Abstract
Constructing thousands of architectural structures and developing sophisticated concepts surrounding the disciplines of astronomy and mathematics, the Maya civilization rose to a cultural florescence between the years 600 and 800 ad, and died out between 800 and 900 ad. In order to gain an interpretative perspective on the fractal analysis of complex geometry and mathematics of Mesoamerican architecture, this paper contemplates two procedures to describe fractality and the fractal dimension. In the first procedure 16 pyramids were analyzed. The authors studied a data set that was treated has a fractal profile to estimated the fractal dimension through variography. In the second procedure, 14 pyramids were included. In the third procedure, 26 pyramids were deciphered and saved as bitmap files. These images were analyzed with the program “Benoit” in order to calculate Box, Information and the Mass Dimensions. This type of study indicates a relationship between the cosmological setting and myth.
First published as: Gerardo Burkle-Elizondo , Nicoletta Sala and Ricardo David Valdez-Cepeda , “Geometric and Complex Analyses of Maya Architecture: Some Examples” pp. 57–68 in Nexus V: Architecture and Mathematics, Kim Williams and Francisco Delgado Cepeda, eds. Fucecchio (Florence): Kim Williams Books, 2004.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
The measurements are approximations of the actual, and the measurements and plans of reference for our calculations were taken from (Marquina 1990).
References
Aveni, A. F. 1997. Observadores del Cielo en el México Antiguo. México City: Fondo de Cultura Económica–CONACULTA.
Broda, J. and Báez, J. F. 2001. La etnografía de la fiesta de la Santa Cruz: una perspectiva histórica. Pp. 165-238 in Cosmovisión, ritual e identidad de los pueblos indígenas de México. México City: Fondo de Cultura Económica–CONACULTA.
Broda, J. 1991. Arqueoastronomía y Etnoastronomía en Mesoamérica. México City: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.
———. 2001. Stanislaw Iwaniszewski and Raúl Carlos Aranda Monroy. La Montaña en el paisaje ritual. México City: CONACULTA. INAH. UNAM. UAP.
Burkle-Elizondo, G. and Valdéz Cepeda, R. 2001. Do The Artistic and Architectural Works Have Fractal Dimension? Pp. 431-432 in M. N. Miroslav, ed. Emergent Nature. Patterns, Growth and Scaling in the Sciences. Singapore: World Scientific.
Burkle-Elizondo, G., Valdéz Cepeda, R. and Sala, N. 2003. Complexity in the Mesoamerican Artistic and Architectural Works. P. 18 in Proceedings of International Nonlinear Sciences Conference: Research and Applications in the Life Sciences, H. Haken, ed. Vienna: INSC.
De La Fuente, B. 1984. Los Hombres de Piedra. México City: Escultura Olmeca. UNAM.
Freidel, D., Schele, L. and Parker, J. 1999. El Cosmos Maya. México City: Fondo de Cultura Económica–CONACULTA.
Garcés Contreras, G. 1995. Pensamiento Matemático y Astronómico en el México Precolombino. México City: Instituto Politécnico Nacional.
Harleston, H. Jr. 1974. A Mathematical Analysis of Teotihuacan. Proceedings of XLI International Congress of Americanists. México City: Comision de Publicacion de las Actas y Memorias.
Hartung, H. 1980. Arquitectura y planificación entre los antiguos mayas: posibilidades y limitaciones para los estudios astronómicos. Pp. 145-167 in A. Aveni, ed. Astronomía en la América Antigua. México City: Siglo XXI.
Lhuillier, A. L. 1992. El Templo de las Inscripciones: Palenque. México City: Fondo de Cultura Económica–CONACULTA.
López-Austin, A. 1994. Tamoanchan y Tlalocan. México City: Fondo de Cultura Económica–CONACULTA.
Mangino Tazzer, A. 1996. Arquitectura Mesoamericana. México City: Editorial Trillas.
Marquina, I. 1990. Arquitectura Prehispánica. México City: Instituto Nacional de Antropología e Historia.
Martínez del Sobral, M. 2000. Geometría Mesoamericana. México City: Fondo de Cultura Económica–CONACULTA.
Matos Moctezuma, E. 1981. The Great Temple of Tenochtitlan: Model of Aztec Cosmovisión. Pp. 71-86 in E. P. Benson, ed. Mesoamerican Sites and World Views, Washington D.C.: Dumbarton Oaks.
Mora-Echeverría, J. I. 1984. Prácticas y Conceptos Prehispánicos sobre espacio y tiempo: a propósito del origen del calendario ritual mesoamericano. Boletín de Antropología Americana, 9 (July): pp. 5- 46. México City: Instituto Panamericano de Geografía e Histoira.
Schele, L. and Freidel, D. 1999. Una Selva de Reyes. La Asombrosa Historia de los Antiguos Mayas. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica–CONACULTA.
Thompson, J. and Eric, S. 1950. Maya Hieroglyphic Writing. Carnegie Institute of Washington, pub. 589. Washington D.C.: Carnegie Institute of Washington.
Trejo, G. J. 1994. Arqueoastronomía en la América Antigua. México City: CONACYT Ed. Equipo Sirius S.A.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Burkle-Elizondo, G., Sala, N., Valdez-Cepeda, R.D. (2015). Geometric and Complex Analyses of Maya Architecture: Some Examples. In: Williams, K., Ostwald, M. (eds) Architecture and Mathematics from Antiquity to the Future. Birkhäuser, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-00137-1_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-00137-1_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Birkhäuser, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-00136-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-00137-1
eBook Packages: Mathematics and StatisticsMathematics and Statistics (R0)