Skip to main content

Quasi-Periodicity in Islamic Geometric Design

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Architecture and Mathematics from Antiquity to the Future

Abstract

For nearly 150 years, scholars have analyzed the symmetries of Islamic ornamental designs, constituting the most highly developed chapter in cultural symmetry studies. Yet these studies hardly exhaust the mathematically significant properties of Islamic designs. Over the past 30 years, mathematicians have given increasing attention to “quasi-periodic” geometric structures (such as the Penrose tilings) which exhibit infinite repetition of their bounded subparts and crystallographically forbidden symmetries, occupying an important niche between random and highly ordered, periodic structures. This chapter provides a critical review of the literature and argues that the dualization of quasi-periodic tiling fragments from two designs from twelfth- and fifteenth-century Iran helps to inform their aesthetic complexity.

First published as: Peter Saltzman , “Quasi-Periodicity in Islamic Geometric Design”. Pp. 153–168 in Nexus VII: Architecture and Mathematics, Kim Williams, ed. Turin: Kim Williams Books, 2008.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For a general introduction to the cultural applications of symmetry studies, see Crowe and Washburn (1991).

  2. 2.

    Good introductions to the symmetries of Islamic geometric designs include the delightful book by Fenoll Hach-Alí and Galindo (2003) and the more comprehensive work by Abas and Salman (1995).

  3. 3.

    Several works analyse the orbit structure of Islamic designs in this manner, including Grünbaum and Shepherd (1986); Abas and Salman (1995); Ostromoukhov (1998).

  4. 4.

    Discussions of this technique may be found in Hankin (1925, 1934); Wade (1976); Bonner (2003); Kaplan (2005).

  5. 5.

    An extensive discussion may be found in Bonner (2000).

  6. 6.

    See, for example, Grünbaum and Shepherd (1987: Chap. 1).

  7. 7.

    Good introductions to this subject may be found in Grünbaum and Shepherd (1987) and Senechal (1995).

  8. 8.

    An interesting discussion of Birkhoff measures relevant to these remarks is found in Rigau et al. (2007). A study of the Kolmogorov complexity of finite subsets of tilings of the plane is found in Durand et al. (2008).

  9. 9.

    Similar views are expressed in Arnheim (1971).

  10. 10.

    Such designs have been produced by Rigby (2006).

  11. 11.

    Aspects of the M2 tilings later appeared in high resolution transmission electron microscopy of aluminium cobalt nickel alloys; see Cervellino et al. (2002).

  12. 12.

    For further discussion of inflation tilings, see Senechal (1995: Chap. 5).

  13. 13.

    The Gunbad-i Kabud has deteriorated, and thus the original design is obscured in parts. Lu and Steinhardt (2007a: Fig. S6) had pointed out that the lower portion of the original reconstruction given in Makovicky (1992) was incorrect. Emil Makovicky has carefully reconstructed the design based on his inspection of the building (Makovicky 2009).

  14. 14.

    Although not addressed in Bonner (2003), the subdivisions he uses are in fact part of a set of inflation rules that can also establish the quasi-periodicity of a segment of this design. Those inflation rules, however, require a subdivision rule for the narrow rhomb and one for an extra pentagon, and require more complex matching rules than those used by Lu and Steinhardt.

  15. 15.

    The large scale dual design from Darb-i Imam appears in multiple guises at many other sites with explicit periodic repetition, though it does not do so in the spandrel studied by Lu and Steinhardt. See Arik and Sancak (2007) and Cromwell (2009).

  16. 16.

    Castera (1999) has claimed that projections of three-dimensional Islamic “Muqarnas” are quasi-periodic, although Makovicky and Fenoll Hach-Ali (2001) have reached contrary conclusions.

References

  • Abas, S. J. and A. Salman.1995. Symmetries of Islamic Geometrical Patterns. Singapore: World Scientific.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Arik, M. and M. Sancak 2007. Turkish-Islamic Art and Penrose Tilings. Balkan Physics Letters 15, 3: 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnheim, R. 1971. Entropy and Art, an Essay on Disorder and Order. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonner, J. F. 2000. Islamic Geometric Patterns: Their Historical Development and Traditional Methods of Derivation. New York: Springer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • ___. 2003. Three Traditions of Self-Similarity in Fourteenth and Fifteenth Century Islamic Geometric Ornament. Pp. 1–12 in R. Sarhangi and N. Friedman, eds. ISAMA/Bridges 2003 Proceedings. Granada: University of Granada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourgoin, J. 1879. Les Elements de l’Art Arabe: Le Trait des Entrelacs. Paris, Firmin-Didot et Cie. English trans. 1971. Arabic Geometrical Pattern and Design. New York: Dover.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butterfield, H. 1931. The Whig Interpretation of History. London: Bell and Sons. Rpt. 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castera, J. 1999. Zellijs, Muqarnas and Quasicrystals. Pp. 99–104 in N. Friedman and J. Barrallo, eds. ISAMA 99. San Sebastian: University of the Basque Country.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cervellino A., T. Haibach, and W. Steurer. 2002. Structure Solution of the Basic Decagonal Al-Co-Ni Phase by the Atomic Surfaces Modelling Method. Acta Crystallographica B58: 8–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cromwell, P. R. 2009. The Search for Quasi-Periodicity in Islamic 5-Fold Ornament. The Mathematical Intelligencer 31, 1: 36-56.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Crowe, D.W. and D. K. Washburn. 1991. Symmetries of Culture: Theory and Practice of Plane Pattern Analysis. Seattle: University of Washington Press.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Durand, B., L. Levin, and A. Shen. 2008. Complex Tilings. Journal of Symbolic Logic 73, 2: 593–613.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Fenoll Hach-Alí, P. and A. L. Galindo. 2003. Science, Beauty and Intuition, Symmetry in the Alhambra. Granada: University of Granada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gähler, F. and J. Rhyner1986. Equivalence of the Generalised Grid and Projection Methods for the Construction of Quasiperiodic Tilings. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General 19, 2: 267–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gombrich, E. H. 1979. The Sense of Order: A Study in the Psychology of Decorative Art. London: Phaidon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goury, J. and Jones, O. 1842–1845. Plans, Sections, Elevations and Details of the Alhambra. London: Owen Jones.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grünbaum, B. and Shepherd, G. C. 1986. Symmetry in Moorish and Other Ornaments. Computers and Mathematics with Applications 12B, 3–4: 641–653.

    Google Scholar 

  • ___. 1987. Tilings and Patterns. San Francisco: WH. Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • ___. 1992. Interlace Patterns in Islamic and Moorish Art. Leonardo 25, 3-4: 331–339.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hankin, E. H. 1925. Examples of Methods of Drawing Geometrical Arabesque Patterns. The Mathematical Gazette 12: 371–373.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hankin, E. H. 1934. Some Difficult Saracenic Designs II. The Mathematical Gazette 18: 165–168.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, C. S. 2005. Islamic Star Patterns from Polygons in Contact. Pp. 177–186 in GI ‘05: Proceedings of the 2005 Conference on Graphics Interface. Victoria: British Columbia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu, P. J. and Steinhardt. P. J. 2007a. Decagonal and Quasi-Crystalline Tilings in Medieval Islamic Architecture. Science 315: 1106–1110.

    Google Scholar 

  • ___. 2007b. Response to Comment on “Decagonal and Quasi-Crystalline Tilings in Medieval Islamic Architecture”. Science 318: 1383b.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lück, R. 2000. Dürer-Kepler-Penrose, the Development of Pentagon Tilings. Materials Science and Engineering 294-296: 263–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Makovicky, E. 1992. 800-Year-Old Pentagonal Tiling From Maragha, Iran, and the New Varieties of Aperiodic Tiling it Inspired. Pp. 67–86 in I. Hargittai, ed. Fivefold Symmetry. Singapore: World Scientific.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • ___. 2009. Another look at the Blue Tomb of Maragha, a site of the first quasicrystalline Islamic pattern. Symmetry: Culture and Science 19: 127-151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Makovicky. E. and Fenoll Hach-Alí. P. 1996. Mirador de Lindaraja: Islamic Ornamental Patterns Based on Quasi-Periodic Octagonal Lattices in Alhambra, Granada and Alcazar, Sevilla, Spain. Boletín de la Sociedad Española de Mineralogía 19: 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • ___. 1997. Brick and Marble Ornamental Patterns from the Great Mosque and the Madinat al-Zahra Palace in Cordoba, Spain I. Boletín de la Sociedad Española de Mineralogía 20: 1–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • ___. 1999. Coloured Symmetry in the Mosaics of Alhambra, Granada. Boletín de la Sociedad Española de Mineralogía 22: 143–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • ___. 2001. The Stalactite Dome of the Sala de Dos Hermanas – an Octagonal Tiling? Boletín de la Sociedad Española de Mineralogía 24: 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Makovicky, E., F. Rull Perez, and P. Fenoll Hach-Alí. 1998. Decagonal Patterns in the Islamic Ornamental Art of Spain and Morocco. Boletín de la Sociedad Española de Mineralogía 21: 107–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Necipoğlü, G. 1995. The Topkapi Scroll: Geometry and Ornament in Islamic Architecture. Santa Monica: Getty Center for the History of Art and Humanities.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostromoukhov, V. 1998. Mathematical Tools for Computer-Generated Ornamental Patterns. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 1375: 193–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Özdural, A. 2000. Mathematics and Arts: Connections between Theory and Practice in the Medieval Islamic World. Historia Mathematica 27: 171–201.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Penrose, R. 1974. The Role of Aesthetics in Pure and Applied Mathematical Research. The Institute of Mathematics and its Applications 7/8, 10: 266–271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rigau, J., M. Feixas, and M. Sbert. 2007. Conceptualizing Birkhoff’s Aesthetic Measure Using Shannon Entropy and Kolmogorov Complexity. Pp. 1–8 in D. W. Cunningham, et al., eds. Computational Aesthetics in Graphics, Visualization and Imaging. Banff: Eurographics Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rigby, J. 2006. Creating Penrose-type Islamic Interlacing Patterns. Pp. 41–48 in R. Sarhangi and J. Sharp, eds. Bridges 2006 Conference Proceedings. London: University of London

    Google Scholar 

  • Saliba, G. 2007. Islamic Science and the Making of the European Renaissance. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Senechal, M. 1995. Quasicrystals and Geometry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Wade, D. 1976. Pattern in Islamic Art. London: Overlook Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

I would like to thank Emil Makovicky , Peter Lu and Peter Cromwell for sharing their work with me and for helpful comments on an earlier draft of this text.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter Saltzman .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Saltzman, P. (2015). Quasi-Periodicity in Islamic Geometric Design. In: Williams, K., Ostwald, M. (eds) Architecture and Mathematics from Antiquity to the Future. Birkhäuser, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-00137-1_39

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics