Advertisement

Introduction

  • B. J. Schaller
Chapter
  • 970 Downloads

Abstract

An adequate and state-of-the-art treatment of atherosclerotic disease of the extra- and intracranial carotid arteries in a patient with an advanced degree of stenosis substantially reduces the risk of subsequent ischemic stroke in patients with recently symptomatic 70 to 99% carotid artery stenosis. The benefit that is to be expected for 50 to 69% symptomatic stenosis, and for asymptomatic stenosis, is more modest [3]. Whether surgical endarterectomy, endovascular stent placement or any other treatment option proves to be the more effective treatment strategy of the narrowed carotid artery has not yet to be demonstrated. In any event, accurate assessment of the degree of luminal narrowing is an important step in the treatment planning. Conventional angiography was generally used to select patients for treatment in the past. However, given the risks of death and disabling stroke due to angiography (1.2% in the Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study [9] versus 1.1% for surgery itself), alternative noninvasive imaging techniques have been sought and investigated during the last years.

Keywords

Compute Tomography Angiography Carotid Endarterectomy Carotid Artery Stenosis Carotid Artery Disease Surgical Complication Rate 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. [1]
    Alexandrov A, Brodie DS, McLean A et al.: Correlation of peak systolic velocity and angiographic measurement of carotid stenosis revisited. Stroke 28: 339–342 (1997).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    Barnett HJM, Meldrum HE, Eliasziw M: The appropriate use of carotid endarterectomy. Can Med Assoc J 166: 1169–1179 (2002).Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    Barnett H, Broderick JP: Carotid endarterectomy: another wake-up call. Neurology 55: 746–747 (2000).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    Biller J, Feinberg WM, Castaldo JE et al.: Guidelines for carotid endarterectomy. Circulation 97: 501–509 (1998).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    Bornstein NM, Chadwick LG, Norris JW: The value of carotid Doppler ultrasound in asymptomatic extracranial arterial disease. Can J Neurol Sci 15: 378–383 (1988).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    Brant-Zawadzki M, Heiserman JE: The roles of MR angiography, CT angiography, and sonography in vascular imaging of the head and neck. AJNR 18: 1820–1825 (1997).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    Cebul RD, Snow RJ, Pine R et al.: Indictions, outcomes, and provider volumes for carotid endarterectony. JAMA 279: 1282–1287 (1998).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    Droste DW, Jurgens R, Nabavi DG, et al.: Echocontrast-enhanced ultrasound of extracranial internal carotid artery high-grade stenosis and occlusion. Stroke 30: 2302–2306 (1999).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    Executive Committee for the Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study (ACAS): Endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis. JAMA 273: 1421–1428 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    Griewing B, Morgenstern C, Driesner F et al.: Cerebrovascular disease assessed by color-flow and power Doppler ultrasonography. Stroke 27: 95–100 (1996).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    Hartmann A, Hupp T, Koch HC et al.: Prospective study on the complication rate of carotid surgery. Cerebrovasc Dis 9: 152–156 (1999).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    Rofsky NM, Adelman MA: Gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography of the carotid arteries: a small step, a giant leap? Radiology 209: 31–34 (1998).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    Rorick MB, Nichols FT, Adams RJ: Transcranial Doppler correlation with angiography in detection of intracranial stenosis. Stroke 25: 1931–1934 (1994).PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag/Wien 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • B. J. Schaller
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of NeuroscienceKarolinska InstituteStockholmSweden

Personalised recommendations