Skip to main content

Vitruvius Machinator Terminator

Bernard Cache

  • Chapter
Objectile Patrick Beaucé + Bernard Cache

Part of the book series: Consequence Book Series on Fresh Architecture ((CBSFA,volume 6))

  • 213 Accesses

Abstract

Should we be surprised that a theory of architecture such as the De Architectura speaks highly of mechanics? Our days where the use of digitally controlled machines constantly increases in the building trade, where software are needed to link the components to the generation of machining programs, the relation between architecture and mechanics should be more than evident. It was however already the case in antiquity where the architect’s position was as well represented as it is our days.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. TACITE, ANNALS, 15,42, 1–2; CHECK THE TEXT AT STIERLIN

    Google Scholar 

  2. PLINE: HN,36,102

    Google Scholar 

  3. PLINE: HN,36,95

    Google Scholar 

  4. PLINE: HN,36,97

    Google Scholar 

  5. “EMBARRAS DE GENRE” PSEUDO-ARISTOTE, MECHANICA, PR. 847A,13

    Google Scholar 

  6. VITRUVE: X,3,5

    Google Scholar 

  7. VITRUVE:1,5,8

    Google Scholar 

  8. LOUIS CALLEBAT: DE ARCHITECTURA X, P XXIII

    Google Scholar 

  9. LOUIS CAILLEBAT: DE ARCHITECTURA X P288

    Google Scholar 

  10. GELL., N.A. 15,31,1 [ABSCONDED INFORMATION IN CALLEBAT X, P 282]

    Google Scholar 

  11. ATHENA, MECHANICA, 27,1

    Google Scholar 

  12. MICHEL CLERC: MASSALIA, STORY OF MARSEILLES FROM ITS ORIGIN TO THE END OF THE OCCIDENTAL ROMAN EMPIRE, LAFFITE REPRINTS, 1971

    Google Scholar 

  13. DE BELLUM CIVILE, II,15,2

    Google Scholar 

  14. DE BELLUM CIVILE, II,9

    Google Scholar 

  15. E. G.: YVES GARLAN, RESEARCH ON GREEK POLIORCETIQUE, 1974

    Google Scholar 

  16. FOR EXAMPLE, DEMOSTHENE, THIRD PHILIPPIQUE, IX, 47–50: “CAN WE NOT SEE HOW THINGS HAVE PROGRESSED, HOW THE PRESENT DIFFERS A LOT FROM THE PAST AND THAT THE MOST PROGRESS AND CHANGES ARE FOUND IN THE WARS? THE LACEDEMOMIENS SUCH AS ANY OTHER GREEK WOULD INVADE A COUNTRY ONLY FOR 4 OR 5 MONTHS, DURING SUMMER AND AFTER HAVING DEVASTATED IT WITH THEIR HOPLITES (HEAVILY ARMED SOLDIERS) WOULD LEAVE AND GO HOME. FURTHERMORE THEY WERE SO IN TOUCH WITH TRADITIONS OR THE CIVIC SPIRIT THAT THEY WOULD BUY NO ONE’S SERVICES. HOWEVER THE TRAITORS HAVE ALMOST RUINED EVERYTHING. FOR EXAMPLE PHILIPPE’s VICTORIES WERE NOT CAUSED BY PHALANX OF HOPLITES BUT BY LIGHT TROOPS, CAVALRY, ARCHERS AND MERCENARIES FOLLOWING HIM EVERYWHERE. AND WHEN HE MET A POPULATION AFRAID OF FIGHTING STAYING BEHIND THEIR FORTIFICATION INSTEAD OF DEFENDING THEIR NATION, SUSPICIOUS, HE WOULD RAISE HIS MACHINES AND INVADE THE CITY, AND OBVIOUSLY HE WOULD MAKE NO DIFFERENCE BETWEEN WINTER AND SUMMER AS THERE IS FOR HIM NO SPECIFIC SEASON TO SUSPEND INVASIONS.” THE IDEALIZATION OF THE SPARTIATE HOPLITES IS THAT THEY WOULD DEDICATE THEMSELVES TO THEIR TRAINING AND TO WARS WHILE THE SERFS WOULD BE IN CHARGE OF THE AGRICULTURE, IN CONTRADICTION WITH THE OTHER GREEK POPULATION WHERE MOST OF THE SOLDIERS WERE FARMERS AND CONSEQUENTLY COULD NOT SPEND ENTIRE SEASONS FIGHTING.

    Google Scholar 

  17. PAUSANIAS, VI, 22, 8

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer-Verlag/Wien

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

(2007). Vitruvius Machinator Terminator. In: Objectile Patrick Beaucé + Bernard Cache. Consequence Book Series on Fresh Architecture, vol 6. Springer, Vienna. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-211-69295-0_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics