. Mann. 1997. Shooting arrows at the sun: Perspectives on a pedagogy for autonomy. In Autonomy and independence in language learning, eds. P. Benson and P. Voller, 132–149. London: Longman.
Brown, J. D. 2004. Research methods for applied linguistics: Scope, characteristics, and standards. In The handbook of applied linguistics, eds. A. Davis and C. Elder, 476–499. Oxford: Blackwell.
Council of Europe. 2001. Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.
Creswell, J. 2003. Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Czura, A. 2010. The influence of assessment type on the development of autonomy in lower secondary school learners. Unpublished PhD dissertation. Wrocław: University of Wrocław.
Dam, L. 1995. Learner autonomy 3: From theory to classroom practice. Dublin: Authentic.
Dickinson, L. 1987. Self-instruction in language learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dickinson, L. 1992. Learner autonomy 2: Learner training for language learning. Dublin: Authentik.
Dörnyei, Z. 2007. Research methods in applied linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dörnyei, Z. and T. Taguchi. 2010. Questionnaires in second language research: Construction, administration, and processing. New York: Routledge.
Holec, H. 1981. Autonomy in foreign language learning. Oxford: Pergamon.
Legutke, M. and H. Thomas. 1991. Process and experience in the language classroom. London: Longman.
Little, D. 1991. Learner autonomy 1: Definitions, issues and problems. Dublin: Authentic.
Michońska-Stadnik, A. 2000. Attitudes to learner autonomy. IATEFL Research SIG. Special Joint Issue. June 2000: 67–71.
Michońska-Stadnik, A. 2004. Autonomia w uczeniu się języka obcego—mity i rzeczywistość. In Aspekty współczesnych dyskursów. Język a komunikacja, ed. P. Chruszczewski, 253–262. Kraków: Tertium.
Olsen, W. K. 2004. Triangulation in social research: Qualitative and quantitative methods can really be mixed. In Developments in sociology, ed. M. Holborn, 103–121. Ormskirk: Causeway Press.
Oxford, R. 2002. Language learning strategies in a nutshell: Update and ESL suggestions. In Methodology in language teaching: An anthology of current practice, eds. J. C. Richards and A. Renandya, 124–132. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pawlak, M. 2004. Autonomia studenta anglistyki – deklaracje a rzeczywistość. In Autonomia w nauce języka obcego, ed. M. Pawlak, 173–191. Poznań - Kalisz: Adam Mickiewicz University Press.
Pawlak, M. 2008. Autonomia w nauce języka angielskiego w liceum – diagnoza, analiza, wnioski. In M. Pawlak, Autonomia w nauce języka obcego – co osiągnęliśmy i dokąd zmierzamy, pp. 137–157. Poznań - Kalisz - Konin: Adam Mickiewicz University and State School of Higher Professional Education in Konin Press.
Sheerin, S. 1997. An exploration of the relationship between self-access centres: Changing roles? In Autonomy and independence in language learning, eds P. Benson and P. Voller, 54–65. London: Longman.
Skrzypek, A. 2004. Autonomizajca ucznia w polskim kontekście edukacyjnym – środowisko gimnazjalne i licealne. In Autonomia w nauce języka obcego, ed. M. Pawlak, 160–172. Poznań - Kalisz: Adam Mickiewicz University Press.
Wilczyńska, W. and A. Michońska-Stadnik. 2010. Metodologia badań w glottodydaktyce. Wprowadzenie. Kraków: AVALON.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Czura, A. (2014). Triangulation in Researching Autonomy: A Post-Research Analysis. In: Pawlak, M., Bielak, J., Mystkowska-Wiertelak, A. (eds) Classroom-oriented Research. Second Language Learning and Teaching. Springer, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-00188-3_19
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-00188-3_19
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-00187-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-00188-3
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)