Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Task partitioning in foraging: general principles, efficiency and information reliability of queueing delays

  • Chapter
Information Processing in Social Insects

Summary

The collection and handling of colony resources such as food, water, and nest construction material is often divided into subtasks in which the material is passed from one worker to another. This is known as task partitioning. Transfer between workers may be direct with the material passed between individuals, or indirect, with the material left in a cache or dump for others to collect. In this chapter, we review the various forms of task partitioning found in insect societies. If tasks are partitioned with direct transfer of material between foragers and receivers, queueing delays will occur as individuals search or wait for a transfer partner. A computer simulation of direct transfer of material between two groups of workers is used to study the effects of colony size and worker allocation on the magnitude and variance of these delays. These delays are important in colony organisation because they can be used in recruitment. Two mechanisms, multiple transfer and averaging delays over multiple trips, by which workers can enhance the information content of these delays are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Robinson GE (1992) Regulation of division of labor in insect societies. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 37: 637–665

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Jeanne RL (1986) The evolution of the organization of work in social insects. Monitore Zool ltd (N S) 20: 119–133

    Google Scholar 

  3. Oster GF, Wilson EO (1978) Caste and ecology in the social insects. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  4. Jeanne RL (1991) Polyethism. In: KG Ross, RW Matthews (eds): The social biology of wasps. Cornell University Press, New York, 389–425

    Google Scholar 

  5. Seeley TD (1995) The wisdom of the hive. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lindauer M (1961) Communication among social bees. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  7. Fowler HH, Robinson SW (1979) Foraging by Atta sexdens: seasonal patterns, caste, and efficiency. Ecol Entomol 4: 239–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hubbell SP, Johnson LK, Stanislav E, Wilson B, Fowler H (1980) Foraging by bucket-brigade in leaf-cutter ants. Biotropica 12: 210–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Anderson C (1998) The organisation of foraging in insect societies. PhD thesis, School of Mathematics, University of Sheffield, UK

    Google Scholar 

  10. Seeley TD (1992) The tremble dance of the honey bee: message and meanings. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 34: 51–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Michener CD (1974) The social behavior of the bees: a comparative study. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ribbands RR (1953) The behaviour and social life of honeybees. Bee Research Association, London

    Google Scholar 

  13. Sommeijer MJ, De Rooy GA, Punt WA, de Bruijn LLM (1983) A comparative study of foraging behavior and pollen resources of various stingless bees (Hym., Meliponinae) and honeybees (Hym., Apinae) in Trinidad, West Indies. Apidologie 14(3): 205–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Jeanne RL (1991) Polyethism. In: KG Ross, RW Matthews (eds): The social biology of wasps. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY, 389–425

    Google Scholar 

  15. Akre RD, Garnett WB, MacDonald JF, Greene A, Landolt P (1976) Behavior and colony development of Vespula pensyl-vanica and V. atropilosa (Hymenoptera: Vespidae). J Kons Entomol Soc 49: 63–84

    Google Scholar 

  16. Jeanne RL (1986) The organization of work in Polybia occidentalis: costs and benefits of specialization in a social wasp. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 19: 333–341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Greene A (1991) Dolichovespula and Vespula. In: KG Ross, RW Matthews (eds): The social biology of wasps. Cornell University Press, New York, 263–308

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hölldobler B (1984) The wonderfully diverse ways of the ant. Nat Geog M 165(6): 778–813

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hölldobler B, Wilson EO (1990) The ants. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  20. Schatz B, Lachaud JP, Beugnon G (1996) Polyethism within hunters of the ponerine ant, Ectatomma ruidum Roger (Formicidae, Ponerinae) Insect Soc 43(2): 1111–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Maschwitz U, Mühlenberg (1975) Zur Jagdstrategie einiger orientalischer Leptogenys-Arien (Formicidae: Ponerinae). Oecologia 20: 65–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Longhurst C, Johnson RA, Wood TG (1978) Pradation by Megaponera foetans (Fabr.) (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) on termites in the Nigerian Southern Guinea Savanna. Oecologica 32: 101–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Brian MV (1983) Social insects. Ecology and behavioural ecology. Chapman and Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  24. Sudd JH (1965) Transport of prey by ants. Behaviour 25(3-4): 234–271

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Stäger R (1935) Über Verkehrs-und Transportverhältnisse auf den Strassen der Waldameise. Rev Suisse Zool 42(3): 459–460

    Google Scholar 

  26. Dobrzanska J (1966) The control of territory by Lasius fuliginosus Latr. Acta Biol Exp (Warsaw) 26(2): 193–213

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Goetsch W (1934) Untersuchungen überdie Zusammenarbeit im Ameisenstaat. Zs Morph Ökol Tierre 28: 319–401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Kirchner WH, Lindauer M (1994) The causes of the tremble dance of the honeybee, Apis mellifera. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 35: 303–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Bonabeau E, Theraulaz G, Denebourg JL, Aron S, Camazine S (1997) Self-organization in social insects. Trends Ecol Evol 12(5): 188–193

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Calabi P (1988) Behavioural flexibility in Hymenoptera: a re-examination of the concept of caste. In: JC Trager (ed): Advances in myrmecology. Bill Press, Leiden, 237–258

    Google Scholar 

  31. Robinson GE (1987) Modulation of alarm pheromone perception in the honey bee: evidence for division of labour based on hormonally regulated response thresholds. J Comp Physiol 160: 613–619

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Bonabeau E, Theraulaz G, Deneubourg JL (1996) Quantitative study of the fixed threshold model for the regulation of division of labour in insect societies. Proc R Soc Lond B 263: 1565–1569

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Tofts C (1993) Algorithms for task allocation in ants (a study of temporal polyethism: theory). Bull Math Biol 55: 891–918

    Google Scholar 

  34. Franks NR, Tofts C (1994) Foraging for work: how tasks allocate workers. Anim Behav 48: 470–472

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Visscher PK, Seeley TD (1982) Foraging strategy of honeybee colonies in a temperate deciduous forest. Ecology 63: 1790–1801

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Winston ML (1987) The biology of the honey bee. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Carl Anderson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Francis L. W. Ratnieks
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Université Libre de Bruxelles, 50 Av. F.D. Roosevelt, CP.160/12, B-1050, Bruxelles, Belgium

    Claire Detrain , Jean Louis Deneubourg  & Jacques M. Pasteels ,  & 

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer Basel AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Anderson, C., Ratnieks, F.L.W. (1999). Task partitioning in foraging: general principles, efficiency and information reliability of queueing delays. In: Detrain, C., Deneubourg, J.L., Pasteels, J.M. (eds) Information Processing in Social Insects. Birkhäuser, Basel. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-0348-8739-7_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-0348-8739-7_2

  • Publisher Name: Birkhäuser, Basel

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-0348-9751-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-0348-8739-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation