Skip to main content

Information flow in the social domain: how individuals decide what to do next

  • Chapter
Information Processing in Social Insects

Abstract

The contributions in this section, in common with the entire theme of this book, address the question, how are social insect colonies organized? This is a major question because it is part of one of the most enthralling scientific quests—to understand how evolution by natural selection has built complexity and sophistication. This is a universal quest because organisms are the most complex and sophisticated organizations of all. The words, organization and organism, have an obvious common root. This surely indicates that the deep fascination of organisms (of all kinds, e.g. individualistic organisms or superorganisms) is associated with their organization. Indeed, the Concise Oxford Dictionary [1] presents as a key clause in its definition of an organism the following—an “organized body with connected interdependent parts”. The coherent behaviour of organizations and organisms is a property of how their interdependent parts interact, how the parts communicate, and more specifically, how reliable information (from both signals and cues) flows among the parts of the whole. Thus the topic here is a fundamental one.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. The concise oxford dictionary of current english (1982) Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bourke AFG (1997) Sociality and kin selection in insects. In: JR Krebs, NB Davies (eds): Behavioural ecology: an evolutionary approach. Blackwells, Oxford, 203–227

    Google Scholar 

  3. Seeley TD (1995) The wisdom of the hive: the social physiology of honey bee colonies. Harvard University Press, Cam bridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bourke AFG, Franks NR (1995) Social evolution in ants. monographs in behavioral ecology. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  5. Franks NR, Hölldobler B (1987) Sexual competition during colony reproduction in army ants. Biol J Linn Soc 30: 229–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Rayner ADM, Franks NR (1987) Evolutionary and ecological parallels between ants and fungi. Trends Ecol Evol 2(5): 127–132

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Stickland T, Tofts C, Franks NR (1993) Algorithms for ant foraging. Naturwissenschaften 80: 427–430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Schmidt-Nielsen K (1984) Scaling: why is animal size so important? Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  9. Franks NR (1989) Army ants: a collective intelligence. Amer Sci 77(2): 138–145

    Google Scholar 

  10. Wilson EO (1971) The insect societies. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  11. Pasteels JM, Deneubourg J-L (1987) From individual to collective behaviour in social insects. Birkhäuser, Basel

    Google Scholar 

  12. Jeanne RL (1986) The evolution of the organization of work in social insects. Monitore Zoologico Italiano (N.S.) 20: 119–133

    Google Scholar 

  13. Jeanne RL (1991) Polyethism. In: KG Ross, RW Matthews (eds): The biology of social wasps. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, 389–425

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kirchner WH, Lindauer M (1994) The causes of the tremble dance of the honeybee, Apis mellifera. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 35: 303–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Goulson D, Hawson SA, Stout JC (1998) Foraging bumblebees avoid flowers already visited by conspecifics or by other bumblebee species. Anim Behav 55: 199–206

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Stickland T, Tofts C, Franks NR (1992) A path choice algorithm for ants. Naturwissenschaften 79: 567–572

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Stickland T, Britton NF, Franks NR (1995) Complex trails and simple algorithms in ant foraging. Proceedings of the Royal Society. London (B) 260: 53–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Real LA (1994) Behavioural mechanisms in evolutionary ecology. Chicago University Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  19. Giraldeau L-A (1997) The ecology of information use. In: JR Krebs, NB Davies (eds): Behavioural ecology: an evolutionary approach. Blackwells, Oxford, 42–68

    Google Scholar 

  20. Cowie RJ, Krebs JR (1979) Optimal foraging in patchy environments. In: RM Anderson, RD Turner, LR Taylor (eds): British ecological symposium on population dynamics. Blackwells, Oxford 183–205

    Google Scholar 

  21. Valone TJ (1989) Group foraging, public information and patch estimation. Oikos 56: 357–363

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer Basel AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Franks, N.R. (1999). Information flow in the social domain: how individuals decide what to do next. In: Detrain, C., Deneubourg, J.L., Pasteels, J.M. (eds) Information Processing in Social Insects. Birkhäuser, Basel. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-0348-8739-7_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-0348-8739-7_6

  • Publisher Name: Birkhäuser, Basel

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-0348-9751-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-0348-8739-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics