Skip to main content

University Ecosystems Design Creative Spaces for Start-Up Experimentation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Innovation, Technology, and Knowledge Management ((ITKM))

Abstract

Religious roots marked the medieval university, alma mater of the Second Millennium higher education institutions. For centuries, the ‘ivory tower’ syndrome, a reminiscence of their monastic lineage, has affected academic institutions. Einstein said, “The intuitive mind is a sacred gift and the rational mind is a faithful servant. We have created universities (society) that honors the servant and has forgotten the gift”. This kind of thinking pervaded, limiting the scope of some universities to knowledge and student production. It seems that analysis has taken precedence over synthesis/creation (in addition to theory always taking precedence over practice). This dissonance between the work of a university and value creation was hinted at by CK Prahalad at the 2010 Global Drucker Forum when he said, “I have never seen a next practice emerge from a regression analysis”.

When the winds of change come, some people build walls, other build windmills.

Brian and Sangeeta Mayne, Founders of Lift International.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Science: from Latin scientia, meaning knowledge.

  2. 2.

    Examples are nanoscience and technology, digital contents convergence, intelligent convergence system. See the case of the Graduate School of Convergence Science and Technology at Seoul National University (http://gscst.snu.ac.kr/introduction/aboutus_eng.php).

  3. 3.

    Carayannis and Campbell (2011 ) have proposed the concepts of Quadruple and Quintuple Helix  as an extension and completion of the Triple Helix: “The traditional Triple Helix innovation model focuses on university–industry–government relations. The Quadruple Helix innovation systems bring in the perspectives of the media-based and culture-based public as well as that of civil society. The Quintuple Helixemphasizes the natural environments of society, also for the knowledge production and innovation. Therefore, the Quadruple Helixcontextualizes the Triple Helix, and the Quintuple Helix contextualizes the Quadruple Helix. Features of the Quadruple Helixare: culture (cultures) and innovation culture (innovation cultures); the knowledge of culture and the culture of knowledge; values and lifestyles; multiculturalism, multiculture, and creativity; media; arts and arts universities; and multi-level innovation systems (local, national, global), with universities of the sciences, but also universities of the arts”.

  4. 4.

    http://newsroom.intel.com/community/intel_newsroom/blog/2012/05/24/intel-invests-more-than-40-million-in-worldwide-network-of-university-research-centers-to-drive-innovation.

  5. 5.

    “A remark attributed to Peter Drucker and popularized in 2006 by Mark Fields, president of Ford Motor Company. As the Leader of Ford, Fields was keenly aware that no matter how far reaching his vision or how brilliant his strategy, neither would be realized if not supported by the culture” (see http://www.relationaldynamicsinstitute.com/?p=48).

References

  • Abramo, G., D’Angelo, C. A., Ferretti, M., & Parmentola, A. (2012). An individual-level assessment of the relationship between spin-off activities and research performance in universities. R&D Management, 42(3), 225–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersson, T., Curley, G. M., & Formica, P. (2010). Knowledge-driven entrepreneurship: The key to social and economic transformation. New York and Berlin: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Brafman, O., & Beckstrom, R.A. (2006). The starfish and the spider: The unstoppable power of leaderless organizations. Portfolio:Penguin Books. England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carayannis, E., & Campbell, D. (2011). Open innovation diplomacy and a 21st century fractal research, education and innovation (FREIE) ecosystem: Building on the quadruple and quintuple helix innovation concepts and the ‘Mode 3’ knowledge production system. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 2(3), 327–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carayannis, E., & Campbell, D. (2012). Mode 3 knowledge production in quadruple helix innovation systems: Twenty-first-century democracy, innovation, and entrepreneurship for development. New York-Berlin: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Donofrio, N.M. (2011). Innovation that matters. In Kauffman Thoughtbook 2011. Kauffman Foundation: MO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Etzkowitz, H. (2003). Innovation in innovation: The triple helix of university–government–industry telations. Social Science Information, 42(3), 293–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Etzkowitz, H. (2004). The evolution of the entrepreneurial university. International Journal of Technology and Globalisation, 1(1), 64–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Etzkowitz, H. (2008). The triple helix: University–industry–government innovation in action. New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Galavan, R., Harrington, D., Kelliher, F. (2008). A work in progress. The road to relevance 15 years on—Are we there yet? EDiNEB Conference Paper, Malaga.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., & Trow, M. (1994). The new production of knowledge: The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenward, M. (2012, August 19). Entrepreneurship and scientific research by academic scholars are not in conflict: Turning entrepreneurial doesn’t stunt academic research output. Innovation Daily.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, J. & Stern, S. (2012). The rate and direction of inventive activity revisited. The University of Chicago Press. Chicago: ILL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Aken, J. E. (2005). Management research as a design science: Articulating the research products of mode 2 knowledge production in management. British Journal of Management, 16(1), 19–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Dick, V. (2012). Building and leveraging your ecosystem to spark innovation-based growth. March/April: Ivey Business Journal.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Piero Formica .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Curley, M., Formica, P. (2013). University Ecosystems Design Creative Spaces for Start-Up Experimentation. In: Curley, M., Formica, P. (eds) The Experimental Nature of New Venture Creation. Innovation, Technology, and Knowledge Management. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-00179-1_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics