Skip to main content

Luhmann’s View of Social Autopoietic Systems

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Knowledge Production in Organizations
  • 1030 Accesses

Abstract

Social systems theory is inextricably linked to Niklas Luhman (1927–1998) who is without a doubt one of the most influential social theorists of the last century. Over the years, Luhmann published on a variety of societal topics such as art, ecology, economy, education, law, love, mass media, politics, religion, and science. Organizations were of major interest to Luhmann. He never lost sight of organizations as a particular instance of social systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Åkeström Andersen, N. (2003). The undecidability of decision. In T. Bakken & T. Hernes (Eds.), Autopoietic organization theory: Drawing on Niklas Luhmann’s social systems perspective pp. 235–258). Oslo: Abstrakt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, R. (2005). Relationality. Organization studies, 26(11), 1689–1710.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hernes, T. (2008). Understanding organization as process: Theory for a Tangled World. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Husserl, E. (1948). Erfahrung und Urteil: Untersuchungen zur Genealogie der Logik [Experience and opinion: Studies on genealogy of logic]. Hamburg: Claassen & Goverts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Husserl, E. (1950). Ideen zu einer Phänomenologie und phänomenologishen Philosophie [Thoughts about a phenomenology and phenomenological philosophy], Husserliana, 3. The Hague: Nijhoff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhman, N. (1990). The autopoiesis of social systems. In N. Luhmann (Ed.), Essays of self-reference pp. 1–20). New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N. (1986). The autopoiesis of social systems. In F. Geyer & J. van der Zouwen (Eds.), Sociocybernetic paradoxes pp. 172–192). Beverly Hills: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N. (1989). Law as a social system. Northwestern University Law Review, 83, 136–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N. (1992). Ecological communication. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N. (1995a). Social systems. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N. (1995b). Gesellschaftsstruktur und Semantik 4: Studien zur Wissenssoziologie der modernen Gesellschaft [Structure of society and semantic 4: Studies on knowledge-sociology of modern society]. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N. (2000). Organization und Entscheidung [Organization and decision]. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N. (2002). Organization. In T. Bakken & T. Hernes (Eds.), Autopoietic organization theory: Drawing on Niklas Luhmann’s social systems perspective pp. 31–52). Oslo: Abstrakt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maturana, H. R. (2002). Autopoiesis, structural coupling and cognition. Cybernetics & Human Knowing, 9(3–4), 5–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maturana, H. R., & Varela, F. J. (1980). Autopoiesis and cognition: The realization of the living. London: D. Reidel Publishing Co.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mingers, J. (1995). Self-producing systems: Implications and applications of autopoiesis. New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pihlanto, P. (2005). From economic man to the holistic individual: A quest for a realistic notion of the human actor. In S. Tengblad, R. Solli, & B. Czarniawska (Eds.), The art of science pp. 87–110). Copenhagen: Liber & Copenhagen Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seidl, D. (2005). Organizational identity and self-transformation: An autopoietic perspective. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seidl, D., & Becker, K. H. (2005). Niklas Luhmann and organization studies. Oslo: Liber & Copenhagen Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. A. (1957). Models of man – Social and rational: Mathematical essays on rational human behavior in a social setting. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Usher, R. S. (1989). Locating experience in language: Towards a poststructuralist theory of experience. Adult Education Quarterly, 40(1), 23–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Foerster, H. (1991). Observing systems. California: Intersystems Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Pres.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, R., & Letch, N. (2003). Knowledge contexts: Through the theoretical lens of Niklas Luhmann. In 7th Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems, 10–13 July 2003, Adelaide, South Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jönhill, J. I. (1997). Samhället som system och dess ekologiska omvärld. En studie Niklas Luhmanns sociologiska systemteori [Society as system and its ecological environment. A study about Niklas Luhmann’s sociological systems theory]. Lund: Lund University.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Koskinen, K.U. (2013). Luhmann’s View of Social Autopoietic Systems. In: Knowledge Production in Organizations. Springer, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-00104-3_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics