Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Key individuals and the organisation of labor in ants

  • Chapter
Information Processing in Social Insects

Summary

In this chapter we examine the organisation of group behaviour at the level of the individual, and discuss the extent and significance of individual behavioural specialisation to group success. Studies of ants in which the behaviour of individuals as well as the group is recorded often reveal a high degree of individual specialisation in the absence of either age or morphological caste differences. Typically referred to as examples of elitism, idiosyncracy or specialisation, we incorporate these examples into a new classification, the key individual concept. This concept defines specialised individuals on the basis of their functional relationship to the behaviour of the group as a whole and indicates that a number of different organisational principles can underlie group behaviour. Some key individuals (catalysts) act to increase the activity level of other group members, whereas other key individuals (organisers) serve to ensure group cohesion and task completion. The demonstration that even large-scale process such as nest emigration can be organised by a subgroup of highly active individuals suggests that studies of group action might benefit from simultaneous analysis at both the individual and group level. Individuals may not always be behaviourally interchangeable, and individual behavioural specialisation, in the absence of age or caste differences, can be a significant component of group organisation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Wilson EO (1971) The insect societies. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  2. Wilson EO (1976) Behavioral discretization and the number of castes in an ant species. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 1: 141–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Oster GF, Wilson EO (1978) Caste and ecology in the social insects. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hölldobler B, Wilson EO (1990) The ants. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  5. Herbers JM (1981) Reliability theory and foraging by ants. JTheorBiol 89: 175–189

    Google Scholar 

  6. Deneubourg JL, Goss S (1989) Collective patterns and decision-making. Ethol Ecol Evol 1: 295–311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Karsai I, Penzes Z (1993) Comb building in social wasps: self-organization and stig-mergic script. J Theor Biol 161: 505–525

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Cole BJ, Cheshire D (1996) Mobile cellular automata models of ant behavior: movement activity of Leptothorax allardy-cei. Amer Naturalist 148: 1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Traniello JFA, Robson SK (1995) Trail and territorial communication in social insects. In: WJ Bell, R Cardé (eds): The chemical ecology of insects, vol 2. Chapman and Hall, New York, 241–286

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Gordon DM (1996) The organization of work in social insect colonies. Nature 380: 121–124

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Bonabeau E, Theraulaz G, Deneubourg JL, Aron S, Camazine S (1997) Self-organization in social insects. Trends Ecol Evol 12: 188–193

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Fresneau D, Lachaud JP, Jaisson P (1987) Individual behaviour and polyethism. In: J Eder, H Rembold (ed): Chemistry and biology of social insects. Peperny, Munich, 126–127

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lenoir A (1987) Factors determining poly-ethism in social insects. In: JM Pasteeis, JL Deneubourg (eds): From individual to collective behavior in social insects. Birkhäuser, Basel, 219–240

    Google Scholar 

  14. Jaisson P, Fresneau D, Lachaud JP (1988) Individual traits of social behavior in ants. In: RL Jeanne (ed): Interindividual behavioral variability in social insects. Westview Press, Boulder, CO, 1–51

    Google Scholar 

  15. Jeanne RL (ed) (1988) Interindividual behavioral variability in social insects. Westview Press, Boulder, CO

    Google Scholar 

  16. Robinson GE (1992) Regulation of division of labor in insect societies. Annu Rev Entomol 37: 637–665

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Stuart RJ (1997) Division of labor in social insect colonies. Self-organization and recent revelations regarding age, size and genetic differences. In: G Greenberg, E Tobach (eds): Comparative psychology of invertebrates. The field and laboratory study of insect behavior. Garland Publishing, New York, 135–155

    Google Scholar 

  18. Beshers SN, Robinson GE, Mittenthal J (1998) Response thresholds and division of labor in insect colonies. In: C Detrain, JL Deneubourg, JM Pasteels (eds): Information processing in social insects. Birkäuser, Basel, 115–140

    Google Scholar 

  19. Bonabeau E, Theraulaz G (1998) Role and variability or response thresholds in the regulation of division of labor in insect societies. In: C Detrain, JL Deneubourg, JM Pasteels (eds): Information processing in Social Insects. Birkäuser, Basel, 141–164

    Google Scholar 

  20. Möglich M, Hölldobler B (1974) Social carrying behavior and division of labor during nest moving in ants. Psyche 81: 219–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Robson SK, Traniello JFA (1998) Social context: A novel source of behavioural specialisation in ants; in review

    Google Scholar 

  22. Combes M (1937) Existence probable d’une élite non differenciée d’aspect constituant les véritable ouvrières chez les Formica. C R Acad Sci 204: 1674–1675

    Google Scholar 

  23. Plowright RC, Plowright CMS (1988) Elitism in social insects: a positive feedback model. In: RI Jeanne (ed): Interindividual behavioral variability in social insects. Westview Press, Boulder, CO, 419–431

    Google Scholar 

  24. Cerda X, Retana J (1992) A behavioural study of transporter workers in Cataglyphis iberica ant colonies (Hymenoptera Formicidae). Ethol Ecol Evol 4: 359–374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Abraham M (1979) Comportement individuel lors de déménagements successifs chez Myrmica rubra L. In: Ecologie des insectes sociaux. Compte Rendu Colloque Annuel U.I.E.I.S., Lausanne, 17–19

    Google Scholar 

  26. Bonavita-Cougourdan A, Morel L (1988) Interindividual variability and idiosyncrasy in social behavior in the ant Camponotus vagus Scop. Ethology 77: 58–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Chen SC (1937) The leaders and followers among the ants in nest-building. Physiol Zool 10: 437–455

    Google Scholar 

  28. Chen SC (1937) Social modification of the activity of ants in nest-building. Physiol Zool 10: 420–436

    Google Scholar 

  29. Clayton DA (1978) Socially facilitated behavior. Quart Rev Biol 53: 373–392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Imamura S (1982) Social modifications of work efficiency in digging by the ant Formica (Formica) yessensis Forel. J Fac Sc Hokkaido Univ Ser 6 23: 128–142

    Google Scholar 

  31. Klotz JH (1986) Social facilitation among digging ants (Formica subsericea). J Kans Entomol Soc 59: 537–541

    Google Scholar 

  32. Forsyth AB (1978) Studies on the behavioral ecology of polygvnous social wasps. PhD thesis, Harvard University

    Google Scholar 

  33. Lenoir A, Ataya H (1983) Polyéthisme et répartition des niveaux d’ activité chez la fourmi Lasius niger L. Z Tierpsychol 63: 213–232

    Google Scholar 

  34. Abraham M, Deneubourg JL, Pasteeis JM (1984) Idiosynchrasie lors du déménagement do Myrmica rubra L. (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). Actes Coll Insect Soc 1: 19–25

    Google Scholar 

  35. Lenoir A (1981) Brood retrieving in the ant Lasius niger L. Sociobiology 6: 153–178

    Google Scholar 

  36. Meudec M, Lenoir A (1982) Social responses to variation in food supply and nest suitability in ants (Tapinoma erraticum). Anim Behav 30: 284–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Allport FH (1924) Social psychology. Houghton Mifflin, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  38. Sakagami SF, Hayashida K (1962) Work efficiency in heterospecific ant groups composed of hosts and their labor parasites. Anim Behav 10: 96–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Traniello JFA, Beshers SN (1991) Maximization of foraging efficiency and resource defense by cooperative retrieval in the ant Formica schaufussi. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 29: 283–289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Robson SK, Traniello JFA (1998) Resource assessment, recruitment behavior and the organization of cooperative prey retrieval in the ant Formica schaufussi. J Insect Behav 11: 1–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Möglich M, Hölldobler B (1975) Communication and orientation during foraging and emigration in the ant Formica fusca. J Comp Physiol 101: 275–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Wilson EO, Hölldobler B (1988) Dense heterarchies and mass communication as the basis of organization in ant colonies. Trends Ecol Evol 3: 65–68

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Hangartner W (1969) Structure and variability of the individual odor trail in Solenopsis geminata Fabr. (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). Z Vergl Physiol 62: 111–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Beckers R, Deneubourg JL, Goss S (1992) Trail laying behaviour during food recruitment in the ant Lasius niger (L.) Insect Soc 39: 59–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Pasteeis JM, Deneubourg JL, Goss S (1987) Self-organization in ant societies (I): Trail recruitment to newly discovered food sources. In: JM Pasteeis, JL Deneubourg (eds): From individual to collective behavior in social insects. Birkhäuser, Basel, 155–175

    Google Scholar 

  46. Franks NR (1986) Teams in social insects: group retrieval of prey by army ants (Eciton burchelli, Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 18: 425–429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Abraham M, Pasteeis JM (1977) Nest-moving behavior in the ant Myrmica rubra. Proc 8th Int Congress IUSSI, Wageningen, Netherlands, 286

    Google Scholar 

  48. Abraham M, Pasteeis JM (1980) Social behavior during nest-moving in the ant Myrmica rubra L. (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). Insect Soc 27: 127–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Huang ZY, Robinson GE (1992) Honeybee colony integration: worker-worker interactions mediate hormonally regulated plasticity in division of labor. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 89: 11726–11729

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Harris JW, Woodring J (1992) Effects of stress, age, season, and source colony on levels of octopamine, dopamine and serotonin in the honey bee (Apis mellifera L.) brain. J Insect Physiol 38: 29–35

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Hirashima A, Eto M (1993) Effect of stress on levels of octopamine, dopamine and serotonin in the American cockroach (Periplaneta ame ricana L.). Comp Biochem Physiol C Comp Pharmacol Toxicol 105: 279–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Wheeler WM (1910) Ants. Their structure, development and behavior. Columbia University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  53. Jeanne RL (1980) Evolution of social behavior in the vespidae. Annu Rev Entomol 25: 371–396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Baroni-Urbani C (1989) Phylogeny and behavioural evolution in ants, with a discussion of the role of behavior in evolutionary processes. Ethol Ecol Evol 1: 137–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Wenzel JW (1992) Behavioural homology and phylogeny. Anna Rev Ecol Syst 23: 361–381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Sudd JH (1972) The absences of social enhancement of digging in pairs of ants (Formica lemani Bondroit). Anim Behav 20: 813–819

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Meudec M (1973) Note sur les variations individuelles du comportement de transport du couvain chez les ouvrières de Tapinoma erraticum Latr. C R Acad Sci, Paris, ser D 277: 357–360

    Google Scholar 

  58. Verron H (1976) Note sur la stabilité de certains traits éthologiques chez les ouvrières de Lasius niger. C R Acad Sci, Paris, D 283: 671–674

    Google Scholar 

  59. Meudec M (1977) Le comportement de transport du couvain lors d’une perturbation du nid chez Tapinoma erraticum (Dolichoderinae): rôle de Tindividu. Insect Soc 24: 345–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Agbogba C, Howse PE (1992) Division of labour between foraging workers of the ponerine ant Pachycondyla caffraria (Smith) (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Insect Soc 39: 455–458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Fukumoto Y, Abe T (1983) Social organization of colony movement in the tropical ponerine ant, Diacamma rugosum (Le Guillou). J Ethol 1: 101–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Simon K. Robson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. James F. A. Traniello
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Université Libre de Bruxelles, 50 Av. F.D. Roosevelt, CP.160/12, B-1050, Bruxelles, Belgium

    Claire Detrain , Jean Louis Deneubourg  & Jacques M. Pasteels ,  & 

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer Basel AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Robson, S.K., Traniello, J.F.A. (1999). Key individuals and the organisation of labor in ants. In: Detrain, C., Deneubourg, J.L., Pasteels, J.M. (eds) Information Processing in Social Insects. Birkhäuser, Basel. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-0348-8739-7_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-0348-8739-7_13

  • Publisher Name: Birkhäuser, Basel

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-0348-9751-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-0348-8739-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation