Zusammenfassung
Seit Jahrzehnten werden in der Behandlung chronischer Wunden zusätzlich zur Standardtherapie erfolgreich verschiedene physikalische Maßnahmen angewendet. Bis heute sind jedoch die wissenschaftliche Evidenz und die klinische Relevanz einzelner physikalischer Therapiemodalitäten in der Wundbehandlung nicht geklärt.
Ziel dieses Beitrages ist es, die verschiedenen physikalischen Therapiemodalitäten vorzustellen, ihre Wirkungsweise zur Förderung der Wundheilung zu erläutern und die Evidenz-basierten Anwendungs-möglichkeiten in der Wundbehandlung anhand der vorhandenen Literatur zusammenzufassen.
-
Venöse Ulzera können mittels Elektrotherapie und Magnetfeldtherapie erfolgreich behandelt werden.
-
Bei diabetischen Ulzera sind Elektrotherapie und Wärmetherapie wirksam.
-
Bei Druck-Ulzera kann Wärmetherapie erfolgreich angewendet werden.
-
Bei allen Wundtypen zeigen sich Ultraschalltherapie und Lasertherapie der Placebobehandlung nicht überlegen.
-
Zu ischämischen Ulzera kann aufgrund fehlender Studienergebnisse keine Aussage getroffen werden.
Wie bei vielen anderen Erkrankungsbildern hat sich die physikalische Therapie in der Behandlung chronischer Wunden empirisch bewährt. Wissenschaftliche Nachweise sind jedoch noch ausständig. Trotzdem sind heute physikalische Therapiemaßnahmen aus dem modernen Behandlungsregime chronischer Wunden nicht mehr wegzudenken.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Literatur
Abergel RP, Larn TS, Meeker CA, Castel CJ, Dwyer RM, Uitto J (1984) Biostimulation of procollagen production by low energy lasers in human skin fibroblast cultures. Invest Dermat 82: 395
Baker LL, Chambers R, DeMuth SK, Villar F (1997) Effects of electrical stimulation on wound healing in patients with diabetic ulcers. Diabetes Care 20(3): 405–12
Barker AT (1981) Measurement of direct current in biological fluids. Med Biol Eng Comput 19: 507–08
Barker AT, Jaffe LF, Vanable JW, Jr (1982) The glabrous epidermis of cavies contains a powerful battery. Am J Physiol 242: R358–66
Barranco SD, Spadaro JA, Berger TJ, Becker RO (1974) In vitro effect of weak direct current on an infecting microorganism in wounds. Ann N Y Acad Sci 238: 543–51
Berliner MN (1997) Reduced skin hyperemia during tap water iontophoresis after intake of acetylsalicylic acid. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 76(6): 482–87
Bosatra M, Juccila A, Olliaro P et al (1984) In vitro fibroblast and dermis fibroblast activation by laser irradiation at low energy, an electron microscopic study. Dermatologica 168: 157–62
Dissemond J, Fitz G, Goos M (2003) Konditionierung chronischer Wunden mittels Ultraschall. Hautarzt 54(6): 524–29
Dyson M (1982) Non-thermal cellular effects of ultrasound. Br J Cancer 45: 165–71
Dyson M, Preston R, Woledge R, Kitchen S (1999) Long-wave ultrasound. Physiotherapy 85: 40–49
Eriksson SV, Lundeberg T, Malm M (1991) A placebo controlled trial of ultrasound therapy in chronic leg ulceration. Scand J Rehab Med 23: 211–13
Flemming K, Cullum N (2001) Systematic reviews of wound care management: low-level laser therapy, therapeutic ultrasound, electrotherapy and electromagnetic therapy for the treatment of chronic wounds. Health Technol Assess 5: 139–221
Franek A, Krol P, Kucharzewski M (2002) Does low output laser stimulation enhance the healing of crural ulceration? Some critical remarks. Med Eng Phys 24: 607–15
Franek A, Polak A, Kucharzewski M (2000) Modern application of high voltage stimulation for enhanced healing of venous crural ulceration. Med Eng Phys 22(9): 647–55
Foulds IS, Barker AT (1983) Human skin battery potentials and their possible role in wound healing. Br J Dermatol 109: 515–22
Goldman R, Pollack S (1996) Electric fields and proliferation in a chronic wound model. Bioelectromagnetics 17(6): 450–57
Hecker B, Carron H, Schwartz DP (1985) Pulsed galvanic stimulation: effects of current frequency and polarity on blood flow in healthy subjects. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 66: 369–731
Ieran M, Zaffuto S, Bagnacani M, Annovi M, Moratti A, Cadossi R (1990) Effect of low frequency pulsino electromagnetic fields of skin ulcers of venous origin in humans: a double-blind study. J Orthop Res 8: 276–82
Ikeda T, Tayefeh F, Sessler DI, Kurz A, Plattner O, Petschnigg B, Hopf HW, West J (1998) Local radiant heating increases subcutaneous oxygen tension. Am J Surg 175: 33–37
Jaffe LF, Vanable JW Jr (1984) Electric fields and wound healing. Clin Dermatol 2: 34–44
James J (1994) Laser therapy on trial. Prim Health Care 4: 18–20
Kenkre JE, Hobbs FDR, Carter YH, Holder RL, Holmes EP (1996) A randomized controlled trial of electromagnetic therapy in the primary care management of venous leg ulceration. Fam Pract 13(3): 236–41
Kincaid CB, Lavoie KH (1989) Inhibition of bacterial growth in vitro following stimulation with high voltage, monophasic, pulsed current. Phys Ther 69: 651–55
Lagan KM, McKenna T, Witherow A, Johns J, McDonough SM, Baxter GD (2002) Low-intensity laser therapy/combined phototherapy in the management of chronic venous ulceration: a placebo-controlled study. J Clin Laser Med Surg 20(3): 109–16
Li X, Kolega J (2002) Effects of direct current electric fields on cell migration and actin filament distribution in bovine vascular endothelial cells. J Vasc Res 39: 391–404
Lucas C, van Gemert MJC, de Haan RJ (2003) Efficacy of low-level laser therapy in the management of stage III decubitus ulcers: a prospective, observer-blinded multicentre randomised clinical trial. Lasers Med Sci 18(2): 72–77
Lundeberg T, Eriksson SV, Malm M (1992) Electrical nerve stimulation improves healing of diabetic ulcers. Ann Plast Surg 29(4): 328–31
Lundeberg T, Malm M (1991) Low-power HeNe laser treatment of venous leg ulcers. Ann Plast Surg 27(6): 537–39
Lundeberg T, Nordstrom F, Brodda-Jansen G, Eriksson SV, Kjartansson J, Samuelson UE (1990) Pulsed ultrasound does not improve healing of venous ulcers. Scand J Rehabil Med 22(4): 195–97
Lyons RF, Abergel RP, White RA, Dwyer RM, Castel JC, Uitto J (1987) Biostimulation of wound healing in vivo by a helium neon laser. Ann Plast Surg 18: 47–50
Malm M, Lundeberg T (1991) Effect of low power gallium arsenide laser on healing of venous ulcers. Scand J Plast Reconstr Hand Surg 25: 249–51
McCulloch J, Knight CA (2002) Noncontact Normothermic Wound Therapy and Offloading in the Treatment of Neuropathic Foot Ulcers in Patients with Diabetes. Ostomy Wound Manag 48(3): 38–44
McDonald WS, Nichter LSM (1994) Debridement of bacterial and particulate-contaminated wounds. Ann Plast Surg 33: 142–47
Mester E, Toth N, Mester A (1982) The biostimulative effect of laserbeam. Laser Basic Biomed Res 22: 14–16
Murray JC, Frandale RW (1985) Modulation of collagen production in cultured fibroblasts by PEMFs. Biochem Biophys Acta 838: 98–106
Orida N, Feldman JD (1982) Directional protrusive pseudopodial activity and motility in macrophages induced by extracellular electric fields. Cell Motil 2: 243–55
Park HY, Phillips T, Kroon C, Murali J, Seah CC (2001) Noncontact thermal wound therapy counteracts the effects of chronic wound fluid on cell cycle-regulatory proteins. Wounds 13(6): 216–22
Peschen M, Weichenthal M, Schöpf E, Vanscheidt W (1997) Low-frequency ultrasound treatment of chronic venous leg ulcers in an outpatient therapy. Acta Derm Venereol 77: 311–14
Peters EJ, Lavery LA, Armstrong DG, Fleischli JG (2001) Electric stimulation as an adjunct to heal diabetic foot ulcers: a randomized clinical trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 82: 721–25
Price P, Bale S, Crook H, Harding KGH (2000) The effect of a radiant heat dressing on pressure ulcers. Wound Care 9(4): 201–205
Robinson KR (1985) The responses of cells to electrical fields: a review. J Cell Biol 101: 2023–2027
Rowley BA (1972) Electrical current effects on E.coli growth rates. Proc Soc Exp Boil Med 139: 929–34
Rudolph DM (1998) Pathophysiology and management of venous ulcers. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs 25(5): 248–55
Schindl M, Kerschan K, Schindl A, Schon H, Heinzl H, Schindl L (1999) Induction of complete wound healing in recalcitrant ulcers by low-intensity laser irradiation depends on ulcer cause and size. Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed 15(1): 18–21
Sheridan DM, Isseroff RR, Nuccitelli R (1996) Imposition of a physiologic DC electric field alters the migratory response of human keratinocytes on extracellular matrix molecules. J Invest Dermatol 106: 642–646
Stiller MJ, Pak GH, Shupack JL, Thaler S, Kenny C, Jondreau L (1992) A portable pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) ddevice to enhance healing of recalcitrant venous ulcers: a double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Br J Dermatol 127: 147–154
Szuminsky NJ, Albers AC, Unger P, Eddy JG (1994) Effect of narrow, pulsed high voltages on bacterial viability. Phys Ther 74: 660–67
terRiet G, Kessels AG, Knipschild P (1996) A randomized clinicla trial of ultrasound in the treatment of pressure ulcers. Phys Ther 76(12): 1301–11
Todd DJ, Heylings DJ, Allen GE, McMillin WP (1991) Treatment of chronic varicose ulcers with pulsed electromagnetic fields a controlled pilot study. Ir Med J 84(2): 54–55
Whitney JD, Salve da Lena G, Higa L, Mich M (2001) Treatment of Pressure Ulcers with Noncontact Normothermic Wound Therapy: Healing and Warming Effects. JWOCN 28(5): 244–52
Xia Z, Sato A, Hughes MA, Cherry G (2000) Stimulation of fibroblast growth in vitro by intermittent radiant warming. Wound Rep Reg 8(2): 138–44
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2007 Springer-Verlag/Wien
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Zorn, C., Fialka-Moser, V. (2007). Physikalische Therapiemodalitäten in der Behandlung chronischer Wunden. In: Wild, T., Auböck, J. (eds) Manual der Wundheilung. Springer, Vienna. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-211-69454-1_29
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-211-69454-1_29
Publisher Name: Springer, Vienna
Print ISBN: 978-3-211-25212-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-211-69454-1
eBook Packages: Medicine (German Language)