Advertisement

Abstract

The subject of fluid mixing is, from the technological perspective, an old one. It is encountered almost daily when we pour milk into coffee or try to achieve a particular paint color. The yearly output of industrial products for which fluid mixing is a part of the production process is measured in billions of dollars. If two fluids are in contact, mixing can proceed purely by molecular diffusion, but it is most commonly achieved by a combination of stretching of fluid interfaces by the macroscopic velocity field and molecular diffusion. Within the subject of fluid mechanics this process has been studied for 100 years, beginning with a paper of Osborne Reynolds. A lot of work has been devoted to non-diffusive mixing in the applied dynamical systems community in the past 20 years, after a seminal paper by (1984), where he coined the term “chaotic advection” to mean efficient non-di usive mixing in flows with simple time-dependence. Since the 1990’s the field of chaotic advection has gained increased attention from (at least) three directions: 1) Scientific investigation of fluid processes at microscale, usually producing flows with simple time-dependence, accompanying the fast technological advances in miniaturization and applications to biology and medicine, 2) Recognition that mixing by large coherent structures can be described using the chaotic advection theory and 3) Increased interest in active control of fluid processes, including control of mixing.

Keywords

Dimensional Manifold Invariant Torus Chaotic Advection Volume Preservation Dimensional Invariant Manifold 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  1. H. Aref. Stirring by chaotic advection. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 143: 1–21, 1984.zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  2. R. Aris. Vectors, tensors, and the basic equations of fluid mechanics. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1962.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. V. I. Arnold. Small denominators and problems of stability of motion in classical and celestial mechanics. Russ. Math. Survey, 18:85–192, 1963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. V. I. Arnold. Sur la géométrie differentielle des groupes de lie de dimension infinie et ses applications á l’hydrodynamique des fluides parfaits. Ann. Inst Fourier, 16:316–361, 1966.Google Scholar
  5. V. I. Arnold. Mathematical Methods of Classical Mechanics. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1978.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. V.I. Arnold. Ordinary Differential Equations. Springer Verlag, Berlin, N.Y., 2006. Theorem and remark after Theorem 17, chapter 5, Sec. 3.3.Google Scholar
  7. P. Ashwin and G. P. King. Azimuthally propagating ring vortices in a model for nonaxisymmetric Taylor vortex flow. Physical Review Letters, 75:4610–4613, 1995a.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. P. Ashwin and G. P. King. Streamline topology in eccentric Taylor vortex flow. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 285:215–247, 1995b.zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  9. S. Balasuriya, C. K. R. T. Jones, and B. Sandstede. Viscous perturbations of vorticity-conserving flows and separatrix splitting. Nonlinearity, 11: 47–77, 1997.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  10. G. K. Batchelor. An Introduction to Fluid Dynamics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1967.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. F. Bottausci, I. Mezić, C. D. Meinhart, and C. Cardonne. Mixing in the shear superposition micromixer: three-dimensional analysis. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series A-Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences, 362:1001–1018, 2004.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  12. J. Branebjerg, B. Fabius, and P. Gravesen. Application of Miniature Analyzers from Microfluidic Components to μTAS, pages 141–151. Proceedings of Micro Total Analysis System Conference, Twente, Netherlands. 1994.Google Scholar
  13. J. Branebjerg, B. Fabius, and P. Gravesen. Fast mixing by lamination, pages 441–446. Proceedings of the 9th Annual Workshop on Micro Electro Mechanical Systems, San Diego, CA. 1996.Google Scholar
  14. J. H. E. Cartwright, M. Feingold, and O. Piro. Chaotic advection in three-dimensional unsteady incompressible laminar flow. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 316:259–284, 1996.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. C.-Q. Cheng and Y.-S. Sun. Existence of invariant tori in three-dimensional measure-preserving mappings. Celestial Mechanics, 47:275–292, 1990.zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  16. N. Chiem, C. Colyer, and Harrison. Microfluidic Systems for Clinical Diagnostics, pages 183–186. International Conference on Solid State Sensors and Actuators, Chicago, IL, vol 1. 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. A.J. Chorin and J.E. Marsden. A Mathematical Introduction to Fluid Mechanics. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1998.Google Scholar
  18. H.-P. Chou, M. A. Unger, and S. R. Quake. A microfabricated rotary pump. Biomedical Microdevices, 3:323–330, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. D. D’Alessandro, M. Dahleh, and I. Mezić. Control of mixing in fluid flow: A maximum entropy approach. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 44:1852–1863, 1999.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. J. Evans, D. Liepmann, and A. P. Pisano. Planar laminar mixer, pages 96–101. 10th Annual Workshop of Micro Electro Mechanical System, Nagoya, Japan. 1997.Google Scholar
  21. C.L. Fefferman. Existence & smoothness of the navierstokes equation. Description of Millenium Prize problems for Clay Mathematics Institute” 2000.Google Scholar
  22. M. Feingold, L. P. Kadanoff, and O. Piro. Passive scalars, 3-dimensional volume-preserving maps and chaos. Journal of Statistical Physics, 50: 529–565, 1988.zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  23. G. O. Fountain, D. V. Khakhar, I. Mezić, and J. M. Ottino. Chaotic mixing in a bounded 3-D flow. In press, Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2000.Google Scholar
  24. J. W. Gibbs. Elementary principles in statistical mechanics: developed with special reference to the rational foundation of thermodynamics. Yale University Press, New Haven, 1902.Google Scholar
  25. G. Haller and I. Mezić. Reduction of three-dimensional, volume-preserving flows by symmetry. Nonlinearity, 11:319–339, 1998.zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  26. M. Hénon. Sur la topologie des lignes de courant dans un cas particulier. C.R. Acad. Sci. Paris A, 262:312–314, 1966.Google Scholar
  27. G.E. Karniadakis and A. Beskok. Micro Flows. Springer-Verlag, New York, 2001.Google Scholar
  28. T. C. Lackey and F. Sotiropoulos. Relationship between stirring rate and reynolds number in the chaotically advected steady flow in a container with exactly counter-rotating lids. Physics of Fluids, 18:053601, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. H. Lamb. Hydrodynamics. Dover, New York. 1932.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  30. Y. K. Lee, J. Deval, P. Tabeling, and C. M. Ho. Chaotic mixing in electrokinetically and pressure-driven micro flows, pages 483–486. Proceedings of the 14th IEEE Workshop on MEMS, Interlaken, Switzerland. 2001.Google Scholar
  31. Z. Levnajić. Ucsb master’s thesis in mechanical engineering. 2006.Google Scholar
  32. R. H. Liu, K. V. Sharp, M. G. Olsen, M. A. Stremler, J. G. Santiago, R. J. Adrian, H. Aref, and D. J. Beebe. A passive micromixer: Three-dimensional serpentine microchannel. J. of MEMS, 9(2), 2000.Google Scholar
  33. R. Mane. Ergodic Theory and Differentiable Dynamics. Springer-Verlag, 1987.Google Scholar
  34. G. Mathew, I. Mezić, and L. Petzold. A multiscale measure for mixing. Physica D, 211:23–46, 2005.zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  35. K. R. Meyer and G. R. Hall. Introduction to Hamiltonian systems and the N-body problem. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1992.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  36. I. Mezić. On Geometrical and Statistical Properties of Dynamical Systems: Theory and Applications. PhD thesis, California Institute of Technology, 1994.Google Scholar
  37. I. Mezić. ABC flows as a paradigm for chaotic advection in 3-d. Preprint, 2000.Google Scholar
  38. I. Mezić and F. Sotiropoulos. Ergodic theory and experimental visualization of invariant sets in chaotically advected flows. Physics of Fluids, 14:2235–2243, 2002.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  39. I. Mezić and S. Wiggins. On the integrability and perturbation of three dimensional fluid flows with symmetry. Journal of Nonlinear Science, 4: 157–194, 1994.zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  40. I. Mezić and S. Wiggins. A method for visualization of invariant sets of dynamical systems based on the ergodic partition. Chaos, 9:213–218, 1999.zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  41. R. Miyake, T. S. J. Lammerink, M. Elwenspoek, and J. H. J. Fluitman. Micro Mixer with fast diffusion, pages 248–253. Proceedings of the IEEE Micro Electro Mechanical Workshop, Fort Lauderale, FL. 1993.Google Scholar
  42. J. Moser. On the theory of quasiperiodic motion. SIAM Review, 8:145–172, 1968.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. S. D. Mueller, I. Mezić, J. H. Walther, and P. Koumoutsakos. Transverse momentum micromixer optimization with evolution strategies. To appear in Computers and Fluids, 2003.Google Scholar
  44. X. Niu and Y. K. Lee. Efficient spatio-temporal chaotic mixing in microchannels. Journal of Micromechanics and Microengineering, 13:454–462, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. J.M. Ottino. The Kinematics of Mixing: Stretching, Chaos and Transport. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1989.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  46. E. L. Paul, V. A. Atiemo-Obeng, and S. M. Kresta. Handbook of Industrial Mixing. Wiley-Interscience, New York, 2004.Google Scholar
  47. J. Pedlosky. Geophysical Fluid Dynamics. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1987.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  48. O. Piro and M. Feingold. Diffusion in three-dimensional Liouvillian maps. Physical Review Letters, 61:1799–1802, 1988.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  49. C. Siegel and J. Moser. Lectures on Celestial Mechanics. Springer Verlag, Berlin, 1971.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  50. T. H. Solomon. Personal communication, 1998.Google Scholar
  51. T. H. Solomon and I. Mezić. Uniform resonant chaotic mixing in fluids. Nature, 425:376–380, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. G. Sposito. On steady flows with Lamb surfaces. Int. J. Engng. Sci., 35: 197–209, 1997.zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  53. T. M. Squires and S. R. Quake. Microfluidics: Fluid physics at the nanoliter scale. Reviews of Modern Physics, 77:977–1026, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. A. D. Stroock, S. K. W. Dertinger, A. Ajdari, I. Mezić, H. A. Stone, and G. M. Whitesides. Chaotic mixer for microchannels. Science, 295:647–651, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. C. Truesdell. The Kinematics of Vorticity. Indiana University Publications, Bloomington, Indiana, 1954.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  56. U. Vaidya and I. Mezić. Existence of invariant tori in action-angle-angle maps with degeneracy. 2006.Google Scholar
  57. R. A. Vijayendran, K. M. Motsegood, D. J. Beebe, and D. E. Leckband. Evaluation of a three-dimensional micromixer in a surface-based biosensor. Langmuir, 19:1824–1828, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. M. Volpert, I. Mezić, C. D. Meinhart, and M. Dahleh. An actively controlled micromixer. pages 483–487, 1999. Proceedings of the ASME Mechanical engineering International Congress and Exposition, MEMS, Nashville, TN.Google Scholar
  59. S. Wiggins. Slowly Varying Oscillators. PhD thesis, Cornell University, 1985.Google Scholar
  60. S. Wiggins. Introduction to Applied Nonlinear Dynamical Systems and Chaos. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1990.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  61. S. Wiggins. Chaotic Transport in Dynamical Systems. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1992.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  62. S. Wiggins and P. Holmes. Periodic orbits in slowly varying oscillators. SIAM Journal of Mathematical Analysis, 18:592–611, 1987.zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  63. T. Yannacopoulos, I. Mezić, G. King, and G. Rowlands. Eulerian diagnostics for Lagrangian chaos in three dimensional Navier-Stokes flows. Physical Review E, 57:482–490, 1998.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  64. M. Yi and H. H. Bau. The kinematics of bend-induced stirring in microconduits. Proceedings of MEMS-Vol. 2, Micro-Electro-Mechanical Systems, ASME, Orlando FL. 2000.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© CISM, Udine 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Igor Mezić
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringUniversity of CaliforniaSanta Barbara

Personalised recommendations