Skip to main content

A multisite-cooperative research programme on risk assessment of transgenic crops

  • Conference paper

Abstract

Genetically modified plants are now being commercialised in several countries as regulatory authorities consider that the balance of risk versus benefit is beneficial. However, numerous questions remain unanswered, especially the impact of these plants when used over large areas and under a range of variable environmental conditions. Some issues need to be re-evaluated [1, 2]. Risk/safety analysis, as well as prospects of transgenic crops depend on the scale which is to be considered. Extrapolation of methods, and laboratory and greenhouse results, to large-scale farmers’ fields, may provide useful preliminary data, but is not a sound approach to the study of the consequences of the commercial release of transgenic crops. Risk/safety analysis involves hazard identification and risk assessment. Hazards are scale-dependent and need to be tested on an appropriate scale. Change to a region’s flora, for instance, is not a matter for a greenhouse test, but must be studied at the regional level. Risks associated with identified hazards depend on local conditions, e.g. non-proportionality of pollen spread with source size, regional variation of crop management practices, interaction between crops, genotype variability of populations of wild relatives, etc. A main concern is to estimate the value of predictability for agriculture and environment of results collected on different scales. In order to answer this question, several institutes (Association Générale des Producteurs de Maïs AGPM, Centre Technique Interprofessionnel des Oléagineux Métropolitains CETIOM, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique INRA, Institut Technique de la Betterave ITB, Institut Technique des Cérélaes et des Fourrages ITCF), seed producers (KWS, Novartis) and agrochemical companies (Agrevo, Monsanto, Rhone-Poulenc) jointly designed an experiment on an agricultural scale. This was a multisite testing of several gene constructs with different crops rotating in farmers’ fields over several years, representing a true field situation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Darmency H (1996) Potential disadvantages of herbicide-resistant crops in weed resistance management. In: Second Int Weed Control Congress, Copenhagen, Dept Weed Control, Flakkegjerg, 427–433

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cooper JI, Raybould AF (1997) Transgenes for stress resistance: consequences for weed evolution. In: Brighton Crop Protec Conf Weeds, BCPC, Farnham, 265–272

    Google Scholar 

  3. Mikkelsen TR, Andersen B, Jorgensen RB (1996) The risk of crop transgene spread. Nature 380: 31

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Lefol E, Danielou V, Darmency H (1996) Predicting hybridisation between transgenic oilseed rape and wild mustard. Field Crop Res 45: 153–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Lefol E, Fleury A, Darmency H (1996) Gene dispersal from transgenic crops. Hybridisation between oilseed rape and the hoary mustard. Sex Plant Reprod 9: 189–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer Basel AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Reboud, X., Gasquez, J., Darmency, H. (1999). A multisite-cooperative research programme on risk assessment of transgenic crops. In: Ammann, K., Jacot, Y., Kjellsson, G., Simonsen, V. (eds) Methods for Risk Assessment of Transgenic Plants. Birkhäuser, Basel. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-0348-8700-7_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-0348-8700-7_2

  • Publisher Name: Birkhäuser, Basel

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-0348-9735-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-0348-8700-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics