Advertisement

Sonographic Evaluation in Carotid Artery Stenosis

  • B. K. Lal
Chapter

Abstract

Over three decades ago, Doppler was introduced as the first ultrasonographic method for evaluation of cerebrovascular disease. Since then, the development of new ultrasound techniques has revolutionized the clinical applications for extracranial carotid disease. Interpretation of pulse wave Doppler signals involves an analysis of audio signals and the frequency spectrum. It is based on the Doppler frequency shift resulting from moving red blood cells in the carotid artery. In experienced hands, pulse wave Doppler ultrasound can identify significant luminal narrowing based on increased velocity of blood flow across a stenotic lesion. High-resolution B-mode ultrasound scanning uses linear array transducers (7–12 MHz) to display morphological features of the arterial wall. Duplex ultrasonography (DUS) combines integrated PW Doppler spectrum analysis and B-mode sonography. The B-mode image offers information about morphology in addition to serving as a guide for accurate PW Doppler velocity measurement.

Keywords

Carotid Endarterectomy Carotid Stenosis Peak Systolic Velocity Carotid Artery Stenosis Asymptomatic Carotid 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    Alexandrov AV, Brodie DS, McLean A et al.: Correlation of peak systolic velocity and angiographic measurement of carotid stenosis revisited. Stroke 28: 339–342 (1997).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    Alexandrov AV, Vital D, Brodie DS et al.: Grading carotid stenosis with ultrasound. An interlaboratory comparison. Stroke 28: 1208–1210 (1997).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    Ascher E, Hingorani A, Yorkovich W et al.: Routine preoperative carotid duplex scanning in patients undergoing open heart surgery: is it worthwhile? Ann Vasc Surg 15: 669–678 (2001).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    Barnett HJ, Taylor DW, Eliasziw M et al.: North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators. Benefit of carotid endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic moderate or severe stenosis. N Engl J Med 339: 1415–1425 (1998).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    Blackshear WM Jr, Phillips DJ, Thiele BL et al.: Detection of carotid occlusive disease by ultrasonic imaging and pulsed Doppler spectrum analysis. Surgery 86: 698–706 (1979).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    Brown OW, Bendick PJ, Bove PG et al.: Reliability of extracranial carotid artery duplex ultrasound scanning: value of vascular laboratory accreditation. J Vasc Surg 39: 366–371; discussion 371 (2004).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    Carpenter JP, Lexa FJ, Davis JT: Determination of duplex Doppler ultrasound criteria appropriate to the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial. Stroke 27: 695–699 (1996).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    DeGroote RD, Lynch TG, Jamil Z et al.: Carotid restenosis: long-term noninvasive follow-up after carotid endarterectomy. Stroke 18: 1031–1036 (1987).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    Executive Committee for the Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study: Endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis. JAMA 273: 1421–1428 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    Faught WE, Mattos MA, van Bemmelen PS et al.: Color-flow duplex scanning of carotid arteries: new velocity criteria based on receiver operator characteristic analysis for threshold stenoses used in the symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid trials. J Vasc Surg 19: 818–827; discussion 827–818 (1994).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    Fillinger MF, Baker RJ Jr, Zwolak RM et al.: Carotid duplex criteria for a 60% or greater angiographic stenosis: variation according to equipment. J Vasc Surg 24: 856–864 (1996).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    Fowl RJ, Marsch JG, Love M et al.: Prevalence of hemodynamically significant stenosis of the carotid artery in an asymptomatic veteran population. Surg Gynecol Obstet 172: 13–16 (1991).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    Grant EG, Benson CB, Moneta GL et al.: Carotid artery stenosis: gray-scale and Doppler US diagnosis— Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound Consensus Conference. Radiology 229: 340–346 (2003).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    Heyman A, Wilkinson WE, Heyden S et al.: Risk of stroke in asymptomatic persons with cervical arterial bruits: a population study in Evans County, Georgia. N Engl J Med 302: 838–841 (1980).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    Hobson RW 2nd: Rationale and status of randomized controlled clinical trials in carotid artery stenting. Semin Vasc Surg 16: 311–316 (2003).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    ICAVL: The Intersocietal Commission for the Accreditation of Vascular Laboratories: Standards for Accreditation in Noninvasive Vascular Testing. Columbia, MD: ICAVL (2005).Google Scholar
  17. [17]
    Johnson BF, Verlato F, Bergelin RO et al.: Clinical outcome in patients with mild and moderate carotid artery stenosis. J Vasc Surg 21: 120–126 (1995).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    Kuntz KM, Polak JF, Whittemore AD et al.: Duplex ultrasound criteria for the identification of carotid stenosis should be laboratory specific. Stroke 28: 597–602 (1997).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    Lal BK, Hobson RW 2nd, Goldstein J et al.: Carotid artery stenting: is there a need to revise ultrasound velocity criteria? J Vasc Surg 39: 58–66 (2004).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    Lal BK, Hobson RW 2nd, Goldstein J et al.: In-stent recurrent stenosis after carotid artery stenting: life table analysis and clinical relevance. J Vasc Surg 38: 1162–1168; discussion 1169 (2003).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. [21]
    Marek J, Mills JL, Harvich J et al.: Utility of routine carotid duplex screening in patients who have claudication. J Vasc Surg 24: 572–577; discussion 577–579 (1996).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. [22]
    Moneta GL, Edwards JM, Chitwood RW et al.: Correlation of North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET) angiographic definition of 70% to 99% internal carotid artery stenosis with duplex scanning. J Vasc Surg 17: 152–157; discussion 157–159 (1993).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. [23]
    North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators: Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with highgrade carotid stenosis. N Engl J Med 325: 445–453 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. [24]
    Ranke C, Trappe HJ: Blood flow velocity measurements for carotid stenosis estimation: interobserver variation and interequipment variability. Vasa 26: 210–214 (1997).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. [25]
    Ringer AJ, German JW, Guterman LR et al.: Followup of stented carotid arteries by Doppler ultrasound. Neurosurgery 51: 639–643; discussion 643 (2002).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. [26]
    Robbin ML, Lockhart ME, Weber TM et al.: Carotid artery stents: early and intermediate follow-up with Doppler US. Radiology 205: 749–756 (1997).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. [27]
    Roederer GO, Langlois YE, Jager KA et al.: The natural history of carotid arterial disease in asymptomatic patients with cervical bruits. Stroke 15: 605–613 (1984).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. [28]
    Sauve JS, Laupacis A, Ostbye T et al.: Does this patient have a clinically important carotid bruit? The rational clinical examination. Jama 270: 2843–2845 (1993).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. [29]
    Strandness DE Jr: Screening for carotid disease and surveillance for carotid restenosis. Semin Vasc Surg 14: 200–205 (2001).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. [30]
    Thiele BL, Jones AM, Hobson RW et al.: Report from the Committee on Standards for Noninvasive Vascular Testing of the Joint Council of the Society for Vascular Surgery and the North American Chapter of the International Society for Cardiovascular Surgery. Standards in noninvasive cerebrovascular testing. J Vasc Surg 15: 495–503 (1992).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. [31]
    van Everdingen KJ, van der Grond J, Kappelle LJ: Overestimation of a stenosis in the internal carotid artery by duplex sonography caused by an increase in volume flow. J Vasc Surg 27: 479–485 (1998).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. [32]
    Veith FJ, Amor M, Ohki T et al.: Current status of carotid bifurcation angioplasty and stenting based on a consensus of opinion leaders. J Vasc Surg 33: S111–S116 (2001).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. [33]
    Wiebers DO, Whisnant JP, Sandok BA et al.: Prospective comparison of a cohort with asymptomatic carotid bruit and a population-based cohort without carotid bruit. Stroke 21: 984–988 (1990).PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag/Wien 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • B. K. Lal
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Surgery, New Jersey Medical SchoolUniversity of Medicine and Dentistry of New JerseyNewarkUSA

Personalised recommendations