Skip to main content

Clinical Proof of the Importance of Compliance for Hydrocephalus Pathophysiology

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Acta Neurochirurgica Supplementum ((NEUROCHIRURGICA,volume 106))

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Bateman GA (2000) Vascular compliance in normal pressure hydrocephalus. Am J Neuroradiol 21:1574–1585

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bateman GA (2002) Pulse-wave encephalopathy: a comparative study of the hydrodynamics of leukoaraiosis and normal pressure hydrocephalus. Neuroradiology 44:740–748

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bateman GA, Levi CR, Schofield P, Wang Y, Lovett EC (2008) The venous manifestations of pulse wave encephalopathy: windkessel dysfunction in normal aging and senile dementia. Neuroradiology 50(6):491–497

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bech-Azeddine R, Hogh P, Juhler M, Gjerris F, Waldemar G (2007) Idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: clinical comorbidity correlated with cerebral biopsy findings and outcome of cerebrospinal fluid shunting. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 78:157–161

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Boon AJ, Tans JTJ, Delwel EJ, Egeler-Peerdeman SM, Hanlo PW, Wurzer HAL, Hermans J (1999) Dutch normal-pressure hydrocephalus study: the role of cerebrovascular disease. J Neuro-surg 90:221–226

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Borgesen SE, Gjerris F (1982) The predictive value of conductance to outflow of CSF in normal pressure hydrocephalus. Brain 105:65–86

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Bret P, Chazal J (1990) L`hydrocéphalie chronique de l’adult. Neurochirurgie (Suppl) 36:1–159

    Google Scholar 

  8. Costabile G, Probst C (1993) Hydrocephalus – analysis of 480 infusion tests. In: Avezaat CJJ, van Eijndhoven JHM, Maas AIR, Tans JTJ (eds) Intracranial Pressure VIII. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, pp 805–810

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. DelwelEJ, De Jong DA, Avezaat CJJ (1993) The relative prognostic value of CSF outflow resistance measurement in shunting for normal pressure hydrocephalus. In: Avezaat CJJ, van Eijndhoven JHM, Maas AIR, Tans JTJ (eds) Intracranial pressure VIII. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York:816–820

    Google Scholar 

  10. Eymann R, Chehab S, Strowitzki M, Steudel WI, Kiefer M (2008) Clinical and economical consequences of antibiotic impregnated shunt catheters. J Neurosurg 1(6):444–450

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gjerris F, Borgesen SE (1992) Current concepts of measurement of cerebrospinal fluid absorption and biomechanics of hydrocephalus. In: Symon L, Calliauw L, Cohadon F, Lobo J, Loew F, Nornes H, Pásztor E, Pickard JD, Strong AJ, Yasargil MG (eds) Advances and Technical Standards in Neurosurgery, Volume 19. Springer, Wien-New York, pp 145–177

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Greitz D (2004) Radiological assessment of hydrocephalus: new theories and implications for therapy. Neurosurg Rev 27:145–165

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hebb AO, Cusimano MD (2001) Idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: a systematic review of diagnosis and outcome. Neurosurgery 49:1166–1186

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Jetzki S, Kiefer M, Eymann R, Walter M, Leonhardt S (2007) Analysis of pulse waves in intracranial pressure. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2007:2863–2866

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Kahlon B, Sundbarg G, Rehncrona S (2002) Comparison between the lumbar infusion test and CSF tap tests to predict outcome after shunt surgery in suspected normal pressure hydrocephalus. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 73:721–726

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kiefer M, Eymann R, Steudel WI (2000) The dynamic infusion test in rats. Childs Nerv Syst 16:451–456

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Kiefer M, Eymann R, Meier U (2002) Five years experience with gravitational shunts in chronic hydrocephalus of adults. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 144:755–767

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Kiefer M, Eymann R, Steudel WI (2006) Outcome predictors for normal-pressure hydrocephalus. Acta Neurochir Suppl 96:364–367

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Kosteljanetz M, Westergaard L, Kaalund J, Nehen AM (1989) The significance of outflow resistance measurements in the prediction of outcome after CSF-shunting in patients with normal pressure hydrocephalus. In: Hoff JT, Betz AL (eds) Intracranial pressure VII. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, pp 383–385

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. Malm J, Kristensen B, Karlsson T, Fagerlund M, Elfverson J, Ekstedt J (1995) The predictive value of cerebrospinal fluid dynamic tests in patients with idiopathic adult hydrocephalus syndrome. Arch Neurol 52:783–789

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Meier U, Kiefer M, Neumann U, Lemcke J (2006) On the optimal opening pressure of hydrostatic valves in cases of idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus: a prospective randomized study with 123 patients. Acta Neurochir Suppl 96:358–363

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Kiefer .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag/Wien

About this paper

Cite this paper

Kiefer, M., Eymann, R. (2010). Clinical Proof of the Importance of Compliance for Hydrocephalus Pathophysiology. In: Czernicki, Z., Baethmann, A., Ito, U., Katayama, Y., Kuroiwa, T., Mendelow, D. (eds) Brain Edema XIV. Acta Neurochirurgica Supplementum, vol 106. Springer, Vienna. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-211-98811-4_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-211-98811-4_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Vienna

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-211-98758-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-211-98811-4

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics