Abstract
Most of the chapters in this book treat colonies of social insects as superstructures whose inner workings are governed by self-organizing processes. It is also in the abiotic world that many patterns, such as windblown ripples of sand, the form of liquids in motion, spirals, spots and stripes are woven by self-organization through simple, local interactions among their component parts. In all these cases global properties are not imposed upon the system by overarching blueprints, templates or other forms of instruction from outside, but emerge solely from numerous lower-level interactions. However, if we move from physical to biological systems, an extra dimension is added. Now the superstructures become “adaptive” the component parts and the rules governing their interactions are finely tuned by natural selection. Whereas the patterns formed by, say, Bénard convection cells can be regarded as merely incidental by-products of the interactions of their elementary subunits [1], biological superstructures are the product of group-level adaptations [2, 3]. Natural selection is the driving agent of the interactions among the subunits of a biological system. In evolutionary terms, a functional higher-order unit can be viewed as a vehicle built by the replicating genes to improve their survival and reproduction [4].
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bak P (1996) How nature works: the science of self-organized criticality. Springer, New York
Williams GC (1966) Adaptation and natural selection. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Seeley TD (1995) The wisdom of the hive. The social physiology of honey bee colonies. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
Dawkins R (1982) The extended phenotype. WH Freeman, San Francisco
Bronowski J (1974) New concepts in the evolution of complexity. In: RJ Seeger, RS Cohen (eds): Philosophical foundations of science. Reidel, Dordrecht, 133–151
Frisch K von (1967) The dance language and orientation of bees. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
Hölldobler B, Wilson EO (1990) The ants. Belknap, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
Seeley TD (1995) The wisdom of the hive. The social physiology of honey bee colonies. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
Wehner R, Lehrer M, Harvey WR (1996) Navigation. J Exp Biol 199: 125–162, 225-261
Gadagkar R (1997) Survival strategies. Cooperation and conflict in animal societies. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
Page RE Jr (1997) The evolution of insect societies. Endeavour 21: 114–120
Sakagami SF, Maeta Y (1987) Sociality, induced and/or natural, in the basically solitary small carpenter bees (Ceratina). In: Y Ito, JL Brown, J Kikkawa (eds): Animal societies: theories and facts. Japan Scientific Society Press, Tokyo, 1–16
Michener C (1985) From solitary to eusocial: need there be a series of intervening species? In: B Hölldobler, M Lindauer (eds): Experimental behavioural ecology and sociobiology. G. Fischer, Stuttgart, 293–305
Ratnieks FLW, Visscher PK (1989) Worker policing in the honey bee. Nature 342: 796–798
Ratnieks FLW (1995) Evidence for a queen-produced egg-marking pheromone and its use in worker policing in the honey bee. J Apicult Res 34: 31–37
Camazine S (1991) Self-organizing pattern formation on the combs of honeybee colonies. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 28: 61–76
Wehner R (1987) Spatial organization of foraging behavior in individually searching desert ants, Cataglyphis (Sahara Desert) and Ocymyrmex (Namib Desert). In: JM Pasteeis, J-L Deneubourg (eds): From individual to collective behavior in social insects. Birkhäuser, Basel, 15–42
Franks NR, Deneubourg JL (1997) Self-organizing nest construction in ants: individual worker behaviour and the nest’s dynamics. Anim Behav 54: 779–796
Wilson EO, Hölldobler B (1988) Dense heterarchies and mass communication as the basis of organization in ant colonies. Trends Ecol Evol 3: 65–68
Bonabeau E, Theraulaz G, Deneubourg JL, Aron S, Camazine S (1997) Self-organization in social insects. Trends Ecol Evol 12: 188–193
Arnold G, Quenet B, Cornut J, Masson C, De Schepper B, Estoup A, Gasqui P (1996) Kin recognition in honeybees. Nature 379: 498
Morel L, van der Meer RK, Lofgren CS (1990) Comparison of nestmate recognition between monogyne and polygyne populations of Solenopsis invicta (Hymen-optera: Formicidae). Ann Entomol Soc Amer 83: 642–647
Breed MD, Leger EA, Pearce AN, Wang YJ (1998) Comb wax effects on the ontogeny of honey bee nestmate recognition. Anim Behav 55: 13–20
Keller L (1997) Indiscriminate altruism: unduly nice parents and siblings. Trends Ecol Evol 12: 99–103
Carlin NF, Reeve HK, Cover SP (1993) Kin discrimination and division of labour among matrilines in the polygynous carpenter ant Camponotus planatus. In: L Keller (ed): Queen number and sociality in insects. Oxford University, Oxford, 362–401
Möglich M, Hölldobler B (1975) Communication and orientation during foraging and emigration in the ant Formica fusca. J Comp Physiol 101: 275–288
Abraham M, Pasteeis JM (1980) Social behaviour during nest-moving in the ant Myrmica rubra L. (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). Insect Soc 27: 127–147
Moritz RFA (1989) Colony level and within colony level selection in honeybees. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 25: 437–444
Page RE Jr, Robinson GE (1991) The genetics of division of labour in honey bee colonies. Adv. Insect Physiol 23: 117–169
Giray T, Robinson GE (1994) Effects of intracolony variability in behavioral development on plasticity of division of labor in honey bee colonies. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 35: 13–20
Calderone NW, Page RE Jr (1996) Temporal polyethism and behavioural canalization in the honey bee, Apis mellifera. Anim Behav 51: 631–643
Jaisson P, Fresnau D, Lachaud JP (1988) Individual traits of social behavior in ants. In: RL Jeanne (ed): Inter individual behavioral variability in social insects. Westview Press, Boulder, 1–51
Gordon DM (1996) The organization of work in social insect colonies. Nature 380: 121–124
Fewell JH, Winston ML (1992) Colony state and regulation of pollen foraging in the honey bee, Apis mellifera L. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 30: 387–393
Fuchs S, Schade V (1994) Lower performance in honeybee colonies of uniform paternity. Apidologie 25: 155–168
Page RE Jr, Fondrk MK (1995) The effects of colony-level selection on the social organization of honey bee (Apis mellifera L.) colonies: colony-level components of pollen hoarding. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 36: 135–144
Page RE Jr, Robinson GE, Fondrk MK, Nasr ME (1995) Effects of worker genotypic diversity on honey bee colony development and behavior (Apis mellifera L.). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 36: 387–396
Page RE Jr, Waddington KD, Hunt GJ, Fondrk MK (1995) Genetic determinants of honey bee foraging behaviour. Anim Behav 50: 1617–1625
O’Donnell S (1998) Genetic effects on task performance, but not on age polyethism, in a swarm-founding eusocial wasp. Anim Behav 55: 417–426
Jeanne RL (1980) Evolution of social behaviour in the Vespidae. Annu Rev Entomol 25: 371–396
Jaisson P (1991) Kinship and fellowship in ants and social wasps. In: PG Hepper (ed): Kin recognition. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 60–93
Michener C (1974) The social behaviour of the bees. A comparative study. Belknap, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
Greenberg L (1979) Genetic component of bee odor in kin recognition. Science 206: 1095–1097
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1999 Springer Basel AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ronacher, B., Wehner, R. (1999). The individual at the core of information management. In: Detrain, C., Deneubourg, J.L., Pasteels, J.M. (eds) Information Processing in Social Insects. Birkhäuser, Basel. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-0348-8739-7_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-0348-8739-7_15
Publisher Name: Birkhäuser, Basel
Print ISBN: 978-3-0348-9751-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-0348-8739-7
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive