Advertisement

Age and the Classroom Learning of Additional Languages

  • David Singleton
  • Agnieszka Skrzypek
Chapter
Part of the Second Language Learning and Teaching book series (SLLT)

Abstract

This chapter deals with some commonly held views in relation to the age-factor dimensions of the classroom learning of additional languages which the authors regard as serious misunderstandings. The principal issues focused on are the following: (a) the widespread notion that the younger = better tendencies observed among naturalistic acquirers of additional languages can be assumed to operate also in formal instructional settings; (b) the often unexamined assumption that such support as exists for the Critical Period Hypothesis constitutes an argument for early instruction in additional languages, or that a resolution of the veracity or otherwise of this hypothesis would also resolve the question of when to introduce additional languages into our schools; (c) the idea that ultimate attainment in the context of the classroom learning of additional languages is so much bound up with the age of those doing the learning that almost no other factors are relevant. With respect to all of the above, alternative research-based propositions are presented and advocated.

Keywords

Language Acquisition Implicit Learning Early Start Instructional Setting Explicit Learning 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Álvarez, E. 2006. Rate and route of acquisition in EFL narrative development at different ages. In Age and the rate of foreign language learning, ed. C. Muñoz, 127–155. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  2. Audin, L. 2008. Langues étrangères à l’école primaire: Recherché INRP 1998-2003 and 2005-07. In Travaux du GEPED en hommage à Danielle Bailly. Special issue of Cahiers de Recherche, eds. D. Chini and P. Goutéraux, 143–154. Paris: Ophrys.Google Scholar
  3. Bruer, J. T. 1999. The myth of the first three years: A new understanding of early brain development and lifelong learning. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  4. Burstall, C., M. Jamieson, S. Cohen and M. Hargreaves. 1975. Primary French in the balance. Windsor: NFER.Google Scholar
  5. Cenoz, J. 2002. Age differences in foreign language learning. ITL Review of Applied Linguistics, 135/136: 125–142.Google Scholar
  6. Cenoz, J. 2003. Facteurs determinant l’acquisition d’une L3: Age, développement cognitif et milieu. Acquisition et Interaction en Langue Étrangère 18: 37–51.Google Scholar
  7. CLAR. 1975. Committee on language attitudes research: Report. Dublin: Stationery Office.Google Scholar
  8. Dechert, H. W. 1995. Some critical remarks concerning Penfield’s theory of second language acquisition. In The age factor in second language acquisition, eds. D. Singleton and Z. Lengyel, 67–94. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  9. DeKeyser, R. M. 2003a. Implicit and explicit learning. In Handbook of second language learning, eds. C. J. Doughty and M. H. Long, 313–348. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  10. DeKeyser, R. M. 2003b. Confusion about confounding: The critical period and other age-related aspects of second language learning. Paper presented at the ELIA VIII (Encuentros de Linguistica Inglesa Aplicada), ‘El factor edad en la adquisición y enseñanza de L2’, Seville.Google Scholar
  11. Flege, J. E. and S. Liu. 2001. The effect of experience on adults’ acquisition of a second language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 23: 527–552.Google Scholar
  12. Gallagher, A. 2006. The role of the education system in the maintenance of Irish. Paper presented at the the Royal Irish Academy conference “Language policy and language planning in Ireland”, Dublin.Google Scholar
  13. Genesee, F. 1978. Is there an optimal age for starting second language instruction? McGill Journal of Education 13: 145–54.Google Scholar
  14. Hatch, E. 1983. Psycholinguistics: A second language perspective. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
  15. Hindley, R. 1990. The death of the Irish language: A qualified obituary. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  16. Hunt, M., A. Barnesa, B. G. L. Powell and D. Muijsb. 2005. Primary modern foreign languages: An overview of recent research, key issues and challenges for educational policy and practice. Research Papers in Education 20: 371–390.Google Scholar
  17. Hyltenstam, K. 1992. Non-native features of non-native speakers: On the ultimate attainment of childhood L2 learners. In Cognitive processing in bilinguals, ed. R. J. Harris, 351–368. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  18. INTO. 1985. The Irish language in primary education. Dublin: Irish National Teachers’ Organization.Google Scholar
  19. Jedynak, M. 2005. The impact of age on ultimate attainment in the pronunciation of English as a foreign language Acta Universitatis Wratislaviensis 2782: Anglica Wratislaviensia XLIII: 195–205. Wrocław: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego.Google Scholar
  20. Johnson, J. S., and E. L. Newport. 1989. Critical period effects in second language learning: The influence of maturational state on the acquisition of ESL. Cognitive Psychology 21: 60–99.Google Scholar
  21. Johnstone, R. 2002. Addressing the ‘age factor’: Some implications for languages policy. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.Google Scholar
  22. Kalberer, U. 2007. Rate of L2 acquisition and the influence of instruction time on achievement. M.Ed. thesis, University of Manchester.Google Scholar
  23. Krashen, S., M. H. Long and R. Scarcella. 1979. Age, rate and eventual attainment in second language acquisition. TESOL Quarterly 9: 573–582.Google Scholar
  24. Mora, J. C. 2006. Age effects on oral fluency development. In Age and the rate of foreign language learning, ed. C. Muñoz, 65–88. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  25. Muñoz, C. 2003. Variation in oral skills development and age of onset. In Age and the acquisition of English as a foreign language: Theoretical issues and field work, eds. M. P. García Mayo and M. L. García Lecumberri, 161–181. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  26. Muñoz, C. 2008a. Symmetries and asymmetries of age effects in naturalistic and instructed L2 learning. Applied Linguistics 24: 578–596.Google Scholar
  27. Muñoz, C. 2008b. Age-related differences in foreign language learning. Revisiting the empirical evidence. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 46: 197–220.Google Scholar
  28. Muñoz, C. 2008c. When context matters: Age effects on FL learning. Paper presented at the Second Language Research Forum, University of Hawai’I at Honolulu.Google Scholar
  29. Muñoz, C. (ed.). 2006a. Age and the rate of foreign language learning. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  30. Muñoz, C., and D. Singleton. 2011. A critical review of age-related research on L2 ultimate attainment. Language Teaching 44: 1–35.Google Scholar
  31. Navés, T. 2009. The ‘long-term’ effects of an early start on the learning of English as a foreign language. Paper presented at the AAAL 2009, Denver, Colorado.Google Scholar
  32. Nikolov, M. 2000. The Critical Period Hypothesis reconsidered: Successful adult learners of Hungarian and English. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 38: 109–124.Google Scholar
  33. Niżegorodcew, A. 2007. Input for instructed L2 learners. The relevance of relevance. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  34. Ó Murchú, H. 2001. Irish: The Irish language in education in the Republic of Ireland. Leeuwarden: Mercator.Google Scholar
  35. Ó Murchú, M. 1985. The Irish language. Dublin: Department of Foreign Affairs and Bord na Gaeilge.Google Scholar
  36. Ó Riagáin, P. and M. Ó Gliasáin. 1984. The Irish language in the Republic of Ireland, 1983: Preliminary report of a national survey. Dublin: ITÉ.Google Scholar
  37. Oller, J. and N. Nagato. 1974. The long-term effect of FLES: An experiment. Modern Language Journal 58: 15–19.Google Scholar
  38. Oyama, S. 1976. A sensitive period for the acquisition of a nonnative phonological system. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 5: 261–285.Google Scholar
  39. Oyama, S. 1978. The sensitive period and comprehension of speech. Working Papers on Bilingualism 16: 1–17.Google Scholar
  40. Patkowski, M. S. 1980. The sensitive period for the acquisition of syntax in a second language. Language Learning 30: 449–472.Google Scholar
  41. Penfield, W. and L. Roberts. 1959. Speech and brain mechanisms. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Rokita, J. 2006. Comparing early L2 lexical development in naturalistic and instructional settings. In Language and identity: English and American studies in the age of globalization, eds. J. Leśniewska and E. Witalisz, 70–82. Kraków: Jagiellonian University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Singleton, D. 1995. A critical look at the Critical Period Hypothesis in second language acquisition research. In The age factor in second language acquisition, eds. D. Singleton and Z. Lengyel, 1–29. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  44. Singleton, D. and J. Leśniewska. 2012. Age and SLA: Research highways and byeways. In New perspectives on individual differences in language learning and teaching, ed. M. Pawlak, 97–114. Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
  45. Singleton, D. and L. Ryan. 2004. Language acquisition: The age factor. (second edition). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  46. Snow, C. and M. Hoefnagel-Höhle. 1978. The critical period for language acquisition: Evidence from second language learning. Child Development 49: 1114–1128.Google Scholar
  47. Spada, N. M. 2004. Interview. ReVEL Revista Virtual de Estudos de Linguagem 2: 2. Retrieved from http://planeta.terra.com.br/educacao/revel/edicoes/num_2/interview_l2.htm.
  48. Spolsky, B. 1989. Conditions for second language learning: Introduction to a general theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  49. Stern, H. H. 1983. Fundamental concepts of language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  50. Thompson, T. and M. Gaddes. 2005. The importance of teaching pronunciation to adult learners. Asian EFL Journal 2. Retrieved from http://www.asian-efl-journal.com/pta_feb_04_mgtt.php.
  51. Wieszczeczyńska, E. 2000. Dlaczego warto rozpoczynać naukę języka obcego w okresie wczesnoszkolnym? Języki Obce w Szkole 6: 6–11.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Trinity College DublinTrinity CollegeDublinIreland
  2. 2.University of AberdeenAberdeenUK

Personalised recommendations