Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The End of the Beginning: The Controversy Enters the Decisive Phase, 1925–1929

  • Chapter
Controversy and Consensus: Nuclear Beta Decay 1911–1934

Part of the book series: Science Networks · Historical Studies ((SNHS,volume 24))

  • 281 Accesses

Abstract

In this chapter, I deal with the period that has been called “the end of the beginning in the developments of beta decay.”1 As we shall see, the long-lasting controversy between Charles Drummond Ellis and Lise Meitner finally came to an end and left a Gordian knot waiting for the cut of an Alexander.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. A. Pais, “Radioactivity’s Two Early Puzzles,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 49 (1977), 925–938, p. 927.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. K. Hutchison, J.A. Gray and H.S.W. Massey, “Charles Drummond Ellis,” Biog. Mem. Fel. Roy. Soc. 27 (1981), 198–233, p. 205

    Google Scholar 

  3. C.D. Ellis and W.A. Wooster, “The β-Ray Type of Disintegration,” Proc. Comb. Phil. Soc. 22 (1923–1925), 849–860; L. Meitner, “über die Rolle der γ-Strahlen beim Atomzerfall,” Z. Phys. 26 (1924), 169–177.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ellis and Wooster, “β-Ray Type” (note 3), p. 857.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ibid., p. 859.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ibid., p. 859.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ibid., p. 858.

    Google Scholar 

  8. E. Rutherford, “Charge Carried by the a and ß Rays of Radium,” Phil. Mag. 10 (1905), 193208; W. Makower, “On the Number and the Absorption by Matter of the 0 Particles Emitted by Radium,” Phil. Mag. 17 (1909), 171–180; H.G.J. Moseley, “The Number of ß Particles Emitted in the Transformation of Radium,” Proc. Roy. Soc. A87 (1912), 230–255.

    Google Scholar 

  9. H.W. Geiger and A.F. Kovarik, “On the Relative Number of Ions Produced by the β Particles From the Various Radioactive Substances,” Phil. Mag. 22 (1911), 604–613.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. E. Rutherford, J. Chadwick and C.D. Ellis, Radiations from Radioactive Substances (Cambridge University Press, 1930), pp. 392–393.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. K.G. Emeleus, “The Number of α-Particles from Radium E,” Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc. 22 (1923–1925), 400–404.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ibid., p. 400.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Emeleus based his correction on an investigation by Kovarik. See A.F. Kovarik, “Absorption and Reflexion of the β-Particles by Matter,” Phil. Mag. 20 (1910), 849–866; Kovarik and L.W. McKeehan, “Messung der Absorption und Reflexion von α-Teilchen durch direkte Zählung,” Phys. Zeit. 15 (1914), 434–440.

    Google Scholar 

  14. R.W. Gurney, “The Number of Particles in the Beta-Ray Spectra of Radium B and Radium C,” Proc. Roy. Soc. A109 (1925), 540–561; L.F. Curtiss, “A Preliminary Note on a Direct Determination of the Distribution of Intensity in the Natural α-Ray Spectrum of RaB and RaC,” Proc. Comb. Phil. Soc. 22 (1923–1925), 597–600.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Gurney, “Number” (note 14), p. 557.

    Google Scholar 

  16. N. Riehl, “Die Brauchbarkeit des Geigerschen Spitzenzählers für α-Strahlen verschiedener Geschwindigkeiten und die Zahl der β-Strahlen von RaE und RaD,” Z. Phys. 46 (1927), 478505.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ellis to Meitner, 8 February 1928, MTNR 5/4.

    Google Scholar 

  18. B.F.J. Schonland, “The Passage of Cathode Rays Through Matter,” Proc. Roy. Soc. A108 (1925), 187–210.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. Riehl, “Brauchbarkeit” (note 16), p. 501.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ellis to Rutherford, 11 November 1925, C.U.L. Add. MS. 7653 E8.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ellis to Rutherford, 29 November 1925, C.U.L. Add. MS. 7653 E9.

    Google Scholar 

  22. C.D. Ellis and W.A. Wooster, “The Average Energy of Disintegration of Radium E,” Proc. Roy. Soc. A117 (1927), 109–123.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. P. Curie and A. Laborde, “Sur la chaleur dégagée spontanément par les sels de radium,” C.R. 136 (1903), 673–675.

    Google Scholar 

  24. E. Rutherford and H.R. Robinson, “Heating Effect of Radium and Its Emanation,” Phil. Mag. 25 (1913), 312–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. C.D. Ellis and W.A. Wooster, “Note on the Heating Effect of the γ-Rays from RaB and RaC,” Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc. 22 (1923–1925), 595–596.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Pais, “Radioactivity’s Puzzles” (note 1), p. 927. 27Meitner to Ellis, 14 February 1928, MTNR 5/4.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Ellis and Wooster, “Average Energy” (note 22), p. 118.

    Google Scholar 

  28. G.H. Aston, “The Amount of Energy Emitted in the γ-Ray Form by Radium E,” Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc. 23 (1925–1927), 935–941. See also Ellis and Wooster, “Average Energy” (note 22), pp. 119–120.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Ibid., p. 120.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Ibid., p. 121.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Ibid., p. 121.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Ibid., p. 121.

    Google Scholar 

  33. For a history of the development of this model, see R.H. Stuewer, “Rutherford’s Satellite Model of the Nucleus,” HSPS 16:2 (1986), 321–352.

    Google Scholar 

  34. For a historical account of Gamow’s theory, see R.H. Stuewer, “Gamow’s Theory of Alpha-Decay,” in The Kaleidoscope of Science: The Israel Colloquium Studies in History, Philosophy, and Sociology of Science, E. Ullmann-Margalit (ed.) (Dordrecht: Reidel, 1986), pp. 147–186.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Ellis and Wooster, “Average Energy” (note 22), p. 122.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Ibid., p. 123.

    Google Scholar 

  37. W. Kuhn, “Absorptionsvermögen von Atomkernen für γ-Strahlen,” Z. Phys. 43 (1927), 5665; idem., “Polarisierbarkeit der Atomkerne und Ursprung der γ-Strahlen,” Z. Phys. 44 (1927), 32–35.

    Google Scholar 

  38. E. Rutherford, “Structure of the Radioactive Atom and the Origin of the α-Rays,” Phil. Mag. 54 (1927), 580–605.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Ellis to Meitner, 28 July 1929, MTNR 5/4.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Concerning Ellis’s visit to Berlin, see the following letters: Ellis to Meitner, 23 February 1927; Meitner to Ellis, 2 March 1927; Ellis to Meitner, 5 March 1927; Ellis to Meitner, undated, but sent from Berlin, MTNR 5/4.

    Google Scholar 

  41. O.R. Frisch, “Lise Meitner,” Biog. Mem. Fel. Roy. Soc. 16 (1970), 405–420, p. 408.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Pauli to Wu, 17 November 1958, MTNR 5/13.

    Google Scholar 

  43. K. Donat and K. Philipp, “Die Ausbeute beim β-Rückstoss von Thorium B,” Z. Phys..45 (1927), 512–521.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  44. Meitner to Pauli, 5 December 1956, MTNR 5/13.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Meitner to Ellis, 14 February 1928, MTNR 5/4. 47/bid.

    Google Scholar 

  46. See C.L. Cowan and F. Reines, “Detection of a Free Neutrino — A Confirmation,” Science 124 (1956), 103–104. See also C.E. Atchley, The Invention and Discovery of the Neutrino: Elusive Reality and the Nature of Scientific Acceptance (Ph.D. thesis, University of Minnesota, 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Pauli gave the lecture at the Zürcher Naturforschende Gesellschaft on 21 January 1957; see C.S. Wu, “The Neutrino,” in Theoretical Physics in the Twentieth Century: A Memorial Volume to Wolfgang Pauli, M. Fierz and V.F. Weisskopf (eds.) (New York: Interscience, 1960), pp. 249–303, on p. 301.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Pauli to Meitner, 3 November 1956, MTNR 5/13; emphasis in the original.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Meitner to Pauli, 5 December 1956, MTNR 5/13.

    Google Scholar 

  50. C.D. Ellis, “Uber die Deutung der β-Strahlspektren radioaktiver Substanzen,” Z. Phys. 10 (1922), 303–307.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  51. Pauli to Meitner, 13 December 1956, MTNR 5/13.

    Google Scholar 

  52. W Heisenberg and W. Pauli, “Zur Quantendynamik der Wellenfelder,” Z. Phys. 56 (1929), 1–61; idem., “Zur Quantendynamik der Wellenfelder II,” Z. Phys. 59 (1930), 168–190.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Pauli to Klein, 18 February 1929, in W. Pauli, Wissenschaftlicher Briefwechsel mit Bohr, Einstein, Heisenberg u.a., Vol. 1: 1919–1929, A. Hermann, K.v. Meyenn, and V.F. Weisskopf (eds.) (New York: Springer Verlag, 1979), pp. 488–492.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Pauli to Klein, 16 March 1929, ibid., pp. 494–495.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Pauli to Bohr, 25 April 1929, ibid., pp. 495–496.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Pauli and Paul Scherrer to Ehrenfest, 7 May 1929, ibid., p. 498; Pauli to Ehrenfest, 15 May 1929, ibid., p. 500.

    Google Scholar 

  57. L. Meitner and W. Orthmann, “über eine absolute Bestimmung der Energie der primären β-Strahlen von Radium E,” Z. Phys. 60 (1930), 143–155.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  58. W Orthmann, “Ein Differentialkalorimeter zur Absolutbestimmung kleinster Wärmemengen,” Z. Phys. 60 (1930), 137–142.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  59. Meitner to Ellis, 20 July 1929, MTNR 5/4.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Ellis to Meitner, 16 July 1930, MTNR 5/4.

    Google Scholar 

  61. S. Bramson, “Absorptionskoeffizienten der ry-Strahlung von Radium D und Radium E und die Zahl der emittierten Quanten,” Z. Phys. 66 (1930), 721–740. See also L. Meitner, “Energieverteilung der primären 0-Strahlen und die daraus zu folgernde -y-Strahlung,” Phys. Zeit. 30 (1929), 515–516.

    Google Scholar 

  62. See Meitner and Orthmann, “Über eine absolute Bestimmung” (note 59), pp. 153–154.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Meitner, “Energieverteilung” (note 63), p. 516.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Meitner to Ellis, 20 July 1929, MTNR 5/4.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Pauli to Bohr, 17 July 1929, BSC (14,3). Reproduced in Pauli, Briefwechsel (note 55), pp. 512–514. The translation is from BCW, Vol. 6, Foundations of Quantum Physics I (19261932), J. Kaltkar (ed.) (Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1985), p. 447.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Meitner, “Energieverteilung” (note 63), p. 516; Bramson, “Absorptionskoeffizienten” (note63).

    Google Scholar 

  67. This was the way in which Meitner referred to Ellis’s hypothesis in her Zurich lecture. See Meitner, “Energieverteilung” (note 63), p. 515.

    Google Scholar 

  68. L.B. Loeb, “Note Concerning the Emission of Beta-Rays in Radioactive Change,” Phys. Rev., 34 (1929), 1212–1216, p. 1213.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Niels Bohr Archive, Blegdamsvej 17, DK-2100, Copenhagen, Denmark

    Finn Aaserud

  2. Dept. of History of Science, University of Aarhus, DK-8000, Aarhus C, Denmark

    Helge Kragh

  3. Hyldebakken 9, DK-3070, Snekkersten, Denmark

    Erik Rüdinger

  4. Tate Laboratory of Physics, University of Minnesota, 116 Church Street SE, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA

    Roger H. Stuewer

Authors
  1. Carsten Jensen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Finn Aaserud
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Helge Kragh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Erik Rüdinger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Roger H. Stuewer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Niels Bohr Archive, Blegdamsvej 17, DK-2100, Copenhagen, Denmark

    Finn Aaserud

  2. Dept. of History of Science, University of Aarhus, DK-8000, Aarhus C, Denmark

    Helge Kragh

  3. Hyldebakken 9, DK-3070, Snekkersten, Denmark

    Erik Rüdinger

  4. Tate Laboratory of Physics, University of Minnesota, 116 Church Street SE, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA

    Roger H. Stuewer

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer Basel AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Jensen, C., Aaserud, F., Kragh, H., Rüdinger, E., Stuewer, R.H. (2000). The End of the Beginning: The Controversy Enters the Decisive Phase, 1925–1929. In: Aaserud, F., Kragh, H., Rüdinger, E., Stuewer, R.H. (eds) Controversy and Consensus: Nuclear Beta Decay 1911–1934. Science Networks · Historical Studies, vol 24. Birkhäuser, Basel. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-0348-8444-0_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-0348-8444-0_5

  • Publisher Name: Birkhäuser, Basel

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-0348-9569-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-0348-8444-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation