Skip to main content
  • 639 Accesses

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliographie

  • Abromeit, H. (1998), Democracy in Europe: legitimising politics in a nonstate polity, New York: Berghahn Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Achen, C.H./ Bartels, L.M. (2000), ‘Blind Retrospection. Electoral Responses to Drought, Flu, and Shark Attacks’, Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston, August 28–September 1, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ackerman, B.A. (1980), Social Justice in the Liberal State, New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ackerman, B.A. (1992), The Future of Liberal Revolution, New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adair, D. D. (1998), ‘The Tenth Federalist Revisited’, in: T. Colborn (ed.), Fame and the Founding Fathers: Essay by Douglass Adair, Ch. 3, Liberty Fund (orig. 1951).

    Google Scholar 

  • Adams, R.G. (1922), Political Ideas of the American Revolution. Brittanic-American contributions to the problem of imperial organization 1765 to 1775, Durham, N.C.: Trinity College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adkins. A.W.H. (1984), ‘The Connection between Aristotle’s Ethics and Politics’, Political Theory, 12(1), 29–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Almond, G./ Verba, S. (1963), The Civic Culture, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alter, K.J., (1996), ‘The European Court’s Political Power’, West European Politics, 19(3), 458–487.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersen S.S./ Burns T.R. (1996), ‘The European Union and the Erosion of Democracy: A Study of Post-Parliamentary Governance’, in: S: Andersen/ K.A. Eliassen (eds.), The European Union: How Democratic Is It?, London: Sage 227–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, C.J. (1995), ‘Economic uncertainty and European solidarity revisited: Trends in public support for European integration’, in: C. Rhodes/ S. Mazey (eds.), The state of the European Union: Vol.3 Building a European Polity?, Boulder, Col.: Lynne Rienner, 111–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, C.J. (1998), ‘When in Doubt, Use Proxies. Attitudes Toward Domestic Politics and Support for European Integration’, Comparative Political Studies, 31(5), 569–601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andeweg, R. (1995), ‘The Reshaping of National Party Systems’ in: J. Hayward (ed.), The Crisis of Representation in Europe, London: Frank Cass 1995, 58–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andeweg R.B. (1999), ‘Towards Representation. Ex Alto and Ex Post? Political Representation between Individualisation and Europeanisation’, 1999–2000 European Forum, Conference Multi-level Party Systems: Europeanization and the Reshaping of National Political Representation, Conference Paper, EUR/11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ankersmit, F.R. (2002), Political Representation, Stanford, Cal.: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Apter, D. (1968), Some Conceptual Approaches to the Study of Modernisation, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arendt, H. (1990), On Revolution, London/New York: Penguin Books, orig. 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aristoteles (1986), Nikomachische Ethik, übersetzt v. O. Gigon, Muenchen: dtv, 6. Aufl.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnold, D.R. (1993), ‘Can Inattentive Citizens Control Their Elected Representatives?’, in: L. Dodd/ B. Oppenheimer (eds.), Congress Reconsidered, 5th ed., Washington, DC: CQ Press, 401–416.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnold, C./ Hosli, M.O./ Pennings, P. (2004), Social Policy-Making in the European Union: A new mode of Governance?, Paper presented at the 2004 Conference of Europeanists, “Europe and the World: Integration, Interdependence, Exceptionalism?”, March 11–13, 2004, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, K.J. (1963), Social Choice and Individual Values, 2nd ed., New Haven/London: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aspinwall, M. (1998), ‘Collective Attraction — the New Political Game in Brussels’, in: J. Greenwood/ M. Aspinwall (eds.), Collective Action in the European Union, London: Routledge, 196–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Assmann, J. (1992), Das kulturelle Gedächtnis. Schrift, Erinnerung und politische Identität in frühen Hochkulturen, München: Beck.

    Google Scholar 

  • Austin, J.L. (1961), ‘Performative Utterances’, wiederabgedruckt in: A.P. Martinich (ed.) (1985), The Philosophy of Language, 4. Ausgabe, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 115–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Austin, J.L. (1962), ‘Locutionary, Illocutionary, perlocutionary’, wiederabgedruckt in: R.M. Harnish (ed.), Basic Topics in the Philosophy of Language, Prentice-Hall: Englewood Cliffs, 30–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Austin, J.L. (1975), How to do Things with Words, hrsg.v. J.O. Urmson/ M. Sbisà, 2. Ausg., Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bach, Maurizio (1999). Die Bürokratisierung Europas. Verwaltungseliten, Experten und politische Legitimation in Europa, Campus, Frankfurt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailyn, B. (1993), The Debate on the Constitution. Federalist and Antifederalist Speeches, Articles, and Letters During the Struggle over Ratification. Part One: September 1787 to February 1788, New York: The Library of America.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball, T. (1988), Transforming Political Discourse, Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball, T. (1995), Reappraising Political Theory: revisionist studies in the history of political thought, Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balme, R./ Chabanet, D./ Wright, V. (eds.) (2002), Collective Action in Europe, Pairs: Presse de Science Po.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barber, J. (1965), The Lawmakers, New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barber, B.R. (1984), Strong Democracy: Participatory Politics for a New Age, Los Angeles/London: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barker, E. (1960), Greek Political Theory: Plato and his Predecessors, 5. Aufl., London: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartolini, S. (1998), ‘Exit options, boundary building, political structuring. Sketches of a theory of large-scale territorial and membership “retrenchment/differentiation” versus “expansion/integration” (with reference to the European Union)’, EUI Florence, SPS Working Paper no 98/1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartolini, S. (1999), Political representation in loosely bounded territories. Between Europe and the nation-state, Paper presented at the conference ‘Multi-level party systems: Europeanisation and the reshaping of national political representation’, European University Institute Firenze.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barry, B. (1970), Sociologists, Economists and Democracy, London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barry, B. (1989), ‘Is Democracy Special?’, in: B. Barry, Democracy, Power and Justice, Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauböck, R. (1994), Transnational Citizenship: membership and rights in international migration, Aldershot: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beach, D. (2003), Towards a new method of constitutional bargaining? The role and impact of EU institutions in the IGC and convention method of treaty reform, Paper presented to Dansk Selskab for Europaforsknings årsmøde, Ålborg, 27 September 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beach, D. (2004), ‘The unseen hand in treaty reform negotiations: the role and influence of the Council Secretariat’, Journal of European Public Policy, 11(3), 408–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, P./ Leißse O. (2005), Die Zukunft Europas. Der Konvent zur Zukunft der Europäischen Union, Wiesbaden: Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beetham, D. (1993), ‘Liberal Democracy and the Limits of Democratization’, in: D. Held (ed.), Prospects for Democracy: North, South, East, West, Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellamy, R./ Castiglione, D. (1997), ‘Building the union: the nature of sovereignty in the political architecture of Europe’, Law and Philosophy 16: 421–445.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellamy, R./ Castiglione, D. (2000), ‘Democracy, Sovereignty and the Constitution of the European Union: The Republican Alternative to Liberalism’, in: Z. Bañkowski/ A. Scott (eds.), The European Union and Its Order: The Legal Theory of European Integration, Oxford: Blackwell, 169–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellamy, R./ Castiglione, D. (2000a). ‚The Normative Turn in European Union Studies: Legitimacy, Identity and Democracy‘, RUSEL, 38, http://www.ex.ac.uk/shipss/politics/research/rusel.htm

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellers, J./ Häckel, E. (1990), ‘Theorien internationaler Integration und internationaler Organisationen’, in: V. Rittberger (Hg.). Theorien der internationalen Beziehungen. Bestandsaufnahme und Forschungsperspektiven, Opladen, 286–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benedetto, G. (2005), ‘Rapporteurs as legislative entrepreneurs: the dynamics of the codecision procedure in Europe’s Parliament’, Journal of European Public Policy 12(1), 67–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benhabib, S. (1996) ‘Introduction. The Democratic Moment and the Problem of Difference’, in: S. Benhabib (ed.), Democracy and Difference. Contesting the Boundaries of the Political, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 3–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benhabib, S. (1996a), ‘Toward a Deliberative Model of Democratic Legitimacy’, in: diess. (ed.), Democracy and Difference. Contesting the Boundaries of the Political, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 67–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benn S.I. (1967), ‘Egalitarianism and the Equal Consideraton of Interests’, in: J.R. Pennock/ J.W. Chapman (eds.), Equality (Nomo IX), New York: Atherton Press, 61–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentham, J. (1818), Plan of Parliamentary reform, in the form of a catechism, with reasons for each article: with an introduction, shewing the necessity of radical, and the inadequacy of moderate, reform, London: T.J. Wooler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berelson, B./ Lazarsfeld, P.F./ McPhee, W.N. (1954), Voting: A Study of Opinion Formation in a Presidential Campaign, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, P./ Luckmann T. (1966), Die gesellschaftliche Konstruktion der Wirklichkeit. Eine Theorie der Wissenssoziologie, Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergman, T./ Mueller, W.C./ Strøm, K. (eds.) (2000), ‘Special Issues: Parliamentary democracy and the chain of delegation’, European Journal of Political Research, 37(3).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergman, T./ Damgaard, E. (2000), Delegation and Accountability in European Integration: The Nordic Parliamentary Democracies and the European Union, London: Frank Cass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergman, T./ Raunio, T. (2001), ‘Parliaments and Policy-making in the European Union’, in: J. Richardson (ed.), European Union: Power and Policy-Making, 2nd ed., London: Routledge, 115–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berlin, I. (1969), ‘Does Political Theory Still Exist?’, in: P. Laslett/Runciman, W.G. (eds.), Philosophy, Politics and Society, Second series, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Betten, L. (1998), ‘The Democratic Deficit of Participatory Democracy in Community Social Policy’, European Law Review 23(1), 20–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beyers, J. (2002), ‘Voice and access. Political practices of diffuse and specific interest associations in European policy making’, ARENA Working Paper No.39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beyers, J. (2004), ‘Voice and Access. Political Practices of European Interest Associations’, European Union Politics 5(2), 211–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beyme, K.v. (1965), ‚Repräsentatives und parlamentarische Regierungssystem. Eine begriffsgeschichtliche Analyse‘, Politische Vierteljahresschrift 6, 145–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beyme, K.v. (1985), Political Parties in Western Europe, Aldershot: Gower.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beyme, K.v. (1992), ‚Parlament, Demokratie, und Öffentlichkeit. Die Visualisierung demokratischer Grundprinzipien im Parlamentsbau‘, in: I. Flagge/ W.J. Stock (Hrsg.), Architektur und Demokratie. Bauen für die Politik von der amerikanischen Revolution bis zur Gegenwart, Stuttgart: Hatje, 33–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beyme, K.v. (1997), Der Gesetzgeber. Der Bundestag als Entscheidungszentrum, Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biddle, B.J. (1986), ‘Recent developments in Role Theory’, Annual Review of Sociology 12, 67–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bieber, R. (1974), Organe der erweiterten Europäischen Gemeinschaften: Das Parlament, Baden-Baden: Nomos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bieber, R. (1991), ‚Verfassungsentwicklung und Verfassungsgebung in der Europäischen Gemeinschaft‘, in: R. Wildenmann (Hg.), Staatswerdung Europas?, Baden-Baden: Nomos, 393–414.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bieber, R. (1995), ‚Verfassungsgebung und Verfassungsänderung in der Europäischen Union‘, in: R. Bieber/ P. Widmer (Hrsg.), L’espace constitutionnel européen, Zürich: Schulthess, 313–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bieber, R./ Pantalis, J./ Schoo, J. (1986), ‘Implications of the Single Act for the European Parliament’, Common Market Law Review 23(4), 767–792.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bingham Powell, Jr. G. (2001), Democratic Representation: Two Contributions from Comparative Politics, Prepared for delivery at the 2001 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, San Francisco, California, August 30, September 2, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birch, A.H. (1971), Representation, New York: Praeger Pub.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birch, A.H. (1993), The Concepts and Theories of Modern Democracy, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackman, R. (1999), European Parliament Elections 1999. Guide to Electoral Systems in the Member States, London: Federal Trust.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blaug, R. (1996), ‘New Developments in deliberative Democracy’, Politics, 16(2), 72–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloch, M. (1992), The Historians Craft, Manchester: Manchester University Press (orig. 1954).

    Google Scholar 

  • Blondel, J./ Sinnot, R./ Svensson, P. (1998), People and Parliament in the European Union: Participation, Democracy and Legitimacy, Oxford: Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blondel, J./ Cotta, M. (eds.) (2000), The Nature of Party Government. A Comparative European Perspective, London: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bobbio, N. (1987), The Future of Democracy, Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boucher, D. (1985), Texts in Context. Revisionist Methods for Studying the History of Ideas, Dordrecht: Nijhoff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boeckenfoerde, E. (1999), Staat, Nation, Europa. Studien zur Staatslehre, Verfassungstheorie und Rechtsphilosophie, Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bodéüs, R. (1993), The Political Dimension of Aristotle’s Ethics, Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohman, J. (1996), Public Deliberation. Pluralism, Complexity, and Democracy, Cambridge, Mass./London: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohman, J./ Rehg, W. (eds.) (1997), Deliberative Democracy: essays on reason and politics, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonwick, C. (1999), ‘The United States Constitution and its Roots in British Political Thought and Tradition’, in: in: J. Pinder (ed.), Foundations of Democracy in the European Union. From the Genesis of Parliamentary Democracy to the European Parliament, London: Macmillan Press, 41–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Börzel, T.A./ Risse, T. (2000), When Europe Hits Home: Europeanization and Domestic Change, European Integration Online Papers, 4 (15): http://eiop.or.at/eiop/texte/2000-015a.htm

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1993), Sozialer Sinn: Kritik der theoretischen Vernunft, Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, K.S.C. (1987), ‘Maintaining the Balance: The Role of the Court of Justice in Defining the Institutional Position of the European Parliament’, Common Market Law Review 24, 41–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, F.H. (1969), Collected Essays, 2. Vols., orig. 1935, Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, K.S.C. (1991), ‘Sense and Sensibility: Parliament v. Council Continued’, European Law Review, 16(3), 245–257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bredekamp, H. (2002), Thomas Hobbes’ visuelle Strategien. Der Leviathan: Urbild des modernen Staates, Berlin: Akademie Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brehm, J./ Gates S. (1997), Working, Shirking and Sabotage, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, G./ Hamlin A. (2000), Democratic Devices and Desires, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brzinski, J.B./T.D. Lancaster/ C. Tuschhoff (eds.) (1999), Compounded Representation in Western European Federations, Franc Cass, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brok, E. (2004), ‚Die künftige Verfassung der Europäischen Union — ein Plädoyer für den Verfassungsvertrag‘, Integration 27(4), 328–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brug, van der, W./ Eijk, van der, C./ Franklin, M. (2001), ‘Small Effects, large Consequences: Electoral Responses to Economic Conditions in 15 Countries, 1989–1999’, Paper presented at the ECPR General Conference, Canterbury, England, September 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brugmans, H. (1970), ‘Foreword’, in: S. Patjin (ed.), Landmarks of European Unity: 22 Texts on European Integration, Leyden: A.W. Sijthoof, 8–15).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruha, T. / Hesse, J./ Nowak, C. (Hrsg.) (2001), Welche Verfassung für Europa?, Baden-Baden: Nomos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunner, O./ Conze, W./ Koselleck, R. (Hrsg.) (1974–1997), Geschichtliche Grundbegriffe: Historisches Lexikon zur politisch-sozialen Sprache in Deutschland, Stuttgart: Klett.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryce J. (1921), The American Commonwealth, London: Macmillan & Co., erstmals 1898 publiziert.

    Google Scholar 

  • Budge, I. (1996), The New Challenge of Direct Democracy, Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bulmer, S.J. (1996), ‘The European Council and the Council of the European Union: Shapers of a European Confederation’, Publius 26(4), 17–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burke, E. (1866), ‘Speech at the Conclusion of the Poll’, in: The Works of Edmund Burke, 12 vls., Boston, orig. 1774, 2: 95–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, E. (1887), ‘A Letter to Sir Hercules Langrishe on the Subject of the Roman Catholics in Ireland, and the Propriety of Admitting them to the Elective Franchise, Consistently with the Principles of the Constitution, as Established at the Revolution (1792)’, in: The Works of the Right Honourable Edmund Burke, Bd. IV, London 1899, 241–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, P. (2001), The Fabrication of Louis XIV., New Haven/London: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burley, A./ Mattli, W. (1993), ‘Europe Before the Court: A Political Theory of Legal Integration’, International Organization 47(1), 41–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnheim, J. (1985), Is Democracy Possible?: the alternative to electoral politics, Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butt P.A. (1985), Pressure Groups in the EC, University Association for European Studies, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, D./ Marquand, D. (1981), European Elections and British Politics, London: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, J. (1999), Gender Trouble, New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cain, B.E./ Ferejohn, J.A./ Fiorina, M.P., ‘A House Is Not A Home: British MPs in Their Constituencies’, Legislative Studies Quarterly 4, 501–524.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calhoun, J. (1995), A Disquisition on Government and Selections from the Discourse, hrsg. von C. Gordon Post, orig. 1849, Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callenbach, E./M. Phillips (1985), A Citizen Legislature. Stretching our thinking about how we govern ourselves, Berkeley: Banyan Tree Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camps, M. (1964), Britain and the European Community 1995–1963, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caporaso, J. (1996), ‘The European Union and Forms of State: Westphalian, Regulatory or Post-Modern?’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 1, 29–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carey, J. (1998), Term Limits and Legislative Representation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carey, J./ Niemi, R.G./ Powell, L.W. (2000), Term Limits in the State Legislatures, Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, S./ Kymlicka, W. (eds.) (2002), Alternative Conceptions of Civil Society, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cayrol, R./ Parodi, J./ Ysmal, C. (1976), ‘French Deputies and the Political System’, Legislative Studies Quarterly, 1, 67–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Checkel, J.T. (2001), ‘Taking Deliberation Seriously’, ARENA Working Paper 01/14, Oslo: Arena.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheibub, J. A./ Przeworski, A. (1999) ‘Democracy, Elections and Accountability for Election Outcomes’, in: A. Przeworski/ S.C. Stokes/ B. Manin (eds.), Democracy, Accountability, and Representation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 222–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cherubim D. (1983), ‚Sprachwandel und Sprachkritik im 19. Jahrhundert. Beitäge zur Konstitution einer pragmatischen Sprachgeschichte‘, in: Literatur und Sprache im historischen Prozeß. Vorträge des deutschen Germanistentages Aachen 1982, 2. Bd., Tübingen, 170–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chi, K.S./ Leatherby, D. (1998), ‘State Legislative Term Limits’, Solutions: Policy-Options for State Decision-Makers, Vol. 6, 1–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiti, E. (2004), ‘Decentralisation and Integration into Community Administrations: A New Perspective on European Agencies’, European Law Journal 10(4), 402–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christiansen, T./ Jørgensen, K. (1999), ‘The Amsterdam Process: A Structurationist Perspective on EU Reform’, European Integration Online Papers 3(1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chryssochoou, D.N. (1996), ‘Europe’s Could-Be Demos: Recasting the Debate’, West European Politics, 19(4), 787–801.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chryssochoou, D.N. (1998), Democracy in the European Union, London: Tauris Academic Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cini, M. (1996), The European Commission: Leadership, Organisation and Culture in the EU Administration, Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, M.V. (1936), Medieval Representation and Consent: A Study of Early Parliaments in England and Ireland, With Special Reference to the Modus Tenendi Parliamentum, New York: Russel⌣ssel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Claeys, P.H./ Gobin, C./ Smets, I./ Winand, P. (eds.) (1998), Lobbying Pluralism and European Integration, Brussels: European Interuniversity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Closa, C. (2002), ‘The implicit model of constitution in the EU Constitutional Project’, E.O. Eriksen/ J.E. Fossum (eds.), Constitution Making and Democratic Legitimacy, Oslo: University of Oslo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Closa, C. (2003). Improving EU Constitutional Politics? A Preliminary Assessment of the Convention. Constitutionalism Web-Papers, ConWEB No. 1. http://les1.man.ac.uk/conweb (23 June 2003).

    Google Scholar 

  • Closa, C. (2004), ‘The Convention method and the transformation of EU constitutional politics’, in E.O. Erikssen/ J.E. Fossum/ A. Menéndez (eds.) Developing a European constitution, London: Routledge, 183–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Closa, C./ Fossum J.E. (eds) (2004), Deliberative Constitutional Politics in the EU, Arena Report No. 5/04, Oslo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cobban, A. (1978), Edmund Burke and the revolt against the eighteenth century: a study of the political and social thinking of Burke, Wordsworth, Coleridge, and Southey, New York: AMS Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coen, D. (1997), ‘The Evolution of the Large Firm as a Political Actor in the European Union’, Journal of European Public Policy, 4(1), 91–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coker, F.W. (1915) ‘Representation’, The American Political Science Review, vol.15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1989), ‘Deliberation and Democratic Legitimacy’, in: A. Hamlin/ P. Pettit (eds.), The Good Polity, Oxford: Blackwell, 17–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, G.D.H. (1920), Social Theory, London: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collier, D./ Levitsky, S. (1992), ‘Democracy with Adjectives: Conceptual Innovation in Comparative Research’, World Politics, 49(3), 430–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Committee of Independent Experts (1999), First Report on Allegations of Fraud, Mismanagement and Nepotism in the European Commission, 15.3.1999, http://www.europarl.eu.int/experts/pdf/reporten.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conolly, W. (1974), The Terms of Political Discourse, Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Converse, P.E. (1964), ‘The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics’, in: D.E. Apter (ed.), Ideology and Discontent, New York: Free Press, 206–261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corbett, R. (1987), ‘The 1985 Intergouvernmental Conference and the Single European Act’, in: R. Price (ed.), The Dynamics of European Union, London: Croom Helm, 238–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corbett, R. (1998), The European Parliament’s Role in Closer EU Integration, London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corbett, R./ Jacobs, F./ Shackleton, M. (2000), The European Parliament, London: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornides, W. (1949), ‚Das Projekt einer Europäischen Versammlung‘, Europa-Archiv, Jg. 1949, 2011ff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costa, O./ Jabko N./ Lequesne C./ Magnette P. (2003), ‘Introduction: Diffuse control mechanisms in the European Union: towards a new democracy?’, Journal of European Public Policy, 10(5), Special Issue: The Diffusion of Democracy — Emerging Forms and Norms of Democratic Control in the European Union, 666–676.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox, G. (1991), ‘SNTV and d’Hondt are “Equivalent”, Electoral Studies, 10, 118–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coultrap, J. (1999), ‘From parliamentarism to pluralism: models of democracy and the European Union’s democratic deficit’, Journal of Theoretical Politics 11(1), 107–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crane, T. (1995), ‘Representation’, in: T. Hondrich (ed.), The Oxford Companion to Philosophy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crenson, M.A./ Rourke, F.E. (1987), ‘By Way of Conclusion: American Bureaucracy since World War II.’, in: L. Galambos (ed.), The New American State, Baltimore: John Hopkins University, 213–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crombez, C. (2002), ‘Information, Lobbying and the Legislative Processin the European Union’, European Union Politics 3(1), 7–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cromme, F. (1995), ‚Der Verfassungsentwurf des Institutionellen Ausschusses des Europäischen Parlaments von 1994‘, Zeitschrift für Gesetzgebung, 10(3), 256–261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crum, B. (2004). Politics and Power in the European Convention, Politics, 24(1), pp. 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Curtice, J. (1989), ‘The 1989 European Elections: Protest or Green Tide?’ Electoral Studies 8, 217–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Curtin, D. (1997), Postnational Democracy. The European Union in Search for a Political Philosophy, The Hague: Kluwer Law.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daalder, H./ Rusk, J.G. (1972), ‘Perceptions of Party in the Dutch Parliament’, in: S.C. Patterson/ J.C. Wahlke (eds.), Comparative Legislative Behaviour: Frontiers of Research, New York: John Wiley, 143–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, R. (1967), Pluarlist Democracy in the United States: Conflict and Consent, Chicago: Rand McNelly.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, R. (1971), Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, R. (1989), Democracy and its Critics, New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, R. (1991), Review Symposium on Democracy and its Critics, Journal of Politics 53(1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, R. (1994), ‘A Democratic Dilemma: System Effectiveness Versus Citizen Participation’, Political Science Quarterly, 109(1), 23–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, R. (1999), ‘Can international organizations be democratic? A skeptic’s view’, in: I. Shapiro/ C. Hacker-Cordón (eds.), Democracy’s Edges, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 19–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalton, R.J./ Eichenberg, R. (1998), ‘A people’s Europe: Citizen support for the 1992 project and beyond’, in: D. Smith/ J. Ray (eds.), The 1992 project and the future of integration in Europe, Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe, 73–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darcy, R./ Welch, S./ Clark, J. (1994), Women, elections and representation, Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davids, K./ Lucassen, J. (eds.) (1995), A Miracle Mirrored: The Dutch Republic in European Perspective, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, R.H. (1969), The Role of the Congressman, New York: Pegasus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dehousse, R./F. Deloche-Gaudez (2003), La genèse d’une constitution transnationale: éléments d’analyse, Paper presented at the workshop ‘European Integration and Constitutionalism after the European Convention, Sciences Po, Paris 18./19. Dezember 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dehousse, R. (2003a), ‘Beyond representative democracy’, in: J.H.H. Weiler/ M. Wind (eds.), European Constitutionalism Beyond the State, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 136–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delle Carpini, M./ Keeter, S. (1996), What Americans Know About Politics and Why It Matters, New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deloche-Gaudez, F. (2001). The Convention on a Charter of Fundamental Rights: A Method for the Future?, Notre Europe Research and Policy Paper 15.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Ruyt, J. (1989), L’Acte Unique Européen, Brüssel: Institut d’Etudes Européen.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Witte, B. (ed) (2003), Ten Reflections on the Constitutional Treaty for Europe. Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies, European University Institute, San Domenico di Fiesole, Italy. http://europa.eu.int/futurum/documents/other/oth020403_en.pdf (16. September 2003).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dietz, M. (2002), Turning Operations, Feminism, Arendt, and Politics, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, P.J./ Powell, W.W. (eds.) (1991), The Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dinan, D. (1994), An Ever Closer Union?, Boulder: L. Rienner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dinan, D. (2002), ‘Institutions and governance 2001–2002: Debating the EU’s future’, Journal of Common Market Studies, Annual Review Pages 29–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dinnerstein, D. (1977), The Mermaid and the Minotaur. Sexual Arrangements and Human Malaise, New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donahue, J.D./ Pollack. M. (2001), ‘Centralization and Its Discontents: The Rhythm of Federalism in the United States and the European Union’, in: K. Nicolaides/ R. Howse (eds.), The Federal Vision. Legitimacy and Levels of Governance in the United States and the European Union, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dohrn-van Rossum, G. (1978), ‚Organ, Organismus, Organisation, politischer Körper‘, in: O. Brunner/ W. Conze/ R. Koselleck (Hrsg.), Geschichtliche Grundbegriffe: Historisches Lexikon zur politisch-sozialen Sprache in Deutschland, Bd. 5, Stuttgart: Klett, 1974–1997, 519–560.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downs, A. (1957), An Economic Theory of Democracy, New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drath, M. (1968), ‚Die Entwicklung der Volksrepraesentation‘, in: H. Rausch (Hg.), Zur Theorie und Geschichte der Repraesentation und Repraesentativverfassung, Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, orig. 1954, 260–329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dryzek, J.S. (1990), Discursive Democracy: Politics, Policy, and Political Science, Cambridge: Cambridge Unversity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dryzek, J.S. (2000), Deliberative Democracy and Beyond: liberals, critics contestations, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duchêne, F. (1994), Jean Monnet: The First Statesman of Independence, London: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duchesne, S./ Frognier, A. (1995), ‘Is there a European Identity?’, in: O. Niedermayer/ R. Sinnott (eds.), Public Opinion and Internationalized Governance, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dulles, J.F. (1950), Krieg oder Frieden, Wien: Humboldt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunleavy, P.(1988), ‘Group Identities and Individual Influence: Reconstructing the Theory of Interest Groups’, British Journal of Political Science 18(1), 21–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, D./ Uhr J. (1993), ‘Accountability and Responsibility in Modern Democratic Governments’, Paper presented at the annual meeting of the APSA, Washingto D.C., September 2–5, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, J. (1980), Political Obligation in its Historical Context. Essays in Political Theory, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, J. (1993), Westen Political Theory in the Face of the Future, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duverger, M. (1959), Political Parties, orig. 1951, London: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dwivedi, O.P./ Jabbra, J.G. (1988), ‘Public Service Responsibility and Accountability’, in dies. (eds.), Public Service Accountability: A Comparative Perspective, West Hartford, Conn.: Kumarian Press, 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dworkin, R. (1977), Taking Rights Seriously, London: Duckworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dworkin, R. (1986), A Matter of Principle, Oxford: Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dykes H. (2003), ‘Political and Parliamentary Aspects of Choice and Representation’, in: R. Morgan and M. Steed (eds.), Choice and Representation in the European Union, London: The Federal Trust 2003, 23–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dzelainis, M. (2002), ‘Anti-Monarchism in English Republicanism’, in: M.v. Gelderen/ Q. Skinner (eds.), Republicanism. A Shared European Heritage, Vol. I: Republicanism and Constitutionalism in Early Modern Europe, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 27–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Easton, D. (1953), The Political System: An Inquiry into the State of Political Science, New York: Alfred A. Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckhart, H./ Ehrenstein C. (2001), ‘Intellectual History Made in Britain. Die Cambridge School und ihre Kritiker’, Geschichte und Gesellschaft, 27(1), 149–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • ECSC (1999), Concise Report of the Debates of the First Convention of Civil Society Organised at European Level, Brussels 1999, http://www.esc.eu.int.

    Google Scholar 

  • ECSC (2002), Opinion of the ECSC on Organised Civil Society and European Governance: The Committee’s Contribution to the Drafting of a White Paper, CES535/2001 FR-DE/MEV/JKB/ym.

    Google Scholar 

  • ECSC (2002a), Resolution Addressed to the European Convention, 19. Sept. 2002, CES 1069/2002 FR/ET/JKB/ym.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edelman, M. (1964), The symbolic uses of politics, London: Urbana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Efinger/ Rittberger/ Wolf/ Zürn (1990), ‚Internationale Regime und internationale Politik ‘in: V. Rittberger (Hg.). Theorien der internationalen Beziehungen. Bestandsaufnahme und Forschungsperspektiven, Opladen, 263–285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eichener, V./ Voelzkow, H. (Hrsg.) (1994), Europäische Integration und verbandliche Interessenvermittlung, Marburg: Metropolis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eijk van der / Franklin M.N. (1996), Choosing Europe? The European Electorate and National Politics in the Face of Union, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eiselt, I./ Slominski P. (2006), ‘Sub-Constitutional Engineering: Negotiation, Content and Legal Value of Interinstitutional Agreements in the EU’, European Law Journal (forthcoming).

    Google Scholar 

  • Eising, R. (2001), ‚Interessenvermittlung in der Europäischen Union’, in: W. Reutter/ P. Rütters (Hrsg.), Verbände und Verbandssysteme in Westeuropa, Opladen: Leske & Budrich, 453–476.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eising, R./ Kohler-Koch, B. (1994), ‚Inflation und Zerfaserung. Trends der Interessenvermittlung in der Europäischen Gemeinschaft’, in: W. Streeck (Hg.), Staat und Verbände (PVS-Sonderheft 25), Opladen, 175–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eising, R./ Kohler-Koch B. (1994), ‚Inflation und Zerfaserung. Trends der Interessenvermittlung in der Europäischen Gemeinschaft’, in: W. Streeck (Hg.), Staat und Verbände, PVS-Sonderheft 25, Opladen, 175–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elshtain, J.B. (1981), Public Man — Private Women Women in Social and Political Thought, Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elster, J. (1983), Sour Grapes: Studies in the Subversion of Rationality, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elster, J. (1994), ‘Argumenter et négocier dans deux assemblées constituants’, Revue français de science politique 44(2), 187–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elster, J. (ed.) (1998), Deliberative Democracy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elster, J. (1998a), ‘Deliberation and Constitution-Making’, in: ders. (ed.), Deliberative Democracy, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 97–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Encarnación, O.G. (1999), ‘Federalism and the Paradox of Corporatism’, in: J.B. Brzinski/ T.D. Lancaster/ C. Tuschhoff (eds.), Compounded Representation in Western European Federations, London: Frank Cass, 90–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eriksen, E.O. (2000), ‘Deliberative Supranationalism in the EU’, in: Erik O. Eriksen und John E. Fossum (eds), Democracy in the European Union. Integration through Deliberation. London/New York: Routledge, 42–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eriksen, E.O. (2001), ‘Democratic or technocratic governance?’, Jean Monnet Working Paper 6(01).

    Google Scholar 

  • Eriksen O.E./ Fossum J.E. (eds.) (2000), Democracy in the European Union. Integration through Deliberation?, London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eriksen, O.E./ Fossum, J.E./ Menéndez (eds.) (2004), Developing a European Constitution, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esaisasson, P./ Holmberg, S. (1996), Representation from Above: Members of Parliament and Representative Democracy in Sweden, Aldershot: Dartmouth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eschenburg, T. (1955), Herrschaft der Verbände?, Stuttgart: Deutsche Verlagsanstalt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eulau, H./ Wahlke, J./ Buchanan, W./ Ferguson. L. (1959), ‘The Role of the Representative: Some Empirical Observations on the Theory of Edmund Burke’, American Political Science Review 53, 742–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eulau, H. (1967), ‘Changing views of representation’, in: I.de Sola Pool (ed.), Contemporary Political Science: Toward Empirical Theory, New York: McGraw-Hill 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eulau, H. (1978). Changing Views of Representation, in: H. Eulau/ J.C. Wahlke, The Politics of Representation. Continuities in Theory and Research, Beverly Hills/London: Sage Publications, 31–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eulau, H./ Karps, P.D. (1977), ‘The Puzzle of Representation: Specifying Components of Responsiveness’, Legislative Studies Quarterly 2, 233–254; wiederabgedruckt in: Heinz Eulau/John C. Wahlke: The Politics of Representation. Continuities in Theory and Research, Sage Publications, Beverly Hills/London 1978, 55–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Europäische Kommission (1992), Communication from the Commission “An open and structured dialogue between the Commission and special interest groups”, SEC(92) 2272, Brussels, 2.12.1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Europäische Kommission (1993), An Open and Structured Dialogue between the Commission and Special Interest Groups, OJ C63/2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Europäische Kommission (1993a), Communication from the Commission concerning the Application of the Agreement on Social Policy, COM(93) 600 final.

    Google Scholar 

  • Europäische Kommission (1999), Report on the Representativeness of European Social Partner Organizations, Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Kommission (2001), Report of Working Group on Broadening and Enriching the Public Debate on Europe, Rapporteurs: B. Caremier und J. Wyles.

    Google Scholar 

  • Europäische Kommission (2001a), Europäisches Regieren. Ein Weißbuch, Brüssel, 25.7.2001, KOM(2001) 428 endg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Europäische Kommission (2002), Communication from the Commission “Towards a reinforced culture of consultation and dialogue — General principles and minimum standards for consultation of interested parties by the Commission, COM(2002) 704, 11.12.2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Europäische Kommission (2004), Report on European Governance 2003–2004, SEC(2004) 1153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Europäisches Parlament (Hrsg.) (1968), Die ersten zehn Jahre 1958–1968, Luxemburg: Generaldirektion Parlamentarische Dokumentation und Information.

    Google Scholar 

  • Europäisches Parlament (1996), Second Reprot on Lobbying in the European Parliament, A4-200/96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Europäisches Parlament (1999), Rules governing the establishment of intergroups, adopted 16 December 1999 by the Conference of Presidents, PE 282.037/BUR/DEF.

    Google Scholar 

  • Europäischer Wirtschafts-und Sozialausschuss (1999), Entwurf einer Stellungnahme des Wirtschafts-und Sozialausschusses zum Thema „Die Rolle und der Beitrag der organisierten Zivilgesellschaft zum europäischen Einigungswerk“, CES 851/99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Europäischer Wirtschafts-und Sozialausschuss (2000), Stellungnahme zum Diskussionspapier der Kommission „Ausbau der partnerschaftlichen Zusammenarbeit zwischen der Kommission und Nichtregierungsorganisationen“ (KOM (2000) 11 endg.), CES 811/2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Europäischer Wirtschafts-und Sozialausschuss (2000a), The Civil Society organised at European Level: Proceedings of the First Convention, Brussels, 15/16 October 1999, EXC-2000-012-004-EN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, P.B./ Rueschemeyer, D./ Skospol, T. (eds.) (1985), Bringing the State Back in, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairlie, J.A. (1968). ‚Das Wesen politischer Repräsentation’, in: H. Rausch (Hg.), Zur Theorie und Geschichte der Repräsentation und Repräsentativverfassung, Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, orig. 1940, 28–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falkner, G. (2000), ‘How Pervasive are Euro-Politics? Effects of EU Membership on a New Member State’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 38(2), 223–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Featherstone, K. (1994), ‘Jean Monnet and the “Democratic Deficit” in the European Union’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 32(2), 19–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feick, J./ Jann, W. (1988), ‚Nations matters — Vom Eklektizismus zur Integration in der vergleichenden Policy-Forschung?’, in: M.G. Schmidt (ed.), Staatstätigkeit. International und historisch vergleichende Analysen (PVS-Sonderheft 19), Opladen, 196–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Femia, J. (1981), ‘An Historicist Critique of ‘Revisionist’ Methods for Studying the History of Ideas’, History and Theory Vol.XX., 113–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fenno, R.F. (1978), Home Style: House Members in Their Districts, Boston: Little Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fenno, R.F. (1991), Learning to Legislate, Washington, D.C.: Congressional Quarterly Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, K. (1984), The Feminist Case Against Bureaucracy, Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferejohn, J.A./ Kuklinski J.H. (eds.) (1990), Information and Democratic Processes, Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrand, M. (1937), Records of the Federal Convention of 1787, Vol. I., New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiorina, M.P. (1981), Retrospective Voting in American National Elections, New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishkin, J.S. (1991), Democracy and Deliberation: New Directions for Democratic Reform, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishkin, James S. (1992), The Dialogue of Justice: Toward a Self-reflective Society, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishkin, J.S. (1995), The Voice of the People: Public Opinion and Democracy, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzmaurice, J. (2003), ‘Choices for the European Parliament’, in: R. Morgan/ M. Steed (eds.), Choice and Representation in the European Union, London: The Federal Trust, 11–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fligstein, N./ McNichol, J. (1998), ‘The Institutional Terrain of the European nion’, in: W, Sandholtz/ A. Stone Sweet (eds.), European Integration and Supranational Governance, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Føllesdal, A. (1998), ‘Democracy and Federalism in the European Union’, in: P. Koslowski/ A. Føllesdal (eds.), Democracy and the European Union, Berlin: Springer, 231–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Føllesdal, A. (2002). Drafting a European Constitution — Challenges and Opportunities. Constitutionalism Web-Papers, ConWEB No. 4. http://les1.man.ac.uk/conweb (22. Juni 2003).

    Google Scholar 

  • Follet, M.P. (1918), The New State. Group Organization the Solution of Popular Government, New York: Longman Green (online verfügbar: http://sunsite.utk.edu/FINS/Mary_Parker_Follett/Fins-MPF-01.html)

    Google Scholar 

  • Fossum, J.E. (2004), ‘Still a Union of deep diversity? The Convention and the Constitution for Europe’, In: E.O. Eriksen/ J.E. Fossum/ A.J. Menéndez (eds.), Developing a Constitution for Europe, London: Routledge, 226–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fossum, J.E./ Menéndez, A. (2003), ‘The constitution’s gift. A deliberative democratic analysis of constitution-making in the European Union’, Paper presented at the CIDEL Zaragoza Workshop, June 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraenkel E. (1964), ‚Die repräsentative und die plebiszitäre Komponente im demokratischen Verfassungsstaat’, in: ders.: Deutschland und die westlichen Demokratien, Neuausgabe von A.v. Brünneck, Frankfurt a.M.

    Google Scholar 

  • Francis, E. (1965), Ethnos und Demos. Soziologische Beiträge zur Volkstheorie, Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, J. (1997), ‘Collaborative Governance in the Administrative State’, University of California Law Review, 45(1), 1–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M. (1962), Capitalism and Freedom, Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, R.S./ Stokes S.L. (1965), ‘The Role of the Constitution-Maker as Representative’, Midwest Journal of Political Science, 9, 148–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedrich, C.J. (1937), Constitutional Government and Politics. Nature and Development, New York: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedrich, C.J. (1968), ‚Repräsentation und Verfassungsreform in Europa’, in: H. Rausch (Hg.), Zur Theorie und Geschichte der Repräsentation und Repräsentativverfassung, Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, Darmstadt, orig. 1948, 209–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frognier, A.P. (2000), ‘The normative foundations of Party Government’, in: Blondel J./ Cotta M. (eds.), The Nature of Party Government. A Comparative European Perspective, Houndmills: Palgrave, 21–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furubotn, E.G./ Richter, R. (1997), Institutions and Economic Theory: An Introduction and Assessment of the New Institutional Economics, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaddum, E. (1994), Die deutsche Europapolitik in den 80er Jahren. Interessen, Konflikte, und Entscheidungen der Regierung Kohl, Paderborn: Schönigh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaffney J. (ed.) (1996), Political Parties and the European Union, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher, M. (1991), ‘Proportionality, Disproportionality, and Electoral Systems’, Electoral Studies, 10, 33–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher, M. (1992), ‘Comparing Proportional Representational Electoral Systems: Quotas, Thresholds, Paradoxes and Majorities’, British Journal of Political Science, 22, 469–496.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallie, W.B. (1956). ‘Essentially Contested Concepts’, in: Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Vol. 56, 167–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galloway, D. (2001), The Treaty of Nice and Beyond: Realities and Illusions of Power in the EU, Sheffield: Sheffield University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geradin, D./N. Petit (2004), ‘The Development of Agencies at EU and National Levels: Conceptual Analysis and Proposals for Reform’, Jean Monnet Working Paper 01/04, New York School of Law, New York University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerbet, P. (1992), ‘The Common Assembly of the European Coal and Steal Community’, in: European Parliament, 40 th Anniversary Proceedings of the Symposium: The European Community in the Historical Context of its Parliament, Strasbourg: European Parliament, 11–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerçek, K. (1998), ‚Die Europäische Gemeinschaft für Kohle und Stahl und ihr politisches Leitbild föderaler Organe’, in: R. Hrbek/ V. Schwarz (Hrsg.), 40 Jahre Römische Verträge: Der deutsche Beitrag, Baden-Baden: Nomos, 102–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gergen, K.J./ Davis, K.E. (eds.) (1985), The Social Construction of the Person, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Gergen, K.J. (1986), ‘Correspondence versus Autonomy in the Language of Understanding Human Action’, in: D. Fiske/ R. Shewder (eds.), Metatheory in Social Science. Pluralism and subjectivities, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerstenberg, O./C.F. Sabel (2002), ‘Directly-Deliberative Polyarchy: An Institutional Ideal for Europe’, in: C. Joerges/ R. Dehousse (eds.), Good Governance in Europe’s Integrated Market, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 289–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gierke, O.v. (1987), Political Theories of the Middle Ages, übersetzt von F.W. Maitland, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giscard d’Estaing, V. (2002), Introductory Speech to the Convention on the Future of Europe, 26 Feber 2002, SN 1565/02.

    Google Scholar 

  • Göler, D. (2003), ‚Die Europäische Union vor ihrer Konstitutionalisierung: Eine Bilanz der ersten Verfassungsentwürfe’, Integration, 26(1), pp. 17–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Göler, D. (2003a), Between Deliberation and Bargaining. The Influence of the Institutional Setting of the Convention on the Mode of Interaction. Paper presented at the CIDEL Conference, Albarracín, Zaragoza, 19–22 June 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Göler, D./ Marhold D. (2003), ‚Die Konventsmethode’, Integration 26(4), 317–330.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein/ Keihane (eds.) (1993), Ideas and Foreign Policy. Beliefs, Institutions and Political Change, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodin, R.E. (1993), ‘Democracy, Preferences and Paternalism’, Policy Sciences 26(3), 229–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, B. (1992), Justice by Lottery, Chicago: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goulard, S. (2003), ‚Die Rolle der Kommission im Konvent. Eine Gratwanderung‘, Integration 26(4), 371–382.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould C. (1996), ‘Diversity and Democracy: Representing Difference’, in: S. Benhabib (ed.), Democracy and Difference, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 171–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grabitz, E./ Schmuck, O./ Steppat, S./ Wessels, W. (1988), Direktwahl und Demokratisierung: Eine Funktionenbilanz des Europäischen Parlaments nach der ersten Wahlperiode, Bd. 15, Bonn: IEP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grabitz, E./ Läufer T. (1980), Das Europäische Parlament, Bonn: Europa Union Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, G. (1992), ‘The Moral Basis of Democracy’, International Journal of Moral and Social Studies 7(2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, K. (1988), ‘How do illocutionary descriptions explain?’, in: J. Tully (ed.), Meaning and Context. Quentin Skinner and his Critics, Cambridge: Polity, 147–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grande, E. (1996), ‚Das Paradox der Schwäche. Forschungspolitik und die Einflußlogik europäischer Politikverflechtung‘, in: M. Jachtenfuchs/Kohler-Koch, B. (Hrsg.), Europäische Integration, Opladen: Leske & Budrich, 373–399.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, W./ Perl, A./ Knoepfel P. (eds.) (1999), The Politics of Improving Urban Air Quality, Aldershot: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, M. (2000), ‘Negotiating EU Treaties: The Case for a New Approach’, in: E. Best/ M. Gray/ A. Stubb (eds.), Rethinking the European Union. IGC 2000 and Beyond, Maastricht: EIPA, 263–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, M./ Stubb, A. (2001), ‘The Treaty of Nice — Negotiating a Poisoned Chalice?’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 39, Annual Review, 5–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grazia, A. de (1951), Public & Republic: Political Representation in America, New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, T.H. (1986), Lectures on the Principles of Political Obligations and other Writings, hrsg. von P. Harris/ J. Morris, orig. 1882, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green Cowles, M./ Caporaso J./ Risse, T. (eds.) (2001), Europeanization and Domestic Political Change, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood, J. (2002), ‘Advocacy, Influence and Persuasion: Has It All Been Overdone?’, in A. Warleigh/ J. Fairbrass (eds.), Influence and Interests in the European Union: The New Politics of Persuasion and Advocacy, London: Europa Publications, 19–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood, J. (2002a), Inside EU Business Associations, Basingstoke: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood, J. (2003), Interest Representation in the European Union, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood, J. (2003a), ‘The world of NGOs and interest representation’, in: NGOs, Democratisation and the Regulatory State. A Collection of Papers presented at the Conferences in London and Brussels, London: European Policy Forum, 51–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greven M.T. (1998), ‚Mitgliedschaft, Grenzen und politischer Raum: Problemdimensionen der Demokratisierung der Europäischen Union‘, in: B. Kohler-Koch (Hg.), Regieren in entgrenzten Räumen, Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag, 249–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greven, M.T./ Pauly, L.W. (2000), Democracy beyond the state?: the European dilemma and the emerging global order, Lanham, Md.: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groeben, H.v.d. (1982), Aufbaujahre der Europäischen Gemeinschaft. Das Ringen um den Gemeinsamen Markt und die politische Union, Baden-Baden: Nomos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grofman B. (1982), ‘Should Representatives be Typical of their Constituents?’, in: ders. (ed.), Representation and Redistricting Issues, Lexington, Mass.: D.C. Heath.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grofman, B. (1983), ‘The Measures of Bias and Proportionality in Seats-Votes Relationships’, Political Methodology, 9, 295–327.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grofman, B./ Lijphart, A. (eds.) (1986), Election Laws and Their Political Consequences, New York: Agathon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths, E.S. (1939), The Impasse of Democracy, New York: Harrison-Wilton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths, P.A./ Wollheim, R. (1960), ‘How can one person represent another?’, in: The Aristotelian Society, supple. vol. 34, 182–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths, R.. (1990), ‚Die Benelux-Staaten und die Schumanplan-Verhandlungen‘, in: L. Herbst/ W. Bührer/ H. Sowade (Hrsg.), Vom Marshallplan zur EWG. Die Eingliederung der Bundesrepublik Deutschland in die westliche Welt, München: Oldenburg, 263–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimm, D. (1995), Braucht ‚Europa eine Verfassung? ‘, Juristenzeitung 50(12), 581–591.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimm, D. (1999), ‚Ohne Volk keine Verfassung. Eine demokratische EU braucht bessere Institutionen, aber kein Grundgesetz‘, Die Zeit, Nr.12 vom 18.03.1999, http://www.zeit.de/archiv/1999/12/199912.verfassung_.xml

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimm, D. (2004), ‚Integration durch Verfassung. Absichten und Aussichten im europäischen Konstitutionalisierungsprozess‘, Leviathan 32(4), 448–463.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gross, D.A. (1978), ‘Representative styles and legislative behaviour’, Western Political Quarterly 31, 359–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grote J.R. (1989), Guidance and Control in Transnational Committee Networks. The Associational Basis on Policy Cycles at EC Level, Paper presented at the Conference of the Structure and Organisation of Government (SOG) Research Committee of IPSA on ‘Government and Organised Interests’, Zürich September 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gudgin, G./ Taylor, P.J. (1979), Seats, Votes and the Spatial Organization of Elections, London: Pinter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunnel, J.G. (1979), Political Theory: Tradition and Interpretation, Cambridge, Mass.: Winthrop Pub.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gusy, C. (1998), ‚Demokratiedefizite postnationaler Gemeinschaften unter Berücksichtigung der EU‘, Zeitschrift für Politik 45(3), 267–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutmann, A. (1985), ‘Communitarian Critics of Liberalism’, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 14(3), 308–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gyford, J. (1970), Local Politics in Britain, London: Croom Helm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas J./ Derrida, J. (2003), ‚Nach dem Krieg: Die Wiedergeburt Europas‘, Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung vom 31.5.2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haas, E.B. (1958), The Uniting of Europe. Political, Social, And Economic Forces 1950–1957, London: Stevens & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haas, E.B. (1971), ‘The Study of Regional Integration: reflections on the joy and anguish of pretheorizing’, in: L.N. Lindberg/ S.A. Scheingold (eds), Would-be Polity. Patterns of Change in the European Community. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 3–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1992), Faktizität und Geltung. Beiträge zur Diskurstheorie des Rechts und des demokratischen Rechtsstaats, Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1998), The Inclusion of the Other, Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (2000), The Postnational Constellation, Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagemann-White, C. (1987), ‚Können Frauen die Politik verändern?‘, Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte, B 9–10, 29–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hague, B.N./ Loader, B.D. (eds.) (1999), Digital democracy: Discourse and Decision Making in the Information Age, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hajer, M./ Kesselring, S. (1999), ‘Democracy in the Risk Society’, Environmental Politics 8(3), 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallam, H. (1865), Constitutional History of England, 3 Bde., New York: Widdleton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallstein, W. (1973), Die Europäische Gemeinschaft, Düsseldorf: Econ-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammerstein, N. (1995), Staatslehre der Frühen Neuzeit, Frankfurt a.M.: Deutscher Klassiker Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Handlin, O./ Handlin, M. (eds.) (1966), Popular Sources of Political Authority, Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen M.H. (1993), The Athenian Democracy in the Age of Demosthenes, Oxford and Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hare, R.M. (1952), The Language of Morals, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harlow, C. (2002), Accountability in the European Union, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harmsen, R. (1999), ‘The Europeanization of National Administrations: A Comparative Study of France and the Netherlands’, Governance 12(1), 81–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harlow C. (2002), Accountability in the European Union, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, R. (1993), Democracy, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartsock, N. (1983), Money, Sex, and Power, New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hättich M. (1968), ‚Zur Theorie der Repräsentation‘, in: H. Rausch (Hg.) Zur Theorie und Geschichte der Repräsentation und Repraesentativverfassung, Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 498–509.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hauriou, M. (1929), Précis de droit constitutionnel, 2. Aufl., Paris: Sirey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F. (1988), The Fatal Conceit: The Errors of Socialism, hrsg.v. W. Bartley, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F. (1991), Die Verfassung der Freiheit, 3. Aufl., Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes-Renshaw, F./H. Wallace ()1997), The Council of Ministers, Basingstoke: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayward, J. (ed.) (1995), The Crisis of Representation in Europe, London: Frank Cass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Held, D. (1995), Democracy and the Global Order. From the Modern State to Cosmopolitan Governance, Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heller, H. (1986), Staatslehre, in der Bearbeitung von G. Niemeyer, 6. Aufl., Tübingen: Mohr, orig. 1934.

    Google Scholar 

  • Héritier, A. (1993), ‚Policy-Analyse. Elemente der Kritik und Perspektiven der Neuorientierung‘, in: A. Héritier (Hg.), Policy-Analyse. Kritik und Neuorientierung (PVS-Sonderheft), Opladen, 9–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Héritier, A. (1999), Policy-Making and Diversity in Europe. Escape from Deadlock, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Héritier, A. (1999b), ‘Elements of democratic legitimation in Europe: an alternative perspective’, Journal of European Public Policy 6(2), 269–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Héritier, A./M. Thatcher (2002), Regulatory Reform in Europe, Special issue Journal of European Public Policy 9(6).

    Google Scholar 

  • Herzog, D. (1989), ‚Was heisst und zu welchem Ende studiert man Repräsentation? ‘in: D. Herzog/ B. Weßels (Hg.), Konfliktpotentiale und Konsensstrategien, Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag, 307–335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hibbert, C. (1980), The French Revolution, London: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hibbing, J.R. (1991), ‘Contours of the Modern Congressional Career’, Amercian Political Science Review 85, 405–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hilf, M. (1998), ‚Eine Verfassung für die Europäische Union: Zum Entwurf des Institutionellen Ausschusses des Europäischen Parlaments‘, in: R. Hrbek/ M. Jopp/ B. Lippert/ W. Wessels (Hrsg.), Die Europäische Union als Prozess. Verfassungsentwicklungen im Spiegel von 20 Jahren der Zeitschrift Integration, Bonn: Europa Union Verlag, S. 523–533.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillion, C. (2002), ‘Enlargement of the European Union: A Legal Analysis’, in: E. Arnull/ D. Wincott (eds.), Accountability and Legitimacy in the European Union, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 401–418.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hindera, J. (1993), ‘Representative Bureaucracy: Imprimis Evidence of Active Representation in the EEOC District Office’, Social Science Quarterly, 74, 95–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinkhouse, F. J. (1926), The Preliminaries of the American Revolution as Seen in the English Press, 1763–1775, New York: Octagon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hintze, O. (1931), ‚Weltgeschichtliche Bedingungen der Repräsentativverfassung‘, Historische Zeitschrift 143, 1–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirst, P. (1990), Representative Democracy and its Limits, Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirst, P. (1994), Associative Democracy: New Forms of Economic and Social Governance, Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hix, S. (1998), ‘Elections, Parties and Institutional Design: A Comparative Perspective on European Union Democracy’, West European Politics, 21(3), 19–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hix, S. (1998b), ‘Parties and Elections in the European Union’, European Review 6(2), 215–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbes, T. (1968), Leviathan, Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbes, T. (1983), De Cive, ed. by H. Warrender, Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobe, S. (2003), ‚Bedingungen, Verfahren und Chancen europäischer Verfassungsgebung: Zur Arbeit des Brüsseler Verfassungskonvents‘, Europarecht 38, Bd. 1/2003, S. 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofmann, H. (1974), Repraesentation. Studien zur Wort-und Begriffsgeschichte von der Antike bis ins 19. Jahrhundert, Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann, S. (1966), ‘Obstinate or Obsolete: the Fate of the Nation-State and the Case of Western Europe’, Daedalus 95(3): 862–916.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann, S. (1982), ‘Reflections on the nation-state in Western Europe today’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 21, 21–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann, L. (2002). The Convention on the Future of Europe — Thoughts on the Convention-Model. Jean Monnet Working Paper 11/02. NYU School of Law.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogan, W.N. (1970). ‘Political Representation and European Integration’, in: Integration 4, 288–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holcombe, A.N. (1935), Government in a Planned Democracy, New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollerbach, A. (1992), Buchbesprechung von H. Hofmann, Repräsentation, Archiv des Oeffentlichen Rechts, 117, 303–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmberg, S. (1997), ‘Dynamic Representation’, Scandinavian Political Studies, 20, 265–283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmberg, S. (1999), ‘Wishful Thinking Among European Parliamentarians’, in: H. Schmitt/ J. Thomassen (eds.), Political Representation and Legitimacy in the European Union, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmberg, S. (1999a), ‘Collective Policy Congruence Compared’, in: Miller et al. (eds.), Policy Representation in Western Democracies, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 87–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holzinger, K. et al. (2005), Die Europäische Union. Theorien und Analysekonzepte, Paderborn: Ferdinand Schöningh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Honneth, A. (1993), Kommunitarismus: Eine Debatte über die moralischen Grundlagen moderner Gesellschaften, Frankfurt a.M.: Campus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooks, B. (1990), Yearning. Race, Gender, and Cultural Politics, Boston, Mass: South End Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Höreth, M. (1999), Die Europäische Integration im Legitimationstrilemma Baden-Baden: Nomos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horstmann, R.P. (1979), ‚Kriterien für Grundbegriffe. Anmerkungen zu einer Diskussion‘, in: R. Koselleck (Hg.), Historische Semantik und Begriffsgeschichte, Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta, 37–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hovehne, M. (1999) Ein demokratisches Verfahren für die Wahlen zum europäischen Parlament, Frankfurt/Main: Peter Lang Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hrbek, R. (Hg.) (1993), Der Vertrag von Maastricht in der wissenschaftlichen Kontroverse, Baden-Baden: Nomos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hull, R. (1993), ‘Lobbying Brussels: A View from Within’, in: S Mazey/ J. Richardson (eds.), Lobbying in the European Community, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 82–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hume, D. (1985), Essays Moral, Political and Literary, ed. by E. Miller, Indianapolis: Liberty Classics, orig. 1741.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hummer, W. et al. (1994), Europarecht in Fällen, 2. Aufl., Baden-Baden: Nomos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hummer, W./ Obwexer, W. 81999), ‚Der „geschlossene“ Rücktritt der Europäische Kommission. Von der Nichtentlastung für die Haushaltsführung zur Neuernennung der Kommission‘, Integration 22(2), 77–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, L. (1989), Symbole der Macht — Macht der Symbole. Die französische Revolution und der Entwurf einer politischen Kultur, Frankfurt a.M.: Fischer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurell, A./ Menon, A. (1996), ‘Politics Like Any Other? Comparative Politics, International Relations and the Study of the EU’, West European Politics 19(2), 386–402.

    Google Scholar 

  • Immergut, E. (1998), ‘The Theoretical Core of the New Institutionalism’, Politics and Society, 26(1), 5–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inglehart, R. (1973), ‘Public Opinion and Regional Integration’, in L.N. Lindberg/ S.N. Scheingold (eds.), Regional Integration, Theory and Research, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 160–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ipsen, H.P. (1972), Europäisches Gemeinschaftsrecht, Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ipsen, H.P. (1983), ‚Die Verfassungsrolle des Europäischen Gerichtshofs für die Integration‘, in: J. Schwarze (Hg.), Der Europäische Gerichtshof als Verfassungsgericht und als Rechtsschutzinstanz, Baden-Baden: Nomos, 29–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Israel, J. (1999), ‘William III, the Glorious Revolution and the Development of Parliamentary Democracy in Britain’, in: J. Pinder (ed.), Foundations of Democracy in the European Union. From the Genesis of Parliamentary Democracy to the European Parliament, London: Macmillan Press, 33–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jachtenfuchs, M. (1996), ‚Regieren durch überzeugen: Die Europäische Union und der Treibhauseffekt‘, in: M. Jachtenfuchs/Kohler-Koch, B. (Hrsg.), Europäische Integration, Opladen: Leske & Budrich, 429–454.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jachtenfuchs, M. (1998), ‘Democracy and Governance in the European Union, European Integration Online Papers, 1(2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jachtenfuchs, M./ Diez, T./ Jung, S. (1998), Which Europe? Conflicting Models of a Legitimate European Order’, European Journal of International Relations, 4(4), 409–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jachtenfuchs, M. (1999), Ideen und Integration. Verfassungsideen in Deutschland, Frankreich und Großbritannien und die Entwicklung der EU, Habilitationsschrift: Universität Mannheim.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jachtenfuchs, M. (2002), Die Konstruktion Europas. Verfassungsideen und institutionelle Entwicklung, Baden-Baden: Nomos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, J.E./ King, D.C. (1989), ‘Public Goods, Private Interests, and Representation’, American Political Science Review 83, 1143–1164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janssen, J. (1991), ‘Postmaterialism, cognitive mobilization, and public support for European integration’, British Journal of Political Science, 21, 443–468.

    Google Scholar 

  • Januschkowetz, E. (2003), Das Demokratieproblem der Europäischen Union. Der Stufenbau der Staatsgewalt als Lösung, Wien: Manz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jekewitz, J. (1976), ‚Herrschaft auf Zeit. Aus aktuellem Anlaß zur Geschichte des Verhältnisses von Repräsentation und Legitimation‘, Zeitschrift für Parlamentsfragen 7, 373–399.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeffrey, C. (1999), ‘Party Politics and Territorial Representation in the Federal Republic of Germany’, in: J.B. Brzinski/ T.D. Lancaster/ C. Tuschhoff (eds.), Compounded Representation in Western European Federations, London: Frank Cass, 130–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenny, M./ Müller, W.C. (2001), ‚Schluss: Erklärung des Verhaltens und Typen von Abgeordneten‘, in: Müller, W.C. et al. (2001), Die österreichischen Abgeordneten. Individuelle Präferenzen und politisches Verhalten, Wien: WUV, 521–537.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jellinek, H. (1900), Das Recht des modernen Staates, Berlin: Häring.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jewell, M.E. (1982), Representation in State Legislatures, Lexington: University Press of Kentucky.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jewell, M.E. (1983), ‘Legislator-Constituency Relations and the Representative Process’, Legislative Studies Quarterly, 8, 303–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joerges, C. (1997), ‘The Impact of European Integration on Private Law: Reductionist Perceptions, True Conflicts and a New Constitutional Perspective’, European Law Journal, 3(4), 378–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joerges, C. (2002), ‚“Good” Governance im europäischen Binnenmarkt: über die Spannungen zwischen zwei rechtswissenschaftlichen Integrationskonzepten und deren Aufhebung‘, Europarecht 37(1), 17–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joerges, C./Y. Mény/ J.H.H. Weiler (2000), What kind of constitution for what kind of polity?, Cambridge/Florenz: Harvard Law School/European University Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joerges, C./ Neyer J. (2001), ‘From Intergouvernmental Bargaining to Deliberative Political Processes: The Constitutionalisation of Comitology’, European Law Journal 3(3), 273–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jogerst, M. (1991), ‘Backbenchers and Select Committees in the British House of Commons. Can Parliament Offer Useful Roles for the Frustrated?’, European Journal of Political Research 20, 21–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jogerts, M. (1993), Reform in the House of Commons, Lexington: University Press of Kentucky.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jopp, M. (1996), Die Reform der Europäischen Union: Analysen-Positionen-Dokumente zur Regierungskonferenz 1996/97, Bonn: Europa Union Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jopp, M./ Lippert, B./ Schneider, H. (Hg.) (2001), Das Vertragswerk von Nizza und die Zukunft der Europäischen Union, Bonn: Europa Union Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jopp, M./ Regelsberger E. (2003), ‚GASP und ESVP im Verfassungsvertrag — eine neue Angebotsvielfalt mit Chancen und Mängeln‘, Integration 26(4), 550–563.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jupille, J./ Caporaso, J.A./ Checkel, J.T. (2003), ‘Integrating Institutions: Rationalism, Constructivism, and the Study of the European Union’ Comparative Political Studies 36(1–2), 7–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser, J.H. (1978), Die Repräsentation organisierter Interessen, Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanther, R.K. (1977), ‘Some Effects of Proportions on Group Life: Skewed Sex ratios and Responses to Token Women’, American Journal of Sociology, 82(5), 965–990.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kantorowicz, E.H. (1957), The King’s Two Bodies. Study in Medieval Political Theology, Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kassim, H. (1994), ‘Policy Networks, Networks and European Union Policy-Making: A Sceptical View’, in: West European Politics, 4, 15–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kateb, G. (1994), The Inner Ocean: Individualism and Democratic Culture, Ithaca/London: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, R.S./ Mair, P. (1995), ‘Changing Models of Party Organization and Party Democracy. The Emergence of the Cartel Party’, Party Politics, 1(1), 5–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katz, R.S. (2001), ‘Models of Democracy: Elite Attitudes and the Democratic Deficit in the European Union’, European Union Politics, 2(1), 53–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katzenstein, P.J. (1993), ‘Coping with Terrorism: Norms and Internal Security in Germany and Japan’, in: J. Goldstein/ R.O. Keohane (eds.), Ideas and Foreign Policy. Beliefs, Institutions and Political Change, Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 265–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kayden X./ Mahe E. (1985), The Party Goes On: The Persistence of the Two-Party System in the United States, New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keane, J. (1988), ‘More theses on the philosophy of history’, in: J. Tully (ed.), Meaning and Context. Quentin Skinner and his Critics, Cambridge: Polity 206–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keiser, L.R/ Wilkins, V./ Meier, K.J./ Holland, C. (2002), ‘Lipstick and Logarithms: Gender, Institutional Context, and Representative Bureaucracy’, American Political Science Review, 96(3), 553–564.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keohane, R.O./ Nye J. (1977), Power and Interdependence: World Politics in Transition, Boston: Little Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keohane, R.O. (1984), After Hegemony, Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keohane, R.O./ Hoffmann, S. (1992), ‘Conclusions: Community Politics and Institutional Change’, in: W. Wallace (ed.), The Dynamics of European Integration, London: Pinter, 276–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kernaghan, K./ Langford, J.W. (1990), The Responsible Public Servant, Halifax, Nova Scotia: Institute for Research on Public Policy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kielmansegg, P. (1985), ‚Die Quadratur des Zirkels. überlegungen zum Charakter der repräsentativen Demokratie‘, in: U. Matz (Hrsg.), Aktuelle Herausforderungen der repräsentativen Demokratie, Veröffentlichungen der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Politikwissenschaft, Heft 2, Köln: Carl Heymanns Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kielmannsegg, P. (1996), ‚Integration und Demokratie‘, in: M. Jachtenfuchs/ B. Kohler-Koch (Hg.), Europäische Integration, Opladen: Leske + Budrich, 47–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kincaid, J. (1999), ‘Confederal Federalism and Citizen Representation in the European Union’, in: J.B. Brzinski/ T.D. Lancaster/ C. Tuschhoff (eds.), Compounded Representation in Western European Federations, London: Frank Cass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinder, D.R./ Kiewiet, D.R. (1981), ‘Sociotropic Politics: The American Case’, British Journal of Political Science, 11, 129–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, A. (1976), ‘Modes of Executive-Legislative Relations: Great Britain, France, and West Germany’, Legislative Studies Quarterly 1(1), 11–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kichheimer, O. (1966), ‘The Transformation of the Western European Party Systems’, in: LaPalombara J./ Weiner M. (eds.), Political Parties and Political Development, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 177–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirchhof, P. (1994), ‚Das Maastricht-Urteil des Bundesverfassungsgerichts‘, in: P. Hommelhof/ P. Kirchhof (Hrsg.), Der Staatenverbund der EU, Heidelberg: MTM Band 65, 11–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirchhof, P. (1995), ‚Die Identität der Verfassung in ihren unabänderlichen Inhalten‘, in: J. Isensee/ P. Kirchhof (Hrsg.), Handbuch des Staatsrechts der Bundesrepublik Deutschland (HStR), 2. Aufl., Heidelberg, Bd. 1, § 19, 775–814.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirchhof, P. (2001), ‚Demokratie ohne parlamentarische Gesetzgebung?‘, Neue Juristische Wochenschrift, 18, 1332–1334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkpatrick, E.M. (1971), ‘Toward a More Responsible Two-Party System’, American Political Science Review, 72, 165–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitschelt, H. (1997), The radical right in Western Europe. A comparative analysis, Ann Arbor, Mich: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kjaer, U. (2000), ‘Representativeness and Local Politics in Denmark’, in: N. Rao (ed.), Representation and Community in Western Democracies, London: Macmillan Press, 24–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, J. (2002), ‘Who’s in charge here?’, in: The Guardian, 26 Juni 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klingemann, H./ Hofferbert, R.I./ Budge, I. (1994), Parties, Policies, and Democracy, Boulder, Col.: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knill, C. (1998), ‘Implementing European Policies: The Impact on National Administrative Traditions’, Journal of Public Policy, 18, 1–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knill, C./ Lehmkuhl, D. (1999), ‘How Europeanization Matters: different mechanisms of Europeanization’: European Integration Online Papers 3(7), http://eiop.or.at/eiop/texte/1999-007a.htm

    Google Scholar 

  • Knill, C./ Lenschow, A. (eds.) (2000), Implementing European Environmental Policies: New Regulations, Old Problems, Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohler-Koch, B. (Hg.) (1992), Staat und Demokratie in Europa, Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohler-Koch, B. (1992a), ‚Interessen und Integration. Die Rolle organisierter Interessen im westeuropäischen Integrationsprozess‘, in: M. Kreile (Hg.), Die Integration Europas, PVS Sonderheft, Opladen, 81–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohler-Koch, B. (1994), ‘Changing Patterns of Interest Intermediation in the European Union’, Government and Opposition 29, 166–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohler-Koch, B. (1996), ‚Die Gestaltungsmacht organisierter Interessen‘, in: M. Jachtenfuchs/Kohler-Koch B. (Hrsg.), Europäische Integration, Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag, 193–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohler-Koch. B. (1997), ‘Organized Interests in European Integration: The Evolution of a New Type of Governance?’, in: H. Wallace/Young, A. (eds.), Participation and Policy Making in the European Union, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 42–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohler-Koch, B. (1998), ‚Europäisierung der Regionen: Institutioneller Wandel als sozialer Prozeß‘, in: Kohler-Koch B. et al., Interaktive Politik in Europa. Regionen im Netzwerk der Integration, Opladen: Leske & Budrich, 13–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohler-Koch, B. (1998a), ‘Organized Interests in the EU and the European Parliament’, in: P.H. Claeys et al. (ed.), Lobbying, Pluralism, and European Integration, Brussels: European Interuniversity Press, 126–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohler-Koch, B. (2000), ‚Auf der Suche nach demokratischer Legitimität‘, Zukunft, 1(1), 14–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohler-Koch, B./ Conzelmann, T./ Knodt, M. (2004), Europäische Integration — Europäisches Regieren, Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koole, R./ Heidar, K. (2000), Parliamentary party groups in European democracies: political parties behind closed doors, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kornberg, A.W. (1967), Canadian Legislative Behaviour, New York: Holt, Rinehart, Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koselleck, R. (1972), ‚Einleitung‘, in: Brunner, O./ Conze, W./ Koselleck, R. (Hrsg.), Geschichtliche Grundbegriffe: Historisches Lexikon zur politischsozialen Sprache in Deutschland, Stuttgart: Klett, Bd. I., xiii–xxvii.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koselleck, R. (1967), ‚Richtlinien für das Lexikon politisch-sozialer Begriffe der Neuzeit‘, Archiv für Begriffsgeschichte 11, 81–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koselleck, R. (1973), ‚Geschichte, Geschichten und formale Zeitstrukturen‘, in: R. Koselleck/ W. Stempel (Hrsg.), Geschichte — Ereignis und Erzählung, München: Fink, 17–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koselleck, R. (1979), Vergangene Zukunft: Zur Semantik geschichtlicher Zeiten, Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koselleck, R. (1987), ‚Das 18. Jahrhundert als Beginn der Neuzeit‘, in: R. Koselleck (Hg.), Epochenschwelle und Epochenbewußtsein. Poetik und Hermeneutik XII., München: Fink.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krbek, I. (1966), ‚Repräsentation nach der Doktrin der Volkssouveränität‘, in: K.D. Bracher u.a. (Hrsg.), Die moderne Demokratie und ihr Recht. Festschrift für Gerhard Leibholz zum 65. Geburtstag. II. Band: Staats-und Verfassungsrecht, Tübingen: Mohr, 69–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurtz, K. (1992), ‘Limiting Terms — What’s in Store?’, State Legislatures, 32–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Küsters, H. (1988), ‚Die Verhandlungen über das institutionelle System zur Gründung der Europäischen Gemeinschaft für Kohle und Stahl‘, in: K. Schwabe (Hg.), Die Anfänge des Schuman Plans 1950/51 — The Beginnings of the Schumann Plan, Baden-Baden: Nomos, 73–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T.S. (1962). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumlin, S. (2004), The Personal and the Political. How Personal Welfare State Experiences Affect Political Trust and Ideology, New York: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kymlicka, W. (ed.) (1992), Justice in Political Philosophy, Aldershot: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kymlicka, W. (1995), Multicultural Citizenship: A Liberal Theory of Minority Rights, Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kymlicka, W. (1996), ‘Three Forms of Group-Differentiated Citizenship in Canada’, in: S. Benhabib (ed.), Democracy and Difference, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 153–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ladrech, R. (1994), ‘Europeanization of domestic politics and institutions: the case of France’, Journal of Common Market Studies 32(1), 69–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laycock, D. (2004), ‘Introduction’, in: D. Laycock (ed.), Representation and Democratic Theory, Vancouver: UBC Press, viii–xxii.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laffan, B. (1997), The Finances of the European Union, Houndmills, Basingstoke: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landshut, R. (1968), ‚Der politische Begriff der Repraesentation‘, in H. Rausch (Hg.), Zur Theorie und Geschichte der Repraesentation und Repraesentativverfassung, Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, orig. 1964, 482–497.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larsen, J.A.O. (1955), Representative Government in Greek and Roman History, Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laslett, P. (1956), ‘Introduction’, in: P. Laslett (ed.), Philosophy, Politics and Society, Oxford: Blackwell, 7–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laslett, P./ Runciman, W.G. (1968), ‘Introduction’, in: P. Laslett/ W.G. Runciman (eds.), Philosophy, Politics and Society, Third Series, Oxford: Blackwell, 7–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laswell, H.D.(1936), Politics: Who Gets What, When and How, New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Läufer, T. (1998), ‚Zur künftigen Verfassung der Europäischen Union — Notwendigkeit einer offenen Debatte‘, in: R. Hrbek/ M. Jopp/ B. Lippert/ W. Wessels (Hrsg.), Die Europäischen Union als Prozeß. Verfassungsentwicklung im Spiegel von 20 Jahren der Zeitschrift Integration, Bonn: Europa Union Verlag, 564–575.

    Google Scholar 

  • Läufer, T. (2003), ‚Der Europäische Gerichtshof — moderate Neuerungen des Verfassungsentwurfs‘, Integration 26(4), 510–519.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lefort, C. (1981), L’invention démocratique. Les limites de la domination totalitaire, Paris: Fayard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehmbruch, G. (1976), Parteienwettbewerb im Bundesstaat, Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehmbruch, G. (1977), ‘Liberal Corporatism and Party Government’, Comparative Political Studies 10(1), 91–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehmbruch, G. (1991), ‘The Organization of Society, Administrative Strategies, and Policy Networks, in: R. Czada/ A. WÍndhoff-Héritier (Hrsg.), Political Choice. Institutions, Rules and the Limits of Rationality, Frankfurt a.M.: Campus, 121–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehmbruch, G. (1997), ‘Interest Intermediation in Westeuropean Federal Systems’, Paper for the 3rd Workshop of the Federalism and Compounded Representation in Western Europe Project, 9.–11. Oktober 1997 an der Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehmkuhl, D. (1999), The Importance of Small Differences. The Impact of European Integration On Road Haulage Associations in Germany and the Netherlands, The Hague: Thela Thesis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenaerts, K./ Desomer, M. (2002). ‘New Model of Constitution-making in Europe: The Quest for Legitimacy’, Common Market Law Review 39(6), 1217–1253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leibholz G. (1966), Das Wesen der Repräsentation und der Gestaltwandel der Demokratie im 20. Jahrhundert, 3. erw. Aufl., Berlin: Walter de Gruyter & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leonard, D./ Herman, V. (eds.), The Backbencher and Parliament, London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lepsius, R. (1991), ‚Nationalstaat oder Nationalitätenstaat als Modell für die Weiterentwicklung der Europäischen Gemeinschaft’, in: R. Wildenmann (Hg.), Staatswerdung Europeas? Baden-Baden, 19–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lequesne, C./ Rivaud P. (2003), ‘The Committees of Independent Experts: expertise in the service of democracy?’, Journal of European Public Policy 10(5), 695–709.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Letwin, S.R. (1989), ‘Democracy and the Rule of Law’, in: G. Brennan/ L.E. Lomasky (eds.), Politics and Process, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 221–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, G. C. (1970), Remarks on the Use and Abuse of Some Political Terms, orig. 1898, Colombia: University of Missouri Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, J. (1998), ‘Is the ‘Hard Bargaining’ Image of the Council Misleading? The Committee of Permanent Representatives and the Local Eelections Directive’, Journal of Common Market Studies 36(4), 479–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, J. (2000), ‘The methods of community in EU decision-making and administrative rivalry in the Council’s infrastructure’, Journal of European Public Policy 7(2), 261–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis-Beck, M.S. (1988), Economics & Elections. The Major Western Democracies, Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis-Beck, M.S./ Paldam, M. (2000), ‘Economic Voting: An Introduction’, Electoral Studies, 19, 113–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lijphart, A. (1985), ‘The Field of Electoral Systems Research: A Critical Survey’, Electoral Studies, 4, 3–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lijphart, A. (1986), ‘Degrees of Proportionality of Proportional Representation Formulae’, in: B. Groffman/ A. Lijphart (eds.), Election Laws and Their Political Consequences, New York: Agathon Press, 170–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Likes, S. (1974), ‘Relativism: Cognitive and Moral’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supp.Vol. 48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindberg, L.N. (1963), The Politics of European Economic Integration. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindberg, L.N./ Scheingold, S.A. (1970), Europe’s Would-Be Polity. Patterns of Change in the European Community, Engledwood Cliffs; Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindsay, K. (1960), European Assemblies. The Experimental Period 1949–1959, London: Stevens & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lineberry, R./ Sharkansky, I. (1978), Urban Politics and Public Policy, 4th ed., New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lister, R. (1997), Citizenship. Feminist Perspectives, London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipgens, W. (1986), 45 Jahre Ringen um die Europäische Verfassung. Dokumente 1939–1984, Bonn: Europa Union Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Locke, J. (1977), An Essay concerning human understanding, London: Everymans Library, orig. 1690.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lodge, M./ McGraw K.M. (eds.) (1995), Political Judgement: Structure and Process, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lodge, J. (1996), ‘The European Parliament’, in: S.S. Andersen/ K. Eliassen (eds.), The European Union. How democratic is it?, London: Sage, 187–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loewenberg, G. (1972), ‘Comparative Legislative Research’, in: S.C. Patterson/ J.C. Wahlke (eds.), Comparative Legislative Behaviour: Frontiers of Research, New York: John Wiley, 3–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loewenstein, K. (1959), Verfassungslehre, Tübingen: Mohr.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loth, W. (1996), Der Weg nach Europa, Goettingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loth, W. (2002), Entwürfe einer europäischen Verfassung. Eine historische Bilanz, Bonn: Europa-Union.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loth, W./ Wessels, W. (2001), Theorien europäischer Integration, Opladen: Leske & Budrich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lord, C. (1998), Democracy in the European Union, Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lord, C. (2001), ‘Democracy in a Contested Polity’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 39(4), 641–661.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ludlow, P. (1994), ‘The Presidency of the Council: A new Power in the European Union?’, in: L’Equilibre Européen. Études rassemblées et publiées en hommage á Niels Ersboell, Brüssel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ludlow, P. (2002), The Laeken Council, Brüssel: EuroComment.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ludlow, P. (2005), ‚Die Führung der Union durch den Europäischen Rat: Übergang oder Krise?‘, Integration 28(1), 3–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lupia, A./ McCubbins, M.D. (1998), The Democratic Dilemma. Can Citizens Learn What They Need to Know?, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lukes, S. (1974), Power: A Radical View, London: Macmillam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundestad, G. (1998), “Empire” by Integration. The United Stets and European Integration, 1945–1997, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luskin, R.C. (1987), ‘Measuring Political Sophistication’, American Journal of Political Science 31, 856–899.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luskin, R.C. (2002), ‘From Denial to Extenuation (and Finally Beyond): Political Sophistication and Citizen Performance’, in: J.H. Kuklinski (ed.), Thinking About Political Psychology, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 281–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luttbeg, N.R. (ed.) (1974), Public Opinion and Public Policy:Models of Political Linkage, Homewood: Dorsey Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, F. (1988), ‘The Role of Jean Monnet in Setting up the European Coal and Steel Community’, in: K. Schwabe (ed.), Die Anfänge des Schuman Plans 1950/51, Baden-Baden: Nomos, 117–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacCormick, N. (1993), ‘Beyond the Sovereign State’, The Modern Law Review, 56, 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacCormick, (1997), ‘Democracy, Subsidiarity and Citizenship in “European Commonwealth”’, Law and Philosophy, 16, 331–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacDonald, W. (1921), A New Constitution for a New America, New York: B.W. Huebsch.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre, A. (1981), After Virtue: a study in moral virtue, London: Duckworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackie, G. (1998), ‘All Men are Liars: Is Democracy Meaningless?’, in: J. Elster (ed.), Deliberative Democracy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 69–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maduro, M. (2003), ‘Europe and the Constitution: What if this is as good as it gets?’, in: J.H.H. Weiler/ M. Wind (eds.), European Constitutionalism Beyond the State, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 74–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magnette, P. (2003), The European Convention: Constitutional Deliberation or International Negotiation?, Paper presented at the workshop ‘European Integration and Constitutionalism after the European Convention’, Science Po, Paris 18./19. Dezember 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magnette, P. (2003a), ‘European Governance and Civic Participation: Beyond Elitist Citizenship?’, Political Studies 51(1), 144–160.l

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magnette, P. (2004), ‘Deliberation or bargaining? Coping with constitutional conflicts in the Convention on the Future of Europe’, in: Eriksen, E.O./ Fossum, J.E./ Menendez, A.J. (eds.), Developing a Constitution for Europe, London: Routledge, 207–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magnette, P./ Nicolaïdis K. (2004), ‘The European Convention: Bargaining in the shadow of rhetoric’, West European Politics 27(3), 381–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mair, P. (1995), ‘Political Parties, Popular Legitimacy and Public Suffrage’, in: J. Hayward (ed.), The Crisis of Representation in Europe, London: Frank Cass, 40–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mair P. (1999), The Europeanisation of Domestic Politics: the Limited Case of National Party Systems, 1999–2000 European Forum, Conference Multilevel Party Systems: Europeanization and the Reshaping of National Political Representation, Conference Paper, EUR/9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mair P./ Müller W:C./ Plasser F. (eds.) (1999), Parteien auf komplexen Wählermärkten, Wien: Signum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Majone, G. (ed.) (1996), Regulating Europe, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Majone, G. (1996a), ‘Temporal Consistency and Policy Credibility: Why Democracies need Non-Majoritarian Institutions’, European University Institute, Working Paper RSC 96/57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Majone, G. (1998), ‘Europe’s “Democratic” Deficit: The Question of Standards’, European Law Journal, 4, 5–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Majone, G. (2000), ‘The Credibility Crisis of Community Regulation’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 38(2), 273–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mancini, G. (1990), ‘The making of a constitution for Europe’, in. R.O. Keohane/ S. Hoffmann (eds.), The New European Community, Oxford: Westview Press, 177–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manin, B. (1987), ‘On Legitimacy and Political Deliberation’, Political Theory, 15(3), 338–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manin, B. (1997), Principles of Representative Government, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manin, B./ Przeworski, A./ Stokes, S.A. (1999), ‘Elections and Representation’, in: Przeworski, A./ Stokes, S.C./ Manin, B. (eds.), Democracy, Accountability, and Representation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 29–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manow, P. (2004), ‚Der demokratische Leviathan — eine kurze Geschichte parlamentarischer Sitzanordnungen seit der französischen Revolution‘, Leviathan 32(3), 319–347.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manow, P. (2006), ‚Die politische Anatomie demokratischer Repräsentation‘, Leviathan 34(2), 149–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mansbridge, J. (1996) ‘Reconstructing Democracy’, in N.J. Hirschmann/ C. di Stefano (eds.), Revisioning the Political. Feminist Reconstructions of Traditional Concepts in Western Political Theory, Boulder: Westview Press, 117–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mansbridge, J. (2003), ‘Rethinking Representation’, American Political Science Review 97(4), 515–528.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mansbridge, J. (2005), ‘The Fallacy of Tightening the Reigns’, in: J. Pollak (ed.), Sonderheft der Österreichischen Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft „Repräsentation und Verfassung. Zur Legitimität des europäischen Verfassungskonvents“, 3, 233–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mantl, W. (1975), Repräsentation und Identität. Demokratie im Konflikt. Ein Beitrag zur modernen Staatsformenlehre, Wien: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • March, J.G./ Olson, J.P. (1989), Rediscovering Institutions. The Organizational Basis of Politics, New Your: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • March, J.G./ Olson, J.P. (1998), ‘The Institutional Dynamics of International Political Orders’, International Organization, Vol. 52, Special Issue, 943–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marko, J. (1995), Autonomie und Integration. Rechtsinstitute des Nationalitätenrechts im funktionalen Vergleich, Wien: Böhlau.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marks, G./ Scharpf, F.W./ Schmitter, P./ Streeck, W., (1996), Governance in the European Union, London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marks, G./ McAdam, D. (1996), ‘Social Movements and the Changing Structure of Political Opportunity in the European Union’, West European Politics 19(2), 249–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, M./ Weßels, B. (1997), ‘Territorial Representation’, European Journal of Political Research 32(2), 227–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, M./ Norris, P. (1997), ‘Political Representation in the European Parliament’, European Journal of Political Research 32(2), 153–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matl, S. (2003). Die Beiträge des Konvents bis zum 28. 10. 2002 (Plenardebatte). Berlin: Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik. http://www.swpberlin. org/pdf/conveu/CONVEU_Konventsynopse_Bd01.pdf (19 Juni 2003).

    Google Scholar 

  • Maurer, A. (2001), Parlamentarische Demokratie in der Europäischen Union. Der Beitrag des Europäischen Parlaments und der nationalen Parlamente, Baden-Baden: Nomos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maurer, A. (2002), Parlamentarische Demokratie in der Europäischen Union. Der Beitrag des Europäischen Parlaments und der nationalen Parlamente, Baden-Baden: Nomos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maurer, A. (2003), ‘Less Bargaining — More Deliberation. The Convention Method for Enhancing EU Democracy’, International Politics and Society 1, 167–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maurer, A. (2003a). Die Methode des Konvents — ein Modell deliberativer Demokratie?, Integration 26(2), pp. 130–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mauer, A. (2003b). Schließt sich der Kreis? Der Konvent, nationale Vorbehalte und die Regierungskonferenz. Teil 1 Analyse und Empfehlungen, in: http://www.swp-berlin.org/pdf/brennpunkte/eukonvregkonfanalyse 01.pdf (13 August 2003).

    Google Scholar 

  • Maurer, A. (2003c). ‘Less Bargaining — More Deliberation. The Convention Method for Enhancing EU Democracy’, International Politics and Society (1), pp. 167–190 (http://fesportal.fes.de/pls/portal30/docs/ FOLDER/IPG/IPG1_2003/ARTMAURER.HTM) (19 June 2003).

    Google Scholar 

  • Maurer, A. (2003d), ‚Orientierungen im Verfahrensdickicht? Die neue Normenhierarchie der Europäischen Union‘, Integration 26(4), 440–453.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maurer, A. (2003e), ‘Mass Media Publicised Discourses on the Post-Nice-Process’, IWE Working Paper Series No. 40, Vienna: Austrian Academy of Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maurer, A./ Matl, S. (2003), ‚Steuerbarkeit und Handlungsfähigkeit‘, Integration 26(4), 483–492.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mauthner, F. (1901), Beiträge zu einer Kritik der Sprache, 3 Bde., Leipzig, Wiederauflage Wien: Boehlau 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayo, H.B. (1960), An Introduction to Democratic Theory, New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazey, S./ Richardson, J. (eds.) (1993), Lobbying in the European Community, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazey, S./ Richardson, J. (1993), ‘Introduction: Transference of Power. Decision Rules, and Rules of the Game’, in: diess. (eds.), Lobbying in the European Community, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazey, S. / Richardson J. (1993a), ‘Environmental Groups and the EC: challenges and opportunities’, in: D. Judge (ed.), A Green Dimension for the European Community: Political Issues and Processes, London: Frank Cass, 109–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazey, S./ Richardson; J. (2001), ‘Interest Groups and EU Policy Making: organisational logic and venue shopping’, in: J. Richardson (ed.), European Union. Power and Policy making, 2nd ed., London: Routledge, 217–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCrone, D.J./ Kuklinski, J.H. (1979), ‘The Delegate Theory of Representation’, American Journal of Political Science, 23(2), 278–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLean, I. (2003), ‘Before and After Publius: the sources and influence of Madison’s political thought’, in: S. Kornell (ed.), James Madison: the theory and practice of republican government, Stanford, Cal.: University of Stanford Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Mentler, M. (1996), Der Ausschuß der Ständigen Vertreter bei den Europäischen Gemeinschaften, Baden-Baden: Nomos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mezey, M.L. (1979), Comparative Legislatures, Durhman: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, B. (1992), ‚Die „unpolitische“ Frau. Politische Partizipation von Frauen oder: Haben Frauen ein anderes Verständnis von Politik?‘, Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte B 25–26, 3–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michels R. (1952), Zur Soziologie des Parteiwesens in der modernen Demokratie, orig. 1910, 2nd ed., Stuttgart: Kröner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Middlemas, K. (1995), Orchestrating Europe. The Informal Politcs of European Union, 1973–1995, London: Fontana Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mill, J.S. (1991), Considerations on Representative Government, orig. 1860, New York: Prometheus Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mill, J. (1976), ‘An Essay on Government’, in: Essays on Government, Jurisprudence, Liberty of the Press, Law of Nations, orig. 1828, New York: A.M.Kelley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller. W.E./ Thomassen, J./ Herrera, R./ Holmberg, S./ Esaisson, P. (1999), Policy Representation in Western Democracies, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, C.W. (1997), The Racial Contract, Ithaca, NY/London: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milward, A.S. (1992), The European Rescue of the Nation State, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minogue, K. (1988), Method in intellectual history: Quentin Skinner’s Foundations’, in: J. Tully (ed.), Meaning and Context. Quentin Skinner and his Critics, Cambrigde: Polity, 176–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Misch, A. (1996), ‚Legitimation durch Parlamentarisierung? Das Europäische Parlament und das Demokratiedefizit der EU‘, Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft 6, 669–995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mishler, W./ Mughan, A. (1978), ‘Representing the Celtic Fringe: Devolution and Legislative Behaviour in Scotland and Wales’, Legislative Studies Quarterly, 3, 377–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitrany, D. (1933), The Progress of International Government, New Haven

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitrany, D. (1943), A Working Peace System, London: Royal Institute of International Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitrany, D. (1975), The Functional Theory of Politics, London: LSE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moe, T.M. (1984), ‘The New Economics of Organizaion’, American Journal of Political Science, 28, 739–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moe, T.M. (1997), ‘The Positive Theory of Public Bureaucracy’, in: D.C. Mueller (ed.), Perspectives on Public Choice. A Handbook, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monar, J. (1994), ‘Interinstitutional Agreements: The Phenomenon and Its New Dynamics After Maastricht’, Common Market Law Review 31, 693–719.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monar, J. (2003), ‚Der Raum der Freiheit, der Sicherheit und des Rechts im Verfassungsvertrag des Konvents‘, Integration 26(4), 520–526.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moncrief, G.F./ Thompson, J.A. (2001), ‘Lobbyists Views of Term Limits’, Spectrum: The Journal of State Government, Fall, 13–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monzambano, S. (1667), De Statu Imperii Germanici ad Laelium Fratrem, Dominum Trezolani, Liber Unus, Genf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moravcsik, A. (1991), ‘Negotiating the Single European Act: National Interests and Conventional Statecraft in the European Community’, International Organization, 45(1), 19–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moravcsik, A. (1993), ‘Preferences and power in the EC: A Liberal Intergouvernementalist Approach’, Journal of Common Market Studies 31/4, 473–523.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moravcsik, A. (1998), The Choice for Europe. Social Purpose and State Power from Messina to Maastricht, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moravcsik, A. (1999), ‘Is something rotten in the state of Denmark? Constructivism and European Integration’, Journal of European Public Policy, 6/4, 669–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moravcsik, A. (2002), ‚In Defence of the ‘Democratic Deficit’: Reassessing Legitimacy in the European Union’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 40(4), 603–624.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moravcsik, A./ Nicolaidis, K. (1999), ‘Explaining the Treaty of Amsterdam: Interest, Influence, Institutions’, Journal of Common Market Studies 37(1), 59–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, R. (1991), The Consultative Function of the Economic and Social Committee of the European Community, EUI, European Policy Unit Working Paper 11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mosler, H. (1966), ‚Die Entstehung des Modells supranationaler und gewaltenteilender Staatenverbindungen in den Verhandlungen über den Schuman-Plan‘, in: E.v. Caemmerer/ H. Schlochauer/ E. Steindorff (Hrsg.), Probleme des Europäischen Rechts. Festschrift für Walter Hallstein zu seinem 65. Geburtstag, Frankfurt a.M.: Vittorio Klostermann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mouffe, C. (1988), ‘Radical democracy: Modern or Post-Modern?’, in: A. Ross (ed.), Universal Abandon? The Politics of Postmodernism, Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mouffe, C. (1993), The Return of the Political, London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulgan, R. (2000), ‘Accountability: an Ever-Expanding Concept?’, Public Administration, 78(3), 555–573.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Müller, W.C. et al. (2001), Die österreichischen Abgeordneten. Individuelle Präferenzen und politisches Verhalten, Wien: WUV.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller, W.C. (1993), ‘Executive-Legislative Relations in Austria: 1945–1992’, Legslative Studies Quarterly 18, 467–494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Müller, W.C. (1997), ‚Das Parteiensystem‘, in: Dachs et al. (eds.), Handbuch des Politischen Systems Österreichs, 3rd ed., Wien: Manz, 215–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller, W.C. (2001a), ‚Politische Tätigkeit und Amtsverständnis von Parlamentariern: Theorien und Methoden‘, in: W.C. Müller et al. (2001), Die österreichischen Abgeordneten. Individuelle Präferenzen und politisches Verhalten, Wien: WUV, 11–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller W.C./ Strøm K. (1999), ‘Political parties and hard Choices’, in: Müller W.C./ Strøm K. (eds.), Policies, Office, or Votes? How Political Parties in Western Europe Make Hard Decisions, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller-Graff, P.C. (2004), ‚Strukturmerkmale des neuen Verfassungsvertrages für Europa im Entwicklungsgang des Primärrechts‘, Integration 27(3), 186–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Münkler, H. (1994), Politische Bilder, Politik der Metaphern, Frankfurt a.M.: Fischer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, P./ Rich, P. (eds. (1996), Visions of European Unity, Boulder, Co.: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nederman, C.J. (ed.) (1990), John of Salisbuy Policraticus, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neisser, H./ Verschraegen, B. (2001), Die Europäische Union. Anspruch und Wirklichkeit, Wien/New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neunreither, K. (1994), ‘The democratic deficit of the European Union: Towards closer cooperation between the European Parliament and the national Parlaments’, Government and Opposition 29(3), 299–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neunreither, K. (2000), ‘Political Representation in the European Union: A Common Whole, various Wholes, or Just a Hole?, in: K. Neunreither/ A. Wiener (eds.), European Integration After Amsterdam. Institutional Dynamics and Prospects for Democracy, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 129–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, M. (2001), ‘Democracy and accountability in the EU’, in: J. Richardson (ed.), European Union. Power and Policy-making, 2nd ed., London/New York: Routledge, 360–374.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newron, K. (1976), Second City Politics: Democratic Processes and Decision-Making in Birmingham, Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newton, K. (1976), Second City Politics, Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neumann, W.R. (1986), The Paradox of Mass Politics: Knowledge and Opinion in the American Electorate, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nickel, D. (2003), ‚Das Europäische Parlament als Legislativorgan — zum neuen institutionellen Design nach der Europäischen Verfassung’, Integration 26(4), 501–509.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicoll, W. (1994), ‘Representing the States’, in: A. Duff/ J. Pinder/ R. Pryce (eds.), Maastricht and Beyond. Building the European Union, London: Routledge, 190–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niekant, R. (1999), ‚Zur Krise der Kategorien ‘Frauen und Geschlecht’. Judith Butler und der Abschied von feministischer Identitätspolitik’, in: C. Bauhardt/ A. Wahl (eds.) Gender and Politics. Geschlecht in der feministischen Politikwissenschaft, Opladen: Leske & Budrich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noel, É./ Étienne, H. (1971), ‘The Permanent Representatives Committee and the ‘Deepening’ of the Communities’, Government and Opposition, 6(4), 422–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nohlen, D. (1978), Wahlsysteme der Welt. Daten und Analysen. Ein Handbuch, München: Piper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nohlen, D. (1995), ‚Wahlen/Wahlrecht’, in: D. Nohlen (Hrsg.), Wörterbuch Staat und Politik, 3. Aufl., München: Piper, 845–852.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nohlen, D., (2000) Wahlrecht und Parteiensystem, Opladen: Leske & Budrich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norman, P. (2003). The Accidental Constitution. The Story of the European Convention. EuroComment, Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norpoth, H. (1996), ‘The Economy’, in: L. LeDuc/ R. Niemi/ P. Norris (eds.), Comparing Democracies. Elections and Voting in Comparative Perspective, Thousands Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • North, D. (1990), Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norris, P./ Lovenduski, J. (1995), Political Recruitment: Gender, Race and Class in the British Parliament, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norris, P. (1997), ‘Representation and the democratic deficit’, European Journal of Political Research 32(2), 273–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nugent, N. (1991), The Government and Politics of the European Community, 2nd ed., Durham: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nugent, N. (2001), The European Commission, Basingstoke: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oberhuber, F. (2003), ‘Deliberation or ‘Mainstreaming’? Empirically Researching the European Convention’, in: R. Wodak/ P. Chilton (eds.), New Research Agenda in CDA: Theory and Multidisciplinarity, Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Obradovic, D. (1998), ‘Accountability of Interest Groups in the Union lawmaking process’, in: P. Craig/ C. Harlow (eds.), Lawmaking in the European Union, London: Kluwer, 354–385.

    Google Scholar 

  • Obradovic, A. (2005), ‘Participatory Democracy and the open access policy for interest groups in the European Union’, Paper presented at the EUSA Ninth Biennial International Conference, Austin, Texas, 31.3.–2.4.2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Offe, C. (1973), ‚Das pluralistische System von organisierten Interessen’, in: H.J. Varain (Hrsg.), Interessenverbände in Deutschland, Köln: Kiepenheuer & Witsch, 368–371.

    Google Scholar 

  • Offerdal A. (1991), ‘Kommunalpolitikaren — rolleforventning og royndom’, in: J. Naustdalsid (ed.), Kommunal Styring, Oslo: Samlaget, 249–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill, M. (2000), ‘Theorising the European Union: Towards a Post-Foundational Discourse’, Current Politics and Economics of Europe, 9(2), 121–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill, J., (2001), ‘Representing People, Representing Nature, Representing the World’ Government and Policy 19, 483–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olsen, M. Jr. (1965), The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups, Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Padover, S.K. (ed.) (1939), Thomas Jefferson on Democracy, New York: Appleton-Century Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Page, B. (1978), Choices and Echoes in Presidential Elections: Rational Man and Electoral Democracy, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paine, T. (1912), The Rights of Man, orig. 1792, London: Everyman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palonen, K. (2002), ‘The History of Concepts as a Style of Political Theorizing: Quentin Skinner’s and Reinhart Koselleck’s Subversion of Normative Political Theory’, European Journal of Political Theory, 1(1), 91–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palonen, K. (2003), Quentin Skinner: History, Politics, Rethoric, Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parekh, B./ Berki, R. (1973), ‘The History of Political Ideas: A Critique of Q. Skinner’s Methodology’, Journal of the History of Ideas 34, 163–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parry, G./ Moyser, G. (1994), ‘More Participation, More Democracy?’, in: D. Beetham (ed.), Defining and Measuring Democracy, London: Sage, 44–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pateman, C. (1970), Participation and Democratic Theory, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patijn, S. (ed.) (1970), Landmarks in European Unity: 22 texts on European Integration, Leyden: Sijthoff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patzelt, W.J. (1991), ‚Der Abgeordnete — ein unbekanntes Wesen? Bericht über das Schrifttum zur Abgeordnetenforschung’, Neue Politische Literatur 36, 76–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peek, G.A. (1954), The Political Writings of John Adams, hrsg. von G.A. Peek, New York: Bobbs-Merrill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pelinka, A. (1999), ‘The (In)Compatibility of Corporatism and Federalism: Austrian Social Partnership and the EU’, J.B. Brzinski/ T.D. Lancaster/ C. Tuschhoff (eds.), Compounded Representation in Western European Federations, London: Frank Cass, 116–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pennock, J.R. (1979), ‘The Problem of Responsibility’, in: C.J. Friedrich (ed.), Responsibility, New York: Liberal Arts Press, 3–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pennock, J.R. (1979a), Democratic Political Theory, Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perelman, C./ Olbrechts-Tyteca, L. (1969), The New Rethoric: A Treatise of Argumentation, Notre Dame, IN: Notre Dame University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pérez-Solórzano Borragán, N. (2004), ‘A Constitution for Europe. What Role for Organised Interests?’, Paper for the CIDEL Workshop ‘Constitution Making and Democratic Legitimacy in the EU’, 12–13 November 2004, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pernice, I. (2001). Europäische Grundrechte-Charta und Konventsverfahren. Zehn Thesen zum Prozess der europäischen Verfassung nach Nizza, Integration 24/2, pp. 194–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pernthaler, P./ Hilpold, P. (2000), ‚Sanktionen als Instrument der Politikkontrolle — der Fall Österreich’, Integration 23(2), 105–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pescatore, P. (1983), ‘The Doctrine of “Direct Effect”: An Infant Disease of Community Law’, European Law Review 8, 155–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, G. (1994), ‘Agenda-Setting in the European Community’, Journal of European Public Policy 1(1), 9–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, G. (1996), ‘Agenda-Setting in the European Union’, in: J. Richardson (ed.), European Union: Power and Policy-Making, London: Routledge, 61–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, A. (2001), Elemente einer Theorie der Verfassung Europas, Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, J. (1995), ‘Decision-making in the European Union: towards a framework for analysis’, Journal of European Public Policy 2(19), 69–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, J. (1997), ‘States, Societies and the European Union’, West European Politics, 20(4), 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petracca, M. (1992), ‘Rotation in Office: The History of an idea’, in: G. Benjamin/ M.J. Malbin (eds.), Limiting Legislative Terms, Washington, D.C.: CQ Press, 19–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petts, J. (1997), ‘The public-expert interface in local waste management decisions: expertise, credibility and process’, Public Understanding of Science, 6, 359–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, A. (1991), Engendering Democracy, University Park, Pa.: Pennsylvania State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, A. (1994), ‘Dealing with Difference: A Politics of Ideas or a Politics of Presence?, Constellations, 1(1), 74–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, A. (1995), The Politics of Presence: Issues in Democracy and Group Representation, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, A. (1997), ‘Dealing with Difference: A Politics of ideas or a Politics of Presence’, in: R. Gooding/ P. Pettit (eds.), Contemporary Political Philosophy. An Anthology, Oxford: Blackwell, 174–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierson, P. (ed.) (2001), The New Politics of the Welfare State, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinder, J. (1991), European Community. The Building of a Union, Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pitkin, H. (1967), The Concept of Political Representation, Berkeley/Los Angeles/London: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pitkin, H. (1989), ‘Representation’, in: T. Ball/ J. Farr/ R.L. Hanson (eds.), Political Innovation and Conceptual Change, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 132–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pitschas, R. (1994), ‚Europäische Integration als Netwerkkoordination komplexer Staatsaufgaben‘, Staatswissenschaften und Staatspraxis 1994/4, 503–540.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plotke, D. (1997), ‘Representation is Democracy’, Constellations, 4, 19–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pocock, J.G.A. (1962), ‘The History of Political Thought: A Methodological Enquiry’, in: P. Laslett/ W.G. Runcimen (eds.), Philosophy, Politics and Society, Second Series, Oxford: Blackwell, 183–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pocock, J.G.A. (1972), Politics, Language and Time. Essays on Political Thought and History, London: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pocock, J.G.A. (1975), The Machiavellian Moment: Florentine Political Thought and the Atlantic Republican Tradition, Princeton, NJ.: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pocock, J.G.A. (1980), ‘Political Ideas in Historical Events: Political Philosophers as Historical Actors’, in: M. Richter (ed.), Political Theory and Political Education, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 139–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pocock, J.G.A. (1987), The Ancient Constitution and the Feudal Law: a study of English historical thought in the seventeenth century: a reissue with a retrospect, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Podlech, A. (1984), ‚Repräsentation‘, in: O. Brunner/ W. Conze/ R. Koselleck (Hrsg.), Geschichtliche Grundbegriffe: Historisches Lexikon zur politischsozialen Sprache in Deutschland, Bd. 5, Stuttgart: Klett, 1974–1997, 509–547.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pogge, T. (1998), ‘How to cretae supra-national institutions democratically? Some reflections on the European Union’s ‘Democratic Deficit’’, in: A. Føllesdal/ P. Koslowski (eds.), Democracy and the European Union, Berlin: Springer, 160–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poier, K. (2001) Minderheitenfreundliches Mehrheitswahlrecht, Wien: Böhlau Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, K. (1944), The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of our Time, New York: Rinehart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollack, M. (1997), ‘Delegation, Agency, and Agenda Setting in the European Community’, International Organization, 51(1), 99–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollack, M. (1997a), ‘Representing diffuse interests in EC policy-making’, Journal of European Public Policy 4(4), 572–590.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollack, M. (2002), The Engines of Integration? Delegation, Agency, and Agenda Setting in the EU, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollak, J. (1998), Zur politischen Identität Europas, Frankfurt a.M.: Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollak, J./ Mokre, M. (1999) ‚Europäische Kulturpolitik als Identitätspolitk Formen, Prozesse, Resultate‘, Österreichische Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft, 28(3), 317–332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollak, J./ Puntscher Riekmann S. (2002), ‘Small States and Big States in the European Union’, in G. Bischof/ A. Pelinka (eds.), Austria in the EU — a first evaluation after five years (Contemporary Austrian Studies Vol. X) New Brunswick: Transaction Publ., 67–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollak, J./ Puntscher Riekmann S. (2003), ‚Von Haien und Heringen oder über die Macht von großen und kleinen Staaten in Europa‘, in G. Bischof/ M. Gehler/ A. Pelinka (Hrsg.), Österreich in der EU-Bilanz der fünfjährigen Mitgliedschaft, Wien: Böhlau, 379–402.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollak, J./ Slominski P. (2003), ‚Europäische Demokratie im Schnittpunkt von parlamentarischem und regulativem Modell‘, in: R. Bauböck/ M. Mokre/ G. Weiss (Hg.), Europas Identitäten. Mythen, Konstrukte, Konflikte, Frankfurt/New York: Campus 2003, 257–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollak, J./ Slominski P. (2003a), ‘Influencing EU-politics? The Case of the Austrian Parliament’, Journal of Common Market Studies 41(3), 707–729.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollak, J./ Slominski P. (2004), ‘The Representative Quality of EI Treaty Reform: a Comparison Between the IGC and the Convention’, Journal of European Integration 26(3), 201–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollard, A.F. (1925), The Evolution of Parliament, London: Longmans.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poore, P. (1877), ‘Constitution of Pennsylvania’, in: ders. The federal and State Constitutions, Colonial Charters and other Organic Laws of the US, Washington: Government Printing Office, Neudruck 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popkin, S.L. (1991), The Reasoning Voter: Communication and Persuasion in Presidential Campaigns, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K. (1992), Die offene Gesellschaft und ihre Feinde, Bd. 1, Stuttgart: UTB.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porritt E./ Porritt A.G. (1903), The Unreformed House of Commons. Parliamentary Representationbefore 1832, Vol. I., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, B.B.Jr./ Whitten, G.D. (1993), ‘A Cross-National Analysis of Economic Voting: Taking Account of Political Context’, American Journal of Political Science 37, 391–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powell Bingham G. Jr. (1982), Contemporary Democracies, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, B.G.Jr. (2001), Democratic Representation: Two Contributions from Comparative Politics, Paper prepared for the 2001 APSA Meeting, San Francisco, Cal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pratt, J.W./ Zeckhauser R.J. (eds.) (1985), Principals and Agents: The Structure of Business, Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prewitt, K./ Eulau, H. (1969), ‘Political Matrix and Political Representation: Prolegomenon to a New Departure From an Old Problem’, American Political Science Review, 63(2), 427–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Priestley, J. (1835), An Essay on the First Principles of Government and on the nature of political and civil liberty, London: Ely.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prodi, R. (1999), Speech given by Romano Prodi, President Designate of the European Commission to the European parliament, 21 Juli 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Przeworski, A. (1998), ‘Deliberation and Ideological Domination’, in: J. Elster (ed.), Deliberative Democracy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 140–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Przeworski, A./ Stokes, S.C./ Manin, B. (eds.) (1999), Democracy, Accountability, and Representation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Puchala, D. J. (1972), ‘Of Blind Men, Elephants and International Integration’, in: Journal of Common Market Studies 10(3), 267–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Puntscher Riekmann, S. (1998), Die kommissarische Neuordnung Europas, Vienna/New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Puntscher Riekmann, S. (2001), ‘Taming the European Prince’, in: A.S. Markovits/ S. K. Rosenberger (Hg.), Demokratie — Modus und Telos. Beiträge für Anton Pelinka, Wien-Köln, 207–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Puntscher Riekmann, S. (2002), ‚Bürokratie und Demokratie. Die Rolle der nationalen Verwaltung in der Europäischen Union‘, in: H. Neisser/ S. Puntscher Riekmann (Hg.), Europäisierung der österreichischen Politik. Konsequenzen der EU-Mitgliedschaft, Wien: WUV.

    Google Scholar 

  • Puntscher Riekmann, S. (2003), ‚Aufständisches Österreich? Der Konvent seine Ergebnisse und die politische Rezeption in Österreich‘, Integration 26(3), 383–389.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radaelli, C.M. (2000), ‘Whither Europeanization? Concept stretching and substantive change’, European Integration Online Papers, 4(8).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rae, D. (1967), The Political Consequences of Election Laws, New Haven/London: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rakove, J. (1997), Original Meanings. Politics and Ideas in the Making of the Constitution, New York: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao, N. (1998), ‘Representation in Local Politics: a Reconsideration and some New Evidence’, Political Studies XLVI, 19–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rausch, H. (Hg.) (1968), Zur Theorie und Geschichte der Repräsentation und Repräsentativverfassung, Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. (1971), A Theory of Justice, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. (1993), Political Liberalism, New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reale, A. (2003), ‘Representation of Interests, Participatory Democracy and Lawmaking in the European Union: Which Role and Which Rules for the Social Partners?’, Jean Monnet Working Paper 15(3), New York School of Law.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reh, C./ Wessels, W. (2002), ‘Towards an Innovative Mode of Treaty Reform? Three Sets of Expectations for the Convention’, Collegium No. 24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reckitt M.B./ Bechhofer C.E. (1918), The Meaning of National Guilds, London: Palmer and Hayward.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reif, K. (1984), ‘National Electoral Cycles and European Elections’, Electoral Studies 3, 244–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reif, K. (1994), ‚Eine Ende des “Permissive Consensus”? Zum Wandel europapolitischer Einstellungen in der öffentlichen Meinung der EG-Mitgliedstaaten‘, in: R. Hrbek (Hg.), Der Vertrag von Maastricht in der wissenschaftlichen Kontroverse, Baden-Baden: Nomos, 23–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reif, K./ Schmitt H. (1980), ‘Nine Second Order National Elections: A Conceptual Framework for the Analysis of European Election Result’, European Journal of Political Research 8, 3–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reuss, H. (1968), ‚Zur Geschichte der Repräsentativverfassung in Deutschland‘, in: H. Rausch (Hg.), Zur Theorie und Geschichte der Repräsentation und Repräsentativverfassung, Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, orig. 1936, 1–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, P.G. (1972), The Backbenchers, London: Fletcher.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richter (1990), ‘Reconstructing the History of Political Languages: Pocock, Skinner, and the Geschichtliche Grundbegriffe’, History and Theory 29(1), 38–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riker, W. (1982), Liberalism against Populism, San Francisco: Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Risse-Kappen, T. (1995), ‘Structures of Governance and Transnational Relations: What Have we Learned?’, in: T. Risse-Kappen (ed.), Bringing Transnational Relations Back In: Non-state Actors, Domestic Structures and International Institutions, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 3–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Risse, T. (2000), ‘‘Let’s Argue!’: Communicative Action in World Politics’, International Organization 54(1), 1–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Risse, T. (2003), ‚Auf dem Weg zu einer gemeinsamen Außenpolitik? Der Verfassungsvertragsentwurf und die europäische Außen-und Sicherheitspolitik‘, Integration 26(3), 564–575.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rittberger, B. (2001), ‘Which institutions for post-war Europe? Explaining the institutional design or Europe’s first community’, Journal of European Public Policy, 8(5), 673–708.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rittberger, B. (2001a), ‚Welche Verfassungsordnung für Europas „erste Gemeinschaft“?‘, Tübinger Arbeitspapiere zur Internationalen Politik und Friedensforschung, Nr. 37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rittberger, B. (2002), The Parliamentarisation of the European Community, Dissertation, Nuffield College, University of Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rittberger, B. (2003), ‘The Creation and Empowerment of the European Parliament’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 41(2), 203–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rittberger, B. (2005), Building Europe’s Parliament: Democratic Representation Beyond the Nation State, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rivière, C. (1988), Les liturgies politiques, Paris: PUF.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, J.T. (1994), Athens on Trial: The Antidemocratic Tradition in Western Thought, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogowski, R. (1981), ‘Representation in Political Theory and in Law’, Ethics, 91(3), 395–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosa, H. (1994), ‚Ideengeschichte und Gesellschaftstheorie: Der Beitrag der Cambridge School zur Metatheorie‘, Politische Vierteljahresschrift 35(2), 197–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosamond, B. (2000), Theories of European Integration, Basingstoke: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, Al. (1988), The Decline of Representative Democracy, Washington, D.C.: CQ Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothenberg, S. (1992), ‘How Term Limits Became a National Phenomenon’, State Legislatures, 35–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau, J.J. (1994), Vom Gesellschaftsvertrag oder Grundsaetze des Staatsrechts, hrsg. von H. Brockard, orig. 1762, Stuttgart: Reclam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowbotham, S. (1986), ‘Feminism and Democracy’, in D. Held/ C. Pollitt (eds.), New Forms of Democracy, London: Sage, 78–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rule, W./ Zimmerman, J.P. (1987), US Electoral Systems: Their impact on minorities and women, Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabato L. J. (1988), The Party’s Just Begun: Shaping Political Parties for America’s Future, Glenview, Il: Scott, Foresman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuels, D.J. (1999), ‘Incentives to Cultivate Party Vote in Candidate-Centric Electoral Systems’, Comparative Political Studies 32, 487–518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandel, M.J. (1982), Liberalism and the Limits of Justice, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sargenet, J.A. (1985), ‘Corporatism and the European Community’, in: W. Grant (ed.), The Political Economy of Corporatism, London: Macmillan, 229–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sartori, G. (1968), ‘Representational Systems’, in: International Encyclopaedia of the Social Sciences, New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sartori, G. (1976), Party and Party Systems, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sartori, G. (1987), The Theory of Democracy Revisited, Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sartori, G. (1997), Comparative Constitutional Engineering. An Inquiry into Structures, Incentives and Outcomes, 2. Aufl., Basingstoke: Macmillan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saward, M. (1998), The Terms of Democracy, Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saward, M. (2003), Representing nature and the Nature of Representation, Paper presented at the 2nd European Consortium for Political Research Conference, Marburg, September 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sawer M. (2000), ‘Parliamentary Representation of Women: From Discourses of Justice to Strategies of Accountability’, International Political Science Review. Women, Citizenship, and Representation, 21(4), 361–380.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sbragia, A. (ed.) (1992), EuroPolitics: Institutions and Policymaking in the ‘New’ European Community, Washington, D.C.: The Brookings Institution.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaefer, A. (2001), Die Verfassungsentwuerfe zur Gründung einer Europaeischen Union, Dornbirn: BSA. Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheuermann, W. E. (2002), ‚Die politische Theorie konkurrierender Eliten: Joseph Schumpeter‘, in: André Brodocz/ Gary S. Schaal (Hrsg.), Politische Theorien der Gegenwart Bd. I, Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag, 399–438.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scholl, B. (2003), ‚Wie tragfähig ist die neue institutionelle Architektur der EU? Der Verfassungsentwurf des Konvents im Spiegel nationalstaatlicher Präferenzen‘, in: Integration 26(3), 204–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, C. (2000), ‘Accountability in the Regulatory State’, in: C. Harvey/ J. Morison/ J. Shaw (eds.), Voices, Spaces and Processes in Constitutionalism, Blackwell, Oxford, 38–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, J. (2002), ‘Classical Republicanism in Seventeenth-century England and the Netherlands’, in: M.v. Gelderen/ Q. Skinner (eds.), Republicanism. A Shared European Heritage, Vol. I: Republicanism and Constitutionalism in Early Modern Europe, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 61–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scharpf, F.W. (1995), ‚Demokratische Politik in Europa‘, Staatswissenschaften und Staatspraxis 6(4), 565–591.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scharpf, F.W. (1997), ‘Economic Integration, Democracy and the Welfare State’, Journal of European Public Policy, 4(1), 18–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scharpf, F.W. (1999), Governing in Europe, Effective and Democratic?, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scharpf, F.W. (2001), ‘European Governance: Common Concerns vs. the Challenge of Diversity’, Jean Monnet Working Paper 6(01).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schattschneider E.E. (1942), Party Government, New York: Rinehart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schattschneider, E.E. (1960), The Semi-Sovereign People. A Realist View of Democracy in America, New York: Holt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schendelen, M.P.C.M. van (ed.) (1993), National and Private EC Lobbying, Aldershot: Brookfield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schendelen, M.P.C.M. van (ed.) (1994), National Public and Private EC Lobbying, Dartsmouth: Aldershot.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schendelen, M.P.C.M. van (1996), ‘‘The Council Decides’: Does the Council Decide?’, Journal of Common Market Studies 34(4), 531–548.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schendelen, M.P.C.M. van (1996a), ‘EC Committees: Infleunce counts more than legal powers’, in R. Pedler/ G. Schafer, Shaping European Law and Policy: The Role of Committees and Comitology in the Political Process, Maastricht: EIPA, 25–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schendelen, R. van (2002), Machiavelli in Brussels. The Art of Lobbying the EU, Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schild, J. (2003), ‚Die Reform der Kommission‘, Integration 26(3), 493–500.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schild, J. (2005), ‚Ein Sieg der Angst-das gescheiterte französische Verfassungsreferendum‘, Integration 28(3), 187–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schindler, D. (1967), Verfassungsrecht und soziale Struktur, 4. Aufl., Zürich: Schulthess.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, S.J. (Hg.) (1992), Kognition und Gesellschaft. Der Diskurs des Radikalen Konstruktivismus, Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, M.G. (1994), ‚Nationale Politikprofile und Europäische Integration‘, in: O. Gabriel/ F. Brettschneider (Hrsg.), Die EU-Staaten im Vergleich. Stukturen, Prozesse, Politikinhalte, Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag, 422–439.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, C. (1957), Verfassungslehre, 3. Aufl., orig. 1928, Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, E. (1969), Repräsentation und Revolution. Eine Untersuchung zur Genesis der kontinentalen Theorie und Praxis parlamentarischer Repraesentation aus der Herrschaftspraxis des Ancien régime in Frankreich (1760–1789), München: Beck.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, H./ Thomassen, J. (eds.) (1999), Political Representation and Legitimacy in the European Union, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitter, P.C. (1969), ‘Three Neo-Functional Hypotheses about International Integration’, International Organization 23, 161–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitter, P.C. (1992), ‘Representation and the Future Euro-Polity’, Staatswissenschaften und Staatspraxis III,3, 379–405.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitter, P.C. (1996), ‘Imagining the Future of the Euro-Polity with the Help of New Concepts’, in G. Marks und F. Scharpf (eds.), Governance in the European Union, London: Sage, 121–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitter, P.C. (2000), How to Democratize the European Union... And Why Bother?, Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitter, P.C. (2003), The Quality of Democracy: The Ambiguous Virtues of Accountability, Draft: http://iis-db.stanford.edu/pubs/20444/QoD_Accountabiltiy_Schmitter.pdf (25.11.2004), abgedruckt in: Journal of Democracy 15(4).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmuck, O. (2003), ‚Die Beteiligung der Zivilgesellschaft — notwendige Ergänzung der Konventsstrategie‘, Integration 26(2), 162–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider H. (1977), Leitbilder in der Europapolitik 1. Der Weg zur Integration, Bonn Europa Union Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, H. (1990), Alleingang nach Brüssel. Österreichs EG-Politik, Bonn: Europa Union Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, H. (1995), ‚Patriotismus und Nationalismus‘, Concilium, 499–509.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, H. (2003), ‘The Constitution Debate’, European Integration Online Papers 7(4).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider H./ Wessels W. (Hrsg.) (1977), Auf dem Weg zur Europäischen Union? Diskussionsbeiträge zum Tindemans-Bericht, Bonn: Europa Union Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schönlau, J. (2003), ‘Conventional Wisdom? Comparing deliberative interaction in the European Conventions Mark I and II’. Paper presented at the CIDEL Zaragoza Workshop, June 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schönlau, J. (2004), ‘Time Was of the Essence: Timing and Framing Europe’s Constitutional Convention’, in: C. Closa/ J.E. Fossum (eds.), Deliberative Constitutional Politics in the EU, Arena Report No 5/04, Oslo, 245–271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schönlau, J. (2004a), ‘The Membership of the Convention: Issues of Representation and Legitimacy’, Paper for the CIDEL Workshop ‘Constitution Making and Democratic Legitimacy in the EU’, London 12–13 November 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoutheete, P. de (2003), ‚Die Debatte des Konvents über den Europäischen Rat‘, Integration 26(4), 468–482.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumann W. (1996), Neue Wege in der Integrationstheorie. Ein policyanalytisches Modell zur Interpretation des politischen Systems der EU, Opladen: Leske + Budrich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J.A. (1942), Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy, New York Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schütz, A. (1962), The Problem of Social Reality. Collected Papers 1, The Hague: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, N.L (1988), The Blue Guitar: Political Representation and Community, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Searing, D.D. (1991), ‘Roles, Rules, and rationality in the New Institutionalism, American Political Science Review 85, 1239–1260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Searing, D.D. (1994), Westminster’s World. Understanding Political Roles, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Searing, D.D. (1995), ‘Backbench and leadership Roles in the House of Commons’, Parliamentary Affairs 48, 418–437.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seidelmann, R. (1995), ‘Democracy Building in the European Union. Conditions, Problems, and Options’, in: M. Télo (Hrsg.), Démocratie et Construction Européenne, Brüssel: Ed. de l’Univ. de Bruxelles, 73–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selden, S.C. (1997), The Promise of Representative Bureaucracy: Diversity and Responsiveness in a Government Agency, Armonk: ME Sharp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (1999), ‘The Possibility of Social Choice’, American Economic Review, 89(3), 349–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shanks, M. (1977), European Social Policy: Today and Tomorrow, Brussels: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, I. (1982), ‘Realism in the History of Ideas’, History of Political Thought, 3(3), 535–578.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, J. (2003), ‘What’s in a Convention? Process and Substance in the Project of European Constitution-Building’, Political Science Series No. 89, Institute for Advanced Studies, Vienna.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, J. (2003a), ‘Process, Responsibility and Inclusion of the EU Constitutionalism’, European Law Journal 9(1), 45–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, J. (2005), ‘Europe’s Constitutional Future’, Public Law, i.E. Frühjahr 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siedentop, L. (2001), Democracy in Europe, New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sieyès, E.J. (1789/1981), Dire de l’abbé Sieyès sur la question du veto royal, 7.9.1789, in: E. Schmitt/ R. Reichardt (Hrsg.), E.J. Sieyès, Politische Schriften 1788–1790, 2. Aufl., Wien/Muenchen: Oldenbourg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, Q. (1966), ‘The Limits of Historical Explanation’, Philosophy XLI(157), 199–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, Q. (1969), ‘Meaning and Understanding in the History of Ideas’, History and Theory, 8, 3–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, Q. (1972), ‘Social Meaning? and the Explanation of Social Action’, in: P. Laslett/ W.G. Runciman/ Q. Skinner (eds.), Philosophy, Politics and Society, Fourth Series, Oxford: Blackwell, 136–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, Q. (1972b), ‘Motives, Intentions and the interpretation of Texts’, New Literary History 3, 393–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, Q. (1978), The Foundations of Modern Political Thought, 2 Bände, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, Q. (1980), ‘Language and Social Change’, wiederabgedruckt in: J. Tully (ed.) (1988), Meaning and Context. Quentin Skinner and his Critics, Cambridge: Polity, 119–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, Q. (1988), ‘A reply to my critics’, in: J. Tully (ed.), Meaning and Context. Quentin Skinner and his Critics, Cambrigde: Polity, 231–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, Q. (2002), ‘Studying Rhetoric and Conceptual Change’, in: ders., Visions of Politics, Vol. 1, Regarding Method, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 175–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, Q. (2002a), ‘Classical Liberty and the Coming of the English Civil War’, in: M. van Gelderen/ Q. Skinner (eds.), Republicanism, Vol. II: The Values of Republicanism in Early Modern Europe, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 9–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slezak, P. (2002), ‘The tripartite model of representation’, Philosophical Psychology 15(3), 239–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slominski, P. (2002), Die Implementation des EG-Telekommunikationsrechts aus rechts-und politikwissenschaftlicher Sicht, Wien: Manz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smend, R. (1955), ‚Verfassung und Verfassungsrecht‘, in: ders., Staatsrechtliche Abhandlungen und andere Aufsätze, Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, T. (1906), De Republica Anglorum, orig. 1572, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith G. (1989), ‘A System Perspective on Party System Change’, Journal of Theoretical Politics 1(3), 349–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith J. (1999), Europe’s Elected Parliament, Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press UACES.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, B.P.G. (2002), Constitution Building in the European Union. The process of Treaty Reforms, Den Haag/London/New York: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sobolewski, M. (1968), ‘Electors and Representatives: A Contribution to the Theory of Representation’, in: J.R. Pennock/ J.W. Chapman (eds.), Representation. Yearbook of the American Society for Political and Legal Philosophy, New York: Atherton Press, 95–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorauf F.J. (1963), Party and Representation, New York: Atherton Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sperenburg, D./ Poidevin, R. (1993), Historie de la Haute Autorité de la Communauté Européenne du Charbon et de l’Acier: une expérience supranationale, Brüssel: Bruylant.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spinelli, A. (1983), Towards the European Union, Florence: Florence University Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spinelli, A. (1984), ‚Das Verfassungsprojekt des Europäischen Parlaments‘, in: R. Bieber/ J. Schwarze (Hrsg.), Eine Verfassung für Europa: von der Europäischen Gemeinschaft zur Europäischen Union: Referate und Diskussionsbeiträge der internationalen Tagung des Instituts für Integrationsforschung der Stiftung Europa-Kolleg Hamburg vom 3. bis 5. November 1983, Baden-Baden: Nomos, 231–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steffani, W. (1981), ‚Edmund Burke: Zur Vereinbarkeit von freiem Mandat und Fraktionsdisziplin‘, Zeitschrift für Parlamentsfragen 12, 109–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinberg, P. (2001), ‚Governance und Parteien — Politisierung als Möglichkeit größerer bürgergesellschaftlicher Identifikation. Ein Kommentar zum Weißbuch Europäisches Regieren‘, Jean Monnet Working Paper 6(01).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberger, D. (1971), Nicht alle Staatsgewalt geht vom Volke aus. Studien ueber Repraesentation, Vorschlag und Wahl, Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sterne, S. (1869), ‘Representative government: its evils and their reform. A lecture delivered 1869, at the invitation and under the auspices of the trustees of the Cooper Union’, New York: C.S. Wescott & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stimson, J.A./ Mackuen, M.B./ Erikson, R.S. (1989), ‘Dynamic Representation’, American Political Science Review, 89(3), 543–565.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stolarek, J.S./ Rood, R.M./ Taylor, M.W. (1981), ‘Measuring Constituency Opinion in the U.S. House: Mail Versus Random Surveys’, Legislative Studies Quarterly 6, 589–596.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stone, C.N./ Wheelan, R.K./ Murin, W.J. (1986), Urban Policy and Politics in a Buraucratic Age, 2nd ed., Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone Sweet, A./ Sandholtz, W. (eds.) (1998), Supranational Governance: The Institutionalization of the European Union, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, L. (1952), Natural Right and History, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strawson, P. F. (1969), ‘Intention and Convention in Speech Acts’, in: K.T. Fann (ed.), Symposium on J.L. Austin, London: Routledge, 380–400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Streeck, W. (1996), ‘Neo-voluntarism: a new social policy regime?’, in: G. Marks/ F. Scharpf/ P. Schmitter/ W. Streeck, Governance in the European Union, London: Sage Publications, 64–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Streeck, W./P. Schmitter (1991), ‘From National Corporatism to Transnational Pluralism: Organized Interests in the Single Market’, in: V. Eichener/ H. Voelzkow (Hrsg.), Europäische Integration und verbandliche Interessenvermittlung, Marburg: Metropolis, 181–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strøm, K./ Müller, W.C./ Bergman, T. (eds.) (2003a), Delegation and Accountability in Parliamentary Democracies, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strøm, K./ Mueller, W.C./ Bergman, T. (2003), ‘Challenges to Parliamentary Democracy’, in: K. Strøm/ W.C. Müller/ T. Bergman (eds.), Delegation and Accountability in Parliamentary Democracies, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 707–750.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sunstein, C.R. (1993), ‘Democracy and Shifting Preferences’, in: D. Copp/ J. Hampton/ J.E. Roemer (eds.), The Idea of Democracy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 196–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sunstein, C.R. (1995), ‘Incompletely theorized agreements’, Harvard Law Review 108, 1733–1772.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sunstein, C.R. (1996), Legal Reasoning and Political Conflict, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sunstein, C.R. (1997), ‘Deliberation, democracy and disagreement’, in: Ronald Bontekoe/ Marietta Stepaniants (eds.), Justice and Democracy: Cross-Cultural Perspectives, Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland, P. (1992), The Internal Market after 1992: Meeting the Challenge, Report to the European Commission by the High Level Group on the Operation of the Internal Market, Brussels, Commission of the European Communities.

    Google Scholar 

  • Syrett, H.C. (ed.), The Papers of Alexander Hamilton, New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taagepera, R. (1986), ‘Reformulating the Cube Law for Proportional Representation Elections’, American Political Science Review, 80, 489–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tallberg, J. (2000), ‘The Anatomy of Autonomy: An Institutional Account of Variation in Supranational Influence’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 38(5), 843–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tarlton, C.D. (1973), ‘Historicity, Meaning and Revisionism in the Study of Political Thought’, History and Theory XII, 307–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tawney, R.H. (1941), ‘The Rise of the Gentry, 1558–1640’, Economic History Review, XI, wiederabgedruckt in: E.M. Carus-Wilson (ed.), Essays in Economic History, Vol. I (1954), 173—214

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, C. (1971), ‘Interpretation and the Sciences of Man’, The Review of Metaphysics 25, 3–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, C. (1974), ‘Philosophy and its History’, in: R. Rorty/ J. Schneewind/ Q. Skinner (eds.), Philosophy in History, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 17–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, C. (1985), Philosophy and the Human Sciences, Philosophical Papers 2, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, C. (1998), ‘The Dynamics of Democratic Exclusion’, Journal of Democeacy, 19(4), 148–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, M.A. (2000), ‘Channeling Frustrations: Institutions, Economic Fluctuations, and Political Behaviour’, European Journal of Political Research, 38, 95–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thatcher, M. (1993), The Downing Street Years, London: Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thatcher, M./ Stone Sweet A. (2002), The Politics of Delegation: Non-Majoritarian Institutions in Europe, Special Issue West European Politics 25(1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Theissen, R. (1996), Der Ausschuß der Regionnen (Artikel 198a-c EG-Vertrag): Einstieg der Europäischen Union in einen kooperativen Regionalismus?, Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomassen, H. (1994), ‘Empirical research into Political Representation. A Critical Reappraisal’, in: H. Klingemann/ R. Stoess/ B. Wessels (Hrsg.), Politische Klasse und politische Institutionen, Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomassen, J./ Schmitt H. (1999), ‘Introduction: Political Representation and Legitimacy in the European Union’, in: H. Schmitt/ J. Thomassen (eds.), Political Representation and Democratic Legitimacy in the European Union, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 3–21.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, D. (1988), ‘Representatives in the Welfare State’, in: A. Gutman (ed.), Democracy in the Welfare State, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 132–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tömmel, I. (2004), ‚Eine Verfassung für die EU: institutionelle Anpassung oder System-Reform?’, Integration 27(3), 202–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tremblay, M./ Pelletier, R. (2000), ‘More Feminists or More Women?’, International Political Science Review, 21(4), 381–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trend D. (ed.) (1996), Radical Democracy: Identity, Citizenship and the State, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tribe, K. (1985), ‘Translators Introduction’, in: R. Koselleck, Futures Pats. On the Semantics of Historical Time, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, vii–xvii.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsebelis, G. (1994), ‘The Power of the European Parliament as Conditional Agenda-Setter’, American Political Science Review, 88(1), 128–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tully, J. (1988), Meaning and Context. Quentin Skinner and his Critics, Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tully, J. (1995), Strange Multiplicity: Constitutionalism in an Age of Diversity, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuschhoff, C. (1999), ‘The Compounding Effect: The Impact of Federalism on the Concept of Representation’, in: J.B. Brzinski/ T.D. Lancaster/ C. Tuschhoff (eds.), Compounded Representation in Western European Federations, London: Frank Cass, 16–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uhr, J. (1993), ‘Redesigning Accountability: From Muddles to Maps’, Australian Quarterly 65(2), 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ullmann, W. (1975), Medieval Political Thought, Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urbinati, N. (1999), ‘Rethoric and Representation: The Politics of Advocacy’, paper presented at the Political Theory Workshop, University of Chicago, 11 Oct. 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urbinati, N. (2004), ‘Condorcet’s Democratic Theory of Representative Government’, European Journal of Political Theory, 3(1), 53–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valentine, H./ Lodge, J. (1978), The European Parliament and the European Community, London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Eijk C./ Franklin M. (1996), Choosing Europe?: The European Electorate and National Politics in the Face of Union, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Velema, W.R.E. (2002), ‘‘That a Republic is Better than a Monarchy’: Anti-Monarchism in Early Modern Dutch Political Thought’, in: M.v. Gelderen/ Q. Skinner (eds.), Republicanism. A Shared European Heritage, Vol. I: Republicanism and Constitutionalism in Early Modern Europe, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 9–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanhoonacker, S. (1992), ‘The Role of Parliament’, in: F. Laursen/ S. Vanhoonacker (eds.), The Intergouvernmental Conference on Political Union: Institutional Reforms, New Policies and International Identity of the European Community, European Institute of Public Administration, Maastricht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vierlich-Jürcke, K. (1998), Der Wirtschafts-und Sozialausschußäischen Gemeinschaften, Baden-Baden: Nomos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vile, J.R. (1991), Rewriting the Constitution: An Examination of Proposals from Reconstruction to the Present, New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voegelin, E. (1991). Die Neue Wissenschaft der Politik, 4. Aufl., München: Alber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voet, R. (1998), Feminism and Citizenship, London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogel, D. (1993), ‘Representing diffuse interests in environmental policymaking’, in: R.K. Weaver/ B.A. Rockman (eds.), Do Institutions Matter? Government Capabilities in the United Stated and Abroad, Washington, DC: The Brookings Insitution, 237–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogel, D. (1995), Trading up: Consumer and Environmental Regulation in a Global Economy, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voigt, R. (Hrsg.) (1989), Politik der Symbole — Symbole der Politik, Opladen: Leske + Budrich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Volkmann-Schluck, S. (2001), Die Debatte um eine europäische Verfassung. Leitbilder — Konzepte — Strategien, CAP Working Paper Dezember 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voort, W.J. van der (1997), In search of a role: The Economic and Social Committee in European Decision-Making, Universität Utrecht, Dissertation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vowles, J. et al. (eds.) (1998), Voters’ Victory? New Zealand’s First Election Under Proportional Election, Auckland: University of Auckland Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, W. (1999), ‚Interessen und Ideen in der europäischen Verfassungspolitik. Rationalistische und konstruktivistische Erklärungen mitgliedstaatlicher Präferenzen’, Politische Vierteljahresschrift, 40(3), 415–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wahlke, J.C./ Eulau, H./ Buchanan, W./ Ferguson, L.C. (1962), The Legislative System, New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wahlke, J.C. (1971), ‘Policy-Demands and System Support: The Role of the Represented, British Journal of Political Science, 1, 271–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wainwright, H. (1994), Arguments for a New Left: Answering the Free-Market Right, Oxford/Cambridge, MA.: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, H. (1996), ‘Government without Statehood’, in: H. Wallace/ W. Wallace (eds.), Policy-Making in the European Union, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 439–460.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, H./ Young, A.R. (eds.) (1997), Participation and policy making in the European Union, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, H./ Wallace, W. (eds.) (1996), Policy-Making in the European Union, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, W.H. (1967), An Introduction to Philosophy of History, London: Hutchinson’s University Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walzer, M. (1971), Obligations: Essays on Disobedience, War, and Citizenship, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walzer, M. (1983), Spheres of Justice: a defence of Pluralism and equality, Oxford: Robertson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waltz, K.N. (1979), Theory of International Politics, New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warleigh, A. (1998), ‘Better the devil you Know? Synthetic and Confederal Understandings of European Unification’, West European Politics, 21(3) 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warleigh, A. (2001), ‘Europeanizing Civil Society: NGOs as Agents of Political Socialisation’, Journal of Common Market Studies 39(4), 619–639.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warleigh, A. (2003), Democracy and the European Union: theory, pratice and reform, London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warrender. H. (1979), ‘Political Theory and Historiography: A Reply to Prof. Skinenr on Hobbes’, Historical Journal 22, 931–940.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waever, K.R. (1986), ‘The Politics of Blame Avoidance’, Journal of Public Policies, 6, 371–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. (1956), Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft, hrsg. von J. Winckelmann, 4. Aufl., Tuebingen: Mohr.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webber (1986), ‘The Contours and Complexity of Legislator Objectives: Empirically Examining the Basis of Purposive Models’, Western Political Quarterly 39, 93–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weidenfeld, W. (Hrsg.) (2001), Nizza in der Analyse, Gütersloh: Bertelsmann Stiftung.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiler, J.H.H. (1993), ‘Journey to an Unknown Destination: A Retropective and Prospective of the European Court of Justice in the Arena of Political Integration’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 31(4), 417–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiler, J.H.H. (1995), Democracy and Federalismus in European integration, Bern: Staempfli.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiler, J.H.H. (1998), ‘European models: Polity, people and system’, in: P. Craig/ C. Harlow (eds.), Lawmaking in the European Union, London: Kluwer, 3–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiler, J.H.H. (2001), ‘The Commission as Euro-Sceptic: A Task-Oriented Commission for a Project-based Union. A Comment on the first version of the White Paper’, in: Y. Mény/ J. Weiler, Jean Monnet Working Paper No. 6/01: Symposium Mountain or Molehill? A Critical Appraisal of the Commission White Paper on Governance.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiler, J.H.H./M. Wind (eds.), European Constitutionalism Beyond the State, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, G. (2005), Analyzing political representation in/and/of Europe — Does a phenomenological approach help?, Paper presented at the ECPR annual conference in Budapest, 7.–10. Sept. 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weissberg, R. (1978), ‘Collective vs. Dyadic Representation in Congress’, American Political Science Review 72, 535–547.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weldon, T.D. (1953), The Vocabulary of Politics, Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wessels, W. (1986), ‚Die Debatte um die Europäische Union — Konzeptionelle Grundlinien und Optionen‘, in: W. Weidenfeld/ W. Wessels (Hrsg.), Wege zur Europäischen Union: Vom Vertrag zur Verfassung?, Schriftenreihe der Bundeszentrale für politische Bildung, Bd. 248, Bonn, 37–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wessels, W. (1992), ‚Staat und (west)europäische Integration. Die Fusionsthese‘, in: M. Kreile (Hrsg.), Die Integration Europeas, Politische Vierteljahresschrift, Sonderheft 23, 36–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weßels, B. (1997), ‘Germany’, in: P. Norris (ed.), Passages to Power: Legislative recruitment in advanced democracies, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 76–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wessels, W. (1980), Der Europäische Rat. Stabilisierung oder Integration? Geschichte, Entwicklung und Zukunft der EG-Gipfelkonferenzen, Bonn: Europa Union Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wessels, W. (1997), ‘An Ever Closer Fusion? A Dynamic Macropolitical View on Integration Processes’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 35(2), 267–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wessels, W. (2001), Jean Monnet — Mensch und Methode. Überschätzt und überholt?, IHS Working Paper No. 74, Wien.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wessels, W. (2004), ‚Die institutionelle Architektur der EU nach der Europäischen Verfassung‘, Integration 27(3), 161–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wessels, W. (2003), ‚Der Verfassungsvertrag im Integrationstrend: Eine Zusammenschau zentraler Ergebnisse‘, Integration 26(4), 284–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weßels, B. (1999), ‘Political Integration in Europe: Is it possible to square the circle?, European Integration Online Papers, 3(9), http://eiop.or.at/eiop/texte/1999-009.htm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westlake, M. (1994), A Modern Guide to the European Parliament, London: Pinter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westlake, M. (1999), The Council of the European Union, London: John Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westle, B. (1989), Politische Legitimität. Theorie, Konzepte, empirische Befunde, Baden-Baden: Nomos.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, H. (1973), Metahistory. The Historical Imaginiation in Nineteenth-Century Euope, Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, H. (1978), Tropics of Discourse. Essays in Cultural Criticism, Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, H. (1987), The Content of the Form: Narrative Discourses and Historical Representation, Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiener, A. (1998), ‘European’ Citizenship Practice: Building Institutions of a Non-state, Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiener, A. (2004), ‚Die Verfassung Europas: Konturen eines europäischen Konstitutionalismus‘, Integration 27(3), 176–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiener, A./ Diez, T. (2004), European Integration Theory, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, S. (1991), ‘Sovereignty and Accountability in the European Community’, in: R.O. Keohane/ S. Hoffmann (eds.), The New European Community: Decisionmaking and Institutional Change, Boulder: Westview (erstmals erschienen in: Political Quarterly 61(3), 299–317).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, J.Q. (1978), ‘The Rise of the Bureaucratic State’, in: F. Rourke (ed.), Bureaucratic Power in National Politics, 3. Aufl., Boston: Little Brown, 54–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wincott, D. (1998), ‘Does the European Union Pervert Democracy? Questions of Democracy in New Constitutionalist Thought on the Future of Europe’, European Law Journal 4(4), 411–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L. (1971), Philosophische Untersuchungen, Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, G.S. (1972), The Creation of the American Republic 1776–1787, New York: Norton & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woolsey, T. (1877), Political Science or the State, Theoretically and Practically Considered, 2 vols, New York: Scribner, Armstrong and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yataganas, X.A. (2001), ‘Delegation of Regulatory Authority in the European Union. The relevance of the American model of independent agencies’, Jean Monnet Working Paper 3/01, New York School of Law, New York University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yates, D. (1977), The Ungovernable City: the politics of urban problems and policy-making, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, I.M. (1992), Justice and the Politics of Difference, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, I.M. (1997), ‘Deferring group Representation’, Nomos XXXIX, Ethnicity and Group Rights, hrsg. von I. Shapiro/ W. Kymlicka, New York: New York University Press, 349–376.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, I.M. (2000), Inclusion and Democracy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaller, J. (1992), The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zellentin, G. (1962), Der Wirtschafts-und Sozialausschuss der EWG und EURATOM: Interessenrepräsentation auf übernationaler Ebene, Leiden: Sythoff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmermann, A. (1971) (Hg.), Der Begriff der Repraesentation im Mittelalter, Berlin: de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zwaan, J.W. de (1995), The Permanent Representatives Committee. Its Role in European Decision-Making, Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zweifel T.D. (2002) ‘... Who is without sin cast the first stone: the EU’s democratic deficit in comparison’. Journal of European Public Policy, 9(5), 812–840.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer-Verlag/Wien

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

(2007). Bibliographie. In: Repräsentation ohne Demokratie. Springer, Vienna. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-211-69916-4_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-211-69916-4_10

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Vienna

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-211-69915-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-211-69916-4

Publish with us

Policies and ethics