Skip to main content

Periduroscopy: General Review of Clinical Features and Development of Operative Models

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Advances in Minimally Invasive Surgery and Therapy for Spine and Nerves

Part of the book series: Acta Neurochirurgica Supplementum ((NEUROCHIRURGICA,volume 108))

Abstract

Background: Myeloscopy is a useful approach for both diagnosis and treatment of back pain. However clinicians have underestimated its potential. From the nineties myeloscopy has been used only as a diagnostic tool, without any improvement of the technique. Racz’s method is nowadays still used for the lysis of adherence by applying medical solutions without a direct vision inside the spinal channel. In 1998 we showed the limitations of Racz’s approach, and in 1999 we developed a new technique, introducing a Fogarty balloon to remove the occlusions of the spinal canal and the resaflex for the lysis of adherence at low temperature (Raffaeli–Righetti technique). In this paper we report a general review of our experience with periduroscopy for the treatment of failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS) and spinal stenosis.

Method: A Fogarty balloon was used to remove fat and/or mild fibrosis occluding the spinal canal, reducing by 50% the volume of the saline solution used in periduroscopy. The Resaflex was subsequently used to lyse adherence and to allow reaching the site of pain origin, using a low temperature (> 50°C).

Findings: the fibrosis morphologies of epidural space (ES) were grouped on the basis of common macroscopic and organizational characteristics, which were revealed during myeloscopy. A year after myeloscopy, 59% of FBSS patients, and 67% of patients with stenosis reported a general improvement of their painful pathology, with a pain reduction above 50 in 56% of patients. Forty-eight percent of patients used minor analgesics and 67% of patients went back to work. Only few complications were observed (4%).

Conclusions: myeloscopy technique enlightens pain-triggering mechanisms otherwise unrevealed; it has specific therapeutic value, whereas on the diagnostic side it has not revealed relevant pathologies. Its effectiveness in FBSS patients is high, with the advantage of its relatively easy implementation, limited invasiveness and repeatability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Bloomberg R. (1984) A method for epiduroscopy and spinaloscopy. Acta Anesthesiol Scand; 29: 113–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bloomberg R. (1994) Epiduroscopy and spinaloscopy: endoscopic studies of lumbar spaces. Acta Neurochir Suppl; 61: 106–107.

    Google Scholar 

  3. de Tribolet N, Porchet F, Lutz TW, Gratzl O, Brotchi J, van Alphen HA, van Acker RE, Benini A, Strommer KN, Bernays RL, Goffin J, Beuls EA, Ross JS. (1998) Clinical assessment of a novel antiadhesion barrier gel: prospective, randomized, multicenter, clinical trial of ADCON-L to inhibit postoperative peridural fibrosis and related symptoms after lumbar discectomy. Am J Orthop; 27 (2): 111–120.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Fager CA. (1991) Role of laminectomy in lumbar disk herniation. Mt Sinai J Med; 58: 133–138.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Igarashi T, Hirabayashi Y, Shimizu R, Saitoh K, Fukuda H, Suzuki H. (2000) The fiberscopic findings of the epidural space in pregnant women. Anesthesiology; 92: 1631–1636.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Manchikanti L, et al. (2001) Role of one day epidural adhesiolysis in management of chronic low back pain: a randomized clinical trial. Pain Physician; 4 (2): 153–166.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. North RB. (1994) Spinal cord stimulation versus reoperation for the failed back surgery syndrome. A prospective, randomized study design. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg; 62 (1–4): 267–272.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. North RB, Ewend MG, Lawton MT, Kidd DH, Piantadosi S. (1991) Failed back surgery syndrome: 5-years follow up after spinal cord stimulator implantation. Neurosurgery; 28: 692–699.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. North RB, Kidd DH, Campbell JN, Long DM. (1991) Dorsal root gangliectomy for failed back surgery syndrome: a 5 years follow up study. J Neurosurg; 74: 236–242.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Ooi Y, Sathoh Y, Inoue K, Miganagi K, Morisaki N. (1981) Myeloscopy with special reference to blood flow changes in the cauda equina during Lasegue’s test. Int Orthop; 4: 307–311.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Racz GB, Havner JE, Singleton W, Carline M. (1988) Hypertonic saline and corticosteroid injected epidurally for pain control. In Racz GB (ed): Technique of Neurolysis. Boston, Kluwer Accademic. 73–86.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Raffaeli W. (1998) Periduroscopy: preliminary reports – technical notes. Pain Clinic; 11: 1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Raffaeli W. (2003) Periduroscopia nel dolore lombare: dalla diagosi alla terapia. Reumatismo; 55 (3): 56–60.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Raffaeli W. (2006) Endoscopia dello spazio epidurale. Periduroscopia. In: Jankovic D, Borghi B, Rainaldi MP (eds): Anestesia regionale. Masson. 399–403.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Raffaeli W, Marconi G, Fanelli G, Taddei S, Borghi GB, Casati A. (2006) Opioid-related side-effects after intrathecal morphine: a prospective, randomized, double-blind dose-response study. Eur J Anaesthesiol; 23: 605–610.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Raffaeli W, Righetti D. (1997) The role of myeloscopy in diagnosis and therapy. In Neumann N, Barolat G (eds): IV INS World Congress, Abstracts, Geneva. 53–55.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Raffaeli W, Righetti D. (2005) Surgical radio-frequency epiduroscopy technique (R-ResAblator) and FBSS treatment: preliminary evaluations. Acta Neurochir Suppl; 92: 121–125.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Raffaeli W, Righetti D, Caminiti A, Ingardia A, Balestri M, Pambianco L, Fanelli G, Facondini F, Pantazopoulos P. (2008) Implantable intrathecal pumps for the treatment of noncancer chronic pain in elderly population: drug dose and clinical efficacy. Neuromodulation; 11 (1): 33–39.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Ross JS, Robertson JT, Frederickson RCA, Petrie JL. (1996) Association between peridural scar and recurrent radicular pain after lumbar discectomy: magnetic resonance evaluation. Neurosurgery; 38: 855–863.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Saberski LR, Kitahata LM. (1995) Direct visualization of the lumbosacral epidural space through sacral hiatus. Anesth Analg; 80: 839–840.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Saberski LR, Kitahata LM. (1996) Review of the clinical basis and protocol for epidural endoscopy. Conn Med; 60 (2): 71–73.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Schutze G, Kurtze H. (1995) Direct Observation of the epidural space with a flexible catheter secured epiduroscopic unit. Reg Anesth; 19: 85–89.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Shah R, Heavner JE. (2003) Recognition of the subarachnoid and subdural compartments during epiduroscopy: two case. Pain Pract; 3 (4): 321–325.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest statementWe declare that we have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to W. Raffaeli .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag/Wien

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Raffaeli, W., Righetti, D., Andruccioli, J., Sarti, D. (2011). Periduroscopy: General Review of Clinical Features and Development of Operative Models. In: Alexandre, A., Masini, M., Menchetti, P. (eds) Advances in Minimally Invasive Surgery and Therapy for Spine and Nerves. Acta Neurochirurgica Supplementum, vol 108. Springer, Vienna. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-211-99370-5_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-211-99370-5_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Vienna

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-211-99369-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-211-99370-5

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics