Abstract
The finite element method has been established as the most important computational procedure to describe deformations of structural systems. But, the limitation of the finite element method to describe large deformations accurately is also well known. The use of multibody dynamics is the most general and accurate computational methodology to describe the large relative rotations of the systems components. The use of the finite element method in the framework of multibody dynamics leads to the ability to model flexible multibody systems that not only describe the large gross motion of the system components but also their deformations, as those shown in Figure 17.1. Finite element based approaches to describe flexible multibody systems, experiencing small and large deformations and the formulation of kinematic joints are discussed here. Several examples are introduced to be used, later, in optimization of flexible multibody systems.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Ambrósio, J. Elastic-Plastic Large Deformations of Flexible Multibody Systems In Crash Analysis. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, 1991.
Ambrósio, J., and Nikravesh, P. Elastic-plastic deformations in multibody dynamics, Nonlinear Dynamics, 3, 85–104, 1992.
Ambrósio, J., and Pereira, M. Flexibility in Multibody Dynamics with Applications to Crashworthiness, In: Computer Aided Analysis of Rigid and Flexible Multibody Systems. Pereira, M., and Ambrósio, J. (Eds.), Kluwer Academic Publisher, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 199–232, 1994.
Ambrósio, J. Dynamics of structures undergoing gross motion and nonlinear deformations: a multibody approach. Computer & Structures, 59(6), 1001–1012, 1996.
Ambrósio, J., and Gonçalves, J. Complex flexible multibody systems with application to vehicle dynamics. Multibody Systems Dynamics, 6(2), 163–182, 2001.
Ambrósio, J. Efficient kinematic joints descriptions for flexible multibody systems experienceing linear and non-linear deformations. Int J Nume Meths in Engng, 56, 1771–1793, 2003.
Anantharaman, M., and Hiller, M. Numerical simulation of mechanical systems using methods for differential-algebraic equations. Int J Nume Methods in Engng, 32, 1531–1542, 1991.
Banerjee, A.K., and Nagarajan, S. Efficient simulation of large overall motion of nonlinearly elastic beams. In. Proc. of ESA Int. Workshop on Advanced Mathematical Methods in the Dynamics of Flexible Bodies. ESA, Noordwijk, The Netherlands, June 3–5, 3–23, 1996.
Bathe, K.-J., and Bolourchi, S. Large displacement analysis of three-dimensional beam structures. Int J Nume Methods in Engng, 14, 961–986, 1979.
Belytschko, T., and Hsieh, B.J. Nonlinear transient finite element analysis with convected coordinates. Int J Nume Methods in Engng, 7, 255–271, 1973.
Cardona, A., and Geradin, M. A beam finite element non linear theory with finite rotations. Int. J. Nume Methods in Engng, 26, 2403–2438, 1988.
Cavin, R.K., and Dusto, A.R. Hamilton’s principle: finite element methods and flexible body dynamics. AIAA Journal, 15(12), 1684–1690, 1977.
Chang, B., and Shabana, A., Nonlinear finite element formulation for large displacement analysis of plates. ASME J. Appl. Mech, 57, 707–718, 1990.
Chu, S.-C., and Pan, K.C. Dynamic response of a high-speed slider-crank mechanism with an elastic connecting rod. ASME J. Engineering for Industry, B97 542–550, 1975.
Erdman, A., and Sandor, G. Kineto-elastodynamics — a review of the state of the art and trends. Mech. Mach. Theory, 7, 19–33, 1972.
Geradin, M., and Cardona, A. A modelling of superelements in mechanism analysis, Int. J. Nume Methods in Engng, 32, 1565–1594, 1991.
Geradin, M. Advanced methods in flexible multibody dynamics: review of element formulations and reduction methods. In: Proc. of ESA Int. Workshop on Adv. Math Methods in the Dynamics of Flexible Bodies. ESA, Noordwijk, Netherlands, June 3–5, 83–106, 1996.
Gonçalves, J., and Ambrósio, J. Advanced modelling of flexible multibody systems using virtual bodies. In: Proceedings of the NATO-ARW on Computational Aspects of Nonlinear Structural Systems with Large Rigid Body Motion., Ambrósio, J., and Kleiber, M. (Eds.), Pultusk, Poland, July 2–7, 359–374, 2000.
Gonçalves, J., and Ambrósio, J. Advanced modeling of flexible multibody dynamics using virtual bodies. Comp. Assisted Mechanics and Engng Sciences, 9(3), 373–390, 2002.
Kane, T., Ryan, R., and Banerjee, A. Dynamics of cantilever beam attached to a moving base. AIAA J of Guidance Control and Dynamics, 10, 139–151, 1987.
Lowen, G., and Chassapis, C. Elastic behavior of linkages: an update. Mech. Mach. Theory, 21, 33–42, 1986.
Meijaard, J.P. Validation of flexible beam elements in dynamics programs. Nonlinear Dynamics, 9, 21–36, 1996.
Meirovitch, L., and Nelson, H. On the high-spin motion of a satellite containing elastic parts. Journal of Spacecrafts and Rockets, 3, 1597–1602, 1966.
Melzer, F. Symbolisch-numerische Modellierung Elastischer Mehrkorpersysteme mit Answendung auf Rechnerische Lebensdauervorhrsagen. PhD. Thesis, University of Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany, 1994.
Melzer, F. Symbolic computations in flexible multibody systems. Nonlinear Dynamics, 9, 147–163, 1996.
Modi, V.J., Suleman, A., and Ng, A.C. An approach to dynamics and control of orbiting flexible structures. Int J Nume Methods in Engng, 32, 1727–1748, 1991.
Nikravesh, P., and Lin, Y.-S. Body reference frames in deformable multibody systems. Int. J. for Multiscale Computational Engineering, 1, 1615–1683, 2003.
Pereira, M., and Proença, P. Dynamic analysis of spatial flexible multibody systems using joint co-ordinates. Int J Nume Methods in Engng, 32, 1799–1812, 1991.
Shabana, A. Dynamic Analysis of Large Scale Inertia Variant Flexible Mechanisms. Ph.D. Thesis, Iowa City, Iowa: University of Iowa, 1982.
Shabana, A. Dynamics of Multibody Systems. John Wiley & New York, New York, 1989.
Shabana, A., and Wehage, R. A coordinate reduction technique for transient amalysis os spatial structures with large angular rotations. J. of Struct. Mech., 11, 401–431, 1989.
Shabana, A. Definition of the slopes and the finite element absolute nodal coordinate formulation. Multibody System Dynamics, 1, 339–348, 1997.
Simo, J.C., and Vu-Quoc, L. On the dynamics in space of rods undergoing large motions — a geometrically exact approach. Comp. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng, 66, 125–161, 1988.
Song, J., and Haug, E.J. Dynamic analysis of planar flexible mechanisms. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 24, 359–381, 1980.
Spanos, J. and Tsuha, W., Selection of component modes for flexible multibody simulation, J. Guidance, Control and Dynamics, 14, 278–286, 1991.
Thompson, B., and Sung, G. Survey of finite element techniques for mechanism design. Mech. Mach. Theory, 21, 351–359, 1986.
Yoo, W.S., and Haug, E.J. Dynamics of flexible mechanical systems using vibration and static correction modes. ASME J. of Mech, Trans and Autom in Design, 108, 315–322, 1986.
Wallrapp, O., and Schwertassek, R. Representation of Geometric stiffening in multibody system simulation. Int. J. Nume. Methods Engng, 32, 1833–1850, 1991.
Wu, S.C., and Haug, E.J. A Substructure Methods for the Dynamic Simulation of Flexible Mechanical Systems with Geometric Nonlinearities. CCAD Technical Report 87–7, Center for Computer Aided Design, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, 1987.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 CISM, Udine
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ambrósio, J. (2009). Distributed Deformation: a Finite Element Method. In: Ambrósio, J.A.C., Eberhard, P. (eds) Advanced Design of Mechanical Systems: From Analysis to Optimization. CISM International Centre for Mechanical Sciences, vol 511. Springer, Vienna. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-211-99461-0_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-211-99461-0_17
Publisher Name: Springer, Vienna
Print ISBN: 978-3-211-99460-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-211-99461-0
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)