Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Acta Neurochirurgica Supplementum ((NEUROCHIRURGICA,volume 108))

Abstract

The lack of radiation, high soft tissue contrast and capacity for multiplanar and three-dimensional imaging have made magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) the imaging modality of choice for evaluating spinal cord diseases. In diagnostic imaging of the spine, MRI is clearly superior to both conventional radiography (CR) and computed tomography (CT) and it should be preferred as first diagnostic examination when degenerative spine pathologies are suspected.

The other technological equipments (CT, CR, dynamic orthostatic X-ray, myelography, discography and skeletal scintigraphy) have to be selectively chosen and adapted to the individual patient.

Both “container” and “contents” of the spine should be primly evaluated. Finally, a correlation between clinical and radiological features seems to be mandatory for selecting the correct therapeutic choice, since the reliability of the MRI as potential prognostic indicator has been demonstrated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Ahmed M, Modic MT (2007) Neck and low back pain: neuroimaging. Neurol Clin 25:439–471

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Carrage EJ, Lincoln T, Parmar VS et al (2006) A gold standard evaluation of the “discogenic pain” diagnosis as determined by provocative discography. Spine 31:2115–2123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Colosimo C, Cianfoni A, Di Lella GM, Gaudino S (2006) Contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the spine: when, why and how? How to optimize contrast protocols in MR imaging of the spine. Neuroradiology 48:18–33

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ross JS, Zepp R, Modic MT (1996) The postoperative lumbar spine: enhanced MR evaluation of the intervertebral disk. Am J Neuroradiol 17:323–331

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bellaiche L, Petrover D (2008) Imaging in chronic low back pain: which one and when? Rev Prat 58:273–278

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Perry J, Haughton V, Anderson PA, Wu Y, Fine J, Mistretta C (2006) The value of T2 relaxation times to characterize lumbar intervertebral disks: preliminary results. Am J Neuroradiol 27:337–342

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Schinnerer KA, Katz LD, Grauer JN (2008) MR findings of exaggerated fluid in facet joints predicts instability. J Spinal Disord Tech 21:468–472

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Thompson RE, Pearcy MJ, Barker TM (2004) The mechanical effects of intervertebral disc lesions. Clin Biomech 19:448–455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Siddiqui AH, Rafique MZ, Ahmad MN, Usman MU (2005) Role of magnetic resonance imaging in lumbar spondylosis. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak 15:396–399

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Brant-Zawadzki MN, Jensen MC, Obuchowski N et al (1995) Interobserver and intraobserver variability in the interpretation of lumbar disc abnormalities. A comparison of two nomenclatures. Spine 20:1257–1263

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Modic MT, Ross JS (2007) Lumbar degenerative disk disease. Radiology 245:43–61

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Thompson JP, Pearce, RH, Schechter M T, Adams M E, Tsang IK, Bishop PB (1990) Preliminary evalutation of a scheme for grading the gross morphology of the human intervertebral disc. Spine 15:411–415

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Fardon DF, Milette PC (2001) Nomenclature and classification of lumbar disc pathology. Raccomandations of the combined task forces of the North American Spine Society, American Society of Spine Radiology, and American Society of Neuroradiology. Spine 26:93–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Millette PC (2000) Classification, diagnostic imaging, and imaging characterization of a lumbar herniated disk. Radiol Clin North Am 38:1267–1292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Dupuis PR, Yong-Hing K, Cassidy JD, Kirkaldy-Willis WH (1985) Radiologic diagnosis of degenerative lumbar spinal instability. Spine 10:262–276

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Carrino JA, Lurie JD, Tosteson AN, Tosteson TD, Carragee EJ, Kaiser J, Grove MR, Blood E, Pearson LH, Weinstein JN, Herzog R (2009) Lumbar spine: reliability of MR imaging findings. Radiology 250:161–170

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cesare Colosimo .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag/Wien

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Colosimo, C., Gaudino, S., Alexandre, A.M. (2011). Imaging in Degenerative Spine Pathology. In: Alexandre, A., Masini, M., Menchetti, P. (eds) Advances in Minimally Invasive Surgery and Therapy for Spine and Nerves. Acta Neurochirurgica Supplementum, vol 108. Springer, Vienna. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-211-99370-5_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-211-99370-5_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Vienna

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-211-99369-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-211-99370-5

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics