Skip to main content
  • 385 Accesses

Abstract

The idea of independent ombudsmen controlling the administrative branch has undergone a development in the 20th century, tantamount to an institutional success story. The structure of the institutions differs throughout the various European legal orders. However, the comparative examination of these institutions shows that they have influenced, complemented and enriched one another in various ways. The suggested models of ombudsmen, classified according to powers — the classical model, the model based on the state governed by the rule of law, and the model centred on the protection of human rights — are only rarely found in pure form. In practice, most of the institutions are provided with different combinations of powers, showing characteristics of diverse models. Thus the conclusion can be drawn that the national-political role of ombudsmen nowadays often exceeds the “classical” idea of an informal control of administration by far.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

o

  • Kelsen Hans, Wesen und Entwicklung der Staatsgerichtsbarkeit, Verhandlungen der Deutschen Staatsrechtslehrer, Heft 5, 1929, 30.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag/Wien

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

(2008). Summary and Outlook. In: Kucsko-Stadlmayer, G. (eds) European Ombudsman-Institutions. Springer, Vienna. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-211-72882-6_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics