Abstract
Human space activities are the subject of critical debate and justifications in the public — much more than other fields of human action and research — as well as in the scientific community due to the great amount of money spent in a highly competitive environment for public funding of scientific research and technological development. The exceptional visibility of space flight is a factor that intensifies the questions of legitimacy and creates public pressure unlike other huge investments in large facilities and enterprises, which are developing outside the limelight of public attention.195 This situation exerts particular pressure on sound reasoning when reaching budgetary decisions for manned spaceflight beyond any short-lived credits that may be gained from single, attractive missions.
Examples may be large ion-colliders and electron-synchrotons for nuclear physical research.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Gethmann, Carl Friedrich. “Manned Space Travel as a Cultural Mission”. Poiesis & Praxis. International Journal of Ethics of Science and Technology Assessment 4 (2006): 239–252.
Another side-effect resulted from the well-known “overview effect” which became a driver for world-wide environmentalism for more the 30 years. See also Seboldt, Wolfgang et al. “A review of the long-term options for space exploration and utilisation”. ESA Bulletin 101 (2000): 31–39.
Knobloch, Eberhard. “Erkundung und Erforschung — Alexander von Humboldts Amerikareise”. Poiesis & Praxis: International Journal of Ethics of Science and Technology Assessment 4 (2006): 267–288.
Gethmann, Carl F. “Man in space: The Ethics of Space Policy”. P. Pompidou, Alain ed. Paris: UNESCO. pp. 55–56.
Jonas, Hans. Das Prinzip Verantwortung. Frankfurt a. M: Suhrkamp, 1979.
Williamson, Mark. “Space ethics and protection of the space environment”. Space Policy 19 (2003): 47–52.
Wilholt, Torsten. “Scientific autonomy and planned research: the case of space science”. Poiesis & Praxis. International Journal of Ethics of Science and Technology Assessment 4 (2006): 253–266.
Schrogl, Kai-Uwe, and Nicola Rohner. “Für einen neuen Ansatz zur Begründung der Raumfahrt”. Die Zukunft der Raumfahrt. Ihr Nutzen und ihr Wert. Gethmann, Carl Friedrich, Rohner, Nicola, Schrogl, Kai-Uwe eds. Bad Neuenahr-Ahrweiler: Europhäische Akademie, 2007.
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer-Verlag/Wien
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lingner, S. (2009). Human spaceflight as a matter of culture and national vision. In: Codignola, L., Schrogl, KU., Lukaszczyk, A., Peter, N. (eds) Humans in Outer Space — Interdisciplinary Odysseys. Studies in Space Policy, vol 1. Springer, Vienna. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-211-87465-3_22
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-211-87465-3_22
Publisher Name: Springer, Vienna
Print ISBN: 978-3-211-87464-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-211-87465-3
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)