Advertisement

Exakte Diagnosestellung — Voraussetzung zur Optimalen Therapiewahl

  • M. Fuchsjäger
  • N. Kropf
  • R. Jakesz
Chapter
  • 847 Downloads

Auszug

Bis in die 1960er Jahre hat eine Mammographieeinheit nicht zu den Routinebestandteilen der meisten Röntgenabteilungen gezählt. Danach, in erster Linie aufgrund der Inzidenzzunahme von Brustkrebs in den Industrienationen, hat sich dies drastisch geändert. Heute zählt die Mammographie zu den zahlenmäßig am häufigsten durchgeführten Röntgenuntersuchungen. Länderweite mammographische Screening-Programme für Brustkrebs wurden eingeführt.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  1. American College of Radiology (ACR) (2004) Breast imaging and reporting data system (BI-RADS), 4th ed. American College of Radiology, Reston, VAGoogle Scholar
  2. Buchberger W, DeKoekkoek-Doll P, Springer P, Obrist P, Dünser M (1999) Incidental findings on sonography of the breast: clinical significance and diagnostic workup. AJR Am J Roentgenol 173: 921–927PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Ernster VL, Ernster VL, Barclay J, Kerlikowske K, Grady D, Henderson IC (1996) Incidence of treatment for ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. JAMA 275: 913–918PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. European Protocol for the Quality Control of Physical and Technical Aspects of Mammography Screening (2005), 4th edn. European ComissionGoogle Scholar
  5. Fuchsjäger MH, Helbich TH (2002) Das duktale In-situ-Karzinom der Mamma: eine diagnostische Herausforderung. Wien Med Wochenschr 152(S113): 69–73Google Scholar
  6. Fuchsjäger MH, Philipp MO, Loewe C, Helbich TH (2003) Bildgebende Diagnostik bei Galaktorrhoe. Wien Klin Wochenschr 115(S2): 33–39PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Fuchsjaeger MH, Reiner C, Rudas M, Riedl CC, Philipp MO, Helbich TH (2004) Galactography-guided stereotactic wire localization and 11-gauge vacuum-assisted directional biopsy of intraductal lesions. Radiology 233: P141Google Scholar
  8. Funovics MA, Philipp MO, Lackner B, Fuchsjaeger M, Funovics PT, Metz V (2003) Galactography: method of choice in pathologic nipple discharge? Eur Radiol 13: 94–99PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Helbich TH, Matzek W, Fuchsjäger MH (2004) Stereotactic and ultrasound-guided breast biopsy. Eur Radiol 14: 383–393PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Heywang-Köbrunner S, Schreer I (Hrsg) (2003) Bildgebende Mammadiagnostik, 2. Aufl. Thieme, Stuttgart New YorkGoogle Scholar
  11. Heywang-Köbrunner SH, Heining A, Pickuth D, Alberich T, Spielmann RP (2000) Interventional MRI of the breast: lesion localization and biopsy. Eur Radiol 10: 36–45PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Heywang-Köbrunner SH, Bickk U, Bradely WG et al. (2001) International investigation of breast MRI: results of a multicenter study (11 sites) concerning diagnostic parameters of contrast-enhanced MRI based on 519 histopathologically correlated lesions. Eur Radiol 11: 531–546PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Holland R, Hendricks JHCL, Verbeek ALM, Mravunac M, Schuurmans Stekhoven JH (1990) Extent, distribution, and mammographic/histological correlations of breast ductal carcinoma in situ. Lancet 335: 519–522PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ikeda DM, Hylton NM, Kinkel K et al. (2001) Developement, standardization, and testing of a lexicon for reporting contrast-enhanced breast magnetic resonance imaging studies. J Magn Res Imaging 13: 889–895CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jackman RJ, Nowels KW, Rodriguez-Soto J, Marzoni FA Jr, Finkelstein SI, Shepard MJ (1999) Stereotactic, automated, large-core needle biopsy of nonpalpable breast lesions: false-negative and histologic underestimation rates after long-term follow-up. Radiology 210: 799–805PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Kolb TM, Lichy J, Newhouse JH (2002) Comparison of the performance of screening mammography, physical examination, and breast US and evaluation of factors that influence them: an analysis of 27,825 patient evaluations. Radiology 225: 165–175PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Liberman L (2000) Percutaneous imaging-guided core breast biopsy: state of the art at the millennium. AJR Am J Roentgenol 174: 1191–1199PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Liberman L (2002) Percutaneous image-guided core breast biopsy. Radiol Clin North Am 40: 483–500PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Liberman L, Smolkin JH, Dershaw DD (1998) Calcification retrieval at stereotactic 11-gauge vacuum-assisted breast biopsy. Radiology 208: 251–260PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Michel SC, Keller TM, Frohlich JM et al. (2002) Preoperative breast cancer staging: MR imaging of the axilla with ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide enhancement. Radiology 225: 527–536PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Morris EA (2002) Breast cancer imaging with MRI. Radiol Clin North Am 40: 443–466PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Perry NM, EUSOMA Working Party (2001) Quality assurrance in the diagnosis of breast disease. EUSOMA Working Party. Eur J Cancer 37: 159–172PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Pfarl G, Helbich TH, Riedl CC, Rudas M, Wagner T, Memarsadeghi M, Lomoschitz F (2002) Stereoptaktische Nadelbiopsie der Brust: Diagnosesicherheit verschiedener Biopsie-Systeme und Nadelkaliber. Fortschr Röntgenstr 174:614–619CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Pisano ED, Fajardo LL, Tsimikas J (1998) Rate of insufficient samples for fine-needle aspiration for nonpalpable breast lesions in a multicenter clinical trial: The Radiologic Diagnostic Oncology Group 5 study. Cancer 82: 678–688Google Scholar
  25. Riedl CC, Pfarl G, Helbich TH, Memarsadeghi M, Wagner T, Rudas M, Fuchsjäger M (2002) Vergleich Häkchen versus Kohlefarbstoff bei präoperativer Markierung von nichttastbaren Brustläsionen. Fortschr Röntgenstr 174: 1–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Rosen PP (1997) Intraductal carcinoma. In: Rosen PP (ed) Breast pathology. Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia New York, pp 227–273Google Scholar
  27. Sakorafas GH (2001) Nipple discharge: current diagnostic and therapeutic approaches. Cancer Treat Rev 27: 275–282PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Stavros AT, Thickman D, Rapp CL, Dennis MA, Parker SH, Sisney GA (1995) Solid breast nodules: use of sonography to distinguish between benign and malignant lesions. Radiology 196: 123–134PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Tabár L, Dean PB, Péntek Z (1983) Galactography: the diagnostic procedure of choice for nipple discharge. Radiology 149: 31–38PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Van-Zee KJ, Ortega-Perez G, Minnard E, Cohen MA (1998) Preoperative galactography increases the diagnostic yield of major duct excision for nipple discharge. Cancer 82:1874–1880PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Weinstein SP, Orel SG, Heller R (2001) MR imaging of the breast in patients with invasive lobular cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol 176: 399–406PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Zonderland HM, Coerkamp EG, Hermans J, van de Vijver MJ, van Voorthuisen AE (1999) Diagnosis of breast cancer: contribution of US as an adjunct to mammography. Radiology 213: 413–422PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag / Wien 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Fuchsjäger
    • 1
  • N. Kropf
    • 2
  • R. Jakesz
    • 3
  1. 1.Universitätsklinik für RadiodiagnostikMedizinische Universität WienWien
  2. 2.Universitätsklinik für ChirurgieMedizinische Universität WienWien
  3. 3.Klinische Abteilung für Allgemeinchirurgie, Universitätsklinik für ChirurgieMedizinische Universität WienWien

Personalised recommendations

Cite chapter

Buy options