This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
European Court of Justice (ECJ), Case C-312/00 P [2002] European Court Reports (ECR) I-11355 no. 53.
ECJ, Cases C-6 & 9/90 [1991] ECR I-5357.
P. Gilsdorf/ M. Niejahr, in: H. v. d. Groeben/ J. Schwarze (eds.), Vertrag über die EU und Vertrag zur Gründung der EG, Kommentar (6th ed. 2004) Art. 288 EG no. 8, 49, 59; A. v. Bogdandy, in: E. Grabitz/M. Hilf (eds.), EU-Kommentar, Art. 288 no. 5, 123; U. Säuberlich, Die außervertragliche Haftung im Gemeinschaftsrecht (2005) 16 ff.
ECJ, Case C-46/93 [1996] ECR I-1029.
ECJ, Case C-352/98 P [2000] ECR I-5291.
M. Cornils, Der gemeinschaftsrechtliche Staatshaftungsanspruch (1995) 196; see also F. Ossenbühl, Staatshaftungsrecht (5th ed. 1998) 602.
See F. Ossenbühl, in: H.-W. Rengeling (ed.), Handbuch zum europäischen und deutschen Umweltrecht, vol. 1 (2nd ed. 2003) § 42 no. 50 ff.
Gilsdorf/ Niejahr J. Schwarze (eds.), Vertrag über die EU und Vertrag zur Gründung der EG, Kommentar (6th ed. 2004) (fn. 3) no. 34 ff.
ECJ, Case 5/71, Schöppenstedt v Council [1971] ECR 975 no. 11.
ECJ, Case 152/88, Sofrimport v Commission [1990] ECR 2477 no. 26; M. Ruffert, in: C. Calliess/M. Ruffert (eds.), Kommentar zu EU-und EG-Vertrag (2nd ed. 2002) Art. 88 no. 13.
See for a list of the rules protecting individuals acknowledged by the Court Ossenbühl (fn. 6) 591.
In this sense however Advocate General Tesauro in the Case C-46/93, Brasserie du Pêcheur [1996] ECR 1066 no. 76; F. Fines, Étude de la responsabilité extracontractuelle de la Communauté Economique Européenne (1990) 331.
Ossenbühl (fn. 6) 591; A. Czaja, Die außervertragliche Haftung der EG für ihre Organe (1996) 79 f.
ECJ, Case 5/71, Schöppenstedt v Council [1971] ECR 975 no. 11; C. Vesting, Die vertragliche und außervertragliche Haftung der EG nach Art. 288 EGV (2003) 90 f.
Ossenbühl (fn. 6) 594; Gilsdorf/Niejahr (fn. 3) no. 54.
ECJ, Cases 83, 94/76, 4, 15, 40/77, Bayerische HNL Vermehrungsbetriebe v Council and Commission [1978] ECR 1209 no. 5.
ECJ, Case 238/78, Ireks-Arkady v Council and Commission [1979] ECR 2955.
ECJ, Cases 116 & 124/77, Amylum and Tunnel Refineries v Council and Commission [1979] ECR 3497.
AG van Gerven, Case 37/90, Mulder v Council and Commission [1992] ECR I-3061; M. Gellermann, in: H.-W. Rengeling/A. Middeke/M. Gellermann (eds.), Handbuch des Rechtsschutzes in der Europäischen Union (2nd ed. 2003) 197.
ECJ, Cases 116 & 124/77, Amylum and Tunnel Refineries v Council and Commission [1979] ECR 3497.
ECJ, Cases 83, 94/76, 4, 15, 40/77, Bayerische HNL Vermehrungsbetriebe v Council and Commission [1978] ECR 1209 no. 4.
ECJ, Cases C-6 & 9/90 [1991] ECR I-5357; see Cornils (fn. 6).
ECJ, Case C-392/93, R. v HM Treasury, ex parte British Telecommunications [1996] ECR I-1631; Case C-5/94, R. v Ministery of Agriculture, ex parte Hedley Lomas [1996] ECR I-2553; Cases C-178-179 & 188-190/94, Dillenkofer & others v Germany [1996] ECR I-4845; Case C-127/95, Norbrook Laboratories v Ministry of Agriculture, Fishery & Food [1998] ECR I-1531; Case C-302/97, Konle v Austria [1999] ECR I-3099; Case C-140/97, Rechberger v Austria [1999] I-3499; Case C-424/97, Haim v Kassenzahnärztliche Vereinigung [2000] ECR I-5123; Case C-118/00, Larsy v Inasti [2001] I-5063; Case C-224/01, Köbler v Austria [2003] I-10239.
See Cornils (fn. 6) 192 ff.
ECJ, Cases C-46 & 48/93, Brasserie du Pêcheur v Germany [1996] ECR I-1029 no. 51.
ECJ, Cases C-46 & 48/93, Brasserie du Pêcheur v Germany [1996] ECR I-1029 no. 42.
Case C-352/98 P, Laboratoires Bergaderm and Goupil v Commission [2000] ECR I-5291 no. 46.
P. Craig/ G. de Búrca, EU Law (3rd ed. 2003) 555 ff.
Ruffert M. Ruffert (eds.), Kommentar zu EU-und EG-Vertrag (2nd ed. 2002) (fn. 11) Art. 288 no. 36; B. Grzeszick, Europarecht (EuR) 1998, 417 (427 ff.).
Case C-472/00 P, Commission v Fresh Marine Company [2003] ECR I-7541.
See e.g. Gellermann A. Middeke/ M. Gellermann (eds.), Handbuch des Rechtsschutzes in der Europäischen Union (2nd ed. 2003) (fn. 20) 197; Ruffert (fn. 11) Art. 288 no. 15; Säuberlich (fn. 3) 26; W. Weiß, EuR 2005, 277 (292); accurate assessment of the new jurisdiction by Craig/de Búrca (fn. 29) 557 ff.
ECJ, Cases C-46 & 48/93, Brasserie du Pêcheur v Germany [1996] ECR I-1029 no. 56.
ECJ, Case C-472/00 P, Commission v Fresh Marine Company [2003] ECR I-7541 no. 24.
AG van Gerven, Case 37/90, Mulder v Council and Commission [1992] ECR I-3061; Ruffert (fn. 11) Art. 288 no. 15.
Similarly: Craig/ de Búrca (fn. 29) 557 f.
v. Bogdandy M. Hilf (eds.), EU-Kommentar, Art. 288 no. 5, 123 (fn. 3) Art. 288 no. 89.
ECJ, Cases C-6 & 9/90, Francovich and Bonifaci v Italy [1991] ECR I-5357 no. 32 ff.
ECJ, Cases C-6 & 9/90, Francovich and Bonifaci v Italy [1991] ECR I-5357 no. 39 ff.; Cases C-178-179 & 188-190/94, Dillenkofer & others v Germany [1996] ECR I-4845 no. 21 ff.
See ECJ, Case C-390/95 P, Antillean Rice Mills v Commission [1999] ECR I-769 no. 60; Ossenbühl (fn. 6) 596 f.
E.g.: ECJ, Case C-198/03 P, Commission v CEVA Santé Animale [2005] no. 72 ff.; CFI, Case T-364/03, Medici Grimm [2006].
Case C-224/01, Köbler v Austria [2003] I-10239; annotations by M. Breuer, European Law Review (E.L.Rev.) 29, 2004, 243; T. von Danwitz, Juristenzeitung (JZ) 2004, 301; W. Kluth, Deutsches Verwaltungsblatt (DVBl) 2004, 393; B. Wegener, EuR 2004, 84.
ECJ, Cases 83, 94/76, 4, 15, 40/77, Bayerische HNL v Council and Commission [1978] ECR 1209 no. 3; Cornils (fn. 6) 202.
See B. Grzeszick, Rechte und Ansprüche (2002) 334 ff.
R. Alexy, Theorie der Grundrechte (1985) 71 ff.
R. Rebhahn, Staatshaftung wegen mangelnder Gefahrenabwehr (1997) 117 ff.
ECJ, Cases 83, 94/76, 4, 15, 40/77, Bayerische HNL v Council and Commission [1978] ECR 1209 no. 4.
ECJ, Case C-224/01, Köbler v Österreich [2003] ECR I-10239 no 30 ff.
ECJ, Cases 83, 94/76, 4, 15, 40/77, Bayerische HNL v Council and Commission [1978] ECR 1209 no. 3.
ECJ, Case C-224/01, Köbler v Österreich [2003] ECR I-10239 no. 53.
Gilsdorf/ Niejahr J. Schwarze (eds.), Vertrag über die EU und Vertrag zur Gründung der EG, Kommentar (6th ed. 2004) (fn. 3) Art. 288 no. 62 ff.
ECJ, Cases 83, 94/76, 4, 15, 40/77, Bayerische HNL Vermehrungsbetriebe v Council and Commission [1978] ECR 1209 no. 6.
ECJ, Cases C-104/89 & 37/90, Mulder v Council and Commission [1992] ECR I-3061.
CFI, Case T-364/03, Medici Grimm [2006] no. 79.
ECJ, Cases C-46 & 48/93, Brasserie du Pêcheur v Germany [1996] ECR I-1029 no. 79.
ECJ, Case C-352/98 P, Laboratoires Bergaderm and Goupil v Commission [2000] ECR I-5291 no. 43.
ECJ, Case C-352/98 P, Laboratoires Bergaderm and Goupil v Commission [2000] ECR I-5291 no. 44; CFI, Case T-283/02, EnBW Kernkraft v Commission [2005] no. 87.
Craig/ de Búrca (fn. 29) 547 (“the general test”) 558 ff.
AG Stix-Hackl, opinion to case C-472/00 P, Commission v Fresh Marine [2003] ECR I-7541 no. 74 ff.
CFI, cases T-198/95 & others, Comafrica, Dole v Commission [2001] ECR II-1975 no. 134.
CFI, Case T-364/03, Medici Grimm [2006] no. 87 ff.
ECJ, Case C-118/00, Larsy v Inasti [2001] ECR I-5063 no. 44.
Craig/ de Búrca (fn. 29) 558.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2006 Springer-Verlag/Wien
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Cornils, M. (2006). Foreseeing Liability for Breach of EC Law. Reflections on the ECJ’s Differing Notions of Illegality. In: Koziol, H., Steininger, B.C. (eds) European Tort Law 2005. Tort and Insurance Law, vol 2005. Springer, Vienna. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-211-31136-3_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-211-31136-3_2
Publisher Name: Springer, Vienna
Print ISBN: 978-3-211-31135-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-211-31136-3
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawLaw and Criminology (R0)