Summary
Over the past four decades, techniques and devices for spinal cord stimulation have undergone considerable refinement. Currently, percutaneous implantable electrodes are placed in the epidural space and a low-frequency electrical current is used to modify the transmission of chronic pain signals in the dorsal columns of the spinal cord.
Before permanent implantation, the spinal cord stimulation will be examined during a test phase to determine its analgesic effect and tolerability.
We have reviewed our experience in 88 patients with chronic nonmalignant pain. The follow-up of our study ranged from 15 to 75 months, with an average of 60 months.
The indication for SCS in these 88 patients was mainly neuropathic pain syndromes.
The patients were followed up by the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), level of activity and subjective assessment of the quality of life. On the basis of the patients’ self-assessments using the VAS, the degree of pain relief was excellent=good in 72 of 88 patients (82%). At the end of the follow-up period, 50% of the patients were in a better psychological status and 86% of the patients reported an improvement in activities of their daily living and a reduction in the use of analgesic medication. Ninety percent of the patients stated that they would go through the procedure again for the same result.
The findings of the present study indicate that spinal cord stimulation is an efficacious therapy for the treatment of chronic non-malignant pain.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bel S, Bauer BL (1991) Dorsal column stimulation (DCS): cost to benefit analysis. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 52: 121–123
Burchiel KJ, Anderson VC, Brown FD (1996) Prospective, multicenter study of spinal cord stimulation for relief of chronic back and extremity pain. Spine 21: 2786–2794
Cui JG, Meyerson BA, Sollevi A, Linderoth B (1998) Effects of spinal cord stimulation on tactile hypersensitivity in mononeuropathic rats are potentiated by GABAB and adenosine receptor activation. Neurosci Lett 247: 183–186
Devulder J, Vermulen H, De Colvenaer L (1991) Spinal cord stimulation in chronic pain: Evaluation of results, complications and technical consideration in sixty-nine patients. Clin J Pain 7: 21–28
Foreman RD, Linderoth B, Ardell JL (2000) Modulations of intrinsic cardiac neurons by spinal cord stimulation: implications for its therapeutic use in angina pectoris. Cardiovasc Res 47: 367–375
Kemler MA (2000) Spinal cord stimulation in patients with chronic reflex sympathetic dystrophy. N Engl J Med 343: 618–624
Kirkpatrick AF (1991) Spinal cord stimulation: Percutaneous electrodes versus electrodes placed by laminotomy for spinal cord stimulation (letter). Neurosurg 28: 932–933
Klomp HM (1999) Spinal cord stimulation in critical limb ischemia: a randomised trial. Lancet 353: 1040–1044
Kumar K, Nath R, Wyant GM (1991) Treatment of chronic pain by epidural spinal cord stimulation: A 10-year experience. J Neurosurg 75: 402–407
Lanner G, Schröttner O, Ascher P (1977) Neurochirurgische Behandlungsmethoden beim unstillbaren Schmerz. In: Neurochirurgie von Heute. Verlag F J Kwizda, Wien, pp 13–18
Lanner G, Spendel MC(2004) Spinal cord stimulation for treatment of chronic non-malignant pain. Neurol Croat, [Suppl] 1: 53
Law JD, Kirkpatrick AF (1991) Pain management update: spinal cord stimulation. Am J P Management 2: 34–42
Mannheimer C (1988) Epidural spinal electrical stimulation in severe angina pectoris. Br Heart J 59: 56–61
Melzack R, Wall PD (1965) Pain mechanisms: a new theory. Science 150: 971–979
North RB, Guarino AH (1999) Spinal cord stimulation for failed back surgery syndrome: technical advances, patient selection and outcome. Neuromodulation 2: 171–178
North RB, Levy RM (1997) Neurosurgical management of pain. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York
North RB, Kidd DH, Zahurak M, James CS, Long DM (1993) Spinal cord stimulation for chronic, intractable pain: experience over two decades. Neurosurg 32: 384–395
Petrakis IE, Sciacca V (2000) Spinal cord stimulation in diabetic lower limb critical ischemia: transcutaneous oxygen measurement as predictor for treatment success. Eur J Vasc Surg 19: 587–592
Shealy CN, Mortimer JT, Reswick JB (1967) Electrical inhibition of pain by stimulation of the dorsal columns: preliminary clinical report. Anesth Analg 46: 489–491
Shealy CN, Taslitz N, Mortimer JT, Becker DP (1967) Electrical inhibition of pain: experimental evaluation. Anesth Analg 46: 299–305
Spendel MC, Steiner R, Lanner G (2003) Spinal cord stimulation for treatment of chronic nonmalignant pain. Proc Europ Cong Neurosurg, Lissabon
Sweet WH, Wepsic J (1975) Stimulation of the posterior columns of the spinal cord for pain control. Surg Neurol 4: 13
Tanaka S (2001) Low intensity spinal cord stimulation may induce cutaneous vasodilatation via GRCP release. Brain Res 896: 183–187
Tesfaye S (1996) Electrical spinal cord stimulation for painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy. Lancet 348: 1698–1701
Van Buyten JP, Van Zundert J, Milbouw G (1999) Treatment of failed back surgery syndrome, patients with low back and leg pain: a pilot study of a new dual lead spinal cord stimulation system. Neuromodulation 2(4): 258–265
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2007 Springer-Verlag
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lanner, G., Spendel, M.C. (2007). Spinal cord stimulation for the treatment of chronic non-malignant pain. In: Sakas, D.E., Simpson, B.A., Krames, E.S. (eds) Operative Neuromodulation. Acta Neurochirurgica Supplements, vol 97/1. Springer, Vienna. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-211-33079-1_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-211-33079-1_10
Publisher Name: Springer, Vienna
Print ISBN: 978-3-211-33078-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-211-33079-1
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)