Advertisement

Theoretical Framework

  • Jon ShaneEmail author
Chapter
Part of the SpringerBriefs in Criminology book series (BRIEFSCRIMINOL)

Abstract

This case is described in terms of James Reason’s organizational accident framework. An organizational accident is a confluence of human, situational and other contextual circumstances that combine and breach established organizational defenses that have been erected to guard against certain hazards, when breached.

Keywords

Police Officer Active Failure Perceptual Error Inadequate Staffing Community Sentiment 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Reason, J. (1997). Managing the risks of organizational accidents. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Reason, J. (1998). Achieving a safe culture. Work Stress, 12, 293–306.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hara, P. O’. (2005). Why law enforcement organizations fail: Mapping the organizational fault lines in policing, at 15. Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dewar, A. J. (1993). Assumption-based planning: A tool for reducing avoidable surprises. Santa Monica, Ca: Rand.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ramanujam, R., & Goodman, P. S. (2003). Latent errors and adverse organizational consequences: A conceptualization. Journal of Organizational Behaviour, 24, 815–836.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Goh, Y., Love, P., Brown, H., & Spickett, J. (2012). Organizational accidents: A systemic model of production versus protection. Journal of Organizational Behaviour, 49, 52–76.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Iannone, N. F. (1987). Supervision of police personnel (4th ed., pp. 24–25). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Schroeder, D. J., Lombardo, F., & Strollo, J. (1995). Management and supervision of law enforcement (pp. 34–35). Binghampton, NY: Gould Publications.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kappeler, V. E. (1997). Critical issues in police civil liability (2nd ed., pp. 425–435). Long Grove, IL: Waveland.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wilson, J. Q. (1968). Varieties of police behavior (pp. 161–171). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chappell, T., MacDonald, J. M., Manz, P. W., & Spickett, J. (2006). The organizational determinants of police arrest decisions. Crime & Delinquency, 52, 287–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Isenberg, D. J. (1981). Some effects of time pressure on vertical structure and decision-making accuracy in small groups. Organizational Behaviour Human Performance, 27, 119–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kelly, J. R., & McGrath, J. E. (1985). Effects of time limits and task types on task performance and interaction of four-person groups. Journal of Personnel Social Psychology, 49, 395–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Reason, J. (1990). Human error (pp. 631–640). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rasmussen, J. (1982). Human errors: A taxonomy for describing human malfunction in industrial installations. Journal of Occupational Accidents, 4, 311–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Shappel, S. A., & Wiegman, D. A. (2000). The human factors analysis and classification system–HFACS (pp. 1–15). Washington, D.C.: Federal Aviation Administration.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Orasanu, J. (1993). Decision-making in the cockpit. In E. L. Wiener, B. G. Kanki, & R. L. Helmreich (Eds.), Cockpit resource management (pp. 137–172). U.S.A.: Academic.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Law, Police Science and Criminal Justice AdministrationJohn Jay College of Criminal JusticeNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations