Imaging After Carotid Stenting

  • G. M. Biasi
  • A. Froio
  • G. Deleo


The effectiveness of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) in the prevention of stroke in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients with carotid stenosis has been demonstrated by several randomized studies (Ferguson et al. 1999; Halliday et al. 2004; MRC European Carotid Surgery Trial 1991; ECACAS 1995). Carotid artery stenting (CAS) is an alternative technique that gives favorable results when associated with the use of brain protection devices (BPD) (Cremonesi et al. 2003).


Digital Subtraction Angiography Carotid Endarterectomy Carotid Stenosis Carotid Plaque Peak Systolic Velocity 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [1]
    Anonymous: Endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis. Executive Committee for the Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study. JAMA 273: 1421–1428 (1995).Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    Anonymous: Carotid revascularization using endarterectomy or stenting systems (CARESS): phase I clinical trial. J Endovasc Ther 10: 1021–1030 (2003).Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    Back MR, Rogers GA et al: Magnetic resonance angiography minimizes need for arteriography after inadequate carotid duplex ultrasound scanning. J Vasc Surg 38: 422–430 (2003).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    Bendszus M, Koltzenburg M et al.: Silent embolism in diagnostic cerebral angiography and neurointerventional procedures: a prospective study. Lancet 354: 1594–1597 (1999).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    Bergeron P, Roux M et al.: Long-term results of carotid stenting are competitive with surgery. J Vasc Surg 41: 213–221 (2005).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    Biasi GM, Froio A et al.: Carotid plaque echolucency increases the risk of stroke in carotid stenting: the Imaging in Carotid Angioplasty and Risk of Stroke (ICAROS) study. Circulation 110: 756–762 (2004).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    Biasi GM, Mingazzini PM et al.: Carotid plaque characterization using digital image processing and its potential in future studies of carotid endarterectomy and angioplasty. J Endovasc Surg 5: 240–246 (1998).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    Biasi GM, Sampaolo A et al.: Computer analysis of ultrasonic plaque echolucency in identifying high risk carotid bifurcation lesions. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 17: 476–479 (1999).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    Borisch I, Hamer OW et al.: In Vivo Evaluation of the Carotid Wallstent on Three-dimensional Contrast Material-enhanced MR Angiography: Influence of Artifacts on the Visibility of Stent Lumina. J Vasc Interv Radiol 16: 669–677 (2005).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    Briguori C, Tobis J et al.: Discrepancy between angiography and intravascular ultrasound when analysing small coronary arteries. Eur Heart J 23: 247–254 (2002).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    Buskens E, Nederkoorn PJ et al.: Imaging of carotid arteries in symptomatic patients: cost-effectiveness of diagnostic strategies. Radiology 233: 101–112 (2004).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    Cademartiri F, Mollet N et al.: Images in cardiovascular medicine. Neointimal hyperplasia in carotid stent detected with multislice computed tomography. Circulation 108: e147 (2003).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    Coward LJ, Featherstone RL et al.: Safety and efficacy of endovascular treatment of carotid artery stenosis compared with carotid endarterectomy: a Cochrane systematic review of the randomized evidence. Stroke 36: 905–911 (2005).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    Dangas G, Mintz GS et al.: Preintervention arterial remodeling as an independent predictor of target-lesion revascularization after nonstent coronary intervention: an analysis of 777 lesions with intravascular ultrasound imaging. Circulation 99: 3149–3154 (1999).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    Derdeyn CP: Conventional angiography remains an important tool for measurement of carotid arterial stenosis. Radiology 235: 711–712 (2005).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    El-Barghouty, Geroulakos NG et al.: Computer-assisted carotid plaque characterisation. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 9: 389–393 (1995).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    El-Barghouty, Levine NMT et al.: Histological verification of computerised carotid plaque characterisation. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 11: 414–416 (1996).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    Elatrozy T, Nicolaides A et al.: The effect of B-mode ultrasonic image standardisation on the echodensity of symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid bifurcation plaques. Int Angiol 17: 179–186 (1998).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    Faught WE, Mattos MA et al.: Color-flow duplex scanning of carotid arteries: new velocity criteria based on receiver operator characteristic analysis for threshold stenoses used in the symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid trials. J Vasc Surg 19: 818–827 (1994).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    Flach HZ, Ouhlous M et al.: Cerebral ischemia after carotid intervention. J Endovasc Ther 11: 251–257 (2004).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. [21]
    Garrard CL, Manord JD et al.: Cost savings associated with the nonroutine use of carotid angiography. Am J Surg 174: 650–653 (1997).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. [22]
    Goyal M, Nicol J et al.: Evaluation of carotid artery stenosis: contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography compared with conventional digital subtraction angiography. Can Assoc Radiol J 55: 111–119 (2004).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. [23]
    Grant EG, Benson CB et al.: Carotid artery stenosis: grayscale and Doppler ultrasound diagnosis — Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound consensus conference. Ultrasound Q 19: 190–198 (2003).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. [24]
    Gronholdt ML, Nordestgaard BG et al.: Ultrasonic echolucent carotid plaques predict future strokes. Circulation 104: 68–73 (2001).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. [25]
    Gronholdt ML, Nordestgaard BG et al.: Echo-lucency of computerized ultrasound images of carotid atherosclerotic plaques are associated with increased levels of triglyceride-rich lipoproteins as well as increased plaque lipid content. Circulation 97: 34–40 (1998).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. [26]
    Groschel K, Riecker A et al.: Systematic review of early recurrent stenosis after carotid angioplasty and stenting. Stroke 36: 367–373 (2005).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. [27]
    Henry M, Henry I et al.: Benefits of cerebral protection during carotid stenting with the PercuSurge GuardWire system: midterm results. J Endovasc Ther 9: 1–13 (2002).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. [28]
    Hobson RW 2nd, Howard VJ et al.: Carotid artery stenting is associated with increased complications in octogenarians: 30-day stroke and death rates in the CREST lead-in phase. J Vasc Surg 40: 1106–1111 (2004).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. [29]
    Hong YJ, Jeong MH et al.: Impact of preinterventional arterial remodeling on in-stent neointimal hyperplasia and in-stent restenosis after coronary stent implantation. Circ J 69: 414–419 (2005).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. [30]
    Jaeger H, Mathias K et al.: Clinical results of cerebral protection with a filter device during stent implantation of the carotid artery. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 24: 249–256 (2001).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. [31]
    Jaeger HJ, Mathias KD et al.: Cerebral ischemia detected with diffusion-weighted MR imaging after stent implantation in the carotid artery. AJNR 23: 200–207 (2002).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. [32]
    Kent KC, Kuntz KM et al.: Perioperative imaging strategies for carotid endarterectomy. An analysis of morbidity and cost-effectiveness in symptomatic patients. Jama 274: 888–893 (1995).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. [33]
    Khan MA, Liu MW et al.: Predictors of restenosis after successful carotid artery stenting. Am J Cardiol 92: 895–897 (2003).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. [34]
    Koch C, Kucinski T et al.: Endovascular therapy of high-degree stenoses of the neck vessels-stent-supported percutaneous angioplasty of the carotid artery without cerebral protection. Rofo 174: 1506–1510 (2002).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. [35]
    Koelemay MJ, Nederkoorn PJ et al.: Systematic review of computed tomographic angiography for assessment of carotid artery disease. Stroke 35: 2306–2312 (2004).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. [36]
    Lal BK, Hobson RW 2nd et al.: Carotid artery stenting: is there a need to revise ultrasound velocity criteria? J Vasc Surg 39: 58–66 (2004).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. [37]
    Lal BK, Hobson RW 2nd et al.: In-stent recurrent stenosis after carotid artery stenting: life table analysis and clinical relevance. J Vasc Surg 38: 1162–1168 (2003).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. [38]
    Lell M, Anders K et al.: CTA of carotid artery with different scanner types. Radiologe 44: 967–974 (2004).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. [39]
    Liapis CD, Kakisis JD et al.: Carotid stenosis: factors affecting symptomatology. Stroke 32: 2782–2786 (2001).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. [40]
    Liebetrau M, Steen B et al.: Silent and symptomatic infarcts on cranial computerized tomography in relation to dementia and mortality: a population-based study in 85-year-old subjects. Stroke 35: 1816–1820 (2004).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. [41]
    Loevblad KO, Pluschke W et al.: Diffusion-weighted MRI for monitoring neurovascular interventions. Neuroradiology 42: 134–138 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. [42]
    Mathiesen EB, Bonaa KH et al.: Echolucent plaques are associated with high risk of ischemic cerebrovascular events in carotid stenosis: the tromso study. Circulation 103: 2171–2175 (2001).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. [43]
    McCabe DJ, Pereira AC et al.: Restenosis after carotid angioplasty, stenting, or endarterectomy in the Carotid and Vertebral Artery Transluminal Angioplasty Study (CAVATAS). Stroke 36: 281–286 (2005).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. [44]
    Moneta GL, Edwards JM et al.: Correlation of North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET) angiographic definition of 70% to 99% internal carotid artery stenosis with duplex scanning. J Vasc Surg 17: 152–157 (1993).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. [45]
    Moneta GL, Edwards JM et al.: Screening for asymptomatic internal carotid artery stenosis: duplex criteria for discriminating 60% to 99% stenosis. J Vasc Surg 21: 989–994 (1995).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. [46]
    Ohki T, Marin ML et al.: Ex vivo human carotid artery bifurcation stenting: correlation of lesion characteristics with embolic potential. J Vasc Surg 27: 463–471 (1998).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. [47]
    Polak JF, Shemanski L et al.: Hypoechoic plaque at US of the carotid artery: an independent risk factor for incident stroke in adults aged 65 years or older. Cardiovascular Health Study. Radiology 208: 649–654 (1998).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. [48]
    Ringer AJ, German JW et al.: Follow-up of stented carotid arteries by Doppler ultrasound. Neurosurgery 51: 639–643 (2002).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. [49]
    Robbin ML, Lockhart ME et al.: Carotid artery stents: early and intermediate follow-up with Doppler US. Radiology 205: 749–756 (1997).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. [50]
    Sabetai MM, Tegos TJ et al.: Reproducibility of computer-quantified carotid plaque echogenicity: can we overcome the subjectivity? Stroke 31: 2189–2196 (2000).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. [51]
    Sahara M, Kirigaya H et al.: Arterial remodeling patterns before intervention predict diffuse in-stent restenosis: an intravascular ultrasound study. J Am Coll Cardiol 42: 1731–1738 (2003).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. [52]
    Schillinger M, Exner M et al.: Acute-phase response after stent implantation in the carotid artery: association with 6-month in-stent restenosis. Radiology 227: 516–521 (2003).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. [53]
    Schillinger M, Exner M et al.: Excessive carotid instent neointimal formation predicts late cardiovascular events. J Endovasc Ther 11: 229–239 (2004).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. [54]
    Schluter M, Tubler T et al. Focal ischemia of the brain after neuroprotected carotid artery stenting. J Am Coll Cardiol 42: 1007–1013 (2003).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. [55]
    Setacci C, Donato G de et al.: In-stent Restenosis After Carotid Angioplasty and Stenting: A Challenge for the Vascular Surgeon. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 29: 601–617 (2005).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. [56]
    Setacci C, Pula G et al.: Determinants of in-stent restenosis after carotid angioplasty: a case-control study. J Endovasc Ther 10: 1031–1038 (2003).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. [57]
    Tegos TJ, Sabetai MM et al.: Correlates of embolic events detected by means of transcranial Doppler in patients with carotid atheroma. J Vasc Surg 33: 131–138 (2001).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. [58]
    Teng MM, Tsai F et al.: Three-dimensional contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography of carotid artery after stenting. J Neuroimaging 14: 336–341 (2004).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. [59]
    Terada T, Tsuura M et al.: Results of endovascular treatment of internal carotid artery stenoses with a newly developed balloon protection catheter. Neurosurgery 53: 617–623 (2003).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. [60]
    Vermeer SE, Prins ND et al.: Silent brain infarcts and the risk of dementia and cognitive decline. N Engl J Med 348: 1215–1222 (2003).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. [61]
    Willfort-Ehringer A, Ahmadi R et al.: Neointimal proliferation within carotid stents is more pronounced in diabetic patients with initial poor glycaemic state. Diabetologia 47: 400–406 (2004).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. [62]
    Willfort-Ehringer A, Ahmadi R et al.: Healing of carotid stents: a prospective duplex ultrasound study. J Endovasc Ther 10: 636–642 (2003).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. [63]
    Willinek WA, Falkenhausen M von et al.: Noninvasive detection of steno-occlusive disease of the supra-aortic arteries with three-dimensional contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography: a prospective, intra-individual comparative analysis with digital subtraction angiography. Stroke 36: 38–43 (2005).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. [64]
    Wolf O, Heider P et al.: Microembolic signals detected by transcranial Doppler sonography during carotid endarterectomy and correlation with serial diffusion-weighted imaging. Stroke 35: e373–e375 (2004).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. [65]
    Yadav JS, Wholey MH et al.: Protected carotid-artery stenting versus endarterectomy in high-risk patients. N Engl J Med 351: 1493–1501 (2004).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. [66]
    Yamagami H, Kitagawa K et al.: Higher levels of interleukin-6 are associated with lower echogenicity of carotid artery plaques. Stroke 35: 677–681 (2004).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag/Wien 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. M. Biasi
    • 1
  • A. Froio
    • 1
  • G. Deleo
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Surgical Sciences and Intensive CareUniversity of Milano-Bicocca, Vascular Surgery Unit, San Gerardo HospitalMonzaItaly

Personalised recommendations