Abstract
This study of 80 cadavers demonstrates that the anatomic position of the motor branch of the musculocutaneous nerve with respect to that of the sensitive branch of the same nerve is lateral in more than 88% of cases in humans.
The distance from plexus to the separation into the motor and sensitive fascicles was 8–9 cm long.
Given the lateral position of the motor component of the musculocutaneous nerve, the nerves that are going to be used to neurotize this area can be directed so as to increase the efficacy of the results for the flexor function of the arm.
Introduction: Brachial plexus lesions produce great morbidity and are relatively frequent in young adults. Innervating the coracobrachial, biceps and anterior brachial muscles, the musculocutaneous nerve is one of the priorities for nerve neurotization when plexus root avulsion occurs because it is essential for arm flexion. This nerve has both a motor and sensitive component, and the anatomic positions of the two components have not been much studied. When performing a neurotization anastomosis to the musculocutaneous nerve, being able to identify the motor component of the graft and attach it to the motor component of the musculocutaneous nerve could avoid a loss of many motor axons which would otherwise occur if the graft were attached to the sensitive component.
Objective: The present paper is based on a topographic anatomic study to locate and obtain the objective positioning of the motor branch of the musculocutaneous nerve in humans, as well as measure its length from the origin in the brachial plexus to the separation of both fascicles into branches.
Material and Methods: The study was performed in 40 cadavers, dissecting the musculocutaneous nerve along its course and measuring the distance from its emergence from the plexus until the separation between its motor and sensitive branches in both arms so as to be able to determine the positioning of the motor fascicle with respect to the sensitive fascicle.
Results: The distance from plexus to the separation into the motor and sensitive fascicles was 8.8 cm on the left side and 8.95 cm on the right side. The position of the motor branch with respect to the sensitive branch was lateral in more than 85% of the studied nerves, all the way from its origin in the brachial plexus until the definitive separation between both branches, on both the right and the left sides.
Conclusion: If the nerves that are to be used for neurotization of the musculacutaneous nerve are directly taken to the lateral fascicle of that nerve, which is generally the motor component, the treatment should be effective and should avoid the loss of motor axons resulting from anastomosing to the sensitive fascicle.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Reference
Belzberg A, Dorsi M, Storm P, Moriarity J. (2004) Surgical repair of brachial plexus injury: a multinational survey of experienced peripheral nerve surgeons. J Neurosurg 101: 365–374
Chiarapattanakonn P, et al. (1998) Anatomy and internal topography of the musculocutaneous nerve: the nerve to the biceps and brachialis muscle. J Hand Surg 23 (2): 250–256
Dubuisson M, Kline D. (2002) Brachial plexus injury: a survey of 100 consecutive cases from a single service. Neurosurgery 51: 673–683
Isla A, Bejarano B, Morales C, Perez C, Avendaño C. (1999) Anatomical and functional connectivity of the transected ulnar nerve after intercostal neurotization in the cat. J Neurosurg 90: 1057–1063
Isla A, Martinez JR, Perez Lopez C, Perez Conde C, Morales C, Avendaño C. (2006) Anatomical and functional connectivity of the transected ulnar nerve after accessory nerve neurotization in the cat. J Neurosurg Sci 50 (2): 33–40
Kawai H (1992) Anatomy of the brachial plexus. www.worldscibooks.com/medsci/etextbook/3477/3477_chap1.pdf
Malessy M, Bakker D, Dekker J. Gert Van Dijk J, Thomeer R. (2003) Functional magnetic resonance imagin and control over the biceps muscle after intercostal musculocutaneous nerve transfer. J Neurosurg 98: 261–268
Midha R. (2004) Nerve transfer for severe braquial plexus injuries: a review. Neurosurg Focus 16: 1–14
Neal J, Hebl J, Gerancher J, Quinn H. (2002) Brachial plexus anesthesia: essentials of our current understanding. Regul Anesth Pain Med 27: 402–429
Philips M, Zager E. (2001) Surgical exposure of the brachial plexus. Neurosurgery 12: 49–56
Samardzic M, Gujicic D, Antunovic V. (1992) Nerve transfers in brachial plexus traction injuries. J Neurosurg 76: 191–197
Samii A, Carvalho G, Samii M. (2003) Brachial plexus injury: factors affecting functional outcome in spinal accesory nerve transfer for the restoration of elbow flexion. J Neurosurg 98: 307–312
Terzis J, Kostas I. (2005) Intercostal nerve neurotization for the treatment of obstetrical brachial plexus palsy patients. Semin Plastic Surg 19: 66–74
Wu-Chul S, Yang ZX, Pho RW, Kour AK. (2003) A variation of the Musculo-cutaneous nerve absent. Yonsei Med J 44: 1110–1113
Conflict of interest statement We declare that we have no conflict of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer-Verlag/Wien
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Isla, A., Pozuelos, J. (2011). Anatomic Study in Cadaver of the Motor Branch of the Musculocutaneous Nerve. In: Alexandre, A., Masini, M., Menchetti, P. (eds) Advances in Minimally Invasive Surgery and Therapy for Spine and Nerves. Acta Neurochirurgica Supplementum, vol 108. Springer, Vienna. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-211-99370-5_35
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-211-99370-5_35
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Vienna
Print ISBN: 978-3-211-99369-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-211-99370-5
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)