Advertisement

Distributed Deformation: a Finite Element Method

  • Jorge Ambrósio
Chapter
Part of the CISM International Centre for Mechanical Sciences book series (CISM, volume 511)

Abstract

The finite element method has been established as the most important computational procedure to describe deformations of structural systems. But, the limitation of the finite element method to describe large deformations accurately is also well known. The use of multibody dynamics is the most general and accurate computational methodology to describe the large relative rotations of the systems components. The use of the finite element method in the framework of multibody dynamics leads to the ability to model flexible multibody systems that not only describe the large gross motion of the system components but also their deformations, as those shown in Figure 17.1. Finite element based approaches to describe flexible multibody systems, experiencing small and large deformations and the formulation of kinematic joints are discussed here. Several examples are introduced to be used, later, in optimization of flexible multibody systems.
Figure 17.1.

Selected systems in which the flexibility plays important roles (a) Robot; (b) Road vehicle; (c) Train pantograph

Keywords

Multibody System Absolute Nodal Coordinate Formulation Kinematic Joint Flexible Body Flexible Multibody System 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ambrósio, J. Elastic-Plastic Large Deformations of Flexible Multibody Systems In Crash Analysis. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, 1991.Google Scholar
  2. Ambrósio, J., and Nikravesh, P. Elastic-plastic deformations in multibody dynamics, Nonlinear Dynamics, 3, 85–104, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ambrósio, J., and Pereira, M. Flexibility in Multibody Dynamics with Applications to Crashworthiness, In: Computer Aided Analysis of Rigid and Flexible Multibody Systems. Pereira, M., and Ambrósio, J. (Eds.), Kluwer Academic Publisher, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 199–232, 1994.Google Scholar
  4. Ambrósio, J. Dynamics of structures undergoing gross motion and nonlinear deformations: a multibody approach. Computer & Structures, 59(6), 1001–1012, 1996.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ambrósio, J., and Gonçalves, J. Complex flexible multibody systems with application to vehicle dynamics. Multibody Systems Dynamics, 6(2), 163–182, 2001.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ambrósio, J. Efficient kinematic joints descriptions for flexible multibody systems experienceing linear and non-linear deformations. Int J Nume Meths in Engng, 56, 1771–1793, 2003.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Anantharaman, M., and Hiller, M. Numerical simulation of mechanical systems using methods for differential-algebraic equations. Int J Nume Methods in Engng, 32, 1531–1542, 1991.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Banerjee, A.K., and Nagarajan, S. Efficient simulation of large overall motion of nonlinearly elastic beams. In. Proc. of ESA Int. Workshop on Advanced Mathematical Methods in the Dynamics of Flexible Bodies. ESA, Noordwijk, The Netherlands, June 3–5, 3–23, 1996.Google Scholar
  9. Bathe, K.-J., and Bolourchi, S. Large displacement analysis of three-dimensional beam structures. Int J Nume Methods in Engng, 14, 961–986, 1979.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Belytschko, T., and Hsieh, B.J. Nonlinear transient finite element analysis with convected coordinates. Int J Nume Methods in Engng, 7, 255–271, 1973.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cardona, A., and Geradin, M. A beam finite element non linear theory with finite rotations. Int. J. Nume Methods in Engng, 26, 2403–2438, 1988.zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  12. Cavin, R.K., and Dusto, A.R. Hamilton’s principle: finite element methods and flexible body dynamics. AIAA Journal, 15(12), 1684–1690, 1977.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chang, B., and Shabana, A., Nonlinear finite element formulation for large displacement analysis of plates. ASME J. Appl. Mech, 57, 707–718, 1990.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chu, S.-C., and Pan, K.C. Dynamic response of a high-speed slider-crank mechanism with an elastic connecting rod. ASME J. Engineering for Industry, B97 542–550, 1975.Google Scholar
  15. Erdman, A., and Sandor, G. Kineto-elastodynamics — a review of the state of the art and trends. Mech. Mach. Theory, 7, 19–33, 1972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Geradin, M., and Cardona, A. A modelling of superelements in mechanism analysis, Int. J. Nume Methods in Engng, 32, 1565–1594, 1991.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Geradin, M. Advanced methods in flexible multibody dynamics: review of element formulations and reduction methods. In: Proc. of ESA Int. Workshop on Adv. Math Methods in the Dynamics of Flexible Bodies. ESA, Noordwijk, Netherlands, June 3–5, 83–106, 1996.Google Scholar
  18. Gonçalves, J., and Ambrósio, J. Advanced modelling of flexible multibody systems using virtual bodies. In: Proceedings of the NATO-ARW on Computational Aspects of Nonlinear Structural Systems with Large Rigid Body Motion., Ambrósio, J., and Kleiber, M. (Eds.), Pultusk, Poland, July 2–7, 359–374, 2000.Google Scholar
  19. Gonçalves, J., and Ambrósio, J. Advanced modeling of flexible multibody dynamics using virtual bodies. Comp. Assisted Mechanics and Engng Sciences, 9(3), 373–390, 2002.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. Kane, T., Ryan, R., and Banerjee, A. Dynamics of cantilever beam attached to a moving base. AIAA J of Guidance Control and Dynamics, 10, 139–151, 1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lowen, G., and Chassapis, C. Elastic behavior of linkages: an update. Mech. Mach. Theory, 21, 33–42, 1986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Meijaard, J.P. Validation of flexible beam elements in dynamics programs. Nonlinear Dynamics, 9, 21–36, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Meirovitch, L., and Nelson, H. On the high-spin motion of a satellite containing elastic parts. Journal of Spacecrafts and Rockets, 3, 1597–1602, 1966.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Melzer, F. Symbolisch-numerische Modellierung Elastischer Mehrkorpersysteme mit Answendung auf Rechnerische Lebensdauervorhrsagen. PhD. Thesis, University of Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany, 1994.Google Scholar
  25. Melzer, F. Symbolic computations in flexible multibody systems. Nonlinear Dynamics, 9, 147–163, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Modi, V.J., Suleman, A., and Ng, A.C. An approach to dynamics and control of orbiting flexible structures. Int J Nume Methods in Engng, 32, 1727–1748, 1991.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Nikravesh, P., and Lin, Y.-S. Body reference frames in deformable multibody systems. Int. J. for Multiscale Computational Engineering, 1, 1615–1683, 2003.Google Scholar
  28. Pereira, M., and Proença, P. Dynamic analysis of spatial flexible multibody systems using joint co-ordinates. Int J Nume Methods in Engng, 32, 1799–1812, 1991.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Shabana, A. Dynamic Analysis of Large Scale Inertia Variant Flexible Mechanisms. Ph.D. Thesis, Iowa City, Iowa: University of Iowa, 1982.Google Scholar
  30. Shabana, A. Dynamics of Multibody Systems. John Wiley & New York, New York, 1989.Google Scholar
  31. Shabana, A., and Wehage, R. A coordinate reduction technique for transient amalysis os spatial structures with large angular rotations. J. of Struct. Mech., 11, 401–431, 1989.Google Scholar
  32. Shabana, A. Definition of the slopes and the finite element absolute nodal coordinate formulation. Multibody System Dynamics, 1, 339–348, 1997.zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  33. Simo, J.C., and Vu-Quoc, L. On the dynamics in space of rods undergoing large motions — a geometrically exact approach. Comp. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng, 66, 125–161, 1988.zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  34. Song, J., and Haug, E.J. Dynamic analysis of planar flexible mechanisms. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 24, 359–381, 1980.zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  35. Spanos, J. and Tsuha, W., Selection of component modes for flexible multibody simulation, J. Guidance, Control and Dynamics, 14, 278–286, 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Thompson, B., and Sung, G. Survey of finite element techniques for mechanism design. Mech. Mach. Theory, 21, 351–359, 1986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Yoo, W.S., and Haug, E.J. Dynamics of flexible mechanical systems using vibration and static correction modes. ASME J. of Mech, Trans and Autom in Design, 108, 315–322, 1986.Google Scholar
  38. Wallrapp, O., and Schwertassek, R. Representation of Geometric stiffening in multibody system simulation. Int. J. Nume. Methods Engng, 32, 1833–1850, 1991.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Wu, S.C., and Haug, E.J. A Substructure Methods for the Dynamic Simulation of Flexible Mechanical Systems with Geometric Nonlinearities. CCAD Technical Report 87–7, Center for Computer Aided Design, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, 1987.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© CISM, Udine 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jorge Ambrósio
    • 1
  1. 1.IDMEC, Instituto Superior TécnicoTechnical University of LisbonLisbonPortugal

Personalised recommendations