Abstract
This chapter concerns the dynamic analysis of flexible multibody systems. After a brief review of the intertial frame, the corotational frame and the floating frame approaches, a general simulation framework is presented in detail. Based on the finite element concept, the proposed approach allows the coupled analysis of dynamic systems composed of rigid and flexible bodies, kinematic joints and control elements. The text is illustrated with some didactic examples and industrial applications.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
Bibliography
M. Arnold and O. Brüls. Convergence of the generalized-α scheme for constrained mechanical systems. Multibody System Dynamics, 18(2):185–202, 2007.
Z. Bai and Y. Su. Dimension reduction of large-scale second-order dynamical systems via a second-order Arnoldi method. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 26(5):1692–1709, 2005.
O. Bauchau and L. Trainelli. The vectorial parameterization of rotation. Nonlinear Dynamics, 32:71–92, 2003.
T. Belytschko and J. Hsieh. Non-linear transient finite element analysis with convected co-ordinates. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 7:255–271, 1973.
P. Betsch and P. Steinmann. Constrained integration of rigid body dynamics. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 191: 467–488, 2001.
O. Brüls and M. Arnold. The generalized-α scheme as a linear multistep integrator: Towards a general mechatronic simulator. ASME Journal of Computational and Nonlinear Dynamics, 13 pages, accepted, 2008.
O. Brüls and J.-C. Golinval. On the numerical damping of time integrators for coupled mechatronic systems. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 197(6–8):577–588, 2008.
O. Brüls, P. Duysinx, and J.-C. Golinval. The global modal parameterization for nonlinear model-order reduction in flexible multibody dynamics. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 69(5):948–977, 2007.
A. Cardona and M. Géradin. A beam finite element non-linear theory with finite rotations. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 26:2403–2438, 1988.
A. Cardona and M. Géradin. Time integration of the equations of motion in mechanism analysis. Computers and Structures, 33:801–820, 1989.
A. Cardona and M. Géradin. A superelement formulation for mechanism analysis. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 32(8):1565–1594, 1991.
J. Chung and G. M. Hulbert. A time integration algorithm for structural dynamics with improved numerical dissipation: The generalized-α method. ASME Journal of Applied Mechanics, 60:374–375, 1993.
R. Craig and M. Bampton. Coupling of substructures for dynamic analysis. AIAA Journal, 6(7):1313–1319, 1968.
M.A. Crisfield and G. Jelenic. Objectivity of strain measures in the geometrically exact three-dimensional beam theory and its finite-element implementation. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A, 455: 1125–1147, 1999.
M.A. Crisfield, U. Galvanetto, and G. Jelenic. Dynamics of 3-D corotational beams. Computational Mechanics, 20:507–519; 1997.
S. Erlicher, L. Bonaventura, and O.S. Bursi. The analysis of the generalized-α method for non-linear dynamic problems. Computational Mechanics, 28:83–104, 2002.
B. Fraeijs de Veubeke. The dynamics of flexible bodies. International Journal of Engineering Science, 14:895–913, 1976.
M. Géradin and A. Cardona. Flexible Multibody Dynamics: A Finite Element Approach. John Wiley & Sons, New York, 2001.
K.D. Glover. All optimal Hankel-norm approximation of linear multivariable systems and their L ∞-error bounds. International Journal of Control, 39(6):1115–1193, 1984.
E.J. Grimme. Krylov projection methods for model reduction. PhD thesis, ECE Department Univ. Of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, 1997.
H. Hilber, T. Hughes, and R. Taylor. Improved numerical dissipation for time integration algorithms in structural dynamics. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 5:283–292, 1977.
J.D. Huggins. Experimental verification of a model of a two-link flexible, lightweight manipulator. Master’s thesis, Georgia Institute of Technology, 1988.
K.E. Jansen, C.H. Whiting, and G.M. Hulbert. A generalized-α method for integrating the filtered Navier-Stokes equations with a stabilized finite element method. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 190:305–319, 2000.
H.-J. Lai, E.J. Haug, S.S. Kim, and D.-S. Bae. A decoupled flexible-relative co-ordinate recursive approach for flexible multibody dynamics. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 32:1669–1690, 1991.
C. Lauwerys, J. Swevers, and P. Sas. Model free design for a semi-active suspension of a passenger car. In Proc. of ISMA 2004, Leuven, Belgium, September 2004.
E.V. Lens and A. Cardona. A nonlinear beam element formulation in the framework of an energy preserving time integration scheme for constrained multibody systems dynamics. Computers and Structures, 86: 47–63, 2008.
R. Mac Neal. A hybrid method of component mode synthesis. Computers and Structures, 1:581–601, 1971.
L. Meirovitch and M.-K. Kwak. Rayleigh-Ritz based substructure synthesis for flexible multibody dynamics. AIAA Journal, 28:1709–1719, 1991.
D.G. Meyer and S. Srinivasan. Balancing and model reduction for secondorder form linear systems. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 41(11): 1632–1644, 1996.
B.C. Moore. Principal component analysis in linear systems: Controllability, observability and model reduction. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 26:17–32, 1981.
N. Newmark. A method of computation for structural dynamics. ASCE Journal of the Engineering Mechanics Division, 85:67–94, 1959.
S. Rubin. Improved component mode representation for structural dynamics analysis. AIAA Journal, 13(8):995–1006, 1975.
A.A. Shabana and R.A. Wehage. A coordinate reduction technique for dynamic analysis of spatial substructures with large angular rotations. Journal of Structural Mechanics, 11:401–431, 1983.
J.C. Simo. A finite strain beam formulation. The three-dimensional dynamic problem. Part I. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 49:55–70, 1985.
J.C. Simo and L. Vu-Quoc. On the dynamics in space of rods undergoing large motions — a geometrically exact approach. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 66:125–161, 1988.
T.J. Su and R.J. Craig. Model reduction and control of flexible structures using Kryolov vectors. AIAA Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 14(2):260–267, 1991.
O. Wallrapp and R. Schwertassek. Representation of geometric stiffening in multibody system simulation. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 32(8):1833–1850, 1991.
T.M. Wasfy and A.K. Noor. Computational strategies for flexible multibody systems. Applied Mechanics Review, 56(6):553–613, 2003.
T.R. Wilson. The design and construction of flexible manipulators. Master’s thesis, Georgia Institute of Technology, 1986.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 CISM, Udine
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Brüls, O., Cardona, A., Géradin, M. (2008). Modelling, simulation and control of flexible multibody systems. In: Arnold, M., Schiehlen, W. (eds) Simulation Techniques for Applied Dynamics. CISM International Centre for Mechanical Sciences, vol 507. Springer, Vienna. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-211-89548-1_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-211-89548-1_2
Publisher Name: Springer, Vienna
Print ISBN: 978-3-211-89547-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-211-89548-1
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)