Advertisement

Other Useful Modeling and Simulation Techniques

  • Wojciech Blajer
Chapter
  • 1.8k Downloads
Part of the CISM International Centre for Mechanical Sciences book series (CISM, volume 511)

Abstract

In this chapter, two other useful modeling and simulation methodologies are presented, which complement the classical codes reported in Chapters 5 and 6, and, to some extent, augment the tools of analysis of multibody systems and the range of applications. The augmented Lagrangian formulation provides one with an alternative computationally efficient numerical code for simulation of multibody systems described in terms of dependent states and implicitly given constraint equations, with the application area extended over some limitations that burden the other formulations of this type. The augmented joint coordinate method supplements the classical joint coordinate code for open-loop systems with an effective and naturally assisted scheme for the determination of joint reactions, with some extensions to closed-loop systems as well.

Keywords

Multibody System Redundant Constraint Multibody System Dynamics Penalty Formulation Constraint Reaction 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Arnold, V. Mathematical Methods of Classical Mechanics. Springer, New York, New York, 1989.Google Scholar
  2. Bayo, E., García de Jalón, J., Avello, A., and Cuadrado J. An efficient computational method for real time multibody dynamic simulation in fully Cartesian coordinates. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 92, 377–395, 1991.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bayo, E., García de Jalón, J., and Serna, M.A. A modified Lagrangian formulation for the dynamic analysis of constrained mechanical systems. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 71, 183–195, 1988.zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  4. Bayo, E., and Ledesma, R. Augmented Lagrangian and mass-orthogonal projection methods for constrained multibody dynamics. Nonlinear Dynamics, 9, 113–130, 1996.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  5. Blajer, W. Augmented Lagrangian formulation: geometrical interpretation and application to systems with singularities and redundancy. Multibody System Dynamics, 8, 141–159, 2002.zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  6. Blajer, W. On the determination of joint reactions in multibody mechanisms. Journal of Mechanical Design, 126, 341–350, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Blajer, W., and Czaplicki A. Contact modeling and identification of planar somersaults on the trampoline. Multibody System Dynamics, 10, 289–312, 2003.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Blajer, W., Dziewiecki, K., and Mazur Z. Multibody modeling of human body for the inverse dynamics analysis of sagittal plane movements. Multibody System Dynamics, 18, 217–232, 2007.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Campbell, S.L., and Meyer C.D. Generalized Inverses of Linear Transformations. Pitman, London, Unted Kingdom, 1979.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. Cuadrado, J., Cardenal, J., Bayo, E. Modeling and simulation methods for efficient real-time simulation of multibody dynamics. Multibody System Dynamics, 1, 259–280, 1997.zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  11. García de Jalón, J., and Bayo, E. Kinematic and Dynamic Simulation of Multibody Systems: the Real-Time Challenge. Springer-Verlag, New York, New York, 1994.Google Scholar
  12. Kane, T.R., and Levinson, D.A. Dynamics: Theory and Applications. McGraw-Hill, New York, New York, 1985.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© CISM, Udine 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Wojciech Blajer
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Applied Mechanics, Faculty of Mechanical EngineeringTechnical University of RadomRadomPoland

Personalised recommendations