Skip to main content

Experimenting Social Constructivist Approach in Entrepreneurial Process-Based Training: Cases in Social, Creative and Technology Entrepreneurship

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Experimental Nature of New Venture Creation

Abstract

In this chapter, the authors deal with the social constructivist entrepreneurial process-based training methodology approach at venture creation across different fields as experienced by trainers moderating the learning process with both social entrepreneurs and technology entrepreneurs in traditional (handicraft) and virtual technologies. The social constructivist approach-based methodology was first developed for implementation within the framework of a venture lab-type of ecosystem/environment at the University of Tartu, Centre for Entrepreneurship. The combination of the above methodology with the venture lab environment was called Entrepreneurship Home® and registered as the trademark of the University of Tartu. Following this, the Entrepreneurship Home® methodology was incorporated into mainstream entrepreneurship courses across study programs of the university, including adult training courses.

Entrepreneurship skills should be part of literacy—3rd literacy after reading and writing, and computer proficiency.

Anzori Barkalaja

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Biggs, M. A. R. (2004). Learning from experience: approaches to the experiential component of practice-based research. In H. Karlsson (Ed.), Forskning, Reflektion, Utveckling (pp. 6–21). Stockholm: Vetenskapsrådet.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cobb, P., & Yaeckel, E. (1996). Constructivist, emergent and sociocultural perspectives in the context of developmental research. Educational Psychologist, 31(3/4), 175–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidsson, P. (2005). The entrepreneurial process as a matching problem, Academy of Management Conference, Hawaii, 5–10 August. Retrieved July 21, 2012, from http://eprints.qut.edu.au/archive/00002064/.

  • Deakins, D., O’Neill, E., & Mileham, P. (2000). Executive learning in entrepreneurial firms and the role of external directors. Education + Training, 42(4/5), 317–325.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (2009). Democracy and education: An introduction to the philosophy of education. New York: WLC Books. (Original work published 1916).

    Google Scholar 

  • Estonian Development Fund (2010, September 01). Development fund steps in with investment in earlier phase than before. News, Retrieved July 21, 2012, from http://www.arengufond.ee/engnews/investment/news1758/.

  • Guclu, A., Dees, J., & Anderson, B. B. (2002). The process of social entrepreneurship: Creating opportunities worthy of serious pursuit. CASE Working Paper Series 3, Center for the Advancement of Social Entrepreneurship, Duke University, Durham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1999). Making cooperative learning work. Theory into Practice, 38(2), 67–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kibena, K. (2012). Interview, by Raudsaar, M., June 28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kickul, J., Gundry, L. K., Barbosa, S. D., & Whitcanack, L. (2009). Intuition versus analysis? Testing differential models of cognitive style on entrepreneurial self-efficacy and the new venture creation process, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33, 439–453.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knowles, M. S. (1990). The adult learner: a neglected species (4th ed.). Houston: Gulf Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: experience as the source of learning and development. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolb, D. A., Boyatzis, R., & Mainemelis, C. (2000). Experiential learning theory: previous research and new directions. In R. J. Sternberg & L. F. Zhang (Eds.), Perspectives on cognitive, learning, and thinking styles. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, K. (1951). Field theory in social science. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mets, T. (2009). Creating global business model for knowledge-intensive SMEs: The small transition country cases. Economics and Management, 14, 466–475.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mets, T. (2012). Creative business model innovation for globalizing SMEs. In T. Burger-Helmchen (Ed.), Entrepreneurship: Creativity and Innovative Business Models. Rijeka: InTech. Retrieved from: http://www.intechopen.com/books/entrepreneurship-creativity-and-innovative-business-models/creative-business-model-innovation-for-globalizing-smes.

  • Niedderer, K. & Imani, Y. (2008). Developing a framework for managing tacit knowledge in research using knowledge management models. In Undisciplined! Proceedings of the Design Research Society Conference 2008. Sheffield: Sheffield Hallam University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I., Toyama, R., & Konno, N. (2000). SECI, ba, and leadership: a unified model of dynamic knowledge creation. Long Range Planning, 33(1), 5–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oinus, M. (2012) Interview, by Raudsaar, M., June 15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. (1966). Psychology of intelligence. Totowa: Littlefield Adams.

    Google Scholar 

  • Politis, D. (2005). The process of entrepreneurial learning: a conceptual framework. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29(4), 399–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, C. & Freiberg, H. J. (1994). Freedom to learn (3rd ed.). New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossman, G.R. & Rallis, S.F. (1998). Learning in the field. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarasvathy, S.D. (2008) Effectuation: elements of entrepreneurial expertise. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarasvathy, S.D., Dew, N., Velamuri, S.R., & Venkataraman, S. (2005). Three views of entrepreneurial opportunity. International Handbook Series on Entrepreneurship, 1(Part 3), 141–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schön, D. (1983). Educating the reflective practitioner: how professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scrivener, S. A. R. (2006). Visual art practice reconsidered: transformational practice and the academy. In M. Mäkelä & S. Routarinne (Eds.), The Art of Research (A 73). Research Practices in Art and Design (pp. 157–179). Helsinki: Publication Series of the University of Art and Design.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shane, S. (2000). Prior knowledge and the discovery of entrepreneurial opportunities. Organization Science, 11(4), 448–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaver, K. G., & Scott, L. R. (1991). Person, process, choice: the psychology of new venture creation. Journal of Small Business & Enterprise Development, 16(2), 23–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sportlyzer (2010). The Next Generation Private Trainer. Retrieved March 25, 2011, from http://www.sportlyzer.com/.

  • Sportlyzer (2012) About Us, Retrieved July 21, 2012, from https://www.sportlyzer.com/.

  • Storkerson, P. (2009). Experiential knowledge, knowing and thinking. EKSIG 2009: Experiential Knowledge, Method and Methodology 19 June 2009. Retrieved July 21, 2012, from http://www.experientialknowledge.org.uk/proceedings_speakers_files/Storkerson.pdf.

  • Vygotskii, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: the development of higher mental processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the support offered by the Estonian Ministry of Education’s project SF 0180037s08 and CB INTERREG IVA projects CREAENT and ENTREINT, and ESF HRD Programme Measure 1.3.1 project No. 1.3.0102.09-0036 “Handicraft for Job 2”.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tõnis Mets .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mets, T., Raudsaar, M., Summatavet, K. (2013). Experimenting Social Constructivist Approach in Entrepreneurial Process-Based Training: Cases in Social, Creative and Technology Entrepreneurship. In: Curley, M., Formica, P. (eds) The Experimental Nature of New Venture Creation. Innovation, Technology, and Knowledge Management. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-00179-1_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics