Abstract
My opinion of the importance of M. Planck’s work does not in any way concur with that of the foregoing article. I am cited because I have expressed the opinion that when seen from a logical standpoint and when supported by the then current knowledge, the derivation of Planck’s radiation formula is not flawless. This is correct. But it is precisely in this fact that I see great merit. A lot of courage and an intimate feel for nature was needed to overcome all constraints and to give us the idea of the energy quantum and the quantum of action. This was true theoretical physics, which I also readily rank above mathematical physics. How magnificently Planck has been borne out by the developments is most evident, incidentally, when you try to imagine how deficient today’s physics would be without Planck’s quantum of action.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsAuthor information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1996 Birkhäuser Verlag
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hentschel, K. (1996). Peter Debye: Comment on the Preceding Article by E. Gehrcke: ‘How the Energy Distribution of Black-Body Radiation Was Really Found’ [May 4, 1936]. In: Hentschel, K. (eds) Physics and National Socialism. Science Networks·Historical Studies, vol 18. Birkhäuser Basel. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-0348-9008-3_47
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-0348-9008-3_47
Publisher Name: Birkhäuser Basel
Print ISBN: 978-3-0348-9865-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-0348-9008-3
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive